* RADIO-TV Stars of silent screen on CBUT HERE'S .a number of cynical jokes:'in circulation about the age of many films shown on television in North America, though genuine criticism of such films. should: ideally be based. on their quality rather than their antiquity. However, there is on Channel 2 a weekly program unashamed- ly devoted to showing films any- where from 30 to 60 years old. This . program is Museum, seen every Wednesday at 6:30 p.m. and it has been divided into two parts — a “feature” and a “short.” The “feature” consists of ex- cerpts from films by directors Movie ~ _Stars of the silent screen are becoming known to the younger generation as their old pictures are shown on TV. Shown above are (from left) Dorothy Gish, Lillian Gish, Beatrice = and Nité Naldi, who met recently in New York at a CBS” radio show. such as D. W. Griffith, Edwin S. Porter, Donald Crisp and Mack Sennett, and their stars - are the greatest of the flicker- ing, silent screen — Mae Marsh, Robert Harron, Mary Pickford, Rudolph Valentino, Lillian Gish and Lionel Barrymore, to name but a few. People of the Potlatch program to be repeated on Channel 2 mF cost ERS who missed the CBUT film on the Vancouver Art Gallery ex- hibition, People of the Pot- latch, and those who wish to see it again, will have the opportunity when the film is given its second showing on Channel 2 at 7.30 -p.m. on Tuesday, May 15. People of - the Potlatch was produced by Daryl Duke, with camera man Wally Hamilton. Film editor, Arla Saare. The com- mentary was written and spoken by Bill Reid. Here is what the CBC Times. has to say about it. ae, ee HEY could carve a sixty foot ocean-going boat from one tree trunk, or mould a spoon from a mountain sheep’s horn, or spend two years weaving in- tricate mat designs which they dyed in blues and yellows made from hardwon pigments. Their tools were simple — the only weaving instrument the women had was a. plain stick from which the yarn hung — but they had plenty of time, and plenty of wood to carve. Then the whiteman came. He brought whiskey and guns and bibles and disease. The native social life crumbled and with it the desire and ability of the Potlatch Indians to maintain their own arts. Now their civilization is dead. Too often West Coast people have been unable to see more’ of the native culture than a few gaudily and falsely painted totem poles. Consequently, ap-- preciation and knowledge of Indian art is not as wide as it could be. An exhibition, People of the Potlatch, shown recently at the Vancouver Art Gallery was designed to give that ap- preciation and knowledge. A young schoolteacher who ‘was showing some of her charges around the exhibition was asked why a memorial pole had on it a series of rings. “That’s just to separate the different sec- tions of the carving,” she replied. The remark made Bill Reid, CBC announcer, whose mother was a member of the Haida tribe, ‘wince. “I don’t suppose they can be expected to know that_ sort of thing,” he said. It turned ° out that the top of the pole represented the hat of the chief the number of rings denoting his rank. “There are only a few of us left who try to reproduce the old arts,” Bill Reid. explained. “Mungo Martin in Victoria is a genuine link with the great - earvers of the past. I do some jewellery, and there are one or two others. But we are groping | into the past. We don’t know the significance of much of the’ design.” Sometimes it is difficult for the white person to catch the very real beauty of these Indian works. The art is alien to him —or rather, he is alien to the art. For the Indian art to be ‘ap- preciated as art, and not just for its curiosity or historical value, a knowledge and sympa- thetic eye is necessary. But CBC cameras can lend viewers * great that knowledgeable eye ina way that no number of words can. The camera can show what Bill Reid, who wrote and nar- rates the script, means when he talks of “the moody quality of the carvings, the feeling of strength restrained in static form.” Lighting and cameras in im- aginative hands bring into strik- ing relief the characteristic eye- shape which Bill Reid thinks is the basic pattern in Potlatch art. As one person remarked after seeing the CBC film, “You know, I walked right round that exhibition but I didn’t even see it.” Gans od The film also shows pieces going back 3000 years when a people, of whom little is now known, sculptured from stone massive bowls decorated with human and animal figures. These bowls are always found alone, never with other objects. Were they sacred, to be used by none other than the holy men of the tribe ? First this pre-historic culture, then the classic period. Finally, a short but violent outburst of virile art which the new v wealth stimulated. But the outburst did not last long. Maybe the Potlatch cul- ture had reached its peak and was incapable of further devel- ment anyway. “Well, it is all over now,” Bill Reid has said. ‘We can only look at what they produced and perhaps feel a deep regret and maybe a little shame that such a culture should have been al- lowed to disappear so com- pletely, practically during our lifetime.” HEALTH Air pollution factor in cancer, bronchitis LOT has been written in A recent months about air pol- lution and cigarette smoking and their effects on health. There are rival theories about whether cigarettes or diesel fumes cause lung cancer; and there is the question of the effect of atmospheric conditions in causing chronic bronchitis, with the special and mortal effect of “smog”. As for lung cancer, it may be a mistake to put it down either to cigarettes or diesel fumes or any other single factor. It might be wiser to suppose that two or three or several fac- tors operate together, their ef- fects being additional or com- plementary to each other. All this remains to be proved. In the meantime it seems highly ‘probable that cigarettes have something to do with it, and quite possible that general at- mospheric pollution — includ- ing diesel fumes — has some- thing to do with it too. * * * The facts. about chronic bron- chitis are less widely known. According to the British Medical Journal, one fact, esta- blished only in the last few years, is that in most cases of chronic bronchitis there is no infection by a germ, even in winter. It is becoming more and more obvious that the purity of the air we breathe is the important factor. Pure air is necessary for life and it is also harmless. But we polluté the air and then it is still necessary for life but ‘no longer harmless. Smoking plays a big part in this. Chronic bronchitis is com- moner- among smokers and particularly heavy | smokers, than non-smokers. It is just as common among women smokers as men smokers. “Smokes like a chimney!” Now let us see how the chim- neys come into it. uP: Most people know that 4,000 people died in London in a few days in December 1952 simply because of the smog that “hap- pened” then. It is now’ known that 1,000 more died in January of this year, from just the same cause. Eee Saree The total effect of less catas- trophic conditions is almost as terrible. Mortality from chronic bronchitis is higher in industrial _ areas than in the country, is higher among the poor than among the wealthy, and is high- er in places where there is much sulphur dioxide in the air (re- gardless of wealth or poverty, good houses or bad). The same is true of areas where there is a high consump- tion of domestic coal per acre. “ When we read that more than five million tons of sulphur di- — oxide (a notably irritant sub- stance) and three million tons of smoke, grit and dust are dis- charged annually into the air over Britain and that “mortality from bronchitis in England and Wales is 20 to 50 times greater than in Scandinavian countries, where little coal is burnt,” we can see the extent of the pol- lution. The British Medical Journal says that “abolition of atmos- pheric pollution may prove to be the most important single factor” in bringing about a re- duction in chronic bronchitis, and it is not difficult to believe. It seems quite likely that chronic bronchitis is above 2 a disease of industrial capital- ism. This particular form of s0- ciety pollutes the air literally as well as metaphorically. Per- haps, in order to get cleaner air it will be necessary to produce a cleaner form of society. Palme Dutt on India TUDENTS of India and Asia the world over will welcome the publication of India Today -and Tomorrow, a thorough his- torical survey by R. Palmé Dutt. Palme Dutt gives a picture of the fundamental ideas and cbjectives behind the changing policies of both the British rul- ers and the Indian National movement. He shows how, from the end of the First World War, the clash between the two became sharper and sharper, with the mass of the Indian people tak- ing an ever more important part in their long struggle for independence, until today their viewpoint is starting to dominate the whole political scene. Particularly important is his analysis of the reasons behind the partition of India in 1947, the historical background to the Hindu-Moslem conflicts and the’ establishment of Pakistan, and his assessment of the natural and linguistic question in India. The emergence of the Indian Communist party as a power! | ful national, electoral and polit- ical force, becoming capable of challenging the domination of all existing traditional parties: is well described. Dutt points out that the Nehru government is now playing a part of vital importance in the fight for world peace; but. that “there are still unresolved con- tradictions between the progres~ sive external orientation and the internal political situation.” The book suffers a little from being abridged from the earlier India Today, being forced 1 concentrate its wealth 0° material into too short a spac& But its vivid and readable account of the background 10 the tremendous movements noW gaining such rapid ground in India and Asia will be ° enormous help to our fight for a true understanding of the a5- pirations of the Indian people: — JOHN ALEXANDER ~ MAY 11, 1956 — PACIFIC TRIBUNE — PAGE 8