Labour By DIANE JOLLY Globalization. Restructuring. Free Trade. These are terms that only a few years ago were unknown to most Canadian workers. Suddenly, and brutally, they are the domi- nant reality affecting Canada’s economy which the trade union movement must respond to. Just consider how Canada has changed since the Tories were re-elected. Free Trade has arrived and we have plant shut- downs across the country, and bitter strikes to maintain Canadian wages and conditions. Social programs have al- ready been attacked and the clawbacks have ended universality in family allowance and pensions, while changes to the Unemployment Insurance program have transformed it from an insu- rance program against unemployment to.a “labour mobility scheme” to force workers into the service sector of the new economy. The Goods and Services Tax is meant to reinforce the new order by lowering the general purchasing power of workers. JOLLY How will the labour movement respond to all of this? As the last federal election showed, we can’t rely on politics alone. But as more and more unions are finding, neither can the bargaining table alone any more meet the challenge we face. When Canada’s largest union, the Canadina Union of Public Employees, meets in Vancouver Oct 16-20, one basic question will underlie the debates: what must be done to mobilize this sleeping giant of a union with its 350,000 members and considerable resources into a counterforce that can lead labour against the neo- conservative agenda and for an alternative? With locals in every part of the country, CUPE is more than just the biggest union in Canada. It is one of the few Canada-wide unions that can bring the workers’ agenda into the centre of the country’s political and social life. As in past conventions, there are once again policy resolutions which commit CUPE to the struggle for a new Canada. Consider this statement: ““We must present Canadians with an alternative economic and social vision which reaffirms the role of the public sector and challenges the unac- ceptable dominance of market forces in our society.” And this one: ““CUPE national, CUPE divisions, district councils and local unions, along with members and staff right across the country (must) build, support and play an influential role in the develop- ment and activities of popular coalitions at every level.” , Those statements, from the convention document, “The Tory Economic Agenda: Building the Resistance,” are an example of the far-sighted policies that have long been a feature of CUPE national’s official state- ments. But there is a different reality in CUPE from the advanced policy statements that it readily adopts at national conventions. There is also a massive organization with a minimum of the education, mobilization and activism that the policy statements commit us to. There is the reality of political and social activism confined to a few experts and a core of highly politicized activists representing us in coalitions or labour cen- trals, with the vast majority of members left on the sidelines. The theme of the national convention is - “CUPE into the 1990s.” But it will have to bea different type of CUPE, and a different type of labour movement, to meet the chal- lenges of the next decade. 12 e Pacific Tribune, October 16, 1989 In Western Canada, like the Maritimes, the restriction of legal trade union rights has left us with no choice but to rethink the whole basis of trade unionism that grew up since WW II under the terms of the social contract. Essentially, labour was institu- tionalized in exchange for agreeing to abide by a code of labour laws. Many of us ques- tioned the wisdom of this arrangement, but right wing governments have in any event now ripped up the social contract. As nurses . and health care workers have demon- strated, we must be ready to give priority to job action and political struggles over labour boards and courts, and be ready to boycott and defy bad laws. This is one good reason for a new, fresh look at the pressing need for co-ordinated bargaining. For collective bargaining pur- poses, resources have to be applied to ade- quate preparations, bargaining conferences, inter-local communications, job actions and strike support. But co-ordinated bar- gaining, to truly meet the challenge of the right wing agenda, must be more than co- ordination of CUPE locals. We need public sector co-ordinated bargaining in each pro- vince, and indeed, overall co-ordination with the private sector as well. But this implies the willingness to mobilize and co- operate in a larger struggle for workers’ rights — not just through public relations but with political and economic action. It is at this point that the labour movement reaches those moments of truth when it digs deeper and moves ahead, or retreats. British Columbia shows public sector employees the ultimate result of retreat: the number of workers on the provincial government’s payroll has been reduced by 40 per cent since the historic Solidarity struggle of 1983 was cut short. But we also know that trade union job action, even the most political, is only part of tomorrow’s struggle. In recognition of that, CUPE has joined the Pro Canada Network and the Social Solidarity Coalition and a staff member usually participates in the central bodies of these important coali- tions. But in the provinces and at the regional level there is a very different situa- tion. Like most of the labour movement, CUPE has not been a driving force in build- ing grass roots coalitions all across the country. Why not? Clearly the answer can only be found in the understanding of CUPE members and leaders across the country, and in the determination of the leadership to bring that awareness to the whole organization in the context of = CUPE’s national policies. It is somewhat representative of this problem that the most talked about issue before the CUPE convention seems to be the election of a new secretary-treasurer, rather than the kind of union that 350,000 public sector workers really need. And look- ing over the published materials of the three principal candidates, B.C.’s Mike Dumler, and Ontario’s Judy D’Arcy and John Murphy, one finds a strong emphasis on personal qualities and keeping the books. This speaks to the gap between CUPE’s generally advanced policies and the real level of mobilization and activism. For regardless of how progressive the policies are on paper, unless the leaders are genuinely committed to carrying them out, they will remain on paper. In my books, that means we need political leadership. which sees the union as more than just a collective bargaining agency. We need men and women who have committed them- selves to the fight for a new Canada, and who will bring CUPE and the whole labour movement into the centre of that fight. That is the message I’m hoping to hear at the CUPE national convention. Diane Jolly is secretary-treasurer of Local 389 of CUPE in North Vancouver. Projectionists locked out by theatre chains — rand PLEAS CINEPLEX ODEON CORP. #8 Projectionists Frank Emery (I), Bill Clayton and Bert Gilbert maintain picket line outside Famous Players’ Capitol 6 theatre in Vancouver on Oct. 12, the first day of action against a lockout imposed by the chain and its main rival, Cineplex Odeon. Members of the B.C. Projectionists Union have been without a collec- tive agreement for four years. The companies are bargaining jointly after securing an Industrial Relations Council ruling, which the union says they have not honoured since they have failed to name a person with which the union can bargain. The employers meanwhile are demanding rollbacks in wages and cost-of-living provisions. All theatres of the chains in B.C. are behind picket lines, with management and scab labour attempting to operate all but eight outlets. Postal Code ...... lamenclosing 1yr.$200) 2yrs.$350) 3yrs.$500) Foreign1yr. $320 : Bill me later = Donation$........ . Cd Oe i i i i Published weekly at 2681 East Hastings Street I Vancouver, B.C. V5K 1Z5. Phone 251-1186 Bi Name tii 26 eae ee, Fi a SS ee, PR mites BvAddrags + aviicert serene ct ae i i i L