tay

a

Ast
Peat

.
°

R. v. Greater Vancouver Regional District’ (1981) 3 F.P.R. 134 (Bic.
Provincial Court) - Private prosecution initiated by Union of B.c.
Indian Chiefs, resulted in fine of $5,000.00 for unauthorized
deposit of sewage in Fraser River Delta.

R. v. District of North Vancouver (1982) 3 F.P.R. 185 ;
Provincial Court) - District fined $20,500.00 for allowing leachate
from sanitary landfill to enter Lynn Creek.

.

R. v.. Richmond (1983) 3 F.P.R. 467 (B.C. Court cf Appeal) - Court
of Appeal confirmed that municipal .corporations may be liable for
contraventions of Section 36(3); remitted to trial judge for trial
involving landfill leachate.

Re v. District of -North Vancouver (1984) 3 F.P.R, 233 (B.C.
Provincial Court); 3 F.P.R. 249 (B.C. County Court); 3 F.pP.R. 491
(B.C. Court of Appeal) - District fined $7,000.00 for allowing

overflow from sewage lift station to enter Hastings Creek,

‘

R. v. Central Fraser Valley Reqional District and District of
Matsqui (1987) 4 F.P.R..57 (B.C. Provincial Court) - Regional
District fined $5,000.00 for allowing sewage to enter creek after .

valve opened by vandals.

eee

Provincial Court) - Commission fined $25,000.00 for allowing
landfill leachate to enter Fraser River. a

R. v. Fraser River Harbour Commission (1987) 4 F.LPLR, 223° (B.C.

R. v. City of Merrit (1987) 4 F.P.R. 311 (B.C. Provincial Court).
oa City acquitted but contractor convicted where ammonia from. arena
refrigeration plant entered watercourse. City established "due.

diligence" defence.

Riv. City of Quesnel (1987) 4 FsP.R. 393 (B.C. County Court) ——
City convicted of allowing chlorine to enter watercourse when valve
opened by vandals, and fined $6,500.00. Jot a

cit! PAGE:

arrest oe eee of