British Columbia CP opens national Campaign to block destruction of UI NANAIMO — B.C. Communist Party leader Fred Wilson opened the party’s campaign to stop the destruction of the unemployment insurance program here Wednesday, calling on party members and Supporters to organize grass roots opposi- tion to the Conservative government’s poli- cies and to make the defence of UI and other social programs a community issue. The party’s central committee launched a country-wide campaign against the attack on UI and the Conservative government’s “free trade agenda” last week in Toronto. “The Conservatives are bringing a new and cruel kind of capitalism to Canada,” said Wilson, “The destruction of the UI program is a betrayal of 50 years of social progress. The Communist Party pioneered in fighting for Ul as a basic social program. It Js only natural that Communists would initiate action today to defend those gains.” Wilson told party members that the government’s attack on the UI program is STOP the attack vo R ; | central to its plan to reshape Canada under free trade. It is the major social program sacrificed to the free trade economy affect- ing millions of Canadians, he said. Last year 3.2 million workers depended on UI. The $3.2 billion in cuts to the UI program are UI changes could mean $13,000 cut for worker With the prospect of an economic downturn in 1990 and higher unemployment levels, the policy changes to the country’s unemployment insurance program which are due to take effect next year will be “like a kick in the guts” for thousands of B.C. families, B.C. Communist Party leader Fred Wilson has charged. Wilson this week released an analysis of the UI policy changes which will affect the expected 300,000 UI claimants in B.C. next year. For about 60,000 of those workers, the UI policy changes could mean a loss of income of between $5,000 and $13,000 next year. “These policy changes spell - welfare for thousands of workers and their families in B.C. in 1990, and it spells depression for many communities that can not afford to lose that income,” said Wilson. The UI policy changes, presently before Parliament, will make four basic changes.to the program. First, it will be harder to get on UI. Second, UI claims will be shorter. Third, there are increased penalties for workers who quit a job or are fired. And finally, all workers will pay higher UI premiums as the government withdraws all public funding for the program. For most of British Columbia’s UI claimants — in Vancouver, Lower Fraser Valley, and on Vancouver Island — the qualification period has been extended from 10 to 16 weeks. The CP analysis points out that workers with between 10 and 15 weeks of work in 1989 are eligible for 34 weeks of UI — but these workers will receive nothing in 1990. The potential loss of income is $12,954. For those workers who do get 16 weeks of work, the duration of their claim has been shortened from 40 weeks in 1989 to 27 FRED WILSON ... changes spell dis- aster for workers, communities weeks in 1990. This would result in the loss of $4,953 in UI benefits. A worker that quits a job or is fired can lose close to $8,000 in UI benefits next year. The present disqualification period of a maximum of six weeks has been extended to 12 weeks. And for workers in this category, the weekly benefit after the disqualification period has been reduced from 60 percent of insurable earnings to 50 percent. The combination of the two penalties could cost $7,772 over a 50-week claim. Wilson pointed out that the federal budget, the Social Credit provincial budget, the Conference Board, and several investment firms have all predicted a slowing of the economy and higher unemployment in 1990. “These changes to UI are more than hardship. They will be devastating and humiliating for thousands of working families. The so called safety net has has the bottom cut out of it, and people will be landing on pavement. “This is what the Conservative’s free trade economy means for working people.” also central to the Conservative’s fiscal pol- icy and represent about half of the spending cuts in the 1989 federal budget. Likely the most sinsister aspect of the UI cuts, Wilson said, is the “retraining scam” which takes money out of UI benefits for the unemployed and redirects it for labour force programs to “adjust” Canadian. workers into the free trade economy. © Almost all of the money will be used in programs for semi-skilled “entry level” jobs, and in slush funds for the private sec- tor, he charged. The UI cuts have nothing to do with the federal deficit, the CP leader argued. UI premiums have in fact been reduced since 1987 and if those premiums remained in place this year a $4 billion surplus in the UI fund — far more than the savings extracted by the cuts in the program would have been available for new programs, he said. The Conservative budget reduced the share of corporate taxation in government revenues to an all time low of 10.2 per cent. Wilson said that if corporate Canada paid its share of national revenue of only a fews ago, and returned to the 1987 UI premium levels, that the deficit could be brought under control at the same time as expanding social programs. “The government is attacking UI because this universal social program doesn’t fit into the free trade economy. They are levelling the playing field by reducing our superior benefits to a level approximating those in the U.S., and simultaneously forcing more workers into the low wage, non-union end of the Canadian economy. The real objec- tive is to destroy the UI as a universal social program.” The CP campaign will include an educa- tion and information program around the slogan “stop the attack on U and I” which has already appeared on a button. Sales of ’ the button, which cost $1, are earmarked to finance the party’s campaign. Wilson also called for the formation of citzen committees in local communities to take the UI issue and the government's free trade agenda to the grass roots — into community groups, churches, service groups and local unions. The campaign to stop the UI cuts should be co-ordinated with the activities of the Pro-Canada coalitions, where .they exist, and used to help build coalitions in com- munities without coalitions, he said. island labour slams budget As the budget train rolled into Ottawa, some 75 trade unionists and others rallied at the train station in Courtenay to add their voice to the call for a repeal of the budget. They greeted the arrival of the Esquimalt and Nanaimo dayliner at 12:30 p.m. June 12 in an action organized by the Campbell River, Courtenay and District Labour Council. Among the speakers at the rally was Jane Larson-Pass of the Courtenay Women’s Resource Centre. Ald. Erik Eriksson of Courtenay was on hand to add city council’s voice to the pro- test over the federal financial cutbacks that could see reductions in the E & N dayliner’s daily run from Victoria to the north island city. The decimation of VIA rail services is one of. the hotly contested features of the budget. So far no cutbacks have been announced for the daily run of the two- coach dayliner, but residents say the runs should be increased, not cut. Petitions were circulated gathering names for a citizens committee to oppose the budget. Provincial Notes Tribal council Wins injunction Five Gitksan chiefs won a landmark ruling in B.C. Court of Appeals June 9, stopping Westar Timber Ltd. for a second time from carrying out its plans to log north of the Babine River — log- ging that would have compromised an historic aboriginal land claim. In a two to one decision, a panel of Appeals Court judges upheld the October, 1988 injunction which pre- vented the logging company from build- ing a bridge across the Babine and moving logging crews into virgin forest which is covered by the Gitksan Wet’su- wet’en Tribal Council land claim. Westar, which owns timber rights in the area, launched its appeal of the injunc- tion Jan. 30. In the majority ruling, Justice Brian Carrothers and William Esson recog- nized that the Gitksans “have raised a triable issue as to the existence of rights which ultimately may be held to prevail ... over the rights asserted by Westar.” The Gitksan-Wet’suwet’en land claim is currently before the Supreme Court and it is expected to be at least two years before a judgment is rendered. But if the logging were to proceed before that deci- sion, the Gitksan chiefs argued, their rights to the land could be compromised. In a dissenting opinion, Justice Cha- tles Locke warned that the decision could “interrupt the established adminis- trative and legal system” in the province. Oil spill review called inadequate Prominent B.C. citizens continued to press their demand for a full public inquiry into the transportation of oil and dangerous commodities along the west coast this week, warning that Prime Min- ister Brian Mulroney’s proposed $3- million public review of tanker safety would be inadequate and ineffective. Under pressure to call an inquiry fol- lowing two disastrous west coast oil spills, Mulroney fell considerably short in his proposed review which will not have the force of a full inquiry, including the right to subpoena witnesses and to provide funding for interveners. “It won’t be very effective,” said Dr. Andrew Thompson, the former chair of the West Coast Oil Ports Inquiry and one of more than 100 prominent citizens who called a press conference April 11 to demand that the federal government call a full public inquiry into “the explora- tion, production and transportation of oil and other dangerous substances along the B.C. coast.” Although Vancouver lawyer David Brander-Smith has been appointed as chair of the review panel, neither the terms of reference of the review nor the authority under which it will work have been announced. Investigation into racist group urged New Democrat MLA Emery Barnes has called on Attorney-General Bud Smith to launch an immediate investiga- tion into the racist activities of the Aryan Resistance Movement (ARM), one of the various names used by the far right wing of the white supremacist group, Aryan Nations, based in the U.S. Barnes is calling for the A-G to use the 1981 Civil Rights Protection Act. The legislation was drafted in response to the upsurge in activity by the Ku Klux Klan but was never used. Pacific Tribune, June 19, 1989 « 3