es David Lewis wrong line ee The ia JOHN WEIR itsett j convention disgrac- atly p Y refusing to forth- inch SCognize the right of the ane on nation in Que- : inal €termination up to the wn Ing separation. Only at ti plified recognition of ,;et can the people of Mest ha anada establish an ship Se for an equal part- dition Only under that Ich ¢ Can the people of Ohintarih eo truly — because ship Y—Jjoin in such a part- a: ee gua eetal Party, which for fd on pees, Of @ century re- F ; y een Canadian votes, Tench «. ational Oppression of Teme nada, resortin to ex- LQ ten asures (the inflation of lo Or teed acts as justifica- Webeo an ilitary occupation of Mati ‘ Savage repression of ET0ung Aa 'St and democratic ‘ individuals) under inet eet —One Nation” Ne to Liberals in Quebec aM Shadg nt tO manoeuvring lempt to ou boxing in an at- TMtempt ard off the wrath and The Gt the peopl People. : thei mctvatives once flaunt- ant ultra-British Empire Tench ¢ which suppression teetone, anada was the cor- wv ate g ven now, although | hit at pooling at the chance *eeain iberals and maybe op fitst pla aj ce at the trough ite oe Hill, they Ginapt Be Mtioha etc solution ie lt conse question in Que- byte Becce: Quegec Tor- ted and a cha the parent ing, Want ee @ camouflage if me Province. French seats by ig on vention, by de- dette Wane put forward tig ates and aA and Quebec Nat that by Opting a resolu- Onal ae the right of “Ceterminati i | ng : ion (if ‘Peak in re ‘to write, or {hey ®S” ag oF indecisive e iction [tea jg°S0lution shiniewas ‘1 tha 2 prime ex, With ie ample of to €xtent }j : J Says old ay lined itself up 1 0 venment, Parties. and the RWis? t old =. arguments just at ..-': To say that as Or of _ 4 Socialist he is etuse ¢ F jietermination © Quect SPPly it i feta i tation of teen ti %oy . mzeze in double- ‘| ‘2 no mor i ) met thational rights eae Voy ant in 8 Woman can be } Vr ate o, aeestract. Either Ten’t—and wh . as i i Spices , the His assure vine is that he , pce that he is , ae Coercion . ae in by if Dieta, “Patate ; oe ‘ Ik ‘i, IS not only Hse Ople ePlain deception. ) bay? Tate { Quebec decide ny Perm; Y won’t ask any- “tay inetd their national the right to : Wish—the mar- 1} Un, Pe aeary or it F tite Plein, © French Cana- J fey, With p2ll likelihood will Pal ate Sis g Nglish Canada ; d thality. But if en ON °halig follow, peehts, they fp & —'sts € bourgeois i nt e | €cide to separ- f pon 18 that | ng, is David Lewis’ 8 of ewis Xcused on the ®ctoral strat ARR nds as the main party - “not to iose votes in English Canada”—is opportunist at its root and won’t bear inspection in terms of practical results. First of all, it means writing the NDP off as a political force among the French Canadian vot- ers. Secondily, if it does appeal to English-speaking Canadians, it is on a chauvinist, anti-Que- bec platform (it is vain to argue that it really isn’t—that’s how it will be understood), ie., an appeal for the votes of the back- ward and reactionary segments of the electorate in English Can- ada, where it will be competing on that very same platform with the Liberal and Tory parties. But why does Mr. Lewis as- sume that the masses in English Canada are backward and chau- vinist? Would it not be better to challenge and expose the old- line parties on this crucial issue rather than drag at their tail, not only as a principled question but from practical politics? Why are we concerned with the policies adopted by the NDP convention? It is not because we have found a stick to beat the NDP with—we wish that stick wasn’t there. We are concerned because as things stand in Can- ada, the hope for a rapid de- velopment of a broad people’s coalition to beard and beat the monopolies and their parties and governments to a very great degree depends on the direction of the popular reform movement expressed through the NDP. It is not concern for the fruits of of- fice but for the future of Canada that animates us, our criticism and proposals. There can be no effective peo- ple’s coalition, it is clear, cer- tainly not one capable of over- coming U.S. and Canadian mon- opoly, without French Canada’s participation on the side of pro- gress. And that won’t be assured unless the national rights of Quebec are recognized and fought for. The Communist Party of Can- ada from its inception 50 years ago has championed the fight for the equality of French Canada. It was the first to demand the right of national self-determin- ation for Quebec and formulated the proposal for a freely-nego- tiated new confederal pact, a new Canadian Constitution bas- ed on the voluntary, equal part- nership of the two nations in a bi-national and sovereign demo- cratic state. This would be in the best interests of both na- tions. Support by the democratic forces of English-speaking Can- ada for recognition of French Canada’s right to self-determin- ation, and support of French Canadian democratic forces for unity of the people of both na- tions against the common en- emy, Canadian monopoly and U.S. imperialism — this is the way to overcome the long-stand- ing distrust, friction and resent- ments that have divided the two peoples. Unity in action of the working class of French and English Can- ada is decisive to win. In the united struggles’ the fraternal bonds between us will be im- measurably strengthened. Book publishing ‘Stop take-over by U.S. A publicly-owned _ textbook corporation under democratic controls to research, develop and publish textbooks required by our educational system is the major recommendation ina submission by Progress Books to Ontario’s: Royal Commission on Book Publishing now holding hearings in Toronto. The proposal has a three-fold aim: e to save this vital and ‘vul- nerable area of book publishing from growing U.S. takeover in- roads in the form of giant pub- lishing conglomerates operating in books, periodicals, video and sound tape cartridge systems that threaten to dictate educa- tional programs in Canada; e to guarantee that available textbooks and learning resourc- es will not be in a state of im- balance prejudicing preserva- tion in our school systems of a distinctive Canadian cultural identity; : e to assure that new books will be researched and develop- ed in as yet unexplored areas of our history, culture and peo- ples—for example, on Quebec, the history of Canada’s trade unions, the story of the Indian and Northern peoples, the immi- grants who built Canada and who play a major role in its present development, the con- tribution of the socialist move- ment yesterday and today. The 44-page brief while em- phasizing the danger to the Canadian publishing industry and the threatened extinction of Canada should now recognize North Korea In a letter to Prime Minister Trudeau the ’ Canadian-Korean Friendship Association stresses that Canada is hurting its own interests by continuing diplo- matic blockade of such coun- tries as North Korea. “Under present conditions of massive surpluses on farms. and in factories, with consequent in- creasing unemployment, how long can this country afford to continue its policy of isolation and embargo of any country?” the letter signed by H. Murray, secretary, asks. “In this respect, Canada’s recognition of China is a fine example to the world to. uproot outdated political bar- riers between the nations. “we ask that the same hand of goodwill and friendship be extended to North Korea. First, by having Canada’s representa- tive at the United Nations press for re-examination by the UN General Assembly of the events leading up to the 1950-1953 Korean War, and that represen- tatives of North Korea be invit- ed to participate in the discus- sion without vote, in accord with article 32 of the United Nations Charter. “we urge this as a first step to clear the way for UN recog- nition of North Korea, essential if the UN is to remain in true character a United Nations. “One of the strongest argu- ments for this is our own recog- nition of North Korea. It will return us generous dividends in future trade and scientific ex- changes with the forty ‘million Korean people.” the Canadian manufactured book draws attention also to the consequent perils facing Canadian themes, authors, graphic artists and workers in- volved in the industry. The brief stressed as well that support for such a program should not be interpreted as nar- row nationalism. “On the con- trary we see ‘the emerging struggle for a Canadian-owned publishing industry as an integ- ral part of a larger responsibility which is to- welcome and ad- vance both the publication and distribution of the best written works of all lands, advancing democratic and _ progressive ideas. . . . there is no contra- diction in our view between a genuine popular love of country and a people’s internationalism that reinforces real sovereignty and independence. We are not anti-American in pointing to the dangers of U.S. monopoly’s in- trusions on our cultural life.” In a summary the submission notes that it “examines the state of the book publishing in- dustry in the context of: the essential continentalist |policy and submission of senior gov- ernment levels to increasing U.S. ownership and control; the new shape and powerful thrust of the U.S. publishing conglo- merate into the Canadian mar- ket and its accompanying or- ganic absorption of Canadian- owned enterprises; and the spe- cial ideological character of the publishing takeovers as distinct from the growing U.S. domina- tion of raw material sources and plant manufacturing. “It is argued that with foreign economic control comes an ac- companying political domination and eventual loss of sovereign- ty; but that more: particularly the process of takeover in book publishing is interwoven with a concomitant ideological surren- der — that makes easier the physical acquisition of the com- manding heights of our econo- mic and political life. “The erosion of an indigneous Canadian publishing industry has gone so far, and the econo- mic and political surrender of our independent initiative in this field has been so sapped that emergency: measures are now required to stop the drift that has become a floodtide. Such measures include an end to further foreign takeovers; large direct government loans (long-term and low interest) to Canadian publishers in need of working capital; favoring of smaller distinctive publishing houses developing programs of a unique and stimulating kind; control of the distributive sys- tems in the country to give an even or better break to Cana- dian titles and authors; a sub- sidized block library purchase plan for the Canadian titles; and finally the setting up of a pub- licly-owned crown corporation to develop, research and publish textbooks required by our edu- cational system.” . Quality Paperbacks published in the Gearman Democratic Republic Seven Seas Books offers titles of special interest to college and university students THE STOLEN REPUBLIC First English translation. of Leicester University. | TASTE BITTERNESS THE STONE COUNTRY Now on sale at: SEVEN SEAS PUBLISHERS DDR 108 Berlin Glinkastr. 13-15 These selected writings of the noted German journalist and author who died a victim of Nazi vengeance, are a living commentary on events in Germany from 1913 through the fall of the Weimar Republic and the advent of Hitler. THE RADICAL TRADITION IN EDUCATION IN BRITAIN A compilation of writings by William Godwin, Thomas Paine, Robert Owen, Richard Carlile, Robert Dale Owen, William Thompson, William Lovett, William Morris, edited and with an introduction by Prof. Brian’ Simon A selection of prose writings in its first English translation of a German poet whose works have recently been recognized for their originality and depth. CONVERSATIONS IN THE NIGHT “Mozart in Prague”, “Meeting in Weimar” and “The Holiday”. Three works which deal with the artist's commitment within society. First English translation. Apartheid in South Africa written by a Coloured South African while under house arrest. La Guma recently received the Afro-Asian Lotus Prize for literature in New Delhi. Prices from $1.00 to $1.95 — Complete catalog on request Progress Books, 487 Adelaide St. W., Toronto 2B Book World, 72 Gerrard St. W., Toronto Editions Progressives, 5327 ave. du Parc, Montreal 152 Co-op Book Store, 341 W. Pender St., Vancouver — 685-5836 Carl von Ossietzky Johannes Bobrowski Louis Fiirnberg Alex La Guma oy SBAGIEIG TRIBUNE ssERIDAY, APRIL 30,1971 PAGE 13 RSA