May 14th, 1979
property and relocating the Church elsewhere in the City. Members of

the Church indicated that no suitable alternate location could be found
as they had considered this possibility at an earlier date, Reference
was made to an earlier proposal to construct a higher density (strata

townhouse) type development, however, as the Council had been opposed to

such a development a few years ago, this was not pursued at this time.

OO

The RS~1A (40' frontage Single-family Residential) subdivision was
considered in order to conform more closely with the existing surroundings
which are primarily 33' frontage residences, however, difficulties in

land acquisition by the Developer have stopped the proceedings at this
stage and it is therefore the intent of the Church to request rezoning for the
existing site and proceed with construction of a new building and perhaps,

at a later date, suitable land exchanges can be arranged to permit a

TORT ee oer dentate ab reine ne ce

suitable subdivision to proceed.

Moved by Alderman Traboulay:

Seconded by Alderman Keryluk:

That the rezoning Application R#11-78 to rezone the Remainder of
Lot 4, Block H, District Lot 466, Flan 10715 and the South One-half of
Lot 2, Block H, District Lot 466, Plan 10715 from RS-1 (Single-Family
Residential) to P-2 (Special Institutional) advance to Public Hearing.
Carried,
Aldermen Ranger and Wright voted against the resolution.

Prior to passage of the resolution stated above, Aldermen Ranger and

Wright advised that in their opinion the proposal should first proceed to

Public Information Meeting. Alderman Traboulay and other Council members
advised that as the proposal merely made an existing use conforming, the
proposal could proceed directly to Public Hearing. Alderman Ranger then
advised that as the rezoning of land was involved, along with a reconstruction
of the church building, the residents of the area should not be denied

the right to attend a Public Information Meeting.

Alderman Laking returned to the Council Chamber and resumed his

‘Ald.Laking returns
/& resumes seat place at the Council Table.

' Bldg.& Prot. From the Building and Protection Committee, May llth, 1979, concerning

‘Comm. Mcy 11/79
re parking lot the Parking Area at the Shopping Centre at Shaughnessy and Lougheed.

/ Shaughnessy &

| Lougheed Alderman Wright further explained that the report was in response to an
enquiry at an earlier Council meeting as to whether a Parking Agreement
should be implemented with owners of the shopping centre and pointing
out that the plan in question appears to be a preliminary plan only and

there is nothing that can be done in this regard. The report was received

for information.