J 2. walker Aes a Oe: ae ee - from Month wage cut imposed by Bill het j PQ challenge defeated paaaw jin Common Front victory PN QUEBEC — The 72% rejec- tion, Feb. 2, of a tentative pact between the leaders of 82,000 » Ron-medical hospital workers and the hugely unpopular Parti Cois government was a | Stunning counter blow to the 80vernment’s failed bid to smash € public sector Common Front’s general strike. Common Front’s massive Show of Strength, Jan. 29 with ' More than 55,000 strikers on the 8tounds of the Quebec National Ssembly, prompted Premier ne Levesque’s government to Move in on what it saw as the Weakest sections of the Common Tont as well as the weakest Unions preparing to join the Province-wide illegal general Strike led by the front. € not retreating an inch the $400-million, three me on all unions in the public sec- ae the government pressed a government employees, th © aren’t in the Common Front, €n later 85,000 non-medical Pik workers to accept con- Tact settlements which offered negligible improvements in job : ee one of the key issues in the strike, Nurses who were slated to Strike Jan. 31 cancelled their Strike plans. The non-Common members of the Quebec Civil Service Union (QCSU), post- poned their strike deadline from Feb. 1 to midnight Feb. 3. At Tribune press time, QCSU negotiators were still meeting with the government. The biggest prize for the government however, seemed to be the 85,000 hospital workers who began their strike Jan. 31 and suspended it at midnight, that night, on the strength of a pro- posed contract that the bargaining committee recommended with a narrow 18-15 vote. Government and corporate = propaganda mills throughout Quebec and the rest of Canada crowed over the apparent disin- tegration of the Common Front. The Social Affairs Federation, ‘(FAS), of the Confederation of National Trade Unions, (CSN), represents 82,000 of the striking non-medical hospital workers. The Quebec Federation of Labor, (QFL) represents the rest. As it turned out, reports of the Common Front’s death were greatly exaggerated. In a stormy two-day meeting, which was sup- posed to last only a day, the 750 FAS council members angrily criticized the agreement as being far too short of the workers’ de- mands and needs. The Montreal section of the FAS came to the council meeting LABOR mandated to vote rejection and to call for a new bargaining commit- tee. Meanwhile, the three leaders of the Common Front, Donatien Corriveau of the CSN, the QFL’s Louis Laberge and Yvon Char- bonneau president of the Centrale de l’Enseignement du Quebec, (CEQ), reminded reporters at a joint press conference, Feb. 1, that the Common Front was still operating in the education sector and was standing firm on its de- mand the government negotiate a decent contract with job security and no wage cuts. Charbonneau, whose 90,000- member CEQ has proven to be the backbone of the general strike and the Common Front recalled the overwhelming mandate teachers had given their union The CEQ mandate called for a strike within or outside of a Common Front. Charbonneau pointed out that as far as his union was concerned nothing in the situation in Quebec had changed to make the union call its mem- bers off strike. It is hard to describe the depth and bitterness of the anger within the labor movement, at all levels against the PQ government. Labor leaders and rank and file members alike, . without hesita- tion, see the government’s attack on the labor movement, the right to strike, and the right to bargain collectively, as first and foremost an attack on democracy. The support that has been shown to the strike by the rest of the Canadian labor movement is greatly appreciated, and leaders as well as rank and file strikers note how, in the days to come, more moral and financial help will be needed. Strikers, their leaders and unions face fines in the thousands of dollars for defying the “‘no strike’’ laws. Levesque has declared the government will fire all strikers who prevent scabs from crossing their picket lines, and everyone expects that the PQ cabinet will indeed invoke harsh measures after its Feb. 3 meeting. Front government workers, _ This guest column is by George Morris, labor columnist 3, the Daily World, New York. The column first appeared an. 14, The AFL-CIO general office in Washington continues to ignore the nationwide sweep for the nuclear freeze, but goes full hog for the ‘forced labor”’ lie. Ronald Reagan used in his unsuccessful effort to block both the Viet gas pipe project and the election-day vote for the arms freeze. The November 13: AFL-CIO News Splashed out with a piece putting Lane Kirkland and the AFL-CIO in full association with the CIA, State Partment and alleged ‘‘dissidents’”’ for the forced labor lie despite the fact that the paper knew the Soviet Union had invited the International Labor Organization to come in and inspect the charge. Charge a Fraud In The Los Angeles Times of November 10 Beril Bolin Of the International Labor Organization reported in an article headlined, ‘‘Soviets Offer Inspection of Pipeline T,”’ that his agency’s officials are discussing with a Viet delegation the date of a proposed ILO inspection and the sites to be inspected. The visits are likely to begin reasonably soon,” he said in the article. But the AFL- O story claimed ILO investigators are “‘blocked’’ and quotes a State Department statement that an investiga- tion is ‘‘probably not bright.”’ The forced labor charge is almost as old as the charge of ‘‘nationalization of women’’ that made the rounds Soon after the Russian Revolution. AFL administrations Used it in their propaganda against the USSR, particu- larly aimed at the Soviet trade unions. It was the stock fraud used by the CIA-dominated AFL-CIO inter- National affairs office through the entire administration of George Meany. For most of Meany’s administration it was Lane Kirkland as his assistant, and eventually as Secretary-treasurer who was directly responsible for op- erations at headquarters and implementation of policy. That the AFL-CIO headquarters is still a CIA nest is Well reflected in the article of November 13. With it is a drawing purporting to show how a “‘forced labor’ camp housing ‘‘four million Soviets engaged in forced labor’’ looks. As chief administrator during Meany’s administ- ration, Kirkland worked closely with the international affairs department when it was headed by Jay Love- AFL-CIO office still a CIA nest = wr oa I Labor in action William Stewart ‘* ay stone, whose record as the AFL’s bridge to the CIA since World War II, was well exposed by a former top CIA official and in Joseph Goulden’s biography ‘Meany.’ Now in his mid-eighties, retired, Lovestone is repor- tedly still in the shadows. Earnest Lee, Meany’s son-in- law, who worked under Lovestone and replaced him, was assigned to collect Meany’s papers, giving the post to Irving Brown, to head the department. Brown was Lovestone’s collaborator in CIA service since World War II and never deviated from the dirty business. A most recent addition was Murray Seager, named by Kirkland to head information and edit the AFL-CIO News. Seager served as L.A. Times correspondent in Moscow a decade back and set the reportorial pattern for his successors, all a perfect model for what CIA Direc- tor William Casey once admitted the CIA uses in ‘“‘some cases.”’ Related to CIA But standing above this gentry of ‘‘labor’’ men is Dale Good. Kirkland named him to be his assistant in May 1980 and at the time the AFL-CIO News termed him a ‘specialist in international labor affairs.’’ Good was co- ordinator of labor affairs in the Agency for International Development, the very government body that finances the CIA operations and the AFL-CIO’s co-operation with the CIA in Latin America, Asia and Africa. He was listed as labor attache in various State Department assignments, in “‘services’’ in Greece, Isracl, the Fed- eral Republic of Germany, in important Korean war agencies and in other duties so closely related to CIA operations that his real role could hardly be mistaken. Such is the collection at AFL-CIO headquarters, that spends much time plotting anti-Sovietism and con- cocting ways to keep “‘forced labor’’ yarns alive to hum- bug the present-day generation, but little time worrying about the forced unemployment and starvation of 12 ' resenting 18 million members initiated the Citizens million Americans and their families, or about the unpaid forced labor of many thousands among the 400,000 Americans in federal and state prisons. To judge by what’s in the AFL-CIO News, there doesn’t appear to be concern over the fact that after more than a year, the much ballyhooed organizing project in Houston hasn’t yielded significant results. Anyway, what can you expect from a president of the AFL-CIO who still holds membership in the Committee on the Present Danger, a big Pentagon sponsored ultra- rightist hawk outfit, from a man in the company of Reagan, CIA director Casey, officials of all major intel- ligence outfits, officials of an assortment of Pentagon divisions and about anyone prominently involved in mili- tary buildups? Kirkland is the sole representative of a labor organi- zation in this company. To say he continues the Meany policy is an understatement. He continues the policy he had a personal hand in making over many years. How can his circle wage an effective struggle against Reagan- omics while tightly fastened to the Reagan crowd for ever-more billions for anti-Soviet war purposes? The Kirkland group has betrayed the Labor Community Co- alition by its tie to this war crowd. :Fortunately, another coalition of 26 organizations rep- Against Nuclear War. Among the initiator unions are the International Association of Machinists, Commercial Workers International Union, Amalgamated Clothing. and Textile Workers, National Education Association — and major organizations of minority, women’s and church movements. : The movement for the nuclear freeze has only started, as so strongly stressed in the follow-up conferences that have already taken place in California and other states. More unions will join CANW. Kirkland will be roundly repudiated. In Labor in action in the Jan. 31 Tribune an error appeared in paragraph four. The paragraph should have read ‘‘The admiration and support of all Canadian work- ing people must be extended to the workers of Quebec for daring to do what was needed in the face of the unprecedented actions of federal, provincial and Quebec governments against public service workers.” Meee PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FEBRUARY 11, 1983—Page 7 -