By STAN DALTON TORONTO — The Toronto Association for Peace, Voice of Women, Ryerson Peace Commit- tee and’the Congress of Canadian Women jointly requested To- [ ronto Mayor John Sewell to name the week of May 5-11 Peace Week in the City of Toronto. In his letter of compliance _ Mayor Sewell said: ‘‘May 8th, 1980, will commemorate the clos- ing of the most destructive war in history and will bring to the fore, the need to put an end to war. War is a small word, but a word _ which badly affects all people for generations. The losses suffered can never be regained.”’ __ From April 28 to May 9 (exclud- ing weekends) the May 10th Ad ' Hoc Committee, including more than a dozen organizations, main- tained a daily noon-hour vigil at the cenotaph in front of Old City Hall. Bearing banners calling for an end to the arms race, the ban- ning of the neutron bomb, Persh- ‘ing I and the Cruise missile, the activists, numbering up to 20 daily, distributed some 20,000 pieces of literature to passersby who, despite the strong cold war atmosphere, were friendly and polite. On May 8 — V-E Day — the giant 30-foot banner: “Never in’’ was held to proclaim sim- and to the point what is proc- laimed in the hearts of millions of » Canadians: No More War! On Saturday, May 10 more than 250 peace marchers gathered at Queen’s Park bearing placards and banners bearing the vital slo- gans for peace and disarmament. eee eee a Yee eee rr As they marched down Yonge St. to City Hall, the main slogan, echoing loud above the roar of the city was: ‘‘Peace — Yes, War — No, Ban the Neutron Bomb!” _ War’s losses Never regained Thousands of strolling shoppers stopped to listen and read the lit- erature handed out on the way. A rally at Nathan Philips Square featured retired U.S. General, Hugh B. Hester. Adam- ant in his condemnation of U.S. President Jimmy Carter and his National Security advisor, Zbig- niew Brzezinski, (madmen, he called them) for their reckless es- capades concerning the situations in Iran and Afghanistan and the entire Middle East, Hester pointed to the obvious threat to all of humanity if these, and other Pentagon hawks, are not stopped. Hester reiterated the connection between the drive to a cold and hot war, to the unrelenting appe- tite of the arms merchants for big- ger and bigger profit. Among the speakers was civic activist, lawyer Charles Roach, who noted with irony that while the U.S. and its allied yes-men (the Canadian Government in particular) are frantically working up a boycott of the Olympic Games in Moscow, and against Soviet goods — all in the name of “‘justice”’ — are still maintaining strong trade relations with racist and fascist regimes like South Af- rica and Chile. The well known Toronto AlI- derman, Dan Heap spoke out against the war overtures of the U.S. Pentagon and NATO. He noted with regret the ‘‘sabre-rattl- ing’’ engaged in by the leadership of the New Democratic Party dur- _ ing the February federal election, and indicated his wish for disar- mament and a world at peace. Tim Feher, Ryerson journalism student and chairman -of the Ryerson Peace Committee, drew the connection between the tre- mendous.cost of arms and student tuition increases. | re} i FS o 7 2 ie} = : iva Fe These children send their own messages for peace at the May 10 demonstration marking the 35th anniversary of the end of World War Il. Joe Bouchard, president of the St. Catharine’s Labor Council and chairman of the Niagara Peace Movement, condemned the arms race, noting the severe implications this has for workers everywhere. Bouchard expressed the hopes of millions when he cal- led for an end to the arms race, for a nuclear weapon-free world where working people can get on with peaceful labor. ; Jean Vautour, executive sec- retary of the Canadian Peace Congress drew attention to the growing respect for the Canadian Peace Congress internationally. This was recently underlined, she pointed out, by an invitation to the Congress from the govern- ment of Iran to send two Cana- dian revresentatives to their country to see, first hand, what’s actually happening there. This is a necessary measure by the Ira- nians because of the intense cam- paign of lies and deception by the ‘free’ press of the U.S., Canada, and their allies in the ‘‘free’’ west. The rally wound up with the song ‘Blowin’ in the Wind’, sung by Ryerson students, Tim Feher and Wayne Cohen. Egypt’s Sadat, friend of Jimmy Carter; self-appointed spokesman for the Palestinian people, is in deep trouble. From 1977, when he first betrayed Arab unity and, with U.S. backing, sold out Palesti- nian rights, Sadat has seen the highly-touted Camp David ac- cords go down the drain. It couldn’t be otherwise. Camp David evaporates Israel’s Begin and the hawks have made Sadat look foolish. They have made no conces- sions on occupied Arab land, on their settlements program or anything else. On the con- trary, Israel stepped up its campaign and _ publicly thumbed its nose at Sadat. The May 26 deadline for a settle- ment, like the Camp David agreement, is meaningless. Warsaw, Nato meetings — a contrast The foreign and defence ministers of the NATO countries have recently concluded a meeting designed on the insistence of the U.S. military to bring its NATO partners into line with U.S. aims. According to the daily press for May 15 the meeting ‘‘condemned the Soviet Union for jeopardizing world peace and agreed on certain military measures to bolster Western defence in the aftermath of Soviet moves into Af- ghanistan.”’ In other words to heat up the arms race. _ The military measures agreed upon were “‘to expedite plans to deploy new weapons (read medium-range nuclear weapons, A.D.) and increase stock of ammunition and transport aircraft in Europe.” Readers will note the NATO strategists have apparently moved Afghanistan into western Europe. The daily press of the same date re- ports a meeting of the leaders of the Warsaw Pact countries. This meeting noted that ‘‘détente was dangerously overshadowed by the intensified activ- ity of imperialist and cold war forces’’. It went on to state that these forces were “‘seeking to aggravate tension and escalate the arms race and pursue policies from a position of strength.”” In sharp contrast to the NATO meeting, the Warsaw Pact meeting, according to the Globe and Mail of Marxism-Leninism in Today’s World May 16, agreed upon a joint declara- tion “designed to give fresh impetus to disarmament and détente talks with the West’’. * * * It is useful to repeat from the Globe" and Mail of the same date the words of general-secretary Gierek of the Polish United Workers Party that the main target of the joint declaration ‘‘is the elimination of the present tension’’. And that ‘‘there is no reasonable alter- native to the policy of détente.” Gierek also drew attention to his pro- posal for a new European disarmament conference in Warsaw which would likely “‘figure prominently in the joint declaration’. The same press release reported that Soviet President Brezhnev stated that “‘in the present complex situation, when millions of people feel anxious _about the destiny of détente and peace, a firm warning resounds from Warsaw against the policy of war adventures and the feverish arms race’’. * * x The sharp Contrast between the ap- proaches of NATO and the Warsaw meetings of how to solve the most cru- cial issue of our times — war or peace —deserves sober study by Canadians. This is particularly so in view of Cana- da’s stance at the NATO meeting. The daily press for May. 14 reports that ‘‘Canada gave a firm pledge’’ to sup- port the defence spending of NATO. This pledge was given as anexpression — of ‘‘willingness’’ to shoulder a greater part of the European defence burden. This is necessary because of ‘‘addi- tional U.S. commitments in the Per- sian Gulf and.the Indian Ocean.” Canada’s Defence Minister Lamon- tagne said at the NATO meeting that there is ‘‘no reason’’ why Canada can- not meet the 3% yearly increase in NATO funding. He offered to help. NATO’s poorest members, Turkey and Portugal. How generous! In order to fire up the arms race our Minister of Defence is prepared to undermine the dietary and shelter standards of our poor working class kids. ee The aggressive-minded circles of U.S. imperialism constitute the greatest menace to peace. They aim to establish a commanding position in the imperialist camp by seizing political and financial control of the former col- onial countries. They hope to stop the decline of capitalist by striving to re- solve its contradictions at the expense of the socialist countries by organizing a war against them. NATO isa military vehicle for the realization of these im- perialist objectives. The cold war against the Soviet Union and the other socialist countries is key to this strategy. The cold war can only be classified as an inter- mediate, unstable state between war and peace, a state of political hostility, one step removed from armed con- flict. It involves maximum restriction of normal trade relations between so- cialist and capitalist countries, restric- tive trade lists, embargoes and economic blockade, cessation or re- duction to a minimum of cultural ex- change and scientific contacts, and subversion against socialist states while outwardly maintaining normal diplomatic relations. * * * This is the cold war which the Cana- dian government wants to support with our tax dollars, and with the loss of profitable markets such as the grain sales to the Soviet Union and other socialist countries. Canadians have everything to gain by uniting to check the cold war and threats .of nuclear war, and strengthening the cause of peace, détente and disarmament, and normal relations with the socialist countries. PACIFIC TRIBUNE—MAY 30, 1980—Page 9