are excerpts aged lecture on Burns imes delivered by Bert 16 Horizons Study Centre p on January 17. a see my name you may hy I should come and to you on Robert you notice it is an - and knowing some- ‘characteristics, if ‘a thing, you know Of -the irresponsibil- “Irish and their love wence and love of ‘So, although being background, I have ed for many years S, not only to his life ferse, but because I see is that there is some- f great importance for sive and labor move- the labor movement urns evenings on the of his birth in order mage to this man who illustrate this evening, of the general radical ssive movement... fore I begin to describe the characteristics of his contribution to ‘literature, I want to u some idea of the his- background, the scene Burns was born. e all familiar with the this area north of the We know. something s:character and the ristics of the ancient race. We know about ds, their clans and t pre-feudal tradi- lowlands, where the influence of England began to be felt very strongly. Particul- arly after the battle of Flodden in 1513, when the Scottish army was defeated, the English in- fluence entered Scotland and Scotland faced a crisis which led to a peculiar dichotomy in in the national character of Scotland. We have the highlands, Gaelic, anciently aligned with France. We have the lowlands where more and more as the years pass there is an effort made both on the part of the English in the south and by cer- tain elements in Scottish society to end the Scottish ways. This was the period when that element of anglifying the community became more and more dominant. One of the great influences in establishing this superiority of the English lan- guage among many in the low- lands was the fact that when John Knox led the reformation in Scotland, he prepared the way for the Scottish people to accept the James I version, as the bible they would read. He also introduced into Scot- tish life a particularly repellent type of religious intoxication, of religious enthusiasm that caused the adherents to eschew the ordinary pleasures of the flesh, the pleasures of this world and to concentrate their total attention upon their destiny in the life beyond this world. This, of course, ran very much contrary to all the ten- dencies of the Scottish people who are a lively, enthusiastic, natural, sensual, people. They BURNS AMD HIS TAME were of peasant stock. They had created a _ wealth, of folk-lore, a wealth of me- lody, of stories, marked by those characteristics of peasant origin with a strong taste for the bawdy, a very easy association with the facts of life. Of course, this approach to life was very repellent to the religious-mind- ed Scottish Presbyterians of the period. So you have these two types of Scots developing. On the one hand, you have the religious, the frugal, the thrifty, the indus- trious with all those character- istics we fondly believe are typical of the Scottish people. On the other hand you have the masses of the people, incapable of conquoring their adherence to ale, other strong drinks, with their love of the ordinary pleas- ures of life. Also you find a remarkable difference in intellectual ap- proach. A large section of the Scotish people with their roots in the past, today, are associat- ed with the labor movement, as- sociated with the radical move- ment, associated with great her- etical and free-thinking tradi- tions. ~ The remarkable thing is that here you have two totally dis- similar groups, dissimilar except in the fact that they are both human beings and this man Rob- ert Burns is hailed by both of them as their native bard, the most revered figure in their lit- erature. And they reach into Burns and select those texts which they feel are most ac- ceptable in confirming the par- ticular feeling which they have about life. This is the Scotland into which Burns was born. You iemember what happen- ed in the eighteenth century. In 1715 the Scots rose in defense of the Old Pretender. That ef- fort was defeated. In 1745-6, they rose under the Young Pre- tender and in this struggle in- fallible artillery settled the question and the clans from the highlands standing out on the plains were mowed down by the English cannon. The clan sys- tem was destroyed as an effec- tive system in the highlands. In the lowlands, we come to the time only 13 years after the bat- tle of Culloden Moor, on Janu- ary 25, 1759, when there was born into the very humble home of a Scottish peasant family, Robert Burns, who was destin- ed to become the most illus- trious figure Scotland has pro- duced. You wouldn't have thought from the home in which Burns was born that he would achieve this eminence. I want to give you a picture of how Burns de- scribed this home. He said “he was born in the most humble of circumstances.” His father had a farm and the land was the ston- jest and as sour as any in Ayr- shire. He had a large family. Robert was the oldest son and his father was able to give young Burns only the most elementary of schooling. Burns was extremely interest- ed in his studies. He was avid about acquiring a knowledge of the use of both the language of the lowlands and also of Eng- lish. He was compelled as he en- tered his teens to give up for-- mal studies and take his place in an effort to wrest a living from the soil of this melancholy farm in the lowlands. Burns at a very early age be- came strongly addicted to poe- try, particularly that of Allan Ramsay and Robert Ferguson. He had their volumes in his pocket as he walked behind the plow. It was his desire to, give to the Scottish people in the language of the lowlands some understanding and appreciation of the great antecedents and the present condition of Scotland. In his political sympathies very early he associated himself with the Jacobite tradition not because he loved the Stuarts but he loved the Hanoverians much less. He wrote some early poetry where he expressed these Jaco- bite sentiments. He became known among his neighbors as a young man — well, he was known among them for a variety of reasons — but among them was as the young man tinkering with verse, producing poems. Some of them suggested, this was on to 1786, that he should publish a book of these poems. We haven't heard anything like this in Scotland, they said. There’s something about your poetry that we like. There’s one remarkable thing about your poetry—that people who ordina- rily are not attracted by poetry, who think poetry is pretty dul! and repellent, like your verse. There’s something about the sen- timent of your verse, something about the humor in your verse, the cunning way that you phrase things in the lowlands’ speech, a catchiness. We think other peo- ple in Scotland will like to read your poetry. Why don’t you print it in a book and make it avail- able to the Scottish people be- cause we think you are the great national poet that Scotland is looking for. So Burns said, all right, I'll look through them. He thought he’d do it because he remem- bered he wrote certain poems that the kirk might not approve of, so he set those to one side. He took the poems that might pass muster, theologically, and he went to Kilmarnock and spoke to John Wilson, a printer there. He said will you print me a book of poems. This is the most fam- ous volume of Scottish poetry— 612 copies was considered en- ough to slake the poetic thirst of Scotland at three shillings apiece . . I haven't told you all about Burns . . . he was not a model person, he was a person of strong and ardent nature. He was raised in a society where drinking was very common, where illegitimacy was a very common thing. This is the part of Burns that people dwell on. But this is not the essential part of Burns. What lives today is the legacy of Burns, his poetry, his songs, this great expression of his worth, his independence of mind. I think Burns is best express- ed by two lines he wrote when he looked at life and the glitter of life and he called attention to a strutting lord who passed him by, saying: The man of independent mind. He looks and laughs at a’ that. Language part of national struggle language crisis in Que- eC ‘according to a declaration i the National Committee of te Communist Party of Que- €¢ Which is being sent to the €gislative Committee in Que- an integral part of the of the French-Canadian for its self-determination, Sovereignty of Quebec and including separation, Majority of the Quebec sire it. The Communist ‘Quebec has many times itself for the sovereign- Quebec, for the right of ench-Canadian nation to rol of. its own state, of momy, of its culture and b, and to decide without tion whether or not it . be associated with eaking Canada in one and if so, in what way.” latement continues: “The domination by the Anglo-Canadian and American bourgeoisie of the French- Canadian nation exerts itself in all fields: political, economic, linguistic and cultural. In this declaration we are concerned with the matter of language where this domination has caused especially painful re- sults, most recently for exam- ple, in Saint Leonard. “Our party supports every ef- fort to encourage the strength- ening and flowering of the French language in Quebec, to remove. every fetter imposed by Anglo-Canadian and American domination as well as by the confessional system of educa- tion. “Precisely as the result of the Anglo-Canadian domination root- ed in the British conquest we declare ourselves against the preservation of all privilege im- posed in favor of the English language, for example: the use of English as the language of work. “We are equally opposed to all forms of discrimination and of coercion, such as the policy of unilingualism. The struggle for the survival and flowering of the national language of French- Canadians should not be con- ducted by denying to the Eng- lish-speaking minority, what- ever its ethnic origin, the free use of its language and the right to education in the lan- guage of choice. We consider as anti-democratic any effort to deprive parents of the right to have their children educated in the language of their choice. It is clear that the solution of the problem of the language of work in Quebec will be the national- ization of all key industries of Quebec now in fact controlled by American and Anglo-Can- adian monopoly-capitalists. But meanwhile, we believe that the workers and other democratic forces should demand that the government of Quebec under- take measures it has refused until now, such as: “That the French language be recognized as the principal and general language in Quebec, and that the policy of bilingual- ism be rejected; “That every collective agree- ment, every directive and in- formation bulletin, every train- ing program, etc. in commercial and industrial establishments be in French, and where necessary, also in English; “That every child have the opportunity and be obliged to learn French adequately as a re- quirement for all diplomas granted by the Department of Education; . | __ PACIFIC TRIBUNE—JANUARY 24, 1969—Page 9 “That where 10 percent of the parents in a school area re- quest a school or classes where the principal language of edu- cation be English, that this right be granted and financially sup- ported by the Government of Quebec. “It is in this way that the Communist Party of Quebec be- lieves it necessary to pursue a policy fundamentally and con- sistently democratic, having as its purpose the defense of the rights to self-determination of the French-Canadian nation in all areas, while at the same time defending the democratic rights, including the choice of language, of those Quebec people who are not French-Canadian. “Such a policy will streng- then the unity of the working- class which is indispensable for the democratic solution of this problem,” Léa am . tvs ier g