The Canadian Magazine, syn- dicated in most daily newspa- pers, for two weeks has carried a story of supposed espionage and subversion written, it is claimed, by retiring RCMP Com- missioner William H. Kelly. The Canadian Magazine is quite evi- dently being used in a large- scale attempt to revive the “cold war.” Ex-Commissioner Kelly repre- sents one of the biggest crime Syndicates in Canada: the anti- Communist racket. This cheap fabrication is aimed at heading off the rising tide of social ‘pro- test, at dividing the working class, farm and reform move- ments, at diverting the peace movements, and so forth. Why does the capitalist press, from time to time, print articles designed to torpedo movements for reform, and to descredit the people connected with them? The capitalist “free press” is attempting to scare and intimi- date the people, and their move- ments for social reform. The capitalist press has done nothing to get the U.S. imperialists, charged with genocide in Viet- nam, into the dock. The remarkable similarity be- tween the dirty job the RCMP’s Kelly does, and the role of the FBI’s Hoover, confirms that the FBI and CIA not only operate in sCanada, but also influence the strategy and tactics employed by the RCMP. Kelly’s story follows hard on the heels of a press interview given by RCMP Commissioner William Higgit, in which he pub- licly instructs Canada’s parlia- ment to go easy on recognizing the Chinese People’s Republic; and a press story that the newly appointed director-general of Security and Intelligence has the express job of “shaking up the RCMP,” and tightening up its security efforts, particularly with respect to Quebec. Kelly trotted out assertions, which have been discredited long since, that,there was a “‘spy ring in Canada in 1945, exposed by Igor Gouzenko, which showed a definite link with the Commu- nist Party.” The government pre- tended that Gouzenko’s story proved that the Communist -Party is guilty of espionage. Kelly also claims that even the U.S.S.R.’s Dynamo soccer team is made up of secret agents! He trots out the threadbare claim that the Communist Party of Canada is financed by the U.S.S.R. Ex-Commissioner Kelly is careful to avoid any reference to the fact that, in the trials un- der the discredited Section 98, the Crown and the capitalist press started out with a similar claim, but under the weight of the evidence, the Crown Pro- secutor was compelled to dis- avow the assertion. There has never been a case in the 49-year-history of the Communist Party of Canada of its ever having been charged with such a violation of the law. It is a fabrication by the ene- mies Of the working class. There is no such thing as a Communist conspiracy. The Com- munist Party represents a legi- timate movement for social change. SS The main basis for the charge that the Communist Party is linked to espionage is the case of Fred Rose, a former Commu- nist MP. A _ doctor, Raymond Boyer, was alleged to have trans- mitted the formula for manu- facturing R.D.X., an explosive, to Fred Rose in 1945, concerning which the McCarthyites concoc- ted a whole legend at that-time that he had transmitted these so- called “secrets” to the U.S.S.R. He wasn’t convicted on that charge. It transpired at the trial that full information as to the manu- facture and use of RDX had been made public on several oc- casions before. The detailed for- mula for its manufacture had been published in full in a scien- tific journal in the United States. Its manufacture, during World War II, took place in a factory involving hundreds of workers who had knowledge of its in- gredients. Dr. Boyer was finally convic- ted on the technicality that he had discussed something with PACIFIC TRIBUNE—DECEMBER 12, 1969—Page 6 ATEtADTTELLAREA LATE AHTTTHATTEATTHA Fred Rose—R.D.X.—that was classified as ‘‘secret” and was, therefore, “technically guilty” of violating the-law. In June 1946 Fred Rose was tried and sentenced. After he had been sent to jail, a Royal Commission admitted that he had never done anything wrong. Fantastic as this may sound, this is the actual case, well known to Canadian officialdom and to the RCMP. THE ATOM SPY HOAX REBORN The background to Canada’s so-called atom spy plot took place in 1946, showing all the earmarks of having been care- fully arranged. Two-and-a-half weeks before Winston Chur- chill’s speech, which ushered in the ‘cold war,” at Fulton, Mis- souri, in March 1946, the sensa- sational story was broken that a number of people had been de- tained by the RCMP in Canada as spies. The Canadian government an- nounced that “information of undoubted authenticity has. reached the Canadian govern- ment which, establishes that there had been disclosures of secret and confidential informa- tion to unauthorized persons, in- cluding some members of the staff of a foreign mission in Ot- tawas 3’ Later events prove that gov- ernment statement false. The government went through the motions of setting up a Royal Commission, composed of two judges. : The Royal Commission claim- ed that the revelations came from a former clerk in the Soviet Embassy at Ottawa, Igor Gou- zenko, who had defected to Canada. Thus an ertire foreign policy for Canada as well as the preparations for the right “at- mosphere” in the United States, which included the murder of the Rosenbergs, were all based on the uncorroborated and du- bious evidence of a single ques- tionable individual. The Royal Commission, at one point, went so far as to say that “membership in Communist or- ganizations, or sympathy to- wards Communist ideologies, was the primary force which caused these agents to agree to do the acts referred to in their individual cases.” Although this is an opinion— a charge — it is unsubstantiated by fact. The Commisioners’ re- port contained the accusations. The charges and corroboration proved to be another matter. The Royal Commission, claim- ing that its charges were based on documents Gouzenko had al- legedly stolen from the Soviet Embassy, never at any time said, or even attempted to prove, that those documents had anything to with espionage—a peculiar omission. It is this opinion that, as it were, puts the cap on how false the government’s statements were. =: The Royal Commission was compelled, later on, to change its statements and to admit that there had been no atomic spy- ing. This was confirmed by Prime Minister Mackenzie King, who said, “This espionage business has not arisen out of the atomic bomb in any way .. .” : That these moves were well prepared is shown by the fact that when this news broke, the New York Times’ correspondent in Ottawa said he could get nothing but confusion from the = government.-officials to whom he spoke, but no less than 2,000 miles away, Major General Pat- rick J. Hurley of the United States said it was known before the end of the war that there had been a leak of atomic ener- gy secrets to the Soviet Union. The same day, the chairman of the House Committee on Un- American Activities, a commit- tee that publishes unsubstantiat- ed and uncorroborated anti- Soviet materials as though they were Official documents, said that “a Communist spy ring had been uncovered in Canada. . and is working through various Communist front organizations.” At the same time Cyrus Sulz- berger in the New York Times of : March 21, 1946, said that “the scare momentum of pro-Soviet feél worked up during the wat 4 support the Grand Alliance ha continued too heavily after armistice . . . For this reas . . . a campaign. was. worked i to obtain a better psychologi g balance of public opinion to pel mit the Government to adopt harder line . . .” It was incons?” quential to the capitalists ™ many lives they ruined, OF many people they destroyed: i John O'Neill, science editor” the New York Herald Tribus on March 24, 1946, characte!” ized the Canadian governmé anti-Communist forgery 45 farcical bit of diplomatic foonery is being staged to Pf ide apparent justification f0 military control group—a % i$ in Canada so ludicr that it is a laugh to all but the most gullible... .” A One day before Churchill 4" Truman appeared together Fulton, the Royal Commis publicly issued a statement the effect that “a network of dercover agents had been OFg* ized and developed by members of the staff of the Soviet bassy at Ottawa under dil" instructions from Moscow : ° ri Churchill’s speech, plane months ahead, contained © theme that the Soviet Unio demonstrated bad'faith, that hopes of cooperation in post years had. been «dashed- ground, and that the sharine atomic information with U.S.S.R. could not concei be thought of—thus starting * cold war, and a process of 4 mic blackmail of the soclé camp. This was the real reason ft the spy scare. 6 Although Gouzenko listed ” persons as spies, in 16 cases be charges were finally found t El unfounded. Gouzenko’s so-call@” information did not provide direct identification of a siné one of the 26 accused pers? nor of their actions. ~ For his services in this shady affair, Gouzenko got a $10U" month lifetime annuity. Army recruiting hit The Congress of Canadian Women, Winnipeg Chapter, sent the following letter of protest to the Winnipeg School Board over the signature of its acting secre- tary, Mrs. A. Thorpe: “We note with alarm press re- ports that Guidance Department heads in high schools are going to take part in a tour of Cana- dian Forces bases in western Canada. We believe that this is not in keeping with the purpose for which guidance counselling was established in our school system. When guidance counsel- ling was introduced it was a real step forward calculated to make the adjustment from school] leav- ing to entry into work vacations smoother and less painful for the student. It was intended to replace the old system of cast- ing the children out of school to sink or swim on their own. To - introduce the concept of prepa- ration for military careers is © trogressive. Many parents wo¥ be opposed to a military cate for their children. They } enough problems coping outside influences on their © dren without having to © tend with undesirable influen¢ which could emanate from judicious use of informati about such careers and wh could become tantamount — recruiting campaigns in schools. “In our modern society thé are plenty of specialized J? through which young people be directed to peacetime care® i which will help build a creatiY” country. The Canadian Fore are quite capable of handl! their own publicity concern! their training programs. We 4 opposed to guidance counsel? disseminating such informati in schools.”~