Wednesday, September 28, l994 Meeting Room No. 2 2580 Shaughnessy Street, Port Coquitlam, BC 5:00 p.m. RERSQIIHEr. IN ATTENDANCE CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Iggdg: LFGACY BLUE LABEL DRAIN LINE MANAGEMENT Pi:OGRAM DRAFT DOWNTOWN CONSIDERATION PARKING STUDY - COMMENTS KBhLU1: 1995/96 PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL BUDGET ZKhLIE NORTH ISLAND ROUND TABLE BHP LANDFILL PROPOSAL Supponlng Documentation - Volume H Additional Studies Out-of-Region Disposal (For Information Only) ITIIM V: 1993i94 ANNUAL REPORT - COMMISSION ON RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT GXhi VI: B.C. HYDRO REPORT - AUGUST 1994 (For information only) ITEM vll: (yrrER BUsINEss ate ntu null FOR SEP2 8 ggI I@iaiiiiil $ I 'p IR'H / ulleaswl P IN'lgllgg gj,":,''%C flea sasigllg =maii = e S IW ill II I e g 8 essa — — . — = ' I I I iu I i I ' 5~i:= — Ih11R Nik ' jj jlfC ~~i i~Meliggllg-"j::-.tatm ill$ 15'ij Ilj ~ g~~ -: ',~ uta + s I I I s at s I%I g a i irgg~[~ttatt Bnl sats — -'— - —— ~ ' ' bE 8 ~ &I ~SR y aa IRRRMS —— THB CORPORATION OF THE Cfi'Y OF PORT ENVIRONMENTAL CQQ~ FR~ON COMMITTEE MINUTES A a&ecting of the Environmental Protection Committee was held at City Hall, 2580 Shaughnessy Street, Port Coquitlam, on Wednesday, September 28, 1994 at 5:00 p.m. in Meeting Room ¹2. In attendance were: Councillor M. Gates, Chair F. Cheung, Project Engineer C. Deakiu, Engineering Secretary The minutes for the Septen;ber 7, 1994 Committee meeting were considered, read and adopted. Curried ITEM I: LEGACY BLUE LABEL DRAIN LINE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The Committee agreed with staff recommendations to clean grease traps and intervals sufficiently request to ensure their proper functioning and use of drip enzyme, chemical treatment or any other treatment in a grease trap with the objective of causing fat, oil or grease to flow through the interceptor and into sanitary sewers should be named and made illegal. Conunittee would also like to have time frame set for maximum time allowable between checks. Project Engineer to get back to Committee with agreeable time limit. ITEM IL DOWNPQWN PARKING STUDY Committee asked that Development Cost Charges be considered for parking. Councillor Gates also asked that dte City consider charging hrdf the fees for service groups like the Legion, Elks Hafl etc. since most of their money raised is given back to community. The above two recommendations shaH be added to the original list. ITEM HI: I995ff96 PROPOSED ENVIRONAL BUDGET For information. NORTH ISLAND ROUND TABLE BHP LANDFILL PROPOSAL For information. 1993/94 ANNUAL REPORT COMMISSION ON RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT — IR,, For information. ITEM VL B.C. HYDRO REPORT For information. HX54 VIL OffHBR BUSINESS a) B.C. Youth Soccer - Donation Committee approve I donation of $ 120 towards a green advertisement in their souvenir program for the Mini-Soccer Festival. ) SEP 2 8 lg04 II IRllI I tw I 'ills" I eu II)([ ~I Iimautur's illa gl I%4 ',I Environmental Pmtection Comminee Meeting of September 28, 1994 Cont'd ... b) PLA Annlication for Environment Areas Councillor Crates asked that the Project Engineer check into application requirements for environmentally zoned areas. Would like to know if the application is removed will the environment be affected? How?. There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 5:40 p.m. Counctifor M. Gates Comtdittee Chairman Project E JEY/cd NOTE Minutes not read and adopted by the Committee until certified correct by the Chairman's signature. Mayor and Councillors City Administrator City Engineer Project Engineer Project Technician [ ~I & I R I I'I l Ii'ln/ 3Ej'2 s %4 III I@, " '.z aL- ~tIIliiir &k,~ SllE .- satncstw.""- — ---- ' /&@I~~ ~ [mls lintIIItIsI tnnanaaIII gp — — Nail -"gl ltiNIF atttan '- I Jl sl ~ Ilti g~~ ' —,~aj~jW — tl ~at ~tl lail' --~X,I I alum .. )III THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM TO: Environmental Protection Committee DATE: September 09, 1994 FROM: F. K. K. Cheung, P. Eng. Project Engineer FILE No: EPC SUBJECT: LEGACY BLUE LABEL BRAIN LINK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM RRt .OMMFNDATION. 1. That Committee receive this memorandum for information only. 2. That Committee consider reviewing the current City Bylaw No. 830 Section 18 that: lh Grease traps shall be cleaned at intervals sufllciently frequent to ensure their proper functioning and certified from an approved vendor that it carried out the cleaning service. Use of drip enzyme, chemical treatment or any other treatment in a grease trap with the objective of causing fat, oil or grease to flow through the interceptor and into sanitary sewers should be named and made illegaL BACKGROIJND Sc COMMKNTSt The attached letter and report from Clemco Industries Inc. was referred to the Environmental Protection Committee from Mayor L. Traboulay. The report documents the evaluation of the Legacy Blue Label drain line management program compared to traditional pumping system which grease, from a food services establishment, is pumped from a grease trap and transport it ofl'-site to municipal treatment facilities. The Legacy is a program that uses biotechnology to reduce waste to create environmentally-friendly byproducts (carbon dioxide and water). Essentially, the report concluded that the Legacy program is a superior system (environmentally and economically) than the traditional pumping system. The report also outlined several recommendations which the City can review and may consider incorporating into the existing City Bylaw No. 830, namely: Grease traps shall be cleaned and certified from ar. approved vendor that it carried out the cleaning service. Use of drip enzyme, chemical treatment or any other treatment in a grease trap with the objective of causing fat, oil or grease to flow through the grease trap and into sanitary sewers should be named and made illegal. I~I jiIM= i~Is „...iljl ,,8 ijli e These two recommendations are worth considering since the City do not monitor or regulate the frequecy or adequacy of grease traps cleaning of food services establishments. The grease in the grease trap, if not regularly cleaned, will create a blockage problem in the food services establishment's own sanitary sewer line as well as the City's sanitary sewer. In addition, the use of drip enzyme, chemical treatment or any other treatment in a grease trap, which permits fat, oil or grease to flow through the grease trap, could also create blockage problem in the City's sanitary sewers. F'. K. K. Cheung, P. Eng, Project Engineer 'liiiiijjj gEp 2 g Sq/ tmjnja+iaRSiIIII IwgjIIljjjgi5.'3,''""i 8!Bll I', I I p 8 .. „'sujjl ~ ~ ~&r Ill I' ' I Ilplj[~ I ll IITI(ll —— tall sl' — I I fj~&,t sa&seel'~I- — =—:=. ''", ~ I ~ flw K'jIII'll '''p~~ I'll j % t I I c -- aeama & .. 8 'sla lass m gYifq ~ No. {qbO, OcfomZ& f966 STORAGE AND HANDLING OF tJTENSILS. ETC: 17.:a) All utensils and equipment after clesnino and bactericidal treatment, single servzce items, linens and cloths, snail be stored in a clean, dry 'anitary place protected from files, dust, olash. or orher contamination, and shall be handl d at all times so as to prevent contamination by contact with dusty surfaces, finoers, used foods or waste marerial of any kino.. r (b) Utensils such as spoons, spstulas, dippers, or scoops used for dispensing WASTE DISPOSAL: Frozen desserts, shell be keot clean and sanitary. 18. All plumbing shall be {a) All waste materials shall be disposed of properly. designed, installed and maintained so as to prevent contamination of water supply, food, drink or equipment. In and about every food establishment there shell be provided and maintained suitaLle location on the property a suf ficient number of garbage cans, equipped with tight fitting lids to prevent access of Flies and vermin, and they shall be washed at intervals sufficiently Frequent to maintain them in e sanitary condi t ion. (b) in s (r) All plumbing, drainage and sewerage f'scilities shell be constructed and maintained in accordance with Bylsws of The Corporation of the City of Poz Coqui t 1 am. s (d) Waste water from refrigeration equipment shall discharge into sn open or drain properly trapped and sewer connected; provided, however, that where sewer connections are not available, clean and adequate water tight drip plans may be used. (e) Grease traps shell be cleaned at intervals suf'ficiently Frequent to ensure their proper functioning. 88 ~! REF'RIGERAT ION: ! 19..(a) I Adequate- tefrigeration shell be provided for all perishable Foods. (b) All refrigerators shell be maintained in a sanitary condition and free From musty, putrescent or other disagreeable odours. No meat shell ba stored in direct contact with shelves or walls. ~KIRI ~a@I (c) All perishable Foods or beverages shall be kept ot or below 50 degrees Fahrenheit except when in the opinion of the Medical Health OFFicer &ower temperatures are required. P.ji~ rozen food storage shall be provided in accordance with the reouirements oF the Pegulat iona governino Frozen food lockers of the Province of Britisl Columbia. @IIII IIII'yweidll ',d) F 'ei 'ccurate thermometers shall be provided n averv rairioerattr unit. IS ejee'eai '"=m w x mm m m Wlh III m 5$ 5%a I 5R %{ I & 'l'ji IRIIWI R R&+ x — ~ un»~ IE 8 ~ w I '': — 'R ({i~ jj )ugf! &'&s a ~ ~ us) ~ ~+z ' " = 5~& &&I I liiww .. — - 'l m swamis'' ll!Illl III I r CIIY I.cs l,.~';",OOOITLAM Clemco Industries Inc. ~$ & 110 -4471 No.6 Rd., Richmond, BC.,V6V 1PS, Tnl (604) 244-1116, Fax (Sac/At-1117 c. .C OOOOOOOOOOO Fc.. August 19, 1994 Honorable M. Traboulay The Corporation of the City of PORT COCIUITLAM 2580 Shaugnessy Street Port Caquitlam, B.C. V3C 2A8 Dear Honorable M. Trabaulay: Each day Vancouverites consume ty billion litres of water. That's more than any other major city in Canada. There needs to be a concerted effort by government and industry to conserve and protect our resources. If not, municipal and industry experts predict we will need to secure new water sources by the year 2005. Government, industry and resid nts must work together to remove harmful rontaminants from municipal waterways. Grease is ane of the mast costly contaminants to remove from municipal treatment equipment aad sewer system backups. In the Lower Mainland, more than 5,000 fmd service establishments dispose of thousands of litres of grease into waste interceptors and transport it oif-site to municipal treatment facilities. The process is often noisy, unsanitary snd does not break down the grease into natural elements. At Clemco Industries Inc., we believed that waste could be treated at the source and reduced into natural elements. II II! For the past seven, months, we have conducted an independent study to test the LEGACyvsu Blue Label Drain Line Management Program in a large multi-national chain resmurant. The program uses biotechnology So reduce waste to create environmentally-aiendiy byproducts (carbon dioxide and water). The results prove the LEGACrxsas program to be an effective waste management tool for the food service industry. ll have included our preliminary results, trial design and program information. We have also included information about what governments are recommending to meet the challenges af waste management in the I'uture, Ir'ia millmmnI I mps li'--- tsn pins 'e R.w ail'g aim n sl ssI l all« iaatlnl / ""- mmIqr Sruini~ —- SEP 2 8 Ig(Ii gi~ ~amRlgfl/ i 8881 mraulnn e'' '".-" — I )gI/ISIIBQIlsft i . ilr I lii ii i)i If g I su lllliiii It ir II lllI 8:: I: .lU!ign— a=-a !~'-r --- — ==' -a m I I =:I au I = =-- =-= 'III ~ . ~Kniinssub ina "--'aa mani iimlllni I ui nm ~aan xi — a 'l '"ss181'am'7' Ill ~ '=. gllllsll illh 'Il&e uuimr'IWTtas'~ "aiIIill«liiiI8!ellgilli6 sn " -'':=un ~~ ' uuir nil Kl — ''" '' I St orr a ra ii «aaluas, I I " 6 i li --- -'=IIh ~ s= ml a sn", '' =: '; IuuiiisitIl --8,'r — BIIIl gII '" ! — — .. ~ I Ili Per a more comprehensive copy of the trial or more information ah on! the p eagre, please call, fax or write to: Mr. Ken Rattray Director - Marketing and Sales Clemce industries Inc. Unit ¹110 - 4471 No. 6 Road Richmond, ILC. V6V 1PS (604)244-1116 or (604)244-1117 (fax.) We believe that the LEGACY program provides a stmng eavimnmentagy-fiiendly alternative to traditional pumping or grease treatments. Ken Rattray Director - Marketing and Sales Enclosures I'Iflllg~ll ll)iiiiijj s t IP I llltLIII!i!IIII mia I-:: ls 0 ill &111 ='I ~ ~:-'~t%ll;.-;=: I '="- Il 1$ ~g Iniit= ~ W!P~smt'n:,-~~ g'$ /5! I illnIS 0 !! I Mlle~lltlai ' II . ~ $ 1'Itc ~ ~ i I I a R, - ' ~F tls! I%II : ~ - ' mm smt — @ ,—ea lit~ III] g~, '' stunsalar '." .". 'rscnlolitgi — ++ 0 l am '~ ''., '' jI&m -'-. — naa&xllgg',',0 unseal i!xiii &~i tgIsntn& mp!iR¹gilR(i li i; ttg~ g joe~ »—;;!I Uul ~ !,„..., S Iglgg ! ';,.ss!" =i --=-- - ll L~ .:'''! = . . —,,, 'nrm lilt)III(II~~ /! tg ~ggjg~~~~~ ii~-,:c:-"- ==-.",AlIIIILI(K—= :-=IN I NL"-''. :== ~"—.-.~„ia =-. —. ri i c -- ' ' " I Stt g ...-.- ~ "~ -=.'==='.=-'Iiul~g(g =-".-.. Government and Industry Working Yo Protect Bur Future... Today, the Greater Vancouver District (GVRD) has recognised the need to protect and conserve its water supply. The GVRD's Ly million residents, as well as businesses are consumiag a billion litres of water a day. Experts predict that new sources will be needed by the year 2005, i the demand continues. (Source: Vancouver Sun, July 17, 1994). Canadian The need to conserve and protect the water supply extends beyond Vancouver. residential water use is two to three times more than some European. countries. 'Estimates suggest that by the year 2001 water use in ail Canadian municipalities will doable. (Sources Municinal Water fasces in Caaada. S. Meakia, c 1993). Municipalities wig need to adopt new approaches to waste management. New treatments and technologies will need to be investigated from biological processing to reducing waste on-site. S. Meakin suggests that biological processing is the mast eKcient way of removing organic matter from municipal waste waters. The Canadian The federal government is concerned about the future of our water supply. environment ministers have set a natioaal goal to reduce waste by 50 per cent by the year 2000, It also encourages governments to promote the development and demonstration of water-saving iiiSIHIE INtiii f% j~lst and non-pollotiug techaologies. s tel The Canadian Council of brdnisters of the Enviromnent (CCME) has acknowledged that pollutant IIIIIIR/ lilWWIAIIIi prevention is a more effective way to control waste than treatment or cleanup. I Ifiii SEP 2 8 l99)t n s s va I I st s msinsuu5 "- Iiw I] ,i =t It at sI i I! = . II Ik il - ' , I%I ; m - ii m 1 51 ~ " ~'fju""" '""IPI%dl jjll lf I in gy~i sssmut ~ gm as)nl lm i/gz gggg/glll EIIISISes '' -=~ "-"':==--- , . ''" y~iwiI i~wasetrtt' ~ ' +I alma tule ll="'--=-g lIii'' f '-: ' l 1""'ijh gili@ I 'l lg s ' I [I g jfjf/ I . ] I Ip ~ 9 Kl u I ~ tn 0 'l(Ili tII tmw ill lip,)gg[g II1llii " ',".~wi«gts hI I liiemts g llhlh w)LtnsssssssdiRIIR~ l™C -uu smi8 jI j -"- There is a need for governments to anticipate and prevent pollution. In the 90's, governments must have an effective program of pollugon management. They must prevent, control aad clean-up waste to protect the environment and work towards smtainable development. The CCME is asking governments to provide leadership and suppon for pollution prevention initiatives by developing public policy and implementing programs. The CCME has developed a framework to represent their new direction (see below). PREVENTION PREVENTION CONTROL 'ONTROL CLEAN-UP CLEAN-UP REACTIVE APPROACH PRO-ACTIVE APPROACH (Traditional Pocus) (New Direction) A responsible pro-active approach to pollution management according to the CCME will: minimize or avoid the creation of pollutants; avoid the transfer of pollutants from one medium to another (i.e, pumping and other waste management techniques transport waste from one location to another); accelerate waste reduction or eliminate pollutants; . minimize health risks; prometn the development of source reduction technologies; use energy, materials and resources more eificiently; minimize costs for environmental enforcement; limit future llcbility avoid costly clean-ups; promote a more competitive economy. Illm I-': ~ sat''(IIIII — ~, i ( 'e, -= ',ig II'' 'lgilj l«mu:==,;, ' —..''~" lii ".:; .. . -~nmm "«e«g~ gltg~tl smumtsiltaghgg 5 lr, — -- '~Iliia.i fl .— nissi 11IR g — — — .-=' m''E -"" -" . sf - :leis IselnllgIln =. «",,gill.lms'"- — -.- " I l IIIIII ~-~=='guns« snn(iRI thcttons tnclude: sting the use of toxic chemicals; pt of treating waste "at the source" or at "the earliest stages of s any concepts, plans, policies, products, projects and piocesses. continuous process incorporating opportunities for improvement ological developments. vernmeuts to recognize and promote successful pollution mments to form psrtnerships to achieve pollution prevention introduced s Framework for Discussion on the Environment. Canada the worlds most environmentally-friendly country by the year mments to support innovative science and technology. II =; . —=M RR I s= I II%1 IIItg IIIIIiIma Iga Sui 1 Wl gt P ! ll I I 1 IINIgll! I@I i KiiiittIi 1(I i sr w&nwwI Ri I! kf! / J L asl I IRvtl SIAM a' I 8EP 2 8 eIIi. Ill I Slu Ig, inn pglRRSII155ISM'WQJIQQI 'll!+III¹',1!~. pfp .-- -.: HIIIIIl 1111la ssl - - ttmst aiba ttwnt.!sNII — - —. 'l I & L 1! S&neaai /II I — E 55511 1 lg — — L — — lg sant s ~ ~ aa !, — .. ~ en~1 g'' Kummt '. t g+ ]t ~ ...-.- „," '11 ~~ ! o ~ » ~ - ~ s Inta IL I !stp ' Iltm I Biotochnoiogy Faclt Sheet In Canada, biotech companies are growing rapidly by oEering innovative products and services ta industries. They are making signit)cant investments in research and technology ta provide products aad services to industries such as food and beverage, cosmetics, forestry and miniug These industries are using biotechnology to gain a competitive advantage. Applications include cloning varieties of plants, pracesses in mining of uranium and gold, blood alcohol tests and waste management systems. (Source: Canadian Biotech '89) In 1993, the Canadian Biotechnology 1993 directory provided a regional breakdown of biotech companies by province. ! province Per Cent Bridsh Columbia Albe rat Manitoba Saskatchewan 17 6 2 3 34 29 Ontado Quebec New Brunswick Nova Scotia Newfoundland 3 3 )1 PEI 1 Total 100 (Sources Canadian Biotechaolosv 1993 Contact Iuterastionsl fnc.) Ilail Industrial applications af bioteclmology vie Srst introduced into Canada in 1982. By 1989, 10,600 pradacm af biatechnolagy hsd been developed, distributed and marketed across Canada. More than 200 biotechnology companies were participating in an internantmal industry valued at $ 6 billion. Industry experts predict by the year 2000, sales af biotechnology will be over $100 billiou, (Sourcet Canadian Biotech '89t On The Threshold) ! II III Il llHRh! l~~~ su m l(far ggl g f@RNWI m mmr ~nsnm~~ ~~8%~ &I%8 K ns — s— — g ' — ~ jq gi ~ I 8W I6 ~ n( Tlus chart represents the six major industries applying the latest biotechnology. ~duad Per Cent Health Care Environment Agriculture Food Beverage Aquaculture 38 16 14 9 5 5 13 100 a Forestry Other industries TOTAL (Sourcet Csasdiaa Bietechnolosv 1993 Contact International Inc3 Carmdn hss gained a reputation as a teatLsg supplier of biological products such as hardy winter wheat and pediatricvaccines. (Ssurcer Canadian Biotech'89: On The Threshold) ln 1989, a survey revealed that product sales per employee were higher in Canada than in the United States although research snd development costs tvere similar. Mare Canadian companies were established before their American counterparts. American companies were more likely to invest in man dhcturing facilities than Canadian companies ( as much as eight times more). And, Canadian companies had a greater depeodence on export sales than American companies. (luformsdoa collected from a survey coBected in s cogaborsdve project of Ernst dr Young High Tnchuology Group, Winter House Scientific Pobgcattons, Industry, Science snd Technology Canada snd the National Research Councg) Biotechnology has plsytd a role for thousands of years. Ancient civilizations harnessed wild yeast to make fermented drbtks and leavened bread. Bach generation applied and adapted thc technology to tasks of the day. Today, scientists create domestic breeds of bacteria to manugtcture bio- logical products that perform very speciBc chemical reactions. (Sourcet Canadian Biotech '89t On Tbe Threshold) go For more iufomustion, piease contact: Judy hfcOstrtcb Splash Marketing Communications (604)940-1657 SEP 2 8 199)t t is amslfggBes es"' ~ 1%5 ~ i e — mlg/g Rljg %IS i ~g w~s W 8!C j jill st 'gtf, ' . ~ I ~~Big ii ttmi~g-" — '~g g-gg]JJ' FOK ~MATE RELEASE Innovative, young company introduces biotech products stud service solutions to the food service industry August 12, 1994 — (RIcfrwoÃp, sc) — More than 5,000 food service establishments in the Lower Mainland will gnd "cutting the ivt" easier with the introduction of the LEGAC)tvu program. Clemco Industries Inc., a dynamic Richmond-based biotech contpaay, has introduced a program to help food service operators protect the environment and manage waste. Traditionally, food service establishments have stored fat, oil ard grease in waste interceptors (grease traps located uuderneath or outside tbod service uuablishments). When they become futt, the interceptors are pumped and the waste is delivered to muntcipnt treatment thciiities. For most feed service operators, pumping is expensive and disrupdv to both their cttstomers and statf. Clemco's LEGAC~ program employs the advances in biotechnology to convert:.as:e build-up. Thc teclmology converts the waste into carbon dioxide, water and sediment reducing the establishment's anspoxskle waste (byspproximately 85 per cent.) The result is carbon dioxide and water byproducts which blend aanuully into municipal waterways. The scient management system effectively keeps waste within municipally legislated guidelines. The program wss fmt introduced into the Vancoutux market in January 1994. Within the past six months, more than 200 food service establishments have imtalled the system. "We have received an ~ enthusiastic response trom restaurants in the Lover Mairdand. We attribute our success to a program that I III 'll 8ll,k I combines excellent senrice arit substantial cost savings for our customers," says William A 2emlak, president, Clemco Industries Inc. ~e,~'s I,'5 I I I g¹ ~'lusm g:I-:~i&Iri*==-:-,.= ~~ 8 5 I mm ungf Elhi(II', I 11915 I I m RRI III I IGNI ~ I g 5 ~ Ill INI I II Clsmco Isdusrrtsr Illc I . ~ tutew= I S jmt un tn n Ness rut,gg-- — — = 1vwvas~nm~~ uvv -)mill imsmmtstsg — 0 I IRMRII uuujvt W $ It l IN omit;g am mt estd IS %g — — —., I sI~il ~ ~~~ ~~ im ~~ I g JIjgmjjI li m I s I 1 58 I gl lb I I ~ R~ Clemco customizm the product and service it offers to meet each customer's needs. Bacterial strains are selected to create a product designed to meet the needs of each waste site. Trained professionals visit regularly to conduct extensive tests, prepare detailed reports and answer customer questions immediately. The program also provides a 24-hour emergency service to respond to customer needs'nd to clear backups. Companies who are committed to pro:~zing the environment and remaining within municipal guidelines have recognized the value of the progrun. They appreciate the ser44ce and savings they have received since implementing the program. "Food service operators are recognizing the importance of our program. The company's aggressive pursuit of netv business and marketing hss been responsible for a 200 per cent increase in sales (over the last two quarters). I anticipate that the program will be installed in over 500 food service establishments in the Lower Mainland by the end of 1994,U says Mr. Zemlak Clemco is poised for rapid growth with a network of trained technicians and customer service professionals armed with the latest technology. The company has a history of providing environmentally&iendly products and services to the food service industry. Its product line-up includes waste management systems, as well as natural solvents, degreasers, and decdorizers. In 1993, the company received from IRAP (a division of the National Research Council) to develop additional assistanc environmentally-friendly products. Clemco Industries Inc. is oae of North America's leading biotech companies committed to providing products and services to protect the environment. Hilt 1%1~ -30- igtl Irot more information, please contact: gl l III Judy McOstrich Splash Marketing Communicat! ons I (604)940-1057 L~s [ IIIII' %IIII I ) jw~aeiJ Cfemce Indlnriss fnc. I I & tft gt 1 I I Wliliili P its 1mli ill a 8EP28 $94 I ts alai I sl fllg IP I 5 I IU U I l lnlrII 1 lh 1ttw = i —,; — mneml'. isae ~l e I 4 m peg I 1 ~ I INR$ $ R - ~ wmi % I 0 I ggh ~= Em as a. 1 Rm ~ants n4 QiL, Kis iII ~ aRm )P'g'gp lm ls~ *ls --Ua mateml mll slttzt~ . ~ e Un I I m Ii ~ W~aignt I il a!i gg] H 1'US LEGACY™ Blue Label Drain Line Management Pr~cCreim Grease generated by commercial food preparation can cause significant problems and expense for municipa ities when it enters the drainage system, or is transported for treatment at GVRD facilities. Clemco Industries Inc., has developed a waste management systeni that: eliminates or reduces the grease entering the sewer system; reduces the maintenance required to remove grease &om sewer liners; Isa reduces the chance of major grease blockages; significantl reduces waste that needs to be transported for treatment; helps to protect the water supply; II|III w% save municipalities money; l/im)l save the food service industry money; ~ "'hill@ and, treats waste at the source. S i ' „"K IIIII& a IltR I W aaw i,ii) idyll i ''~lnl~'an aIe Illlll Ri JEIIR '" $ ~i ii m sslla ln" % iIlal ss iaiSI~ R1[~~$ slS~ISgg ~: lsiiialfiIII .— IIRJILII lllIII lhllll I'4 RSSSI INtlIII ut lltl@ip g IIH~ I/I~IRlfi IllllllI Clemco Industries Inc. Conmlalscncse 11D-4471 No.SRoad Richmond,ac,canada VSVIP6 Tun(604)2441116 FAX.(604)244111T Vsncouuaramnehe 110-4471No.SRoad Richmond,sc,Canada VSV(PS Tal. (S04)2441116 FAX:(604)2441117 The LEGACY Blue Label drain line management program. A complete, on-site waste interceptor snd drain line management service performed by our highly trained LEGACY Service Representatives. 24 Hour emergency service for blocked drain lines; regularly scheduled maintenance calls to treat your waste on site using our unique bioremediation process; drainage system design consultation; assessment of the status and compliance of your waste interceptor; assistance with regulatory authorities on your drain line problems; advice on drain line techniques to avoid costly backups; extensive documentation to help you manage your facility at its optimum efficiency; available complementary range of neutral pH cleaners, degreasero, sanitizers snd deonlorizers. Ths puturs is Hers Td)(favl The LEGACY Blue Label program with our proprietary bioremsdiation service is the future for handling waste in the food service industry's drain line system. It: saves money; treats your effluent on site; 'liminates or greatly reduces the need for pumping; avoids drain line backups; avoids municpal fines; reduces or eliminates odors from your drain lines snd waste interceptor, reduces the use of hazardous acid or caustic drain cleaners to protect you and your staff; reduces plumbing costs; eliminates cosily, toxic and ineffective chemical treatment (ie. enzymes, solvents, etc.); siiminates the need for you or your staff to deal with your drain lines or waste interceptor. Inness 3ghgLgsss LE( ACY Blue Lnbsf Bsrvicsg 0 I I 1 611 I LEGACY services over one hundred customers in the lower mainland. Many are muttip)s sits companies, or have mom than one waste interceptor on each site. Our customers range f)om small grease traps that were pumped at up to six months intervals, to high volume operations that were formerly pumping up to twice monthly. The fo))ow)ng types of organizations are typical users: oFast food restaurants sGovemment cafeterias Ill,lIII oHotels ~ Supermarkets sF ull service restaurants aSchools 'Golf courses spubs and bsrsf "Producfs and services to prsserve our natural resources" I II e««sill I ulllldc Dccoml la s )I/I g I. i I') )jtgglljltsses==: (g I'Ilel ass@ $ SSIasIWOO $ (6 7 Dale leased. Auauel 12, 1444 ( II go«as ssnlggme~eln ~ ...~ "- al In Id I aa nn $'O't) 0 o en „ n«neo«mm Ner a, I ace f I I l.:.—.— ii ) I "' ~1 en« .—... la lla ~ -~ill SI)nil tee lola ~I iiliig;s e e«e ~g 'SI ~ e 4 )ly(fc ~ I I -"7N Ij Whv Avoid Poomtaina and Grita~gyg)BC+ The food service industry is required by law to maintain waste interceptors (often called grease cooking fats, oils and grease from entering the municipal sewer system and to maintain certain traps) to prevent effluent standards. Waste interceptors were traditionally pumped (as frequently as every two weeks), and the resulting waste trucked to a specTiic municipal sewage treatment plant for disposal. The problems with pumping are: it is expensive; it is noisy, smelly snd disruptive to both staff snd customers; it only removes waste periodically, snd the trap rapidly fiils again; it doesnot maintain continued compliance with municipal effluent ~ guidelines; restaurant grease is the largest problem in municipal sewage plants because it reduces the efficiency of the bacteria in the plant's digesters (a long time use of bioremediation) and clogs ~ machinery. Drip enzyme treatment is an unacceptable alternative to pumping. Drip programs introduce only enough enzymes to the interceptor to break up the grease but not fully metabolize it. Such programs are discouraged by municipal authorities, who realize that the dispersed grease will recombine to block the municipal system. programs are currently under consideration for bylaw restriction in a number of United States andDrip enzyme Other unacceptable methods which only send the grease problem fariher down the Canadian municipal line indude hot water flushing snd solvents to dissolve the grease. 'ursidictions. Pjroven in the Fieldi Through extensive testing using an independent laboratory, an international fast food chain and the active Involv~ ment of local municipal authorities, we have documented and pmven that the LEGACY Bfus Label program outperforms all other systems currently used to handle food service effluent. The following is a graph cf actual Tots'il and Grease (TOG) results of the LEGACY Blue Label drain agement program as compared tc puInping the same trap monthly. The test site was an international line manrestaurant ln Vancouver yy(tatg.f) ta)ttNosts intercentor was foooneotv oumaed eve rv two wacke, fast food snd the results were obtained by an independent laboratory under the monitoring snd protocol approval of the City of Vancouver. EygtLBBer sixteen weeks on the LEGACY Blue Lehef oroeram. no numnino was reeuired or alsnnedl CODD 0 ~ CNNOONC ~ NINNPWD IT N~ DACT ~ NAVIC ~ \COACT NWDA 5000 2750 2500 2250 E-==-",= ~!ll%'I s Q l)i%(5% 1II lg 1 2000 1750 ~ ~ DWCI + Naoo i 1250 ~ NT IW ~ 0 Et'1a zzc ii F 750 isj 250 lI'Illa''lii 0 I z a z c s s s 'o c e s 4 IIIII $8 Fuff Of W 5nfuf&NIl/I O~ 'I ON IN Nl ~ ' s WT ~ IT 4 0 III I ' I I I I os NllllllltI 1 ' ~0 aoo Rt IIII I El lfN ~ 4 0 i a roe s 1000 ill!I Ig all arq Iaioea Noa w- .. at= — E IIII n : — .— ': — iNI 5 ~ DW 7 ~ iso( res ac oralitkl'S I ~ ON 0 IINf 11'.:— " I IN 115 I H ~ TNT ~ N IRI 1!a sa 11. ": ~ "~ I a oa )a; . „ ~I ~ !1 ~ No vo ~ 4 a Sa ra aat I I 5 ~ 4~ ~ I I a as IE ! 1 1 INooolm N sllliao oa~wlaaa.ii l)Btgtl&lgNIH )B I I I i og Eo No w70 (I(Ill Pl I II 4 I, ~ It) — ee ao wN I N K 4 T~ Il,jmi I ~ ~: ra 4-— IRBaasaso-- -, --- „"..iNI . «,BR Copyright 1994 Clsnlco Industries Inc. .P I I IS g SSI II I ~ ~ I R E% ~ .BWH$ 4 iip1 ~ I EI ~w ~1 I I I 15~ii I~ ' RMI ~ J~Q ~ I ~ MI ~ IRONS ~ M 1 II I ~ IJS I I K Ckmco Industries Inc. acfgwgokdges the strong cooperation of&tdDonaQ's 9i'estaurants ofCanad'a 4imited'nd the Environment&Protection Branch, 9'ermits and 4icenses Department of the City of 'Vancouver in cond'ucting this test. iiiiiIlI Ill! IIN 'mlllm' lmiiIIH $ Copyright 1 gee Clemoo Indesldse Ino. AS rights resenred IIIII II'Ill Pege 2 .". I mreggi = I II rl = — -—- sj s ijjw swlgwwrsew r rlwnwerwr» — — ~II lsleIIW ~ .-== ilISil«e' .:I IIII jig/gmle d.Kllii r se ~ ew'rre t Program SEP28 Pago 3 ~ tive Surnmarv d service industry is required by law to maintain certain effluent ds, The standards in the Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD) out in the Sewer Use Bylaw No. 164 (Bylaw 164). Waste interceptors called grease traps) are the most common method used to prevent fats, oils and grease from entering the municipal sewer system. Waste tors are traditionally pumped and the resulting waste trucked to a municipal sewage treatment plant for disposal. The negative aspects of g are: is expensive; is noisy, smelly and disruptive to both staff and customers; only removes waste periodically, and the trap rapidly filis again; does not maintain continued compliance with municipal effluent uidelines; only bypasses the sewer lines periodically and still moves the waste, 'thout treatment, to a down line treatment facility; staurant grease is the largest problem in municipal sewage plants ecause it reduces the efficiency of the plant's digesters and clogs achineiy. acceptable methods which only send the grease problem farther down cipal line include drip enzyme treatments, hot water flushing and to dissolve the grease. 'ise r'.dustries Inc. (Clemco) developed the LEGACY Label drain line ment program as ths economical environmentally superior altsrnativ. d's Restaurants of Canada Limited was the impetus for Clemco's efforts r ongoing programs to reduce restaurant waste on site. McDonald's and of Vancouver, with the encouragement of the Greater Vancouver District, requested that Clemco undertake a monitored field trial to. rate the effectiveness of the LEGACY program. Clemco agreed to a trial at 8 McDonald's restaurant. This trial would be monitored by the ancouver. A great many of ths guiding principles of Clemco's business are summarized in a document entitled ldll(t(fttionat Commitmsnt to Pollution Prevention by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. These principles broadly provide for a cooperative relationship between industry and government, encouraging voluntary experimentation and implementation first and regulation in a supporting secondary role. piiiiijI IiIiiiIi4ll' 'gism R. ee eg gs a r ~ I Se Copyright 1994 Clemse Ihdusoles Ir&c. All rights reserved Pege 4 The LEGACY 8/rje Label drain line management program is a complete, onsite waste interceptor and non-sanitary drain line management service performed by Clemco's highly trained Service Representatives. It includes: 9 o 9 9 ~ 9 9 9 ~ 24 hour emergency service for blocked drain lines; regularly scheduled maintenance calls to treat the waste on site using Clemco's proprietary bioremediation process; hydrajet cleaning of all drain lines; available pumping service to remove accumulated sediment; drainage system design consultation; assessment of the status and compliance of the waste interceptor; assistance with regulatory authorities on drain line problems; advice on drain line techniques to avoid costly backups; extensive documentation on services performed for management and regulatory purposes; available complementary range of neutral pH cleaners, degreasers, sanitizers and deodorizers. Monthly service charges range from as low as $ 18.50 to $ 65.00 per interceptor depending on services, the number of interceptors on the site and the payment plan selected by the customer. There are approximately two hundred sites in the lower mainland currently using the I.EGACY™ Blue Label drain line management program. The purpose of the test was to evaluate the LEGACY™ Blue Label drain line management program compared to traditional pumping in a field trial, and to provide recommendations to municipal authorities for increasing effluent compliance. A protocol was developed and approved by McDonald's, the City of Vancouver, Bio-Research Laboratories Inc. and CanTest Ltd. iIImIIII1 ',WIN%IIIIII iII~-"- lmeI Ialll III Ilsw- The test was conducted on the waste interceptor at the McDonald's restaurant at Terminal Avenue and Main Street in Vancouver between February 1 and June 28, 1994. This restaurant is reportedly one of the largest voiume McDonald's in western Canada and the interceptor was formerly pumped two times per month at a cost of approximately $ 179.00 per month. A graph of the results of each test parameter (except chemical oxygen demand), as there is no specified Bylaw 164 limit) was developed. The results, based on the grab sample limits in the test protocol, indicate: tota! oii and grease in the effluent was reduced to below Bylaw 164 limit; total suspended solids always remained below Bylaw 164 limit; o pH was slightly below limit; 9 biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) was below the 4000 mglL Bylaw 164 limit that is applicable to the test site, but above the 2000 mg/L limit ~ 9 IsiI IIIIIIIi:.I.'.',& '.;,'.I.'0l filli, i'."'.='..",— I l&lgssri M% I j I Copyrtght 1994 Clsmoo Industrlss Ino. All rights rsssNsd Psgs 5 PEP 2 0 LI)gg WI~ ¹i II1 5. Interceptor pumping can be reduced from twelve times per year to one time per year with a drain line management and bioremediation program. This will result in a substantial reduction in the restaurant grease delivered to Iona Island if applied across the GVRD and assuming that the effluent in the test is representative. IIllll gli'I~& IlitIIII ~st mm la ro fg ssl sm er I iatr mesc~,III'5 9 / III 'III I I '- 4. Just pumping the interceptor even on a monthly basis will not keep the food service establishment in compliance with Bylaw 164 effluent limits on a sustained basis. — =,=; lR 6. Current interceptor technology is adequate to meet or approach Bylaw 164 effluent guidelines if the establishment is diligent in its management of its influent and effluent. 7. Most food service establishments do not have a regular maintenance program on their interceptor or any other type of voluntary program to monitor and reduce their effluent. Reaction to blockage and overflow is a common service approach, rather than preventative maintenance. Iiiiiiwgi ll" ="..-=rm1I Cspyrlght 1994 Cfemce Industries Inc, Atl rights resented 4's~r,I4l,Ia )I I It@-. 8. Drip enzyme treatment and other methods of flushing fat, oil and grease through the interceptor negate the reason for the interceptor in the first place. The result is equivalent to a pipe connecting the establishment's sink directly to the municipal line. 9. With a bioremediation component, it is possible to regulate r'ood service establishments into reducing their effluents while reducing their costs at the same time. A mandate can be implemented that is actually beneficial to the establishment from a financial perspective. Other indirect benefits such as reduced emergency blockages will also be obtained, and the municipality will have a reduction in the number of grease blockages in its own lines as well as a reduction of effluent at its treatment facilities. The following recommendations are made: 1. The use of drip enzyme and chemical treatments in an interceptor, or any other treatment with the objective of causing fat, oil or grease to flow through the interceptor should be named and made illegal under Bylaw 164. Fines for a of treatment and maintenance should be severe, should increment with eachlack occurrence and should be levied immediately on site. 2. Food service establishments should be subject to a bylaw requirement that they service their interceptor every month. The bylaw should initially apply to those establishments that have in excess of twenty seats (or equivalent measure for takeout operations without seating). The bylaw could be structured as follows: 9 based on a "Waste Reduction Incentive" of $ 300.00 per year, to be assessed on the annual renewal of the establishment's business license. ln lieu of paying the Waste Reduction Incentive, the establishment could provide a certificate from an approved vendor certifying that it carried out monthly service on its interceptor, 9 service detined narrowly as pumping the interceptor or maintaining a bioremediation program. This definition could be expanded through industry consultation to encompass other acceptable programs or new technologies; 9 service performed by private sector vendors approved by the GVRD to carry out the work. The establishment could select any approved vendor; 9 monthly interceptor service would include: 9 interceptor service and written rating stored on site; Copyright 1994 Crsmeo Industries Inc. Att rights resented SEP2 jj 5(JJ notation of any interceptor deficiencies from a recommended confiauration developed by the municipality; 9 possible extension to other problem areas, including compactor, rendering bin and dumpster maintenance. 9 This type of program would cost little to administer at the municipal level, as all business license documentation is already generated and mailed. It would save money for the municipality on site as the Environmental Officer or the Health Inspector would not have to open the interceptor, but would only have to inspect the Service Record. The requirement would not cost anything for establishments that were legitimately maintaining their interceptor, as they would be provided with a Waste Reduction Incentive certificate by their vendor. Indirect benefits would include less pollution from pumping trucks ariving around the lower mainland. 3. The tipping fee for restaurant grease at the lone Island treatment plant should be significantly increased. The tipping fes should be consistent with the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment principle that, "There should be an ongoing effort to ensure that prices better reflect ths full costs of pollution, in order to understand the real benefits of prevention." Tipping fee increases of tsn to fifteen times for restaurant grease would not be unreasonable given the availability and cost savings of bioremediation based programs. This preserves the option of pumping and trucking for those establishments that elect this method. However, they should have an economic disincentive to transfer their waste given that on site treatment is now technically and economically viable. 4. Municipal governments should encourage waste generators to experiment in the open, and be prepared to tolerate continuing non-compliance where an organization has voluntarily identified a problem and is experimenting to develop s solution. Enforcement efforts should not be based on whether an establishment meets the current Bylaw 164 guidelines on a single grab or composite sample, but rather on whether that establishment has a program in place to continuously improve its current situation. Enforcement should be vigorous on those establishments that do not meet effluent guidelines and do not demonstrate any desire to improve. aliis III IMII' ~ 1I,'IIIi HILI k%IIll'III Iii ilI li 'I.ltSIIII II s~ I[ ss I % I 1 1 'll Nll I ~ mltr r I r m I ~, ~ Srg S ii I 9 n ~: L: III 1 I~~I Sl Ir S sire'l~ SP IPII; ' PP P U: "-''Sl L I ~ II g I s I.:.19 s I:= ; S I I ~ Il I Lire =- ill I lii ri ppele LppLUMIIQli g fmlmfIii I,'llilliI5IPta -PI I ~,', '' -Uil il58lgg,iii III P\ I ~ I P' ~ Ii II I fm I ll I ~ 1L I'I%III Pege 9 cepyrlght 1994 cremes Indnshles Inn ns nghrs resslsed sg '~'.,'S ii PK . 'Um IIIII'I iittttta ~IIIII INIII I IlsmI g II Clemco Industries inc. (Clemco} developed the LEGACY Blue Label drain line management program as an environmentally and economically superior alternative to pumping and enzyme treatment. McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Limited was the impetus for Clemco's efforts as a result of McDonald's ongoing programs to reduce restaurant waste on site. McDonald's and the City Lmtt||f] y PP g grease would be prohibitively expensive. Drip programs are discouraged by municipal authorities, who realize that the dispersed grease will recombine to block tho municipal system. Other unacceptable methods which only send the grease problem farther down the municipal line include hot water flushing and solvents to dissolve the grease. Iso I I so ms e a!Irol !III"II hl I sr 8 Ilil itf! I!i II rrrrmrms~ohsor o r: P~s Copyright 1994 Ctsmoo Iortosotso Iso. Alt rights rsosNsd 'qadi'li~ 'il 99 I%morris ~ s rr ~- ~rso rrli ~ ' ".:I+g„;: —:-tI =:=5LIIlrrIIj s": ~joro rrrr os II I I I I I I I! I 1 I jl I lit sir I@II~"„@I& iiIil; . » I~ IIII i I SI 'm%1 ~ I'I grtii lil .!1 I'I / I l'lit e ~ 8 } ~-', sisi ~ I I at! ~ sr oil . Still 51% l I I II (~egrigiii [ I ti I i rm s i. of Vancouver, with the encouragement of the District, requested that Clemco undertake a the effectiveness of the LEGACY™ program. a McDonald's restaurant. This trial would be B. A National Commitment to Pot)JJ A great many of the guiding principles of Cle Commitment to document entitled Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environ ~tlonal According to the document, "The Canadian C Environment (CCME) is the major intergover discussion and joint action on environmental global concern. Environment ministers from federal government, and the two territories p a year. They discuss environmental issues, e decisions and establish policy for work to be CCME.s The CCME has developed the following pri 9 All Canadians are individually and col of the environment, and should be inv wherever they have the opportunity to 9 All jurisdictions should cooperate to h approaches to prevention; ~ Voluntary action, regulation and econo and often complementary roles to play in pollution prevention. All approaches for prevention should be considered, with a view to using'he most effective approach, or combination of approaches. Voluntary actions will be encouraged; ftj I L ~ 9 I I Prevention should be considered at the earliest possible point in the development of any concepts, plans, policies, products, projects or pf'ocesses; . IISlfjf ~ flimiiii I Ill ll( jjlj, ~ I'KRI1 ihj 1 I saw ~ I Pollution prevention planning should be a continuing process, incorporating opportunities for improvement on an ongoing basis, such as new scientific and technological developments; Prevention should apply to the entire life cycle of a product, from resource extraction to final disposal (i.e., from cradle to grave); I IISA I Iris ~ s Ills'".l I I ~ fg III II li S lNI I 11 la 1 Page 10 copyrlgsrr 1994 clsmco Indsaalea ino. AI rlghra reserved ~ ISI S I I~ I 9 lal IF I I Il ll Ij III IS Ilii iii Jill% II fiIj Rlmgl Ill j Ialllssss ftssi tmsls ISLIlgn J '8 ill ill 1 II II I 9—' ' 11 r sl lr ~ ' I 9%slag S sl s~ ~I I J I I I rss Jl, I' I I =lraiii la 1 I Im 1 arsml ~ I ~ as Jl 9 I I ~, I I am,isNI f Il]fill' l I,I rg/ 8 "lhj lilffi II sgi sslrlg'j s O I ~ ig I Il IIIII IS II % a There should be an ongoing effort to ensure that prices better reflect the full costs of pollution, in order to understand the real benefits of prevention; o Fuff use should be made of pollution prevention to achieve greater domestic and international competitiveness." The role of government is key and is explicitly defined in the document. It reads, nAII member governments of CCME undertake to advance pollution prevention. The following are some ways this can be achieved: o Show leadership by establishing a climate in which pollution prevention can flourish, and develop cultures that encourage and reward prevention; a Set an example through good stewardship, by keeping their "own houses in order"; field", advance competitiveness, promote behavioral change and ensure that the environment is protected." P il 5 lli liiiiig ig These principles broadly provide for a cooperative relationship between industry and government, encouraging voluntary experimentation and implementation first and regulation in a supporting secondary role. ) MKHlil Clemco provides commercial and industrial customers with environmentally friendly products and services. Clemco's objective is to provide "cradle to grave" i I,'er I Ribs IIIIlili, I products, whereby the customer purchases products or services where the ill) l IR I ar I III ~ ~ I I I'lllifll I I II Si I al 'IIII 'i I, ,ll IIII ~%~la ' 1 IN ili Rlllll C. The LEGACY~ B/ue Label Brain Line lillanaaement Proas~ III s% Re-orient a greater portion of research, science and technology towards pollution prevention; a Incorporate, where feasible, innovative pollution prevention principles into legislation and regulations to support partnerships, create a olevel playing gl'Ilk I Provide the information that citizens need to make informed decisions; a PI1Wli If I I i ~ with incentives to make decisions that further pollution prevention; 1 IIIRI$ I Establish partnerships to enhance the capacity to achieve pollution prevention goals, and to share the benefits an J risks necessary to improve government, business and industrial practices; a Influence the marketplace with economic instruments that provide people 55RRI I'I LI a I copisrghr 1984 Clemso Indusadas fna. Ag rlghls msanrad lain ~~ gI g I I ml 1 I 'e gLR IRli-- ma rs ~ I ~ 1 I I' l l Ls I\ s II la lal I I I sr I I ll I I%I II%,Ll1'P, nr I 1 ILls II il'S I: I ~Ej'z 8 vs~ Pl'III Pago 11 Il .-'- i'll II o I I I I I u —— 1'III all I ' I ii irs I I I II Is Ia I ~ III g I,I .' :II ~ II m , ~ ~ "-— a - ~ „-, ~I 1 sth s sit on me In IIIS by the can be This ng ed in corded on a Service Record and displayed on site. A sample Service Record is provided in Appendix D. All site work is supported by an extensive computer database which records a large number of factors about each customer site, maintenance history and the work performed. These records are available to customers in periodic reports. PI/' IRS Fast food restaurants ~ Supermarkets ~ Full service restaurants II+ l 11 ra . 3 I 5 L911 IO) I I I l i I Ill ~ Copyright 1994 Ctomco fhduohtoo Iho. Att righto rosohrod II ass tlIINI ',= =..; I I 'I 0 l." /l thr«s 'P'' - m... '...=.-.; I. Illalg 1 h It sir sl lnt|rtt; = or ~ i ' I o o. o or rt & aa ~ i a I'',llllll Pogo 12 dl ' 1 ! ':' 'S — ~ ~o II — om ~ I I I —. II -'~ ~ I ~1 rural g 391 III ha Iiio I mr o rorS:" 9 ~ r. '%MR I I I i ..-. idit I tgggl 8 Il! 5ttl1II .-ji rm rrooroo oiliiSII tttNII.- I mi migi ilr 3 5- IIII%'I IINI'I ~ rooa u IlI Iglll IIIi Hotels ~ Pubs and bars ~ Golf courses ~ I~ll'",.," I fig i&Ital'lnlial There are approximately two hundred sites in the lower mainland currently using the LEGACY Blue Label drain line management program. The following types of organizations are typical users: I@IIIII liiii', i 'III'l I I, to i i ; 'mif : ~ rs Iwl ~ on I ooI ~ looloooo o I moosg in designing its program, Clemro sought to provide its customers with an on site disposal alternative, a cost saving and an alternative to traditional pumping. The result was to base the LEGACY Blue Label drain line management program on bioremediation. Bioremediation is the process of using bacteria to degrade hazardous or toxic wastes into benign substances. The process involves selecting and combining strains of bacteria to consume specific waste products. Each strain of bacteria feeds on a particular element or structure in the waste, with the objective to identify and select strains of bacteria to consume all elements that are present in the waste. The bacteria use the elements or structure as a food source, converting the food into water, carbon dioxide and heat while reproducing &II rapidly (counts can doubie every twenty minutes). Upon completion of the bioremediation process when the food is exhausted, the bacteria die and return to the environment. All micro-organisms that are used in bioremediation processes are naturally occurring, non-pathogenic and not regulated because they exist naturally in the environment. There is no engineering of new strains of bacteria, but rather selection effort from approximately three thousand strains that are currentlya available. The number of strains applied to a particular waste may range from three or four to dozens, and the selection process must consider one strain feeding on another as well as the target waste. Master strains to consume a wide variety of wastes are available from a number The microorganisms are stored and shipped either granular or in liquid suspension. Clemco currently obtains its micro-organisms from United States suppliers. Bioremediation is best known in the oil industry, where it has been used for approximately thirty years. Parts of the EXXON Vatdez oil spill were cleaned using bioremediation. of universities and private companies throughout North America. D. Test trumostt mgsgrt ia ski gas .e~ P,-.".-'t.~ )Nl5 eel Ilei I — SlllA si a s 'im The purpose of the test was to evaluate the LEGACY Bfue Lafrel drain line management program compared to traditional pumping in a field trial, and to provide recommendations to municipal authorities for increasing effluent compliance. lgsiiimllli 'm Il II I%I'li $ lia'tIItaII jl I15 11 I 'JJI1 RH! t sat timtm' I II np ~ I iri iii 'Is I ~ Copyrlghl I!$4 Clemoo Indussres Ino. Al rights reserved pari erl ti flit SIIII Iieet 1 Ii I Il ill l islRRII lot iag i '— ra II I 5 IIII ~ i ":; a II» ~ Iri I I Iil I IK s'' ~ i i, Ir I,II II p~as SFPg g (gtjf ' sir I RSI ~~a»v- —. = sa IIIR a I h ta r e se s '=: e ii st W 'zt 8 I In ii ~ I = . Ii I I I !Pea I Rl 4 SI III Wee IIiimll ,'illa',III E. Test Protocol The test was conducted on a fully independent basis. A protocol wa and approved by McDonald's, the City of Vancouver, Bio-Research lnc., and CanTest Ltd. The test was conducted on the waste interceptor at the McDonald's Terminal Avenue and Main Street in Vancouver between February 24, 1994. This restaurant is reportedly one of the largest volume Mc western Canada and the interceptor was formeriy pumped two times at a cost of approximately $ 179.00 per month. The interceptor size is approximately 2000 litres. The irrtercsptor wa and placed into the configuration recommended by the City of Vane the test. This involved the construction of a sampling tee and placem baffles. The first phase of the test was to clean and pump the interceptor, an weekly effluent samples for a period of four weeks. This was the tra pumping scenario used in many interceptors. The second phase of the test was to clean and pump the interceptor begin the LEGACY Blue Lalge/drain line management program. T included the establishment of the micro-organism colony and a main (including maintenance seeding of the micro-organism colony) every along with full management support and training as described in an e section. The program was to run for six weeks with weekly effluent sa was increased to eighteen weeks to provide additional results, igIiiig jm The effluent was sampled by CanTest, with ths sampling process att the City of Vancouver on the basis of a grab sample. A full explanatio terms and the limits is provided in Appendix A. Stampted Parameter Unit of Measure pH -pH units mg/L Total suspended solids Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) Total oil and grease Chemical oxygen demand 5,0-1 mg/L 2400 2000 mg/L mg/L Not spec 600 Ijillk Note (1) The BOD5 grab sample limit is 4000 mg/L for establishments that were operating at the time Bylaw 164 was enacted in 1990. The McDonald's test 1j 1jlm 5 I (I IIII I Ilaljml III I'Ii(II),i Iallii I 'Iftg-'"='= '"I a j II II ,lil "II 9'," ~ 6 I 61 I '' '''I llilll '9 igi Li 1 ~ i ill 9 '=: =.Ia g.'.'9 iiLgti I Iaa 'a~— aisosl ~ 996 Iliis 9lEF nl I, ~ I I I pago la Coplidght 1994 Ciooloo lildosilios illa. AS Ilghls Iasolvod ii/I ~ i! .".!- I i i —;i 6 ~ 6 n5 6 ~ ~ I I ii iaa II gg SJSK ' i gI ' Jl I SIR .. Sa — I i I "mi" ilmi tltlg-'=: = I 99%a~-'i Ii ~ 16 ~ ,ldlllSM "" I & 9 I!,j ill lg 9— ' '" „„„- = = =: si!sl " ~ ', i I I j I ' ah. j I I 66 66 IIIIII J II ~'„ Ijjs'"'"!,''," '' .'.'F llill I i ~ 6 -1 j 1 ~ III sgiigs ls gsg&+Il I I IIIII lil'IHSWIW~'" i jjjsij Ia 'A ~I,& t - '— ::,: tt t I ~ " 6 , I IIIKI I laoal',1 l - - -- — ~i S,IIIII I 96 — —. site was constructed before 1990 and qualifies for the 4000 mg/L limit. This limit will be reduced to the 2000 mg/L for all establishments on January 1, 1996. Additional parallel samples for some weeks were drawn by CanTest under the test protocol and provided to Bio-Research Laboratories Inc. for internal analysis of total oil and grease. A signed test protocol is provided in Appendix E. F. Test Results and Commentarv The raw data from the test results is provided in tabular form in Appendix F. In addition, a photograph of the interceptor on a weekly basis was taken, and the series is available for viewing by contacting Clemco directly. A graph of the results of each test parameter {except COD, as there is no specitied Bylaw 164 limit) follows. The sample weeks during the pumping portion of the test are designated P1 to P4, while the weeks on the LEGACY Blue Label drain line management program are designated L1 to L18. Each graph . contains the following: 9 the relevant Bylaw 164 grab sampie parameter limit; 9 weekly results for four weeks after pumping; 9 weekly results for eighteen weeks after the startup of LEGACY Blue Label service; 9 a four week moving average {4WMA) of each test parameter to smooth results. While Bylaw 164 is not enforced on the basis of a moving average, it is Clemco's opinion that based on the objective of the test, the 4WMA provides a more representative presentation of the actual state in the trap than the individuai grab sample results. In addition, the graph for total oil and grease shows the specific weekly results ~NNNIS f as reported by Bio-Research Laboratories Inc. for analysis of the samples provided to them. Sg ID%~.IK ~g Total Oil and Grease Commentarv IIIIKitsir"Istt This parameter was the main objective of ths test program as reduction of total oil and grease is ths principal goal of the LEGACY Blue Label drain line 0 t Ijlj 111 5 N:-:= t==: sl 85 I 5 I I II management program. Weeks P1 to P4 show that a pumped interceptor exceeds the Bylaw 164 effluent limits after only two weeks . As there is no service to the interceptor other than pumping, it is likely that ths effluent will continue to exceed the Bylaw 164 limits ) )] Rls I fig i Il~= -"=':'-.I I9 5 I III II iihll ~ SEP2 8 jggN; II jinni NN Nt NN Itwarl Copyright 1994 Clsmcs Industries lns. All rights rsssrusd WIN~ /Ills',.—...: == ==--."~ar=&ttttsfft-="== — =".9N~N=. ". ~~est — — ---- —u=)iaSS —— ===; „:,="„W] IIIIII II - ri I ff II II \ 9 lllsI tttltlt " ! ~lr — —— — Ps9s 16 ~ llss &sr 9691 Sl .'s l ' "tul,.!gilttgl ram,Qssusss le Nd U Nulli srlls I l d~ until a subsequent pumping and for this reason the pumping results portion was terminated after four weeks. Weeks L1 to L18 indicate a number of interesting results. First, there are spikes in certain weeks that can be attributed to sampling variability. This is indicated by the difference between the Can Test analysis and the Bio-Research Laboratories anaiysis for samples that were drawn at the same time, by the same individual and under the same protocol. Second, even if the CanTest spiked results are included, the four week moving average returns to compiiance within several weeks. Finally, fourteen of the eighteen weeks sampled were in compliance with Bylaw 164 limits without any averaging. There are several possible reasons for sampling variability. These include the flow through the interceptor, even during a short sampling period, depth differences when drawing the sample from the interceptor, the effect of larger pieces of solids (e.g. grease or fat) which may be included in only one sample and the additional three days required to ship the Bio-Research samples to the United States for analysis. The most important point to note is that during the eighteen week period of the test, the interceotor was not oumoed or cleaned in anv wav. At the conclusion of the test, a buildup of sediment and biomass was occurring on the bottom of the interceptor, but as the test results show, this buildup was not affecting the effluent ieavlng the interceptor. One reason is that the interceptor was properly repaired before the test commenced, including the installation of proper elbows and the allowance of eight inrhes between the bottom of the interceptor and the inlet to the ouNow test tee. As of the date of this report, which was prepared approximately after seventeen weeks, the interceptor continues to function in the same manner as the test results and is not scheduled for pumping. BOD Commentarv BOD levels in the P1 to P4 weeks exceed the Bylaw 164 allowable limit of 2000 mg/L for sites constructed after 1990, but are in compliance with the 4000 mg/L allowed for the test site. BOD levels indicate the same sampling variability as the total oil and grease results. The four week moving average BOD is approximately 3500 mg/L. The micro-organism mix used in the LEGACY Blue Label drain line management program is primarily aerobic and designed to consume fat oil and grease. The BOD5 appears to come largely from material that is not consumed by the current micro-organism mix and that ultimately accumulates as biomass '. '!sal s -'.,iIIII )« Ig llal « «'««j « I I I ~~« I «ssjll! I P«g« 16 II eii ieasui I IRI «IMIII II I , 4 i hlssslslahl~%i«~,; — I I ~ -;,'ill ~ I ~ IW Iie'= ul tg Jttg NII1III ' e sial«« : W ItIISIN ~": ==-— ".= % II (fl Ii I I I I,'lii HM ~ I gf FBI IRIIIl!a««« ~ «« iI~! l I ~~: ~ ~issirPilllll81 ~~~~~7e = ~ ~ 5 ~ Pa» ~l~&IIIIII'~ 5I, ~lg IQgg~& 'gklllllll%IRssmipaiia i~RMIR~~+~+WIISK~4~ ~hals1&Q~ ~~~j~ irwcissililwies ~ly~~/ g(III 5& 5,~~ . gilll 5$ gg ' g g / - - — — . gag~~ —. NIQ R ~~ . ~z, &~~ g ~ ~lp ~~~i5)[p])g~ M] I ==m I I iI Ia a I p — - - — '. mlS sea g a mi i a~fmma& & maes [J I SI~ R1lggg/g Ig ~ LINIS Ildl@l Po aoii Shill 'I Ilgl~mm I . III99 I 4 4 SSSIS ~, IiiI i aiI COPPlght 1 994 CISSICO hldUShhs lhc. Ag dghhl isssfVSd ~~g I(lmh Sama —... =,—:-=: i Iiii! IlliIIIII.'I'E I BM hghsgh ~~gg~eis Psgs 19 ~lll5li~g g[ 'I I II LR I K 8 %Ilail IC II% i~~" lX-I ~ II' Irir I ~ re ~ 1111 LI ~ J.. $ ~ IS ~ 41 1 8"'SI I I III 11 I I I ~ I - ASS S II III L19 ...I I hl I I 448III 4 J $ 81 Fiil J IIII%$ 1 I,I im', li'm i I ill &it ill I i ~ 'II lil i i i 'III & I &h ~ &! ~ 4 44!M ' mI I I I I f444 ii 'I'll P~ .": ! Ihi 'I limni I i 4 & I li I fPiiiii &i!: i ii !1 ll:'- 'I I I '! i! '1 l I I 'gl'$ I I i I t tl ! I I I I ~ I I I' » 'l4' I ~ Wl le I I I I I! I I I G. Conclusions Based on the data collected, the following conclusions are drawn: 1. Bioremediation as oart of a orogarrgytntenance nroaram will keep a food service establishment in compliance with 8ylaw 164 total oil and grease effluent limits on a sustained basis. Ti o effectiveness of the bioremediation is clearly evident frvm the test, as the interceptor was not cleaned and the effluent remained in compliance throughout ti',e test. 2. The LEGACY Blue Labef 1rain line management programs saves money each month on a direct basis for.sn establishment that currently uses or requires monthly pumping of its interceptor. Additional saving occur on an indirect basis through the reduction of emergency blockages. 3. There are opportunities to modify the micro-organism rnx to address a reduction of the BOD levels measured in this test. C!emco is already researching appropriate formulations under its'continuing development program. flRllll Mf I '0 RI I I e 4. Just pumping the interceptor even on a monthly basis will not keep the food service establishment in compliance with Bylaw 164 effluent limits on a sustained basis. 5. Interceptor pumping can be reduced from twelve times per year to one time per year with a drain line management and bioremediation program. This will result in a substantial reduction in the restaurant grease delivered to iona Island if applied across the GVRD and assuming that the effluent in the test is representative. 6. Current interceptor technology is adequate to meet or approach Bylaw 164 effluent guidelines if the establishment is diligent in its management of its influent and effluent. 7. Most food service establishments do not have a regular maintenance program on their interceptor or any other type of voluntary program to monitor and reduce their effluent. Reaction to b! ockage and overflow is a common service approach, rather than preventative maintenance. 8. Drip enzyme treatment and other methods of flushing fat, oil and grease through the interceptor negate the reason for the interceptor in the first place. The result is equivalent to a pipe connecting the establishment's sink directly to the municipal line. Ql I II 9. With a bioremediation component, it is possible to regulate food service establishments into reducing their effluents while reducing their costs at the SEP2 8 iM4 cuptulsnl 1991 cunnco Inuusulnu Inn. nil nQnu rnunnnKI I ~ I I Pub 19 u iSIIS 'I same time. A mandate can be implemented that is actually beneficial to the establishment from a financial perspective. Other indirect benefits such as reduced emergency blockages will also be obtained, and the municipality will have a reduction in the number of grease blockages in its own lines as weli as a reduction of effluent at its treatment facilities, H, FLecommendations The following recommendations are made: 1. The use of drip enzyme and chemical treatments in an interceptor, or any other treatment with the objective of causing fat, oil or grease to flow through the interceptor should be named and made illegal under Bylaw 164. Fines for a lack of treatment and maintenance should be severe, should increment with each occurrence and should be levied immediately on site. 2. Food service establishments should be subject to a bylaw requirement that they service their interceptor every month. The bylaw should initially apply to those establishments that have in excess of twenty seats (or equivalent measure for takeout operations without seating). The bylaw could be structured as follows: e based on a "Waste Reduction Incentive" of $ 300.00 per year, to be assessed on the annual renewal of the establishment's business license. In lieu of paying the Waste Reduction Incentive, the establishment could provide a certificate from an approved vendor certifying that it carried out monthly service on its interceptor; gllll" 4! I tigt I service defined narrowly as pumping the interceptor or maintaining a bioremediation program. This definition could be expanded through industry consultation to encompass other acceptable programs or new technologies; ~ service performed by private sector vendors approved by the GVRD to carry out the work. The establishment could select any approved vendor; ~ monthly interceptor service would include: IHII MINN 4 !ill I dill 44114 ~ II ~ I ill lt! Iiiit'i Iiii!1 I ~ I IN I 1 I I interceptor service and written rating stored on site; notation of any interceptor deficiencies from a recommended configuration developed by the municipality; ~ possible extension to other problem areas, including compactor, rendering bin and dumpster maintenance. ~ ~ i!11 4 I I es I 'j llil If II 111 I ~ I I I 'opyright 4 I' 41''I 1994 Cheese Industries Ies. All rights reserved '- 94144 1111 ~ ~ 4 S! I/ I I i I,...— —: IIII1N ~ 11 "- ~ ~ !ga a N 'I 19! 1 IN!I 41 !el I!1 I Qkt ml ram would cost little to administer at the municipal level, as all documentation is already generated and mailed, It would save nicipality on site as the Environmental Officer or the Health not have to open the interceptor, but would oniy have to inspect rd. The requirement would not cost anything for establishments tely maintaining their interceptor, as they would be provided duction Incentive certificate by their vendor. Indirect benefits s pollution from pumping trucks driving around the lower crease the tipping fee for restaurant grease at the Iona Island he tipping fee should be consistent with the CCME principle d be an ongoing effort to ensure that prices better reflect the on, in order to understand the real benefits of prevention." ases of ten to fifteen times for restaurant grease would not be en the availability and cost savings of bioremediation based e option of pumping and trucking for those establishments that However, they should have an economic disincentive to e given that on site treatment ic now technically and le. a"In Jll If Nme5lflj sere 8 R es I N 1 I Ij ~ ~ INN N 1 I r liie re.i: ri 1 Ii 2 rg I 2[~a ~ '' iyig ~ - - ~ i'ill gn~ r ~ il~lgs el wmgg i I A recent program in Australia, for example, that licenses pumping trucks to pickup and dispose of waste was designed to ensure that the pumping trucks did not dispose of the waste illegally (as distinct from the objective of providing more efficient or lower cost waste handling and disposal alternatives to waste generators). Such programs can only add cost to both municipalities and food service establishments and are unnecessary if the incentive is given to treat waste on site and eliminate the need for pumping. 4. Municipal governments should encourage waste generators to experiment in the open, and be prepared to tolerate continuing non-compliance where an organization has voluntarily identified a problem and s experimenting to develop a solution. Enforcement efforts should not be based on whether an establishment meets the current Bylaw 164 guidelines on a single grab or composite sample, but rather on whether that establishment has a program in place to continuously improve its current situation. Enforcement should be vigorous on those establishments that do not meet effluent guidelines and do not demonstrate any desire to improve, Ni il i%5 r'I 'I 'ili1 r res lf /J SEP2 8 1994 Copydghi I gee Chnnoo Indusoles Ino. AN righis reserved I I I Page 21 n~~ ~ W ~ ~ I r 5 I I sr Ii gi Igr lm r: 'rl Aooerjdi~ Excerpts from GYRO Sewer Use Bylaw Number No. 1164 ]/]11@5 . 'tr iiiimr im 1 1 Idg rtd II ~ I'Og I g' Idlddlau dl ~ ~ 'll gl-: II I' 8 Ll 9 Iellll1 I Pl I III 5IJIl 'F If I l d iii,i, I &l lrtir,iiI 1/ I !..': ".:: Ij1 ~ dd ~ u Qcpyrlght 1994 Clemcc Induelrlea Inc. All rlghta reoerved Pago 21 glr a I Ir I P I I Ia I ~ I 11 I I m 111 II;r. '' 1 I I a d ~ a II d e g g d f l 1C Wl QQRI I 0 0 :Fg 'C lo n 0 f5«)( -'388 8 8 I I $ Q -" g Qg &4 Eg 8- Pn O n N -gi8 n « 0 n 4 O 0 r 0 n n n N pn «D 8'8 t 0 00 onrt?I li, tang fF:. e CL N 8 'g Ol QE 0 rt N n rt n «o n 0 gg (gf «? 'n 0 8 8rt Ol ? 8 0 gn 4-8 f 8„ O Qn M 0 . CL I - "IT)" 8. 0 Ol n 8 8 )$ h 8« CL g eefus'g 0 Mg )g, nl Ol 8 8 Ol .-':'F I ?t 0 Vng 0 I 8 ) :Fif 8 I IV e«UN :- 5-8) 8$ f KE 8ig g io8 Kgjg $ 8'f Irk a rtp ZSln 8) 8 k=g ff 88 Nl F Ol O 8 8 N, Ol ~ 8 808 88 fggbln .=i)f no 5 8 0 8 rt N 0 8 8'«8 0 h Q,nal 88 QK 8 o eNn''nl 0 ono 'IINRII%~8 ~ SNN r 0 a lt H Ol ~&f~m'~.~~i'll F" ":8 Olllll ilfihi',il ii Qglliioohn 0 0 8F:88 Ul n 08K o n'8 n 0 8 9 08 e ok @ =, )~ a&egg M lnn 3 + 8«o '04'011 0 0ll« no K I! nglt)o«f Q I I I II I 88 QKa Knn 8~ c 0 0 0 Nal 0 3- Krngn 8 0 oae «'8 N 8 8 88« ( 0, 0 8 0 0 «N0 nI Don ?8 n 8 P Oy N 8 Qn O' fI 8 F- N n 88 8, rr 8«8 0 il, 8 8 :p iji 'ii CII Ul ~ n N ogg Io M al 0 0 0 I n 0 Cr 0 n 0„-Qrt 0 5,8 n Main 0 n 8 0 oI e 0 8' 01 I 8 K 0 0 8 rt*tn D p h 8 I «0 8 ««Mgn « 0 Pea a I el' 'IIE"', 0, eo0 na D 0 ln con N I I Qgg h j 'f85« 8'„8 0 n $ f f n g I I P lt 0 N8e n 4 n 0 ~ . 088 0 f5 I O 0 lo 4 n e 4).86':"-s~i &CMMMQQ'8(Pff.'. ~ 0 0 Cg« n 0 ! ll 11%11811 ~ Ol o Ol CL (QDR iggilljljj xiii;=, "8 0 ' 'onn 8 58j I jjfl aQI jj f,i P N ggggfg 08Ke IOM8 8«8 9 8 0 08 r me hhhi 41'Uhhf I Ci, :I ihli giillc-.'l ll Ji II la ~ ff fCLII I.: lh IQil i II l :11 I.'.: I : II I .,; ~0 - ... I 0' :=-...i 8! =; ihlf 1111%11 lla ~ io li — il I I 'I'8 „ , „'l % 'l' I'l li 4 I: I! I Ii it 'I I'; I ~I I I 'I'4 'I If1 1 1 II II I 4$ I ~, !f ~ lo ~ I 14 LgiilllMi ~ 8 ll '0 l01i ~ I I I 'I lo ' 9661 8 id~i 8 8 I N 8. I I N N 88 8 0 ) I al N ~ g g I f8 4 8' lid 88 88g0 Ol 8 8 g g g Ol k.' '~k Io'g I lil 8'I 4 $ 8 I.:pr 8 I» 8 "k8 04 nla w 8 h lf 0 w Noocn gg 8 w 0 0 8 n a n 0 gV It a g8 O O "- K I ln al D I D 0 w a C 0 I 0$ v8 f "8 .:r-..'f lt '8 It V v':Ol I n 0 a0 0 I 8 I KK'8P CI )K 58 Ol n c neo $ c n 0 o t» I $ „"f84' 8 D KPi'0 Fw-' 883 I»8 o V 8 ~f ,'8 laoonI $. g8f, %88 j I V0 N» hajj A CO ED IWC CD CD +II 8 .. I Fe:, — Il ' I i ) I I e Ii l i ! Iiil ~ I Nl ~~ Ia Ial On Ilail 'tl a: /CD I lail a OI8, g OD,,, l gD CD O P ( CD »md% 'lil ~ I, I 5 Oo ~ rm na aa Q IM gg $ I ''8C gill [ S ll ai I I / J 5 ~ — ~II C 8 — = I '.-:--=='ll Nllll i4-, ''' » I loll» =':I'I1IC1 IIII, "Ill I IRSII 8L o II I I II I ~ lal i -.,-=;;..-.=-; a Wl'III ~ lh ~I0IIC lg g ~ S RI I I I a I 8881 L". P'1111118 M KU 0 '" ~ »ill II I a 0 a CUD: I '' ~ '~ n 0 0 td 8 4 O' an PP I 4 rr 0 0 0 7 P I I 7 7 rt DC I c ms 0 «5» ca \1 0 0 NP IrP C I~ 0 P 0 Ne 8 D rt ft fl D O vn If I ft 0 II ~ K I r D 'C I )g, a rt It C 0 D Ovv ld D 0 ra KvL' dl D 0 ~f al .nm o,op ~I Il fl it I\ dlI ~ 11 0 dl 0 If 0 0 fd al It alK l/)gal lliwivlll'~iII~ 'gs I&&H ]II"' 8'liad~ Iidl li ~Pe jIi 8~4 r 0' ' OI 4181'Ill : Ii oo 0 ft 0 D I e 7 Ito N 0 I 0 7 t\ a en 0 8 n 5 D I n * fl IL ODD N It ffl Id '0 S 0 nfl 0 I la Ia Cl 'll nod 4I rt 0 I O V rt I rtd lo n»vo 8 "I I al ft gee fr O D D I I g CN SL nft ~ 0 fm 8a Da '0 ~ P ft 0 rt .r eev 0 70 prt 0 tt D rt p0 I 4 Ddadae air r DD NP 0 lta Ir 8, iPKgoe 0 'O Ngrt 'C Y O' Ia 4'4 D I ra O e call 8 ffl nla I I 8a CI 'IS IP ms D D df D 0 D I en v laorr '0 oftv I IP Iaeno» t 7 p "I 0n h N al e 7 fl Ifl al « ILP rr a 0 rt rto n 7 O dl 0 0 DI fa 0 rt 0 v nov 0 OPO I I O Y«D 0 0",e Pa«E I Ia 0 ft DCD It a, tt r'apl oeno D g paI y tr Pao 'd ft eD ~ 0 0'0 Pa C 0 Isola rt 4 Crto 0'I c ra NIP 0 0 Da O,O, SO o e CON» 7 D Ia N O I ra 0 I D 0, I 0I al D 7 N 0 8 I I Dl 7 0 r n N Im 0 V rt « ft Cl 0 4 O rtftn 8 C N re IL DO pr It al Id V' rt.. n I IL al V V84 cava ave V.D 1 VN lth NV OVI ror rteaeo I" 0 N'0 0rr«e I C 0 dl 0 0 I 7 Dn farto tr DIPI a I 0 fd 7 0 4 » If al '0 rt C 0 N 8« g '8 IL4I rt I Ia ffl I 0 Des'lt 3 Page'IS Dn dl ~ I «0 tl ft D 8 gae dl ta D N C rt »Q 4 fta Il 8 fl dl «0 a0 al 'O 7 al I e 0 /DC I 0 7 tl fl '08 P rt e»rtoo 8 O 0 D D 7 I 0 N ml. 0 0 0 rt rt 0 '-"III 0 0 I rt 0 pa ~I rp I r 0 rtrt O8 a J N I f e D P1 D Sllll f. DDrt 0 rt 'rr» "..". lill WI IS lo mID tl fr no ti Y l' 8 tl I It tte 8 go POOD St t ~ 1$ 8I il C 0 „:3(s sola rt 0 I 0 ILrtrt K St Ilii1Iiij imdf I I 0 ~ ii 8 oft 4 Cl g OOD I tt n- g D VD Ill(I n' rt D DC'nn 0 I iil ie% III D "d 4 P«0 7 D lf '1' Nadl ra 0 a Crt«vrtn Deesela C I D C I nor . OOD 0 4lrt N ~ D 8 ft rt D I 7 N C PO D N ON I ffl D 1 la 'I 8Zi 50 dirt 8. rt I 0 la o Cf4 0 ac ale Cl DDI I D 7 2 ms fl Doe V C pa I I III 4 4I N O NNN V 'd I ~ Pa fl Im n'OY D HNI 8 '1 7'0 HCO v 6)ON dl fm 88«I D a D 0'0»8 0 0 la'0 40 N I I ~ ann Pa 0 0, I D N 8 4I Coo'ON « t log D Paladl lit 0 8 v va N nrtm aide 7 frfdfL eCI PID p 4 tavh aln r ON« IlPl 00 P rtdl DPI ga D V 0 I~ N I ~ V 0l 7 rtp I td C N D td NK ~ D g V C ',I' ' '' ilils ll 1"iillillli .- .-;; ,--: II Ii ...lid OII 8 jj Ia iISli8d'I ~d. I —. — 8 8'I1117~488lal 3151 Io 8iiidf llim o air 8. j ijllK„--;; I 'l 'j III iiIRII '...'l ~ IIIO ~ll i1 --=lIIILt jlmi t ~ «iII18 I' -=~a I LII,I I := 4~18R IIII'eap 881 ~ il 4 ~ i I Ciai ., ll 70 — = 8 Pe I ' CCI I f8 ~ 48 I i 1 I ll Ilj lIRi "8 liidli84d ifii/ ~ ,'; «ol II/8 Ildde C f81 i ~lid l84 w OII,8iS,U dg ~ Nad f561 8 Zd3$ I t 0 «Dg I Vlt » 0I I I I 0 DCC IIIlsO»IP Ho I 8I I I I a nag P 8 I H. lH.DCI HCX g Ct N I 0 ~ 0 0 UH ccrvao»0 6 I 0'SK»o 8 4Oaela I INI4 o rl DH 00 H '0 SI D DPPD 008 6'HD o 0 va 4 I 0 '0VP PI 0nno 0 H ee I ct ~ I cs 400 II IUl«l ~ \ a nrtp OO000 4 v Sl P I Inn 'ID Dl40 Slna 4 IItNI IIC Inert H PENH0 te «KK Pg o 4 g«noae ODQ IN 4 Sl It Sl I ~I tl 'ga 44 tl I I OIPH ct'I~ IIN4 4ct P I sn 8 rt I Ego»N6 Cel I N I D v re ~ o 44il 0 I e '8 »vale» vnan K40I P 40 I Ngaca I cl D I QISKPra IH »,,Oa p cs Sl na ItisD I0 4 I ct I K el'0 I El va 8 ED K Og 0» I I Is I DI 6O O I 0 I H It 0 P) Ieg". I belli--gf I)iimi+ . 'I ,! I f5 I Cl 'I I ]I I ~ 0 sl 0 '0 c ct 0 P0 tv 0 ~ anaa ~ P ISO 4 law II IUIE! Inc ~ ~ !fi!lllll I $$ I I II III ls II Ill /lgi~fi i !IIII rls liiaa" c !la I HIP 8 lf is 8 v» Ul 8 c IngleC'C NIC ND'eo Oft I 0 N H 0 IPHZK 4 HD rl I It 40 c 0nl I IIDDI ctp ID D» rtn 0 Ul cs v I N 4 4 6 I I Q 6 n if I 0 4 I II SI N N acs I 00 OV 0 OOOI 00 000000Ul 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 SI 0 0 0 IS 00 V Sl 0 V V P vn vn H cf I 8 0 D 0 I 680 I a« Oct 00 Ss vn vo rs CrtPD II D 0 V4 0 I~ I ~I v»ooe 0 heooohoooooooooo » 0 0 no oo o oooo» o o o oooo» leo o ol H»v PD'ODD aagp FOH- 6» a I-ft V Ul 0ovvs vo 0 ~ v» a p 0 IHn0 ClP Is I p 08 C I ;-; pea 0 0 IJ UrSH I ~ I I 'a%ill~; I I I 8 fajiiP I iNIia! meilia III flgssf iiII i jg It ll I.ls » ~H \ Ina N0U CNQ 0 HN I0 tr nnl N Inan N ctgn0 PS»I 0 «» I O 4 one DNP o 0 0 o a 0 o v o o oo o 00 vo 0 o o 5 0& 18IIC II Ill!0 .=.=,;0 lil IMARI I I I I 0'I "4& IaK giiwgeas li; RI! ~ I Ps 4 rt V IPI ft I Car rt v cr 0 0 0 Dv I I P fs I «6 84 0 I D a o. 0 rt HCWI %D ~ H ap .'l!'1SCDI»Iac I It Pa 0 I Ps Ial N 0 I 4 C Cl CI O' ~ l~ I ) I'lCll l 88 I 0 8I H 0 I I~ P C n '0 rt H" 00 Is»480 Sl IV I e I asaiiii8 I I „Of '0HI O 4 a CI 00«g ft D Cl It V I 0» SKS OII 8DPc I 0 6 It Ct It .686K e" o«gn r. I 0K I«g f I !fiiiiillll Icr I N It »6 0 VI KS Sfr'UN I't agl 5 sl 0 0 PP K fs Ol 0 b SKII P O It teal HHNCXDI I PHQISI I I DPI glPCI PE'vK$ Qrt I0 N I 00 INN, i 0 I V Ct s I 00 0H HH K'IIS 0tlgCIY» H I D aaavg OO a H« islI el a»8pn IN a 0 4 O Pv «g I V ov » no6ciP 0I P I ONI C «8 CSI I 4 O g«I KS Kg H D4 vs 0 Dna 0 0'I'g tt v 0 0 I 888 0 VD KO 60.00 cl'0 V le D Is I IactoDI 0~ I OSII Dg, I ~ V » 0'rtcl * I P 0 O H 0 n g 0 0 ct 0 S 'g ~ IGNI DC vvQQ' D I ~ 0 I KH 6I g 0 C 4I a 4 I rt DS'gl naw 6'$ g g0 aRE» I =" l] lrcl al! , —— 'Rli iI! Irmis I IM 'RIB SI 1WR! WRNZ ~lab = mwiSI III I ;=~ 'illpm@a." =.--- -'-~g I II ~ : ':!" &QIi llllhimc I'I ID al !i 5hgNI I alit NMP l:: ': '' iis IIIII Fll li nose as/ 04 O. ~ 4 es O 500 0 0 SKililll WOI ffI 4q LIII,, B B i-'3 kf y 11 ie II[ Ie C oi 3~ R j; f 5 P I ee 3B 0 aB; ~ o$0 ran Be C P p!seer ~ 0 los ! e 0 0 0 e ee 0 se 0. ee III%5'Jl e jf 3 555r ~ e e S see e ~ R n p @Ill ~ Rill W.YIR'II! 4! IIII ere l 3K I! I1/)$ eo e n ee g RR444llg] li ii IIII 4 g 0 n 00 e 0 0! sa CI 0 te I Src n 0'g » e I.w 4 ee n B B B 0 (e 0 ~e scale sr 0 eo IW, ~e 0 so ~ 0 'I%III 1lllltl IINU'ij IIIII "I 00 See as g IIIII B 4aBi : .451 II, I I I II 4 4 4l ~r I 51 I IHilI, 15 I illliII'l I I IXII I II I II I I 0 e! o e eee alii '..'llli il ) ! II11 II l 4 '! le! Pf f,1H 6'l HlitI!'I I1 I'I '1 0 I ! h e il ill l I ee 'II I Ii !' I! I 14, I I II fr lki 0 lg SN Agsoastdlx 8 LEGACY Literature Iimrai cia llijiiie j I%last ~,lg IIIIII h I I I I '. I l Il ~ II 'I rrl IIIJl $ / )I II II %I%I'] mls', f Rll Is sr Ji:. I s SEP2 8 1994 Copyright I SSS Clemeo Indoslrlos Ino. Al dghU rssonrsd I I I II t 'I areal 5 I~I aii "liiK=—= I ~ Clemco Industries Inc. IN Carporalac(scm 110 447(No.hRuad Richmond,ec,Canada V8V1P8 Tea(604)2441110 FAX:(004)2441((7dggL vancouver sranch: 110-4471 No. 0 Road Rlchrnond, sc, canada v6v 1 pa Tah (604) 244 1110 FAx: (604) 244 (1~ lue Label Drain Line I@anagement Pragram rain line management program. A complete, on-site waste interceptor and drain line rmed by our highly trained LEGACY Service Representatives. Igl emergency service for blocked drain lines; y schedule(I maintenance calls to treat your waste on site using our unique diation process; e system oeslgn consultation; assessment of the siatus snd compliance of your waste interceptor; assistance with regulatory authorities on your drain line problems; advice on drain line techniques to avoid costly backups; extensive documentation to help you manage your facility at its optimum efficiency; available complementary range of neutral pH cleaners, degreasers, sanitizers and deordorizers ~I Iiilii II IIIIV iaw rum The Future is Here Todevl ii,I&iiiilI The LEGACY Blue Label program with our proprietary bloremsdiation service is the future for handling waste in ths food service industry's drain line system. It: iiigII 0 saves money; IIIIIII 0111 hr ll '1'sl ll 0 0 0 treats your effiuent on site; eliminates or greatly reduces the need for pumping; avoids drain line backups; avoids municpal fines; reduces or eliminates odors from your drain lines and waste interceptor, reduces the use of hazardous acid or caustic drain cleaners to protect you and your staff; reduces plumbing costs; egminstes cosily, toxic and ineffective chemical treatment (le. enzymes, solvents, etc.); eliminates the need for you or your staff to deal with your drain lines or waste interceptor. IIIE li ,'1',111 l,i! IIII il /Is RB tsg I lt 81 i, 0 itl fI 0 0 8 Sill i i 'f I 0 R 'ill( 0 R ea 0 7, II I Who Uses LEGACY Blue Label Serhrice? 1 ~ Government cafeterias ~ Hotels ~ Supermarkets ~ Schools ~ Golf courses w r 0 8( II)!I n 0& Itlll 'll' 'll ks LEGACY services over one hundred customers in the lower mainland. Many are multiple site companies, or have mors than one waste Interceptor on each site, Our customers range from small grease traps that were pumped at up to six months Intervals, to high volume operations that were formerly pumping up to twke monthly. The following types of organizations sre typical users: ~ Fast food restaurants ~ ~ Full sendce restaurants ii npubs snd bars II'ecvnwn ! uProducfs and senrfces fo Preserve our natural rssovraes" numher, 0000011 C Ihdeteeued vulva,lone nn I heelacee dain Ane 0, 1004 Iweveal dhcwn ] II( II rg Whv Avoid Pumninn~d Drin Enzvmesg The food service industry is required by lsw to maintain waste interceptors (often called grease traps) to prevent oking fats, oils and grease from entering the municipal sewer system and to maintain certain effluent standards. aste interceptors were traditionally pumped (ss frequently as every two weeks), and the resulting waste trucked to s specific municipal sewage treatment plant for disposal, The problems with pumping are: it is expensive; it is noisy, smelly snd disruptive to both staf and customers; il only removes waste periodically, and the trap rapidly fills again; it doesnot maintain continued compliance with municipal effluent guidelines; ~ restaurant grease is tne largest problem in municipal sewage plants because it reduces the efficiency of the bacteria in the plant's digesters (a long time use of bioremedlstlon) and clogs machinery. Drip enzyme treatment Is an unacceptable alternative to pumping. Drip programs introduce only enough enzymes to the interceptor to break up the grease but not fully metabolize it. Such programs are discouraged by municipal authorities, who realize that the dispersed grease will recombine to block the municipal system. Drip enzyme programs are currently under consideration for bylaw restriction in a number of United States and Canadian jursidictions. Other unacceptable methods which only send the grease problem farther down the municipal line include hot water flushing and solvents to dissolve the grease. I Il I~II II ill I'I i i'i(ll'rlt Ig II IIt(III IIPsl! i. all '1il ) I II Proven in the Fieldl ilk! Through extensive testing using an Independent laboratoiy, an international fast food chain snd the active involvement of local municipal authorities, we have documented snd proven that ths LEGACY Blue Label program outperforms all other systems currently used to handle food service effluent. e following is a graph of actual Total Oil and Grease (TOG) results of the LEGACY Bfus Label drain line mangement program as compared to pumping the same trap monthly. The test site was an international fast food restaurant in Vancouver where the vvsste Interceptor wss focmsrlv mimosd everv two weeks, and the results were obtained by en independent laboratory under the monitoring and protocol approval of the City of Vancouver. Even sffer slrtesn weeks on ths LEGACY S/us Lcbef oroersm. no numoino wss csmilced or olsnnsdl s ~ CCIOO C ~ VVPIVO 4 I ~ 4&CO ~ ~ ~ VIO ~ I ~ 4&CO&WC& $ )i% l'ilsj 'stri !it I Eii It Ill jj 11 I I! 5 i)II'I I|'ll.,'' ll I I I I 2500 2250 l 1 5ii»i I I 2000 i250 1500 1250 I000 750 500 250 e g z Se Purt of W Sofutionllll ~ I SEP 2 B 1994 bendix C LEGACY Interceptor Rating Standards RHIIII li I II IP.4ls I I I III IE: till 4 Ia I is I a/ I ~ II rs I III I'I I SISI I I lls R Is' Is niiie III J II t ss'ls SsI s I I os ' tall 4'4 'III I%' ni I t J I I Sl 'I II)ol'! ll IS I I s '% r ~ 4 oK tl'l I I' , ~ In ~ s I I 4 COpydght I OOO Clernee Induelrfee InO. nts dtthle reeeNed r I I essmlnif iI To2cm. ,.!',!,"Ill t I I Iii I II I II I )ilia Pgi II LiNe Sattand pufly To13cm. Ceimnd ( IRLIlliL I To30cm, Evident )Ilti ilf,4 L'll,'"',',„',,'» 'J / ilile'wi ~ ,il I II III fl ii f J, II I I Pi II llf,l) I fll ii ni I Sp ff PS I I I ~ i I ~~ ff S 111 Producds end services to preserere our nsfursl resources" ( Dennnnnlnen lnn, DC00012 lsieeael neer. WA Raplanae Pale: WA Dale lwnnr Febieny 10, 1004 I % rp ~ i lie 29 1994 SEI i D ii I 0 Iie I' n a' IP I ii2 el i ii ~ ~15'P Rl S ~ ' I I I ~ j Ill.ii ni ai le ~ %IN ' iiiiRIAI %Kgggg~~ dllllL Rl II I SRIl Phl aI alan a pl I~ I 115,$ lsR 'L jN,'ij'g I'mgI 1 I%III( Kii fi'j i ) g~~'j'9 I'lily I :=.!!.'!!ll ;::— "",''.,':',l '~ II s rl P ((I .-.'."..':'I I II jI Ill il 'ill( 'li 'ILI. a ra I II I I 9 .:.: 'll ~ aI 'jjj,a& I Co pydght I 994 Chard no Indoalrloa Ino. All dghba ron orvod '] il ill a:~g ~R I 5lh lP ~ La I I naa RR'= —— I j i aalm ~, ~R ~ o I I I ao do ~ I ~ a ~ aa — aa 9 : . le 3l "911 Rg J Q~ IISI ISI5%+Q ~ ll II M I I I I H ICOSI I $ 1$ RI IIIIISI — &~ ihlgl 5$ l I ilail'1 I I Rl lg If g I I ' I '~l s;=:'-= I'gllilll mam Ilii;~S 111 & === i'S ~ I ling S '! ~EP p 8 1994 . P ),, --iJ ~ ~ '' II ~gg hm— ~ ASS ~ ,All ~ r" '\ IS ~ SS ~ 'l l C I I S I I II aiiisii iiIIISIIPI I ig e ii- ~ .— — am-a %iNIH Wi'Ilia» ia~iiniiiii ne gg aa aa a li: ~ I I I / ~ a ~~ I tl ~ a h ~ Ilh '@Ill g =: Q'~(INDI ~ll I, — eaCIIII ji i Sama ; ICI I!IO iti'SI(AItt 9!( .AIK)itA'I'('(I! II .', libel( .'te(7 "(..(((I Av( u((( N,i!. I l&vdmunrl, WR (%0,(2-55 I 4 (',!lie) N)((- l221 I'(((X: (an(; .(( "- I'r! I SUMMARY OF STUDY PROTOCOL Study Title: Bio Rcmcdiation Agent Efficacy Study Test Sponsor: Clemco Industries, inc. 110-4471 No. 6 Road Richmond, BC, V6V 1P8 Canada Test Facility: Can Test'00 1523 West 3rd, Vancouver, B.C. phone: (604) 734-7276; fax: (604) 731-2386 — Study Numbers Purpose of tbe Study: ) n, Its To bc assigned at study initiation. . To evaluate the cffcctivcness of a bioremcdiation agent. Study Monitor: John J. Mnjnarich, Ph.D., Bio Research Laboratories, Inc. Redmond, WA 98052 Study Director: Richard Jomitz Cantest, 200 — 1523 West 3rd, Vancouver, B.C.phone: (604) 734.-7276; fax: (604) 731-2386 Records Maintained: All raw data, final reports, documentation, and protocol wilt bc nmintaincd in Test Facility's Archives. Record Retenticr.: All raw data and complctcd no!cbooks. ~ (u a i a i ~~4INII I(S,I! (~ ~((( Sill illa'((( ~ hl11'Ittgii i', i [ s,%II Ii i 8 IJ I \ r I I ( I I $ P"E B 1994 l. Oll and Orcase (total) 2. pH 3. Total Suspcndcd Solids (TSS) 4, Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) S. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) On day 28, after sample collection thc intcrccptor tank will be pumped and filled and Clcmco's bioremediation agent will bc added. I lI III I 'l I I II lla I ~ 5'==l I I I IN I ~ ~ I I I I I ~ ~ S h — ss — — ~ , ~~I%i%I ~~a SSI ~ a 'r —— I%SISS ~+ am~a '~iR~tmst s S mmlla Ig la lily g Rsaas I asmmtiiiltmm, 'ta~ 111% II IIm IISaegg jg /It&1 ~ Iles@ II II '' lItl sl s ~I l S ~ I f R ~ g S gtf ssssl i ta t tm i&l ~ ~ Rl I I Protocol: Bio Rcmcdiation Agent Efficacy Study Conf!dcntial April 7, 1994 I&or: Clcn&ilo tu!los&rica, toc. On days 35, 42, 49 and 56 grab samples will bc colicctcd by thc testing facility, fully utilizing proper chain of custody forms and other collection protocols. The samples will bc kept in a cool cnvir&mmcnt during shipment to thc test facility. Notes shouki hc &akcn rcgardiog &hc consistency oF thc grouse layer in thc trap including thc thickness (if possible), as well as thc appcarancc and condition of thc discharge to thc sewer. On day 56 a boost of the biorcmcdiation agent will be added to the interceptor tank. On days 63 and 70 the final grab samples will be collected by the testing facility for review, under the same sampling protocol as above. Analysis of the samples are to bc conducted by the testing facility for thc following parameters: I. Cht and Grease (total) 2, 3. pH Total Suspcndcd Solids (TSS) 4. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD!) 5. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) On days 21, 35 and 42, addition&!I I liter samples will bc collcctcd for shipment to Bio Rcscarch Laboratories, Inc. for further analysis. Table Ii Summary Gf Exp rimcr&tal Design Day Activity 0 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 I Pump existing interceptor tank and ict lines sample outflow sample outflow sample outflo.v sample outflow pump intcrccptor tank and jet lines, fill tank, add bio remediation agent sample outflow sample outflow sample outflow sample outflow and add bio remediation agent sample outflow sample outflow BRL testing sample outflow., sample outflow sample outflow l ! sample outfi~ow i SEP 2 8 SLY Confidential April 7, 1994 Protocol: Bio Rcmcdiation Agent Efficacy Study For: Clcmco Industries, Inc. Ciity of Vancouver and GVRD involvement: Thc City of Vancouver and the GVRD will coordinate their review and oversight of this study through Mr. Doug Roberts, Supervisor, Environmental Protection Branch Pemuts and Liccnscs Dcpartmcnt, City of Vancouver. This oversight will include approval of the test site, the sample collection protocol, visual inspections of thc scwcr lines to bc conducted before and after trcatmcnt as spccificd above. A copy of the fina! rcport by CanTcst and Bio Rcscarch Laboratories will be sent to thc City of Vancouver and thc GVRD for their rcvicw and analysis. lan~ j„nw1% , I II s n a~$ % I [jj '@rQ III jiill III jul M IK ttll ntn ss r I I a + g I 'Igl'hajj ~ lllll Ijn jjiiII iiiil ia& +aali I'[I~IIf Ma i ~ . '. a D: — -" - jn qI Ip=-='a s P'. ',— »: lrh, '.. 5I- =~smarts='c~„Ihttitt~i& .. n ~ ae&a ll1i: ''~l!QI ji ~==,',t '' =I eM ~:": —= ~ ~ Igloo 'lew I~yggn&i'inst aims t 'stsnat [i gQ ls a[tt[N'': ------~aWI jII)i&,~ zm~IIIj ~ $ )1~1 g ~gg I Protocol: Bio Remediation Agent Efficacy Study For: Clcn&co Imlustrics, inc. Confidential April 7, 1994 grovel Gf Protocol Study Location McDonalds Restaurant Mainfl'crminal — Vancouver, B.C. Day 0 Monday, January 24„1994 Study Director richard J& Date Cantcst, 200 — 152 phone."(6 , B.C. (604) 731-2386 e.hNv Study Monitor D. Date Biogcscarch Laboratories, Irtc. (206) 869-4224 40 ra~ L X'r. Study Oversight Dou~obcrts, Supervisor, Environmental Protection Branch Permits and Liccnscs Dcpartmcnt, City of Vancouver, Canada Mary Gurney, (604) 873-7122, Permits Ki Licenses Dept„City of Vancouver 'jtIiiijj, iiiaiil~ g s attI HrllIj tn'-'" ~-i~mlles '' I tisa cas ~I@j - 'IjIstjIiAIIIjJil" — -— Inl I tin -5 l~zts.sIlflPiIlfl g +sstsaainas~~Iiim;--r:. ats ~ll /IlnIh l— ~1na~auaiaiai iiihaaa ~ ¹l~ ~ ng '~ ~ Ir rIIIII lRll=: mmii4 Il ~aai ~ &i+It Arseendi~ Raw Test Data lip~~-Srr»r redril Co pydght 1994 Clemco Induslrles Inc. All dghts resowed ~'~tlc ti "-' m I — — ''==ii mrh I ''gal iII jj I rl PIIS III Kd38 &6S 8 IT O'T 8'8 0 Sl; fm 2222 OOOO 2222 mmmm rrrr 0 0Q m OO 0D co C grggr Ccm m I= O Ol O O 0 0 Ct P 0 0 '0 0 0 P0 Q O Q O CQ CP Q CQ CQ Q 0 Cl 0 0m Q O Ql IQ C oo aCV aDD V gO m m Q Q 0 D a fa Pl a fa fa a s h - '" 0 i: if. if: — - '" '- h Q Q Ql D Q 0 fPolallV C»aalIV VaaV SS CQ CQ CC VO O m 0 0 4 IO~ ™0 00 4H4 0IA 'Q 20 m 0 graf C Ill g RR-"$ 5S=RRKR.". 20 0 I» 2 IA IA I m0 ay e 8 -C iO 8 'g p g0 2 Q IQI K am m m A0Dn 4$ -)Vg)VmgL)L'g C QI V 5:0""'=088LfB g5 g llllh ii~s m ~I=': Al IQiWR I I lame o I,, g I ifki";;: 'i —.mQi N '.ill SIU Ilf..'"„", Q=— .——,...„, ~w L4'I " eIIec -' %%8II lfliC i ' Q, -- —. Qi. III " = IpeINQI~~lwa=-.= ..:Q -=~~ij SieIhVyeei'g'~ i IIII gpss CQm llmn Ie 21 isa@ /gal]/ (~ ICQI ll '''- ~~ —.—, f fc I / $ v.lilll Ill till 11 \ —;i'gkQii lfj: .I ~ II I Rlgl - ~ ll ~ . ILN/~ ' gI nc I II Scllll ~ xiii i "'%~%I@ THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM Environmental Protection Committee TO: ~ FILE: EPC J.E. Yip, P. Eng., Deputy City Engineer PRELIMINARY SUBJECT: DATE: September 22, l994 - DOWNPOWN PARKING STUDY BACKGROUND R COMMENTS: The Planning Comminee has referred the attached preliminary draft of the Downtown Parking Study for the Committee's review and comments. In reviewing the draft report the following comments are provided for the Committee's review, discussion and consideration: Included in the study, a complete inventory of available City, on and off street parking. Identify, investigate and consider other methods to manage parking, such as: 2) parking meters lor on street parking pay paddng lots and structures Joint facilities with major parking management company such as IMPARK. Have company front end cost of parking structure and City provide land. adopt a user pay policy to establish and maintain parking fund. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) 3) Identify what parking arrangements can be accommodated on City owned lands witldn the designated area (existing sites). 4) Carry out an overaB review to determine the best locations for future parking lots and/or structure(s). Future parking requirements may be impacted by: Commuter rail Rapid Transit Coimnunity buildings (i) (ii) (hi) Cany out a study to evaluate current on street parking. Assess the present restrictions and review the need for other timed, daily or monthly parking I! ISIWt requirements. .Rll % 5 tm::::-! ==II In the review of parking management mechanisms include methods used by private companies (ex. Impark). = lg"'=' IIIIRI ~~ g~lllll'Illa' /l[g',~ 'v~'D Dep'uty Pity Eng'incor f JEY:cd I Rl: '-:— ! II',8 SEP 2 8 199/t /gQi m PI II pl gg I „„'„".;-"=asemellgJRm~o~RH 5 &pal! gg!! [ ~~ ~ I — !!atu — ' — ' =-~i==- --"'tt:'-rti i as I — I ~ ~ — - ~ ~ -. %WIJIII ' --=:alit ~littd ~ gi~i~utai=='==: j g !I a t Is 8 5 I I g! rs s v a t! s I - - - ~ %5 s m g Ptst $ as j~ 2 ~ pg I I - I t1 I I —,— —...— I 1lss I III gh THE CORPORATION. OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM MEMORANDUM TO: Tony Chong Budget and Administration Committee DATE: September 1, 1994 FILE: Parking Igor Zahynacz Public Works Committee Jeff Yip Environmental Protection Committee Janna Taylor Parks and Recreation Committee Carfos Feiip Director of Planning Preliminary Draft-Downtowri Parking Study Planning Committee is referring ths attached preliminary draft of the Downtown Parking Study to your Committee for review and comments. In order that the report may incorporate your Commitee's input pdor to being submitted to Council, Planning Committee has requested that comm'ents be forwarded to the Planning Department by October 3, 1994. If you require additional time to review the report, please advise ms II possible. 1& 5 as soon as Ig M W & && IS Carlos R $ 11~IS 8 Jtjgg $ CrtvM&&lOIAQS&&lllP&ffdAQ I i I 115II ili l,' ~ M i ed Plan sr, Director of Planning 1 ig iiiI/I]1 ii@1 ' gggg ~ ~111 &~ — &l ~l.. pg r~&stai 1(& &IIII&tsggil/ p al&&& &j l l lt '::: — «ul& — — J$ 1RII1sl ' && rlsf =-."...! "&1i'P'tl:,,'," g — a ~E&&is&mama&e &&&~&&&l.em ~ - ~~ %lmlei& ==- &a 'm I DRAFT July 13, 1994 DOWNTOWN OFF-STREET PARKING STUDY Purpose of the Study ... 1.1 2.0 CURRENT MUNICIPAL POUCIKS AND RKGUIJtlTIQNS.... Municipal Act Powers............................... The Development Management Bylaw.... The Ofricial Community Plan ................,.. 2.1 2.2 2.3 8.0 ANALYSIS OF PARKING.REQUIREMENTS IN THK DOWNTOWN .. 8 Current Parking Requirements ............ Medium Telni Requirements ........,...... Lang-Term Requirements ..........,......... Summaiy of Parking Requirements..... 3.1 3.2 3.3 8.4 4.0 MECHANISMS FOR MANAGEMENT OF PARKING ...... Current Parfdng Management in Port Coquitlam ........ 4. l.1 Parking Rental.................................................. 4.1.2 Municipal Parking Facili5ss.............................. 4.1.3 Off-Sits Parking Provisions .............................. 4.L4 Evaluation of Current Parking Management Mechankrme in Port Coqumam ........................ Parking Management in other Munkdpali5ss .............. 4.1 4.2 Caela-lieu ..............................,....................... 4.241 424 Devekrpment Variance Permit ......................... 44.8 Shared Parking .........;...................................... 4%4 Kvskuttion of Current Parldng Management Mechanisms in Other Municipalwes................. Conrpartson of Parldng Standards.............................. 4.8 5.0 'O Kg 4 .,. 9 ...... 1 0 ...... 1 0 ...... 1 0 ...... 1 1 PARKING POLICY RKCOMMKNDATIQNS.................................. 18 , IMPLEMENTATION QF PARKING PQUCY RKCOMMKNDATIQNS .............................................-.....--....-.... ~ 18 a IU 11s I 44 IR8 gear 'i I%Pi ~ i . iI 4 ' %IINIIIIII re~re i ills 44„ ~,"l",:lfli 8 IKiii,8 i"III rp 4 i 1111 14 ~ I kill% II I Ii Jhgiia'- lmiPP Ilj ' all m Nll I i IRrl/It it I I 4 114'l 1' iiriiliiLI g /) m)( IEEI' smiggi 'NIK. =-==-:~~m 4415==-ais --: —pry—-- ( 1 ll, I1 %IS 14 ~ 1I II,'.'':, I'1 if rl I'ILII ':= ~ Jf -- =::-- —-=-----, Hsmts II'JIK ' &I li l sIvs IIIIIIL 9 i ~ MIIIIIIII I ill f99'ITY OF PORT COQUITLAM Draff: July fa, Ths City of Port Coquitlam has experienced a rapid growth in population over the past several ysaia. Between 19SS and 199 t, the numbers increased 27% from 29,000 to 37,000 residents. Mrith an ample supply of residential land and a healthy housing market, these trends do not. show signs of abatsmsnt. The influx of new residents into the City is generating more traffic into ths Downtown core and more demand for goods and services. The business traffic has also resulted'in a shortage of parldng in ths Dovmtown. A contributing factor to this parking shortage is the fact that many buildings in the Downtown do not meet current bylaw standards for the provision of off-street parking. Some of the oidsr buildings rely solely on street parking and either have no off-street parking or ars far below prsssnt~y requirements inc~ With ths parking shortage in the Downtown reaching a critical stage, ths issue must bs examined in order to determine paNng needs and a tang-range plan of action. Over ths long term, ths Downtown will corittnue to develop and redevelop as ths City's business and employmsnt centre. therefore, adequate parking must be provided in the Downtown for customers and einployees if the Downtown is to remain convenient to local residents and economically viable to local businesses. f. 1 ~ Purpose of the Study lands north of Wilson Avenue, south of ths railway underpass, and from the west side of Shaughnsssy Street to Kingsway Avenue. a M I II ilfl 8 taL II b c )o ~ Estimates current and future paitdng needs; Reviews current mechanisms used by ths City to parldng; Reviews methods used in other munictpa8ttes to address parking shortages; Recommends a policy plan and methods of implementation for consideration. "II~II II SEP 2 8 1994 . Mli I'fill I IIWlii ~~r:= t~am11~ I ai i I emt[I gp ]Ig IL!51llll "'I '~) ~ ....,I.=-=~~~II@;=;.;.;,@ le~~~&;.„---,,,"-.-— . III f ~. ssg, / II&'"' " ' ';~„','/Ill[i( i(i i- — -)yf I I I Ul 8 ~ 2.6 CURRENT WJIUNICIPAL REGULATIONS AND POUCIES 2. f Nunicipsf Acf Powers The power of a municipality to regulate parking provision is derived from ths Municipal Act. The Act specifies that a local government may: establish bylaws to require that off-street partdng be pmvided for any land, building or structure; ciassify uses, buildings and structures and dNersntiats between these classes with respect to ths amount of parking spaces provided; acquire property for the provision of off-strset parldng facilNss; construct, maintain and operate public off-street parldng facltldss; collect cash-in-lieu of providing ths required amount of parking and place these monies into a reserve fund for ths purpose of parking proviske. 2.2 Port Coquitlarh's 'Development Management Bylaw, 1987, No. ths number of parking stalls required for various types of rsskfsn5af, commercial and industrial development. In addition to quantity, the bylaw akto spscik'es ths minimum size for parking stalls, loading areas, and maneuvering aisle widths. 2241'egulates I The Dsvsfopmenf.Nsnsgsmenf Byfsw WRI I II All development is required to provide a certain amount of off-street parking. Ths number of required stal!s varies according to type and intensity of use. Relaxation of the parking requirements is generally not granted to new developments without extraordinary justNcatton. RI'RIS ~ lhs Ollfcfsf Community Plan 2.8 I ~B ~ MS% ~ ~ inta~ Tbs Offidal Community Plan contains general polio@a that encourage parking in'commercial arses to be located underground or within a structure. guidelines within the O.C.P. require that surface parldng lots be wtlh landscaped islands and that a landscape screen be provided where they are exposed to major streets. Ths O.C.P. policies help to promote a more treatment of parking areas in the City. a~ I EIIIII j~.,&I IPIjj'i Is Illl all I IIiiIIII fa,l 2 If'I I sllhHQJBg]4 Ilmie I:=--= p;,—,;.-.-t — - —, —: li 's~s++uJIIiI w IIII -— ..... — ~t"-; ., '--' ~ ~ ~ Tlllr'.~x'ii g/~l ~ ' b'';I I —;..;= — —,, 5'I,SIIII --'-., . " g =-" '' I I~ I i I ~ ' -;"',. - — — I,—— IIII I'all II ':=-=:==I-= "':: '"': I I wliiiliiiiltiatniaessii,;==;='~'"I'~ -" Ill " 'I, ~~]sssjt~ ~~+ s '''' IIII IML - --isi amiiiI~ Nl ~,: = iiltt«"-- -- - =~. ie= == u,.=: --+'s-., 1~ g[ — — "Zxarrswl —.: "~j+QQirI5$ I+I ~ IP %440: -~'a — i~~ IIiiitat ~ xiiaeics: Ii' -2 —;~ 'tllsalll14» — -.ii &'' i RM anise" IIgjjg 'IsslsBRJL'3g'' ~ ~~ ~IR —. ~ — I I I i i ~ — ~ I I ANALYSIS OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS fN THE DOWNTOWN 3.9 For this study, the following three scenarios were used to determine parking requirements: Current Scsnarig - This looks at the amount of ofi-street parking that is presently required versus ths amount that is actually provided in the Downtown. Medium-Term Dsvslocmsnt Scenario - Ths mediumvterm is deemed to bs over the next ten years. It is expected that during this time, lands that are now vacant in ths Downtown will develop with two to three storey buildings, some of which will bs mixed-uss residential and commercial. Lono-Term Dsvelocmsnt Scenario - Ths long-term scenario forecasts ths amount of development that will bs accommodated in the Downtown when complete redevelopment ultimately occurs. It is anticipated that in ths long-term, lands in ths Downtown wili bs mors intensively developed with multi-storey mixed-uss buildings. The latter two development scenarios reflect ths continued popuiatfen growth in ths City that will generate additional demand for goods and services by residents. Forthcoming projects in the Downtown such as ths new Provincktl Courthouse will generate employment opportunities and new demand for related business services, With ths add5on of this major instttutknal facility, which will help to reinforce ths Downtown, development of vacant sites is anticipated in ths short term and redevelopment of older properties will likely occur over the lang term. Furthermore, many of ths sites in the Downtovm are presently underdeveloped and do not maximize site potential. Ths zoning regulathns in the Downtown permit multi-storey development, underground parking, and residential uses above ground floor commsmial. Nsw development in the Downtown is encouraged to take advantage of thkr potential and make more intensive uss of the land. ~ ln all three scenarios, certain assumptions were made about ths amount of land in Ihs Downtown that have development potentiaL The following Lands to have no development potential (and were therefore excluded from the total land availabls for development) because their use will not likely change over the long-term: three paridng ktts, two City parks, and the Hydro substatlon. Two apartment buildings at 2233 and 2285 Wlkon Avenue were also excluded because they do not have a cornmsrdal use The component and are deemed to satisfy their own parking Provincial Courthouse site was also excluded from the total lend avalktble for development because it will also satisfy its own parldng requtrwnents. were /~JPIIIIIERj. ~@,— mmvl I Rl! H City~ rsqui~. )%4 g IIIL'S IIIN @ illlS S&j'2 8 1994 4,;;,:spill li!' Ij lj j IlfiLj fg g ja n i aa s m r s ~ ~ aia 'I »S 44» ~ IIII» ~$ %5riai li ~ '1 ~RLII I I ]ha " = "vol I 5 1 I r»I» '%I ~ IlkltI ~ Ie I g "==L ) I II 4R5 ~ I a4 4 4 )t sl I. I6644'+ Rl 5 [ )j » les e s ~ I ~ I jj e»P1Mle~ee'g g~ ~ u~ jj~ almliffilff a~ :: '8 ="=SKI Es = =mar sr ~s.=:=: = .~ee m II a ~ I jjf NSS'~S tll ss: i,iil III- '-- sisssr I '' ~ 4 . '-'"-~ Rti ll~ lllaf 5 1 IS% 111 I ~ I la =-==== == =-"' mssssssiRIiltsa KSf ~ ss.s simmsl5 E u all I piutl ~ el gs g frgiiijii;. s ==-.„-,—, —, Ey~ -; — ~~~g Il amati, gg SSI gill rase is ssI....",~:,;~l ~ 4 IIIII 5 gifaIiiiisl"'jj s lite - — — I 15 Iws em~ iasase~asllRP I )5 i" '~ I „~le aller „, ;'""„--„';3') -4 Bllbs~ie ~ MERE 3.1 Ccrrrsnf PerNng Rscfulrsmsnfs This section estimates ths number of parking spaces currently required in ths Downtown according to existing uss and compares it to the number of offstrset parking spaces that are actually provided. This comparison will determine ths extent of ths parking shortage in ths Downtown. Ones ths total floor area (of office and retail uses) and the number of seats (of restaurant and assembly uses) were determined, the parking standards of the "Development Management Bylaw, hlo. 2241 wacs applied to calculate ths parking requirements. Table 1 below shows the amount of parking required and provided in the City. Table 1: Current Parking Requirements and Provision In ths Downtown Amount of Floorspscaf Parldng Standard Number of Seats or Units Office Retail Restaurant Assembly Residential ~iM space per 45 m2 space psr 47 m2 1 per 5 seats 1 per 10 seats 1.7 per unit 9,913 rn2 20,798 m2 1,849 seals 1,088 seats 74 units 1 1 eSIIIIN IIIst,,ah~) ~ ~ 221 spaces 443 spaces 330 107 spaces 128 spaces ~vlded Psrklncg hlunfcfpal Psrkktg Lots Private QIRRnsst Parkktg Arses Ii g III I II I %~II 58 b ~R ISIII r ) 1115% II II IW i (t u&v ~»I ii ~ p ash I I I IIII.'-, — -:=-:= — "i ~as ~c — '-: — .-- ...'.!ll"" ~. I 'i- I " — I III~tllai: ~ ai ~ i II ~ ~ R I 8fedftrm-7srm Parfdny Requfremenfa 2.2 that most of ths new development Over ths next tsn years, it is expectedvacant sites. For the purpose of within the Downtown will occur on presently floorspace, vacant lots are assumed forecasting ths amount of new commercialsits coverage and 50% of ths kn area 40% to develop with two-storey buildings, ths total floor area provided in ths sscon of Half availabls for surface parking. to be used for oNce purposes and the storey of new development is assumed units. The proportion of restaurant to remaining half to bs used for residential proportions currently found in ths on retail use at ths ground level is based 1$ Downtown. $ Downtown are not expected to The remaining developed iands in thebelow summarizes ths parking redevelop or change substantially. Table 2 scenario. requirements for ths mid-term development Table 2: Development Sce Parking Requirements of ths Medium-Term Bftfgtlpsd Parkfrtg; Forsctfstsd Amount of Uss Parldng Standard Recfufred space per 45 rn2 1 space per 47 m2 1 psr 5 seats 1 per 10 seats 1.7 spaces psr unit 81 8 spaces Parldng FfoorapacafNo. of Seeks or Units 14,297 m2 29,952 m2 2,885 seats 1,068 seats 125 unite Office Retail Restaurant Asssmbiy ! Residential 1 587 spaces 107 spaces 218 spaces 1,818 Total Parldng Recfulrsd: ~ [Municipal Parldng Lola lands 'rom development on pnssently vacant Areas Exfeting Pdvate Off-Street Parking Tobal Parldng Provided: IR I)IR i ai ail Ill I'l hII I/ l lli gg gI kjwl, ifLPI8t ~ ==-"„I" lIII AHI II IIII ~gqiain" II+fglw ~K: ~ &alInI em s= . — — --. ~aa &~Ikw ~~~ISS~ryaim'~ ~ ..— I&%II .'8 I Ijsss ~+ii +RI~$ 4 nwg~ I 5EPP fl %k 5 o WK / mr~~ I%'ea gI IIgi i~ssiswllhl+IR . 1 .. — — —.— l1 ~',;; — ~= ' IX ] I.','~~~ ~',g~MI~IIL~g~sml~lR~:," ICI LIHi ~ ' JIPRI I '~ ~ aw1 X9 Long"TIlllt Psrfdrrg Rs@ulfsNwnfrr The gnal scenario considers the amount of cornrnsrcial floorspacs in the Downtown when it reaches a point of uitimate saturation with new dev !opment. Some bmad assumptions were made about ths type and form of new development that could occur in order to reach a realistic conclusion of hcw the Downtown will appear in ths long-term. For this scenario, it is assumed that 50% of the developabls land area in ths Downtown wiil bs occupied wIth three-storey, mixed-use buildings ths'. avs a floor area ratio of 2.1. Parking for these types of buildings will be contained in an underground structure; therefore, virtually 100% of the site area is availabls for parking provision. The remaining 50% of the developable lands is anticipated to develop with two-storey commercial development with a site coverage of 50%. Thee~ dsveiopments ars expected to provide surface partdng. it is also assumed gtat these developments will not contain a resider@at ecrnponent. .Table fb Parking Requirements of the Long-Term Qevsfopmstd Pwtfdng Standard Forecasted Amount of FloorspacsfNo. of Seats or Units Office Retail Restaurant Assembly Residential 47,857 m2 35,785 m2 2,980 seats 1,402 seats 290 units ~o . 1 1,084 1 781 space psr 45 m2 specs psr 47 m2 1 per 5 seats 1 psr 10 seats 1.7 ~ per unit Total Partdng Raqutrsdt Municipal Parking Lots Gff-street Parking Areas in new development 597 141 ~ ~ 499 spaces 2A Summery ot Perking Requirements Table 4 below summarizes ths three scenarios in order to illustrate ths present day parking deficit and the potential shortages over ths medium and long term. Table 4: Summary of Parking Requirements ln ths Oovmtown Present Medium-Term Oay Scenario Lang-Tenn Scenario Required Parking Spaces 1,227 1,818 8,088 Provided Parking Spaces 1,001 1,972 Parking Deficit Ths above table shows that Dcwntawn Port CoquNam presently requires aver 200 more cff-street parking spaces to meet the proper standards of the "Development Management Bylaw, 1987, No. 2241 . As the Downtown continues to develop and redevelop in a more intensive manner, it wili become increasingly mors difficult to meet parking requirements on-site. Over ths next tsn years, if ths present day deficit is not eliminated, the City can anticipate shortages of over 500 parking spaces as vacant lands in ths Downtown develop. Gnce the City has reached its level of ultimate developrcsnt, there may bs a shortage of over 1,000 parking spaces if there are no policies or provisions in place to create new ofl-shiest partdng. ~ ~ sl III P~'a I~ I~ ale Sl ~ swII ~8 19'aiie4 ~Is Illllll'EP I 1 Mal I IJIllll 2 JJ &I Nf'I flL' ,Jelll d Me e t t il ~1 '="-= ="'-"" tII e sl a e,;, —- II) I %pl 1 IW I I SI ~ ~l I I Current Psrfrfng Nsnsgsmsnf iyfschsnlsms In Port Ccvfuiffsm 4, 1 4.1.1 Parking Renfei Many older commercial buildings in Port Coquitlam wars built prior to the establishment of parking standards. Consequently, many of there buildings do not provide adequate cff-strset parking to meet today's needs. Businesses in Port Coquitlam that cannot meet off-street parking requinrmsnts must rent parking from the City. Currently, a business pays, for each deficient parking space, a one-time fes of $360 and $7.50 psr month thereafter. The business is afoot assigned a specific space in a lot or on the street for its sxciusivs use. This system is strictly cash-in-Iisu of meeting iba parldng requirements. The collected funds are used for on going maintenance of pubNc parking lots and for acquidng more land for parking. In 1994, a total of 283 'spaces'ere rented among 11 businesses and organizations in the City of Port Coquttlan, aN of which were kcated in the Downtown. 4. 1.2 Afunicipsl Parking Facilithss The City presently owns and maintains three surface parking lots in the Downtown. These lots provide a total of 234 paddng staNs for the pubgc that ars frss of charge. The lot at ths comer of Wilson Avenue and Donald Btrsst, which is most centrai to the Downtown, has a three-hour time Nmit and is intended primadly for uss by shoppers. The two other lots, located at ths periphery of ths Downtown, provkle agcy parking to accommodate people who work In the Downtown or who want to leave their cars for the day in order to uss pubNc transit tc.commute to other munlcipagties. IIP:ll 4 1.8 Cd&its Psrfdng Provisions Under ths provbshns of ths Development Management Bylaw, required parldng doss not have to bs located on the same parcel as the use for whhh the parking is required. SecNon 8(b) of the Byktw states that required parking spaces can either bs located on the parcel, or ~ ow~ "on a parcel or portion of a parcel kcatsd wNhln 95 m (322.91 ft.) of the building for which they ars required, provided that annexed to such parcel is a covenant registered in favour of ths that the parcel or poNon of the parcel concerned shaN ccnNnue to bs used solely for paddng Mun~ purposes.'5 PI II I Rllll III g SI IIII[ ! Il',III 1 III'( I'I ~ I II+ ~ — -. M taj j ~ '-. ~ ~A ~ ~ ~ its&s I IS~i% s aaslc:.:: —:— a's iljn. II%K ~ W! I BIER s ~s&sh bP'=& 4 ~ I ~ 5 '~ I ~~ --==~','' wsNI IHRN!arm I aa I 4 g IaaSI I I I iaa4aEa%$ 5$ %$ 5l,ll I i ~ I ~ I~Rt ANNI//Q Nsgspi~ll ILII ~~M [[ NsINfl~'ahRI ~ h ssrs ~emamea&R; ~ ~aI — . 'sRNHI s parking" is currently permitted in Port Coquitlam, there is no aking advantage of it in the formalized manner outlined above. er municipalities also have similar provisions within their local pacify that a lot up to 150 or 200 metres away may be used to parking requirements. There is also a condition tc register a nicipality's favour to ensure that such parking would be as required. stion of Cunent Partrtng Management Msctbanisma rt Coquitiam n of monthly rents for parking spaces allows the City to snue for ongoing maintenance of existing municipal paddng ats funds for'fbture acquisition of lands for parking purposes. e only municipawy in ths Lower Mainland that uses a em. It has a number of shortcomings which include the ng time to generate suNclent funds for property acquisNon monthly rates are low; ection requires staff time and administration on a regular and S; sees that rent spaces do not actually get a space assigned to uss. Munlcfcal Parkino Faciiitkbst The municipal lots provide 234 parking stalls ln three kcatlons in the Downtown. Even if the businesses that rent spaces fbom the City were assigned an actual partdng staN in one of these lots, there would not be enough stalks as there are over 280 bskbg rented. J! sb s'as lb sbb i s sat Nl ss II s.'gilifilI I ~ $ IIsl~ IS 11!sI sbs 5g I'ii siii" i'till 5 3 Ill e &a b ISLI s I""---—— bbalallll s &a sb b N II Blhl IbHb Thefts is a need to evaluate the municipal hts to ensure that they are sNcfsnt and sdtractlve to users. As some of the ksts are kcatsd at ths periphery of the Downtown, it ks important to reinforce the pedestrian Inkagss to and from the lots. InsuNctent lighting and threat of vandagsm also need to bs examine and addressed so that people will feel comfostabks uskbg those kbtss. e Paddno P ovbsionsb This method allows a site wNb a surplus of parking spaces to assist another sits that cannot meet Its requirements. Thkb would aIcw for more SEP Z 8 &9&4 efficient uss of eNsting parking areas. However, there are several drawbacks, including the following: The Municipality would have an an-going role in administering the required covenants; There may not be any appropriate parking areas within ths specified distance that could bs used for fulfilling parking requirements; and There may be a change in use so that the property with the surplus parking would require ths fuil uss of its parking. Hence, that propsriIy would no longer be able to assist another property in fuNlling its parking requirement. 42 Psrfrfny Nanagsment Nscfranisme In Other Nunlcfpalltlee There ars additional methods of implementation being canied out kt other municipalities to address parking.deficiencies. Several widely-used methods are summarized below. MunicipalNss wsw found to apply one or mors depending on the extent of the parking deficiency and ths appropriate remedy. m~ 4,2.1. Cash-in-Lieu Instead of a monthly parking rental, some munhipalNea collect a ons-fims lump sum fes for each parking stall that is short of the total requtnwnents. These ises are placed in a reserve fund to bs used for upgrading of exkrting parking lots and acquisition of properfies for new ones. Ths payment amount differs among municipalities depending on who is made to pay. N In some municipalities, cash-in-lieu paymsrrts ranging from $ 10,000 to $ 14,000 psr stall are paid for stdctly by developers instead of IndMdual Su~ ,isN+)( businesses. Cash-in-lieu ia triggered only if thew is a development appfication to aw build a new building or make an additke to an exisfing ons. generally exempt from having to pay ths high penalty fess for parldng shortfall. LR:": to sfihsr developers or businesses where there Is a parking shortfaN. In new development or an addNon to an sxkrfing buikling, the developer would pay for each dsficisnt parking stall. If thew is a change kt it N the business to one that riquires more off-street parking than ficence. business Sat pays the fee prior to issuance of aRaiill54 ~ In other munlctpalNss, a lower payment (in ths range of $ 3,500 to $ 8,000 per stall) Is 1'LIP%7 II'Ilij' 4.2.2 Development Variance Permit ll II II ig 10 lu«« '» e srf I ~ )IIf«&~«««« ilasIW I «« 5 aN 'RS ~ MR I 8&« I ~ g~,'$ /Ftag=='- "-- fM W'« '",x«BM ~ s vhi" I Ill I ['AN&e ic I Ilia! 3 Nfl A Development Variance Permit may be gwnted by Council to wktx parking requirements if they cannot be met cn nearby or adjacent lots. In some municipalities, a D.V.P. application to relax parking must bs accompanied by an 5wlii ii ««N IR I 5 «««m «3 I4 MIBIlg'I N ~IM ~ DSg «« ~ ~, lel; ' =::5iia& aasra«IsIIIN Hlii «Sl I I I ~ mm «««I ja I fs«aa = ««Sl « m] ~ « II ~ sea ~ « & u/~',gj ';. ~ S ,'8IIMNtlrs 1~ ~'««« tlf 11: ~ r slat«i gJRISNI ~ ( I '«$,$ LS I u g[ ' .' Is ~ ~ «'' S««« II 'I I IC — Ig ''«INI IBID — ~~2( „, -- — — — v sB -— « & R ] l I ap I%I Ml ~ Isi'5'I R nl ". elsewhere nor would any funds be collected in lieu of parking provhske to assist the municipaiity in land acquisition for parking. I )N It'll ;a IIiEti,, L I ll f SEP2 B $94 11 e && Shared parking results in mors efficient uss of land because less land would be required for parking purposes. However, this method faces ths same problems as offTsite parking provision. If there is a change In any of the businesses that share the same parking spaces, the 'sharing may not bs able to continue. Ons of ths businesses would then find itself unable to meet its parking requirements. 43 Comptrrlson of Psrfdny Standarcfs The parking standards for commercial development in other municipalities were compared to those of Port Goquitlam. Overall, the standards tend to be quite similar between municipalities for most commercial uses. In the comparison, however, higher parking requirements were noted for some uses that generate more traff!c snd customer volume. Gommercktt uses such as banks, medical ofgces, and retail liquor stores have higher parking standarda than general commercial uses. Some munclpalttiss recognize the stgnIScancs of the Downtown commercial core by having higher parldng requirements than in ths secondary commercial areas. Some bylaws tie ths parking requirements to density of development by requiring a certain number of spaces for the first several parldng thousand square metrss of gross floor area and then a requirement for floor area over and above that base amount. h~r & 4llll I j iii4I ~IIII & ~ can -- il~ wlr 44rt ~ ~ & 44 4 4 ~iigaai ~ I & la I il ~ii141 44& II& I& a&44 44&&a t4 a&la~I '4='==-4@5 jt." p I i4 I '~ IIII Wil II'lL'I eat S t;~l ~tM'@8-===--==t!I = :..=.. sell lgtll ~la! &4m,@tile — — a&1m t ltalt@/LIj 44 &«4 tie«a&i ilia: ~ 5.6 PARKING POUCY RECOMMENDATIONS Ths analysis in Section 3.0 confirmed that there will not be enough off- strsst parking to accommodate the type and density of development that is expected in ths Downtown. Ths City has a rssponsibiiity to local businesses and residents to help create a vibrant and economically viable Downtown Core. It must, therefore, implement some actions to help increase Ns supply of parking before ths situation is too critical. The previous section examined the types of mechanisms presently being used in Port Coquitlam and several other municipalities to address ths problem of parking shortage. There is no perfect solution to solving the need for mors parking. Some of the City's methods such as the parldng rental, have certain shortcomings and could be revised to ths more common cash-in-lieu system used in other muncipalities. Some of ths methods found in other municipaiSss were deemed to bs inappropriate to Port Coquitlam's sftuatkwt. The following is a sst of piopossd policies for Council consideration. The poiicies confirm the City's commitmsnt to improving ths paitdng situation in the Downtown through direct action and changes to its regulatory mechanisms. The actions that can be implemented to achieve the policiss ars detailed in the next section of this report. policy t: That the City take s direct role In provldlng new public perking fscilltlee In the Downtown snd making meet effective use of existing ones. This policy option means that the City will take an active part in. Providing public parking facilities. Mors surface parldng lots could be onstructsd on vacant municipal iands or existing ones couid be expanded, where possible. This would provide an immediate supply of parking spaces. Other kxtgsr-term proactive roles could indude purchasing land for parking purposes or undertaking to construct a mulg-level parkads somewhere in the Downtown.,These are more capital-intensive projects that require collsctkxt and/or tdkcalcn of funds. —." @II Kl s s gtli I &i I ISI ~ i Mll IIIIsa ""~ iI 8 IMI/ ~ Is' I ii a [~ ~ guI/ n IS!II .=:=In iI ~ gssai ii~lll, policy gr Xhet the Cltfr eet'strlleh e new perfdng fteserve Fund to collect funds for the future development of meJor pertdng projitrrcts bus~ The City currently collects rent from and landowners who cannot meet the off-street parking requirements. These funda are placed into a reserve fund for the purpose of maintaining and bulkling muniopal parkhg lots. The fess presently collected ars low, relative to the fess charged in some oNsr municipalities. Consequently, it will take much keger to colktct sufMsnt funds cEp p 8 199I II ~ l4II I rule I i lib'~ Se4 as — Iil ~eiIII to initiate a major project. Revisions to ths parking Reserve Fund could be made to establish a ons-time cash-in-lieu payment system to eliminate monthly billing and collection. policy fh Tftat the City encourage perking areas In the Downtown to be underground or within a structure. Through its policies and regulations, ths City can direct parking areas to be located underground or covered within a structure. Such parking arrangements uss up less surface area and meke more efficient use of ths land Policy 4: That the City facilitate ways to reduce the number of care taken Into the Downtown area ~ Another way of reducing ths amount of pressure to find ptufdng is to encourage people to leave their cars at home. Ths City could Identify ways of ensuring that ths Oowntown is pedestrian-friendly or conduchre to other of transportation. Policy Sr That the following municipal lots be used solely lbr publfc parking In perpetuity: Northeast comer of Donald Street and Whwn Avsnuel 2. Southeast corner of Shaughnseay Street and Nngsway Avenue; 8. Northeast comer of Elgln Avenue and Navale Street, The above-mentioned sites ars presently used for public parking. In order to ensure that these sites ars protected from being sokl off for development, Council can identify these lots for exciusivs parking use in perpetuity. These Iota may bs considered as potential Iocatfons for a parking structure or rsmahn as surface lots. Policy Sl Yttat- prior to the sale of any City~ lands within the Downtown, the lande will be evaluated lier their potsndal as ~ putdfc perNngsltee. g!&w5]g m e ~ Rllll I I $N In to ths municipal parking lots and ssvend parks, ths City owns several other sites within ths Downtown ares lhat will eventually bs tendered to the public and developed for commerckd uss. Pdor to ths sale of any City owned! ands to a private developer, ths City shoukl evaluate them for any potential use as public parldng sites. If ths lots as petpstual parldng lots in Policy 5 are not sufMsnt to meet needs, ths City wli have to determine If additional City land should be corwertsd to parldng lots or explonf means of securing public parldng in new development through agtasmsnta with the developer. ~sd g;;i:!jjjll t4 ~~ ~ F% I N RI5jwgj, i%IS+~~ l ~ s we 15llplNIINI — — N Rj MS IK 6.0 IMPLKMKNTATION QF POUCY RKCQMMKNDATIQNS In order to implement ths policies recommended in the previous section, a number of actions can be taken. This section reviews ths various strategies that the City can undertake to implement the policies. Policy 1: 1. That the City take e direct role in provfdlny new pubyc perNny lecilltlee ln the Downtown end rneNny most etffclent use ot exletlny ones. Pave ths remaining portion of the municipal lot on Shaughnessy Street close to ths Kingsway Avenue overpass. Several years ago, the City purchased the property at 2670 Shaughnssay Street and demolished Oe building on the lot. The lot has since remained as gravel-surfaced. This portion of ths lot can bs paved over and ths parking stall lines rs-painted. 2. Rs-design ths parking areas alound Leigh Square to accommodate better circulation and maximize parking opportunlttee. 3. Rs-inforce pedestrian linkages between peripheral public parking lots and ths Downtown to encourage maximum usage. Such improvements incfuds: Provide more lighting in lanes that connect to public parking areas. a Install low-profile landscaping around public paridng areas instead of large tress and hedging. ~ Improve condition of lanes that connect to public parking areas to eliminate potholes and drainage problems. ~ Remove glass in parking lots more frequently to improve safety to both o cars and pedestrians. 4. Identify parking lots at government buildings as being reserved or 6ms-limited during the weekdays only. During times when these offices ars not open, their parking arses should bs available for uss by ths general pubNc. 5. Ds~ two areas for a future parking structure: the paddng lot on WIison Avenue near Donald Street and the parldng lot at the north snd of Shaughnessy Street close to the Kingsway Avenue overpass. Funda can bs collected accordingly for conatructke of a structure in the future. ~ 6. Review the Development Management Byktw to update the parMng standards to reflect higher parldng requirements for more uses. SEP 2'8 1994 Polfcjr eL 1. Yfet ffre Cltfr tacffffefe arefrs fo nsduce fhe number of cere fefren hNe Ne Bowrtfown area. Prove mons an~Nes and facilNes for cyclists (e.g. bgre racks, bke lockers). 2. Provide more amenNes and facilNes for pedestrians. These ktcfude: I mole benches and feel sfeas ln the Downtown. o require buildings to provide canopies or other forms cf weather protection. o wider sidewalks to facilitate outdoor actMtles and acccnsnodate display areas in front of storefronts. 3, 4. transit connections into the Work with B.C. Transit tc improve public 'n areas. Ths City could work with Ride Downtown and identify potential Park the Downtown Core where B.C. Transit tc identify potential lots outside of of taking their to cornmuters could. park for the day to transfer a bus instead cars into the Downtown. Park 'n Ride in ths Work with commuter rail authoritiss on a collective lot or facility to serve the Downtown that would also double as a parting needs of workers or shoppers in the Downtown. ~ used solely for public Policy fh That the following municipal lots be parlrfng In psrpstultyr and yffllson Avenue 1. Northeast corner of Donald Southeast comer of Shaughneasy Street and Nngeway Avenue Street; and 8. Northesaf comer cf Slgln Avenue and bfaple people to lhe public parldng areas. 1, Provide better signage to direct and 2. R4Hr valuate efficiency of parking lots ~ign, nary, to circulation and access. if i~ CNywwnedIands wlthln tfre Policy fh That prior to the sale of any evaluated for their potentbrl aa Downtown, the lande will be public psrldng sltea. lola. Citywwned properties that are suitable for surface 1. identify additional negotiate 2. Determine if there is any potential to proviaon of public paifdng from developers of Citywwned sites. I!111 a i aiiia IIIM aaa a sa I i 1%jete IIiii j jeIIt ifiitl) II W R 5%I I iiii:,i'~ yIiI rti'II I i~'-.'-. SEP 2 8 199li 17 THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY'F PORT COQUITLAlvi MEMORAND Environmental Protection Committee TO: F. K. K. Cheung, P. Eng. FROM! project Engineer . SUB JECT: 1995 - 1996 PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL RFt AMMENDATIONI That Committee review snd approve the 1995 - 1996 pr 1. BACKGROI JWD dl COMMKiaiXS" The Engineering Department is preparing the 1995 - 1996 propo end of September to City Treasurer. Included in the Budget is th which includes projects for a grass and leaf depot facility, comp cost share. It is recommended that Committee review and appro Budget. FKKCI attachment %II II NIIN I1 lh fii tamil glttttl s~ I UU I IRgl /Inlli 11 I'Ill'! '! Ii'1119t I .~ '',; .-.- II ll ~ ~ a % ~ I I ttn U ~ ~ tta I Ian II &U~ I ''a U ~ n I II I na lig B Stg l1 il ~ I l al ' I ~ UI I I ~ asm~i ~ ., 'Uis Is I ~ ~ I n I I'ass I ll I I al :al ~ I II Ja amass I UU Ua M I I 8 ~ II I s U I W I Ills I u iiaia II I' I ~~~ Inaa=- —.: I SS ~ I ~ if ' I HUU .«P 2 8 1994 I II I I I lail ~ .-, a l ILN in t ~ Il I J I 1 ~ 5 ~ 'I 5 I%M III w It www D Oww I ~ "w "w O WOOD O O O e O OOOOo O OO 5 555515 I J '1 55 54 gl I m8 Rll1%1 /I 4 ~ 11 ~ 5 50 IIIINSI I i5 I5)Ill 1' I/fi'II1i 51 li I :..''.::.=:fII II I I I 14I I II I I I L5II II I Ill I N 5 I I 1 ITS I Ilail ~ %1 aa-t:to — . — lil iFIIUI ~I' ! I I5 It 11 II I ~ 14 : NI5 5 55 ',I I gg~'iill llill0 Ill f) IIIII I ) ] ii[gg]1'I5~ o '... I ~, 111 ~ II ' I II 111'' 11, I 11 .St 3 I 1. I I k t I ~ l%1 8 ' 1 V '%ii t I liiiii' I llii I 1 II III ; 5 1155 ~ ' ~ It SO D D 4 CI VI O C 0 SSO M O 0 0 O Q CS g 0 5'A IA 00 O 4) Oa O IF 4I 0 0 4F C O SF 00 0 C Fb Cl D ~ III"II( $ IIIII I I ll ll/l&, LI'i : "cS Sl SF I ~ ~ S Clg ~+USE .,S SSISI IS% Ill lilli I ~ I Ill IN " I II I S IF ~ ~ ~ Sa I I !SISII ~ S $ '$ I Sli ~ ~ ~I C F lllai &V&i I Sl I I' IRI SI I" „is% I I. I 4 l! ~ S ~ II II S i 11' I I I I Il nmm y ) Cti bsi ls f llÃ'=-— ~gieg advantages, of approval: Resources required: !Personnel & benegts -provide an alternative foz residents to raus and recycle their recyclable materials. ( Equipment -reduce overall solid wastes and recycling i Illli g I I SI collection and disposal costs. Utilities -proposed budget for two events, Spring and Fall. Materials & supplies &ai glI! M'J~ f IIRSI II! Wl lg ps!! '! M4II4I in iii Nlgi Iigtg4 !Wisz 8 su ) 4 Contracted services CAPITAL Tot» Implications of Denial: -overall solid wastes and recyclable collection -cost vill continue to increase zaiil . I I I 5RI '%) ~ $ 6n nnn Revenue generated $ Other funding $ '4 'jl Il Other funding source Illa'!! ,I 'budget dz Administration Committee recommendation: NRI I g I gIf IzsI e I I I I I I I l I I I )N,i IIII IIII Iree 4 gl ieai xiii i P44II 814 II i II II i i i II '' ill! O'I '4" I ii!111 II gigg I 'I:: ! ~zaz, I I! 1st II I all Ilhml g ' M 'ml ra 0 I~ , r II ,':;41 4n el r '..411 I ~ '11r ~ II \ %I ~ I ~ I I I ~ m m el a 'I !II 8! 4 -reduce overall solid wastes collection an disposal costs. Ill% IIM5@ 0 Equipment -generate revenue from sale of composted material to Parks and Recreation Department 8ii im 0 150,000 gI I, gR 0 RLR %~I RSS il 5 IS%. Total 'mplications of Denial:I .....« ..«I ........I...„...h disposal costs will continue to increase. lail 4 I em 4 I I el jmr r Ilml Revenue generated I)l l $ Is Vl ~ 44' ',15 llill, I, l)ji ip" Rlj I jjjjl /IRIjjH $ 150,000 Other funding ) 'I lg~ ill 44 44 Other funding source m l Vi I jl 4 el mr a I slvslR.leer budget & Administration Committee recommendation: j I jII RltnIU II 44 44114 Illll II 1II / I jj jjIlj SF.P 2 S 199fI I''II I I iii 1llf LjgD --— IB I'II'I jjl/11 Ilr ~ All I I... j jiig; 4 I hlhls IIVV ;.='l g;;;; 4 I I I he S . Meh elm lhl r ' ~gj ~ 4 4 ~ I g s Rs II V ses li I S I II %1 li I l-,elf ill%i ln! '5th = = = ~ 4 5 aa e I I ~ I vjlII '8SI gIIII insllRII . QI II II il I's Ij I Utilities Materials & supplies Isr rum lilt)) I mll I II mmr I a ua III I I All * — ijI 14 ~ - 1 -encourage residents to recycle their recyclables. Equipment -reduce overall solid waste collection and disposal costs. R!! IW 5 1! I (ISIS $ 20,000 Materials gr supplies $ 75 000 Contracted services '$25,000 Utilities Total lmpiicatiorr of Dmria1 I -over.ll solid waste collection and diapers.'- costs will continue to increase. Revenue generated Other funding ul I.a' Igi g Other funding source IIBudget gr Administration Committee recommendation: ~4 ])baal Ia I igIgI Ii N ~ .bbi!:":";", = 'ill! i I I il I r, Iiil!I I I II ri I II!I F" '.'." '' Iilc = ': . . FII 4 Ii II I g in g Ig I I IF I I I IL4I . - =.bII- SII I II F AFII ~ 4~ ~ $ lPP PPP $ BH}g Minerals Canada t.td. Island Copper Mine P.O. Box 370 Pert Hardy, B.C. Canada R(ON 2PO Telephone (R4} 34OO323 Paaaasslas (Oed} Oaedagae Minerals . OF PORT POOUITIN NGINEERI}dn .FII ~ r SEP Enclosed please find: TO 1. A copy of the first report of the North Island Round Tabl: -J7. ..;PE FROM Nz. $ (t iS(o BHP Landfill Proposal. IC ws 2. A copy of an extract from Volume 2 of the Greater Vane(I Solid Waste Man gen t Plan. Additional studies out-of-Region DisposaL This extract describes the BHP landfiH proposal as of the date of publication. For further information, piease contact: I W I Mr. R.B. (Dick) Robertson Mr. Craig P. Aspinall Project Manager BHP Minerals Canada Ltd. P.O. Box 370 Port Hardy, B,C. VON 2PO Tel. 949-6326 Fax 949-8130 Craig Aspinall 8 Associates Ltd. ¹302 - 1226 Homer Street Vancouver, B.C. V6B 2Y5 Tel. 682-6301 Fax 684-6819 Public Relations ~% lRI lllil liO aalml lI i lURI lsm lie~ » s li ssgg sisi l ~ s~ ~ n n a asg I I . I )Is dgaeii tt II iI l7Ir :::: 3ILI sEP 7 8 199(} "'O Ol I ~a I'.rl }i Ill}II lllllllil H I ~ ~ I III'I'I IrPlll}::.; . I IIIII» .", I x I ~ I I a t1 ~ 11 ' l I II II I ee IN" ! sap ng: ss Isl }lifts I I H 2 151 il '- ':;;an ital( "„=, Illgl I I 'oa: ii/es lulu a. nial s aa ~ i(Ill l ~ R I I 1 uutt natu a I II' II I I P OR Oll Italian III }} Hl!'Hl —— ~ 2lJ I H n ll gang H - I lal Stjg mSEH ma I I s '"'"» i H I I 4 ~Iiiig tail1 require Ihe construction of a , drsposai wshout causing Irenster staten and contan- ,'poiiutron of air or water and er term nai at Irre mouth of It»!I rt woiaf monde 8 steady Ihe Fraser Awer, e contaner hase of employ mani Ior restermmal on the Nonh Island, iden!sot Me area. container vessels to trans. Port the waste to the North After the community meeiisiand, Imcks to transport ngs it became apparent the waste across the North that there Waa rtqt e Ccriisiand, ano numerous faut. sensus in the North Island ties at the mine site rtseif. communrtas as Io the ben. BHP est mates that capttsf elis of BHP's proposaL costs will be about 375 mii. Opin ons ranged from t,on and Ihai about 100 enthusiasm to outnght d rect pbs would be created oppoaimn to Ihe proposal. IntheNorth is!and. The fitfnlls repoftad Ifiasa 'ifferent vaws snd Ihe BHP hunng the months of proposef Imcarita tha sub. ehruary, Ma ch and Apni feel of Iwhfic corttrovwas In 1993, 8HP conducted a , pefticulsr, tits Oustsiiio Task nenes of commun ty rr eel. 'orce was organrzed hy rss. ngs dunng wh ch they pre dents of OOBisrrto to rliohl. sent-0 iileir propossi er d pubic opinion egwnst i ', j , i Ilijlilg e repon. Please nuul or fax Mr. Pauick Moore. Facilitator, Nonh Island Round Table, 101 — 1198 West Pander Stmei, Vancouver, B.C. 96E 289 Telephone: 689-'l500 Facsimile: 669.0028 In additionStudies to this puhticsuon, ihe fogo»fng material will be available lor review on the premises si the locations lisied I lom Round Table Report June 1994. Memorandum ol Dndcrstantgng, Round Table Minutes, Pmjcct Praspecius — April. 1993, Major Pro/ect Review Process. B.C. Lnndfi8 Criteria. Island Copper litine - 1992 Environm«niaf Assessment Hspon, Design ol Rock and/er Soil Slopes (8. Findlsy), W tc quality monitoring of Qustwrm Sound(I. Home). Mine clo., sure plan O. Home), Ileview of likely consequences foBowinn a large sank+8 (A.M. Rohermon), Southwsg Pushback Projem (R.B. Robenson. B.Tfudlny, K. 0'ne), Summmy of CVRD Strategic Recommendations, Scope of Work (Emcon), Leachate Tmstroent (8 C. Revcmch), Tounsm Impacu - Preliminary Assessment (C. Aspinag), Press clipping file. INFORMATION CENTRESr Pubgc Lihrsri Povi Offices; Cnal Harbour Winter Hathour Port Hsnly Pon htcN»ig Pun A lie Alert Bey Hnlhr rg Smniula 'ue Qentsino Task Force C en Honsen T.h 949.7960 'mii Bbj'H ~ ~ I I I r ve re) ''-" fljg ~ 8 jg I rmi ~'ii''rii'ii[ll ~ IIII I j Ij j I 3 ~ ~ gjj js Iillill's tnt $ f /)1'Jtf ,lh ii tf I Bii 11 I B t I';WF ':::: = IIB I ~ gllggggIMggggggg IM ~ ga iw emr Ie Ie I I r r 1 i ~8i I BM i 0 I j' j I ij illll lllij iiiBSIW)IUIBJ)i i/Ill a,mE j fl II i I & tai Itiii, MB +~ mf'iil imhlR :I — 1'-., , 118 ( glm w~llg smmmaB,l I I 2 ~ igmt ~ 8 —,— ~ eu~ 8 ~ g]fq ~ II II I,il iig gg li'g gl I I I! &! .! Iliiiijg~=.=:=,'=== JF( gfllm "Igg ei I . 'I I'll ~ I 14 ' '1 il I *"'=:= 'belli Wieab Is em rg ~ mt mme ~~ E /ll" 2:M:~g gi,gggggai dl aelaB ~ tsausaam leaE. ~, II ia eamj iI jjgj 5a '- NISI ...a&~&IH~ eealg ~5~--' I 3 ~ e II!I ='::&~ Hml elm'@pe &eee~ j I 'ae ah ll[Iii ea, ~ e e M 5 lijg lgfgi jj'I Il&II%A Sll, g jaj ljii i I ea '". i~gigliee~e I ~ le I '"'" MIla a ~i eae~lm Iaaa ~ e ' i» e» — a ea leaiellllA, m~ I +II ~a—: a e»ll ~ Bl O'Ip 'pig~ II+ le ee p jjljjm&+ " ~ ' ~~...,, . eeal ae as ~e e~ "e~ieaae e ~ la aa eaaeaaa — .'~gSIme& a Ia — -'%&IS~~&aaaeeaeal =-= ~ D(opossl'n tref to aw( deos on on the February 1994 members of Ihe Round Table went on a field tnp to vrsit landfill Tl e sublect of "trust" was cc:- . '.o many discus. fries in Washington Stale and the Lower Mainland. 'hie purpose of the field tnp was to lamilianze members with landfifi design and man- mc -. ers ano ( the puScme May meebngs the Round Table d(SCuaaed the 18 issues in lqjht of the infor. mation they gathered during presentations and field trips. The concerns raised dunng Ihese discussions are the ms 4 ale(rw of tw5 repDrt. Tf(v Role of the Norrh l(fxxd Round Tails I I was agreed eely in the process that the North Island Round TBDle is only one pan of a larger process that will judge the ments of the BHP proposal. Ths North Island Round Table has no 8Ulnwny to approve w dis- approve the project or to require amendmwns to it. it was agreed the mb ol tlw Round Table is to identsy and aniculate local concerns and to make those concerns known to ths pub. lc, BHP, and afi levels of governmenz I SWINSIN ifiml ws wg w [PI [ i I / g I I I 'lex Birkenhead fiy expbrns 9 C Research feechafe lasts by BHP. In addition. it is the Round Table's understanding that if BHP does deckle to 90 ahsatl wsh tha P(qem ttlwa wrfi ba 8 fol(ABI federal-provincial Malor Project Review P(cease w ils equivalent, This was confirmed in a letter of July 5. I 993, 'lo M. C. Hafim(seri of Cuatsino from Anne Edwards, Minister of Energy. Mbes and Petroleum Resources and John Cashofs, 016fl Mirliste( of Environment, La(ids and Parks. The role of the Nonh Island Round Table in Ihe process of IS@sung the BHP proposal cen be summed up as lolbws: To bring together represen tefives of varous Interems on the North Island lo discUss the lmplNBtrons of the BHP proposal. To Idwtsiy Issues f!httad lo Ihe pmposal end to slate lhe concerns of ths Round Table members. '-:: I lfiifi" -.-lIII 199INBIN also agreed the Round Table does not have the resources or the expsr lise to g we a firufi opinen on many of ths complex technn cel snd wmial aspects of the pmposal. Those Oaves vnfi be addressed if the proieci advances tc lhe s;age of a full feasiblizy study pwd for fspofl. The Round Table did not 'To provide a document that adempt lo reach consensus on whether or nol the BHP sums up the concerns of Ihe Round Table members pfoymt should 90 Bhmd. Firstly, there is not yet so BHP, the public end the enough informat'Nn to make government agericies that ' ddkawe Ndgmem: seo. Ihe proposal have a Iudge clear. delafed expression of ondly, the Round Table is local concarns. not authonzed to make fhe dada'Nn. While it is fwr lo ssy there is a range of op'0ue DOC(used end the iorw on the merits or demerCon(en» nf (he Round its Dl lha p(oposel, IhBfs s(a T«bf fifiembe(s two d(slrllcl vxlws: r 'I.ThosB who 5(8 opposed lo Iha proposet Bnd wtlo require a greater degree of assurance than they now enfoy. panicularly about environmental concerns. he Round Table members had many hours of dia"usson dunng which there was an oppwtunny to raise any and afi issues related lo \he proposal. The Round Table operates by consensus so tlwre are no votes. Onhl ind(calons of agraemenl or whee there is not eg(zxh 2.Those wlN would approve of tl,a p(ojscl, pfovKkK! K Is posabls to demonstrate IS CISW. To gather miormation about tha p(oposBI a(Id BboUI (ahaed Issues 5Uch 85 facy. ding, landlifi dewgn, air and water posudon., hsheries, toimsw. job c(s81(oh, etc. The members ol the Ran (0 Table realize there may be Dthef Issues aAd concw(8 than those expressed in this report. They invfie pub(0 comment on lhe Osues raised in the report and any other subiects that may be 'To determvw where tnere is of interesl to Ihe membem. New inlormstcn or conagreemenl and whore there ,'erns w II be rncorporated are 0 derencas of opinion, ments to keep nlemst in mind. .-. mbers are dis- tor ohen serves the Dublir, interest betlw than govemmsnl-run enterpnse. Soma iheihbers Ihirik ttlare (5 hot enough governmwa regulatKxl lo CoilffDI p((Vale I((le(asia whaa othws ba lava thee is akssdy too much government regulaton. These differences cwta cannot be resolved by a s - II commmee orl north. em U Ncouver Island. dunng the discuseons of the North Island Round Table, l. Alta» oI T ho members ol Ihe Round Table are aware of only two existing alternatxe proposals for the open pil when tl e mire ceases oper. atmnin1995 Thefirst slhs plsfi lo food ths ODS(1 p(l wah sea wBI a ( cB Oped w Ih fresh water Io make a lake Tile second s lo use the pil for a faildfia to drsposs Of thsl It woukl nol cBUBB unamepfsble ernnronmwttal domege. muncipa'cud waste. While these two points of vkhv sorAsaitlBs seen( Dotes BpB(l (I IS r(Dona(I IO feC hwn fkeding the pt vwth WBtar. There 8(8 Ao 58(Ious ognoe they share emiler concerns. Everyone agrees the emnnxvrwnt must rot be damag6d by the Drqect and dwt ttwre are sgnrficsm WIVI(onnlSAISI CoflCWhS, j With these general points in mind the folfcuxng are Ihe issues and concerns raised Evenyo(w agrees the sodol a(Id sconDfn(c wea.bsirlg of North Iskmd resklents is imponant and must be cen- There ere no presently known economic benefits snwronmsntat concerns rs(sed by this opt(oh. There would be s gnif economic actnnty generatdjf by s munippal waste landfill operalen In the open ps. Tyws Ius a flufnbe( of 5(g. hrlicshl ailvlrofl(riafssl coil. cefns Bssocxltsd w(th Ihrs opfion I wx ~ $ 11 H Ihto a (Bvbed adilio(1 of this prlorrlfi 0( pe(5paclwa among members of Ihe Round Table, fneflt, drscussioft Uhtrl tha nature of the disagreement I II was ng compan es trustful of the motwes of the pnvate sector while Dlhsrs believe the pnvate ssc. (ABAI optrohs. Cunng the March, Apnl, and members are Dnablq.than oth- '* agement, to contrast sub. standard sites wsh wes.run sit'es, lo vis I waste transfer stations and rscycing centers, and to observe venous ways in which landfill methane is indnerated or used for induslral purposes. The group also veiled B.C. Researcn wnwe scentists retained by BHP were conducting towcay tests on various landSII leadlates and invesbgating leachate treal- sic'e II ji P gjlj..—"— --=.. =Dg sii 8»flq 14214- —— 'jjIFwlHI If I 'lfii 4' j 'e(86 w»i wi mi 8, ~ ~hkRf ~9+B ~ +SI1lfKii~ 9. Ilgj Bgfitlg 4N~~~ II I(la gjfiNS ,',",jNIIIim~ml~ ~ + — ' selellap ~bll~' —~~ 5 gj — — 'm W'((s (4 zg SNk, sf ~ I(a jg x,l INN Iwfa =- —;=.959III I ~ ~ ~ I » I jljjl Jj fiIN ~ IINIBI 5$ $ other party unless orred. so to do 00 bkr goverrirhent ope Indu Sita If BHP were to sell afi or pat furisd I go ahead with ths landfill p'o&osal or il government &ecides against the propos 8, then the pl wis be flood. rtl and lurnso into a fake. T. O d nnklp rind 'tkii of ils lrttsresl fn 8 Iandig opsf. 'tion rt vsl retain is oblige- of t Mo ten lo contrd pofiutlon caused byttamine site. The 'vw Bnd 08 proposed bnc fill would be separate opera. tens and fsi under separate mts of lurscictions and rsgulatic.ns. Some members of h the Round Table are concerned thBI il wis be difficult disc I to determine whether some future enuronnlsntal impact is due to the legacy of the s prssenfiy proposed the mine or lo the landfill opera. andfifi opsrslion would be tion AB members agreed &wned by BNP as a pnvats this concern Should be &usiness suklecl to govsrn- resolved before any appro. nent regulslon. vals are given for the landfill. I ol w in th regu this uniq psl, fere incfud Bivo When the Island Capper Mine was established in fiie mrly I 970's tha waa occu. hiough Ihs Treaty pied by the ml and other buildings was added to the ommisslcn msy resutt in ansfer of ownership and Municipality of Port Hardy in over lands urisdiction some order to provide a properly o the First Nssons. tsrt base for Ihe community The optvi pit wss riot incliiil. pffR has Bri Obligstkui Uirtkir ed ili this ersB Bird Is pivt of provincial legslslion tc Area C of the Regional reclaim the mine site and Distnct of Mount Wadding. lo ensure there is no polo- 'on. As tha arse occupied nian caused lem water by the mine is Crown it end draining through Ihe mine presently hekl under miner81 This responsibility Ins lease by BNP. 0 kmit snd will be AB members agreed that if ed by the posting of the lmtdfill opsrafion goes d that is sufficiBnt to cover any formmabte envi. ahead it will be necessary to ronmental impacts after Ihe resolve the issue of local mine is closed. SHP cannot furisdiction an the sits. At pass this responsitiilrty on to issue is whsthw the larldfil IThe Round Table recognrtss ]he government.to-govern. ent negosssons underway ~ 'I SOS 4 wast ronmen Bntj II was mus leds the p Peg irNJs n sn st the Ther S.e I Ihe R proces be part Dist Wadd sge the 8 'I 000,0 I I SINN Il 0.0 8 000 0 II .„bmg M&4%OM&%ÃMH I" wrss WC$OBPrgkg': O. Patrt... III (~iiisp I fllIUk II ! &I Ig,'Sfffl! saea,~(l +mi SIC @g I Bstt — — I Igii ~ i =.: I I I I I I ., I ~0 I II Sm ~ 8 mi ~ 88 weml~ I eig i I I Ila,, w ~&miiMi, IIIII glamor IAII(II+II IIIII +'1II!II/ '/ / )IIIII 'gg'=" mtistema~gg'..". — WI i = "~~ &I '-:-»~~~l~gm ma+BR'~~fm BHP betieves, and some members agxw, that the scale of the larxall operalon wifi make it more eco- earth floating to the surface. No sclkl waste could escape fram ew pfi into RuperHnlet due to the large expanse of waste roc'.I that wes paced between the pit . Aommai to conduct recyclng programs than the current system by provklIAB 8 rrlsans of trails porlation to markets. snd the inlet. Most committee memtxvs Bgrssd 8 tilsrs was sn alxth- It wss agreed that Ihe cost of waste dksposal may be a factor in determining ths project's vnpact an the 3 As. Some members felt that lowenng current deposal costs could result in reduced efforts to imple. ment the 3 As. skier membws feil that savings generated by lower land. sl costs could be divert- Round Tebl'e members el Hidden vafiey Lsndnin washington slate ed to recyding programs economic cabulations. modifies regwding trade ACI coAtanlfrrallxf wrth toxic BHP beksvas they should AI members agee that the and transportation'j This of BzafdoUs rlatwiels. be permitted lo offer landfill- 3 Rs should be succored ousse oft 15 reklvant bsceuss rng services al the lowest by regulation Bno that the some Iunsdicficns and cost possible to achmve BHP protect should be inieresl groups have adopt- T. The Physfvef fmeswyy an economically viable oper- designed to enocurage of d e Opex Plt. ed policws to restnct transation. recycling programs and to port of wasls awoss jurisprovide the pubn mth infor- dctlonal Coulxisrrss. The Round Table discussed maeon and resources to Most membws agreed tnat the issue of wnslher the support these programs in principle thwe should be he Rountf Tacb heard a Sdoplion of 3 Rs programs no differonce between number at pmmntafions silould be camo primenly muniopal wape and other fram experts an the physical 8, Tmde exd on economic reasonmg or commodities regartting reg. integrity of the open pit. It Tranvpertativx of Ihsl lhey should b8 pursued Ulelkxl of 1lsd8 snd trans. wss sgmBd thBt Ihe rock ilfiuafcipol Iyowe. sgglesswdy becBUsa therr porlation. Il was recognized was of Iha pit sle 518ble sre good in therr own that many commodrfies in and that there ls Idle fikekAght". This discussion rs 8 Irade, such as industnal hood or fractures developcomplex one that invClves chemicals. Srs rrluch mcm rrlg Irl Iha IOCk IIIBI COUld col1sidsrBtlorl of SAvlrorl he Aound Table considhazardous Ihan munidpel Bllow leachate tc escspa. mental and sodaf costs that ared the question, "Should waste. Ae membws fell that The memkwrs we perticuktlere diffimxt to measure and muniopel waste be treated the main issue is lo ensure iy Co ICIXnsd BI¹UI tha Cofl are not induced in the usual dfifemntly from other comIhat the muni opal waste is crete sluny wafi'n the solfih scil! of Ihs pt towBrcls the ma. The sklvy welf was burfl Io keep wBIC out ol tha pit So 8181 Ofs front tha south wall ol the pll could be exlramed. Mehtenanoe T r of Ihe rrltsgrity ol Ifle 5IUAV wBII woUld bs scsssery rf 8 landlifi were Io proceed. Ihe membsm Sgnwd that rn Island Copper Pit Illii!8 ,I~,m, ist.la nsIII) Sl 81N AS LI5 ti'8 worst cess scwvuxl Brl esrthouske coukf cause a nusw rupture of Ihe siuny wall end fiooding of the prt mm seawater at Such a rats that Ihe lwtdfill prefect would ra etc be abamkxwd. 8 n i! jw-:ITI I il I [ ~nin pk cuske of such a magnitude lima would be much mors swloUS dBfhag8 ceUssd thai the fkXXfrng Of I;8 land. n wrlh sBswstlx. Ths fnsrhbsfS sglBsd lhers wes vlrtUeltr flo possrtlifib ol a fidef weve reaching Ihe mine wte due lo the CWISlflCtk¹ Of tfiuaidllO Nsmiws. s. Iyarer TIanfky e Meaepemeat. 8 HP believes, based an sxsllrlg technology 6fld expsnsnce, that lendgl Itech- ( ate and ac¹ rock ararnage carl be successfully tlBstsd lrl 8 ISBchBts trealrnerlt pierlt i Such treatment would be needed to remove twavy AlstBIS alXI Blnrnorlis to levels tilst sre Aon.toxic to fish and meet environmental sledsrds Afi Round Table members sre coflcerncd Bbolri Imues of water oualfiy and water management n relation to the landfill proposal. This is parccularly trna for water gat leeches thmugh the waslo ard muw be pumped lo ths 5Uffece, I188led SAd dischwged to me sea. Thwe is also a concwn for the continurng discharge of water that becomes aodililxi 85 it drwrls through ths waste rock from Ihe mine. The combination of landfill leachate end acd rock dranage musl be tho iy eddA!558d Vl arb' rh6 IISI IBVISW Or tile prism IscL mmpt ror Ihe posslbikly of btmyant ~ fin",',l!'!"--''-Illa'! =;;ialllll„. )' '—: 'ml IIIIIl iiasa-liI'-'II'.1 pJIlljljl 88 lllfilISjjsi is I I I!III~~~== 1RIIJEsafifisssaiiiiaaniaa 'IIIII '.'..,': I,,",,",,",,,",. II ll! uld be patina Some members believe that a coritainer temlinal on the North Island would attract other freoht such ss seafood, specralty pulp wood products, and recyclable materials. The con. lainer ships would be returneg empty so there may be a possib ky of 'back. having" other corn. mod ties. to for 12. Trasrpve rien Routes and Fecdkles. tribulSd BCUBSI BiACNlg ilia population For example I Ihe trucking of waste created 8 safety risk, traffic con- T j gestion protyems or exces ave rioise, these impacts would affect some people mae than other . Tile members of Ihe Round Table agreed that sny feder. al.provincial review of the project must indude a thorough study of social impacts. There should be panicular reference lo the distribution of those impede among the residents of the North Island. he BHP proposal invotras the con Iructen of a container lermvial for trBnsfer at snd loading of municipal ration waste at Ihe mouth of the must Fraser River. Containers , 8 would be loaded onto he barges or ships for transport tech. .'ome members ais conlo the North Island. cerned that Ihe landfill pro. Containers could also be tact might harm other indus- pcked up at communises ( trie, parteuarly tounsm between Vancouver and the d the and fishing. For tourism the North Islare, key concern is ihe perception that the exist inca of a BHP inaafly proposed two 18. Pvrception and large landfill might deter options Ior the shipping Pvychofoay. people from»seng tte route fram Vt¹couver. All 100 North Island. For fislvng the Rourld TBble fAeinbenl ate concern is for ths qualriy oi agreed that if wacs fs to bo water discharged from the 6hipped to the North Island lancgll CNSB led into ths sea. it should coma up the Inside cne memters of Ihe ths pBSssge arid riot Up IIN! Round Table Se olcsfAed In order to gather informawast coast and Iheugh that ths prblic image of the tion on the impact of landfllls OUBINIIC Narrows. North island will be dtnfinend UNN. lonres par day. Other jobs on tourism BHP conducted Ishai if there Is a major WOUId tXI CfestfK! BI the 8 preliminay review of the Ilwouldbe ecesssryto landfill located at Ihe nlfne southern shipping terminal, silustlon at Cache Cnek. build a contakwr terminal on sks Bnd that this mey csUNB transfer at slatbns. Snd on The Cache Creek landtsl the North island snd lo 8 iiKIUCIIcii ill tourieiri. OIINif i tandgb generate vessets carrying the waste. opened in 1989 wKI transfer Ihe waste ccntelnmembas point to Ihe fact methane gas. 11e methane recdves munidpal waste Ns by lruck froih th8 east that nxsl major populslk¹ is created by anaerobic bac- The Round Table dkt ret from ttw Greater Vancouver ccae io ee taea sks on cNANS tave Nrdfita R sek lena that digest the organic attempt detaled cakuw. Reglowl District. 9 can Rupert Inlet. BHP is studyrridnky axl In the somewhat porten of the waste. Water tions af lhe Indrecri job cre- sck:ally be seen Scm the lrlg 8 IUfiIbsr Of poteAIIBI Cofliparable Case Of Ihe helps to speed up tho reac- ation fram the pkfecl bul highway passing through tccstk¹s tor Pe sapplRI Cahe Cack lsndflfi thee tion so a landfill on lha Iha riwfnbers agree that tho tawn. terminal. has heal ilo plxcNvad North Island would be effec. Aiilo could be skriklr lo Ihe IAlpBCI CNI tourISflu ive al prcducng methane. pressnt mining operation. In BHP conducted inlenriews Same members are conolhlx»Kxd5 Ite IBIKlflll pro. with lhe ma i or end two for- oerned that additional ship Some members are conLandfill operators are now ject coUld IBplscs Bbcut mer mayom of Cxrchs Creek IIBffiC Up the IAade pesSage aewd tha project would ona-fiflh of ths present often required lc collect and vsth the Presidera oi mght cause problems for effect the way reskkets of methane pnxfucal as it is direct end Indirect Iobs geii the Cache Creek Chamber fishers sAd rscrBatk¹BI thB Nor;h Island pwceie fismmable and Is also 6 crated by the mino. of Ci¹NABrcs. Ttwy Bll boalws. CKAN membee fek Ihemsske5 end that N powerful gnwnhoUSB gas. agreed that the landfill had Ihe additenal ship tragc would Impact Ihe Identriy of Atter collection methane is creatsd valuable jobs. had fabout one ship evay 30 Ihe North lsend In a nega11. Spm-olf Economic either incinerated or burned pfovKied Badly ileadsd hoixsj woukf riot fiiske Ii tke feshen. Ouwr membas Pevkive Impact for erergy prcductiori. fUfids ffofn plopeny texas 5 grvflcanl difference. believe if the project Is 8 And Nearxive. and royalties, snd had no kenefil to socely snd sets e B tP estimates ths profieglifive eilVifoAfnN14tl All members agreed lhat il gixxl exariple fof oftlsfs II posed landfill will generate impacts retsted lo tounsm. wauld be preferabe rf Be shoUld rssUII fil 8 posilwe the equivalent of 30 to 50 IrucMng route Iwross the impact an Ihe Idenfily of the megawatts of methane HP believes the tandfd AI members ol ue Round Neth Island were nol an the North Island. erNNBF Tilts Is 8 slgrlecont Table agreed that any feder- man paved highway. acjsa cOUk! bs Iha cora Nliourit Of sfi6iib Ifl ielatioil projea eat wctrid enraa al provtflcial %view of Ihe to the needs of Ihe North ogler edusclrwJC Ihe sita, IS. Faf dccessro pfopossl sholild fequlf6 IS. Social Imeactr Information. Island. Pon Hardy conRecycfire ndustrke fa d6taled BXsffliilBlkNI Of Brly sieies Bbotri 10 nlegBWBtlS lfllOCNW SUCh BS ru!ws possible nogatwe econome of electrical snagy sl pAI paper sfld weal Aey impacts of the pfojecl. ( i $ ,bmjb )Ib j BBI 9 % i Ii i i III ~ 5=:.bj il'R! jl biaiyimm 'I ~ 'I I ( b llill j Nii , 39 8 ibi - a II «) Ii $ (b I 4::=.: 8 'b('i L'II",III( ( IPP'"..jjlfRI ~~ Nmii jb SNIL The m6lhsils COUld be U5ed to piodUcr! becana atsbshed on the et the erie. pan of which WOUld be Uaad lo ne ths pufiIPs BAd olhBf teUlprllera and part of whch coukf be B CCUkl lkovlds Cis Snagy Ot lhasa Brid Nhw Sxkeukw x taa firiethaw horn Se tend. Round Taws d'8 cussed a number of issues reared lo sockll IIIIPacls, Ill plalicukir the fBcl thai lhasa I ~s»~enotC d,. r he membee of 'rie Round Table agreed they hsd txen given lair access lo information on yw BHP acpceal. The Round ea 1 1 I r tl c ri F v n 5 5 5I!.". '-.i( F"-' jblkti ri 5 ~~Pre I IB: 5 j 9jgla [b'4 Si sf %I Iij 'I !Ij Ij'@Il= — I I II 14 M ~ ~ I ~ lal I ~: ease b b j m Table ghee them Bri oppor. tunity to partiosete in a process that is fair arid informea Bnd in which they I [ Iflli'::-II ' 'Hfm '":",~Ni7ft ' '"'" 1 cen rase tt.eir concerns The Round Table agreed early in Is work ttlat ally ~ssue Inst had already been , discussed could be brought , up again at any cme. espeaa!ly if there was nsw inform son on the sublecL It was also agreed that new issues could be intraluced at any arne Tho agenda remans open sa tong as Ihe Round Table continues to .! 8 f@gfby'u,';""'iyff~~~"' Pa+at'r Mcgrath'gajilitatoy i';«.",';",".-';"'f::~+,„.„.: Lef'h ",I 689t7500 Vancouver Mana ltgacDevnakl, Secretary Member - ' ' ',1,,0'egardkbttjetR,Vjj ' Telephone 974-5855 9494245 288-3313 973-2029 949-7960 wofk Ae members are concerned w,lh the need to proves Ihe general public with bolter $ 8 Im I I I +hill i... 5'ilt Nwl I I I I ! 11 , , Id is g ~ e all et / 'IIIIlIIII ge y efellg'g get mal I se her I I . n 6tf this period. 8 IQJI i 1 I 4 Ss I Tl lr Ii Ifl I'I s I members agned thai the Rowid Tabli!'8 woili ot i. Nays@ iiI 949-7189 949-6548 949-7001 Miiirngddkcbt~ 949-7443 949-6326 Minctsda'~~~t Proponent Round Table suppon this ,'equirement, lf BHP decides lo proceed lllll 1 IU I Waste BHP 'd. Irfie Dovx rfiv Prnrvxx tvnrn 284-6201 ll" District PortHard'y Fec LAN'Iyesfefop'ntent Committee Port Hardy Recycling Society Coal Harbonrr Iffit. %'addhkton Region Solid Dick Robertson Ror d Tnbf 95~6 'ort: airify ' Rick MiRigan Sophie Moore Norm Prince 1st ':-.-"=: ll T Starillfctenitan II 9 IIIIIII'If , I Ruersy,lytcGctnTiakf-"'"'P 949-9433'949-6911 the u ii I must be taken into conaa. aration by BHP and by gov ernmsnl agences involved n raxawng Ihe proiecl. The concerns rased by members of Ihe Round Table must te taken sen. Gusty tly Iris federal aid provinaai governmenis ana snould be fully addressed n any teaeral.piovinc at nlviow 9 t!Bel ea It Beige I 1 II I all à 1 il 1 I ti IM 'acr step would te a pro. I'I,IIIII, fact fBlkxl Bs loqu fed by Bulgtt I of the Malar profocl RGvisw Process. The prolecl report vxe owe a deleted asseiement of tne envron. mental impacts as well as specvications tor costs and silgifleeniig. BHP has agretxf Ihsl itis prqect report we II in I 8 I I I I I I 11 1 I k 11 ll Ill I III 'flI, ill ' 1 sis I seeress aries issues ana concerns raakf by members of ths Round Table. 1 is the unaersiand ng of the Round Table tha! tho pm v nc el government will rectu nl 8 Malar Protect Rev ew of Ihe proposal Ihm would include study of envu the IINtw i'l vu&1ll&f,-:.-:::i! I 8 I I I mtl mrl III'I1II ~ ill': ronmenlsl, economic and sooal impacts of Ihe pro iacL As morribtirs of Ite 9 I jIt) diMsp -„,e ea 9 I .. as a tma 98 N id 11 Ill Illtll 'weh tns proiect tne next , 1'j'g)llij ~ ar 8 uy."-;yu'-" access to informalion about BHP's propoml and oboul Ihe Round Table's work. h was agreed that this repon wir be widely dislnbuled on Ihe Norlh Istand and that there wsbe a penod of lime dunng wti ch public co nmenl v be re-eived The Round Table w e consider raising Ihe repon on Ihe Oaos Gf informaoon and concerns raised dunno 11@ii'egional , 9 9 I ~ Ir J 1 a a ~ I I 'll 'l n L I 55II mam g / t j1 QEIIBHgl 8 8 g- +hmw... '''' III Engineering, Ltd. r ~ ~ 'II ii in association wrth Concord Environmanlal ..:I I I I I . Rkl ltll ~ IIIIII CNNHIII '1 I a nl I I n I 4 April 1994 tint rii. .t il II IJI 4 ' ~ ' Iirtlrs l ~ »r CDntents .Page Section 1-1 Introduction Background 1 1-1. Objectives Methodology 1-1 BHP Minerals Canada, Ltd; Project Description 2-1 2-1. 1-'1 2-.2 Proponent Disposal Site Transfer and Transportation . Environmental Suitability Continental Environmental Systems, Ltd.. Project Description Proponent Disposal Site Transfer and Transportation Environmental. Suitability la~IIII~IIIll/!( IIII!=::=:Pg 2r3 2-4 2-5 3-1 '3.1 . . IA I ~ Eel l l elelj I ee, eeIm !! I ' . IIIWSIll ~,II 5 IIII II Waste'Management of Washington, Inc.. III!! II ~ el ll , Ie ~.... ,es. Project Description Proponent Disposal Site Transfer and Transportation Environmental Sukability 4-3 , '5-1 5-1' 5-1 ',5-'f. .'5-4 Appendix A. References Appendix'. List of Contacts, III "r 4-1' 4-2 Proponent Disposal Site Transfer and Transportation Environmental Suitability elllll I 4-1 4!1. Village of Cache Creek and Wastech Services, Description lf 3-3 '+ I 4 Ltd.'roject ! . SEP Z.fj lSct Figures I'„ 1-1 1-2 Map ~ II Ki~y t 0 glII iiiiiiu I I I Methodofogy Telephone interviews were conducted with each proponent to ask follow-up questions and . request additional wriaen infonnadon with respect to their proposaL Each proposal is documented on the basis of the proposals received, the msults of the telephone interviews,. supplementary documentation provided by proponents, and other information gadtetud for the purpose of, the Stage 2 evaluations. The major topics addtessed for each site iichtde the following: I+'~('i '@lsl, tiai5111 'gl,iia '-saint I II%I% ~ project descnption proponent Disposal site Transfer and transportation Environmental IIIIimii]ii at litti i IIR Pll al Ill I a llh ~ Jl ' Iaaa suitability'he'envimnrnental suitability of each project is based on an assessment. of the following tssues: I Air impacts ~ I 'P '1 1 ll 1 1 'a-'-. fP I Ill P~ 1 ~ Ia ~ 111 ml I I Nl tl IIP I P . 1aap.l I «P "I!t 'i I ",", ps i.'l ~ I .—. 'Peaa, .— 'lla ~ IJ I ~ g 1-3 Introducs'on ~ 41~ ~ ?4la il% i(I ~ Water impacts o Local acceptability ~ Other environmental considerations (e.g., terrestrial msources, 'land use, 'cultural and historic resources) 'The assessment of each facility also includes opinions. mgarding the likely ability of each landfill to conform with the BC Landfill Criteria, or other applicable regulations or requireinents. The assessment of environinental suitability is based on ihe same base of information described above. As such, opinions regarding environinental suitability and local community acceptance are general in nature., Definitive conclusions would requhe considerable evaluation of specific proposals with detailed site investigations. In reviewing the proposals. the level of detail subiniued by organization varied. Accordingly, a'proposal discussed in a high level of detail should not be construed as one discussed in less detail. Consistent with the terms of reference for this study, to which we have been able to cross check vendor-supplied information ia limited. " None of the sites were visited by CH2M HILL project team personnel for the purposes of this report. the'egme preferable-'o 'efemnces of documents reviewed for this analysis are included in App'endix A, an'd a list. I 'i of contacts made during this study is pmvided in Appendix B. Illllkitaa!ggtge n i a. =, 4441 4 il Q si 4~ ~ '4 ~ ~ t ts 44 u "%81 I ''I ra4& '&& ~ t! 'Pz I 4a if I lllS u! i: =, tlap II I .', ~',g mi4 Rg1 I ui ~, „..., .;; jig 8 'gil g e.w 41 I u ~ I ealcotst8944 441 II i 44 -,, ,1,!? li! ' 44 4 t!at t S ~ il 4 ~ 4 44 ! i 4 ~ 144 I a i 44 4 4 4 4 il ll fgl 'll al ill 4 4 II III W II%'4 SE —.- — —. sm4W= il) 'e ' : III II .=.la 4 I yg g I al I ~I I ~ I 'll S ' fill' Ii(aaaaI lia1% II 4 I BSII Ia ~ III ~ : I I I 'I I I ' K ~Sl J I ll I I 4 Ia 'dll \(:: aa I ' 41414 ~ la 1 44 I~H '.IHP ~4 ~l a la 'I ~ 1I 44 4 Ia ~ 'I 4 section 2 BHP Minerals Canada, Ltd. Project Oeecription 'f BHP Minerals Canada, Ltd. (BHP), has been researching alternative closure plans for its Island Copper Mine on northern Vancouver Island,'hich is scheduled to close in 1996 with depletion of the ore body after 25 years of operation. The company proposes to determine the feasibility of using the open pit as a municipal solid waste landfilL A feasibiTity study will identify potential sources and volumes of waste from the, Georgia Strait Basin, including Greater Vancouver and the Puget Sound region in Washington State. In order to be viable, the landfill operation will require a substantial volume of the sogd waste produced in the GVRD (approximately 625.000 tonnes per.year ininimurn). According to BHP representatives, several regional districts and at least one Washington county have expressed interest in using the system, but these jurisdictions are generally waiting for further developments prior to making any firm comruitm'ants. The feasiMity, accepting less than the 625;000 tonnes per year has not been'studied in detail, but may be part of the pending feasibility study. . III ~mgi else i el i I 1 I 1 BHP plans'o apply for a landfill permit from the Ministry'f Environment, Lands; and Parks (MOELP) after conducting a feasibiTity study 'for the pmject. The feasibiTity study would be conducted after expressions of sufficient interest'n the proposal by potent'Ial customers. BHP intends to be included in the Solid Waste Management Plans of mgional districts associated with the proposed landfill prior to applying. for a Waste Managdment Permit. The timing to commence application is currentiy dependent on solid planning in the'rovince, but BHP hopes to begin the application process i'n II I I i hIi M'ilm IRI ~ Q tg lilt amlII I I I is I ia R I RI ~ 1 I I 8 '"'="glg I gIe ~ Mining operations in the pit will 'terminate in early.1995 and millhtg oFstockpiles 'wiU continue u'ntil the end of 1995. BHP estimates the landfiiB could be operational in )eras'1 than 2 years fmm date of project and awanL The greatest unknown ht the time for pe'mitting and approvals. Site preparation will require as liale.as 6 months, with a somewhat longer lead tune for acqutrmg a contamer vessel(s): eI(g - /Ii early'994. waite,man-'gement ll ~1'i atr 11 tg[ 't At this time'„ the proponents anticipate that waste would be loaded 'into standard shipping ', the, containers at existing transfer stations. and trucked to an ocean shipping. terminaL rollwtt/roll-o8', or terminal, wast- would be loaded onto ships anil transported by barge, vessel through the Strait of Juan de Puca or the Strait of Georgia to northern Vancouver il11,,! 0 l ii)II II R i!I 1R I': = 1 I ''EII' IR1 III I ~ IRR: ~ utile I 1 I I Il I ~i r:. ill e ..'.':. ~w '-= I 1'+ 1/1gb ' R II II l gt Kgeer e III e I I R II it iIi 1RI e I «ii el I' ~ ;%8111 e "e ''' l. I g lite R . RI I '.". ". — Iq 1 lim I Re I R I R I le il ''Sit ~ I~ 1 I ::: Ie r.—. ~ 1 1 e l INI 111%ILIll '.Ri i asila I 9I i~ 'Rlie ualaamll/ Rl lilisliiiiilali Supporting Documentation-Duty-Region Disposal 2-2 Island. Future studies will include emergency planning and safety regulations proposed by the Canadian Coast Guard. along with all the socio-economic and technical studies necessary for securing permits. All project financing will be provided by BHP, and the operation will be self-supporting. The business relationship between the Mount Waddington Regional District (MWRD), BHP,'nd the GVRD (and any other agencies involved) 'would be based on each specific request for proposal and negotiated to arrange a mutually satisfactory agieemena I IIIl RK BHP owns and operates Island Copper Mine, 14 kilomeues south of Port Hardy on the north end of Vancouver Island. The mine employs 560 people, which is about 20 percent of the population of Port Hardy. They have been operating the mine for 23 years and have an international reputation for'expertise in pit dewatering systems, ground and stormwater collection systems, and slope stability engineering. The company is a whollyowned subsidiary of the Broken Hills Proprietary Company Limited of Melbourne, Australia, which is Australia's largest company in the resource extraction'industry. The company has $ 21.4 billion (CDN) in assets, employs appmximately 49.000 people in 50 countries, and has 201.000 shareholders in more than 80 countries. The mine'delivers typically 250,000 tons of copper concentrate to smelters in Asia and 4,600 tons of molybdenuin concentrate to Europe and South Atnerica every'ear, ler . In exploring the feasibility of development and operation of a residual sogd waste 'man- . IW I :g / 11 ii;.;:=.= h e BHP hss retained specialists to provide irnpmvements and innovations in the collection, handling,'rocessing, and disposal of waste and resource recovery.. Specialbtts have'lso been responsible foi the preliminary land.".dl'design. They'have also commissioned detailed studies of leachate ueatment to pmvide data for.use in'treatment.plant design and. for use in the development of landfill gas tmatment systetns for the prbposed landfilL BHP has also commissioned studies of marine 'route and vessel 'selectioh for the faciTity for design of appropriate port facilities., I !!en 11 "! ! I!e I!! !m I I '-" Other consultants have been involved in the eiivironinental monitoring and practices of assessments requhed Island Copper Mine as well as in the geological and hydtogeological ' facility. disposal for the mining operation and the proposed Iig li a I! u I! I/i pris " I I/ — I 'nd ~llf mmlt ssI ru Me! rl agement facility at Island Copper Mine, BHP ltas worked with a.number of companies . and individuals with expertise in landfiH design, leachate and gas. treaunent, transportatiqn; and hydrogeology and geology. ''I)toy have also assembled a gmup of advisors with wide range of expertise for the purpose of mviewing and assessing pmject development and operation. i/ I/ -=-','el 'Ip '' II ''!!t! It tt!11!T, !! F !F! ~ ~ (jiagg/ Ml ~ ! %I ~ 11 g !, elle ~$ IR ! ~ tLs ass I %IW BHP lÃ/nenb/s r'unada, Ltd. 2-3 Disposal Site The below-sea-level open pit is 2.4 kilometms long, 1.2 kilometres wide, 390 menus deep at the lowest point, and lies next to Rupert Inlet in Quatsino Sound. The capacity of a landfill in the pit is close to 380 million cubic metres, with an estimated life span of S00 years at 625,000 tonnes per year, or 2S0 years at 1.25 million tonnes per year. The assets at the mine site include flat land, mine water supplv, 75 MW power supply, a regular ocean shipping system between the north island and.the lower mainland, and the physical infrastructure, such a roads, on site. The area in the vicinity of Island Copper Mine (ICM) pit is underlain by v'arious rock formations intruded with rock from the Jurassic and Tertiary age and overlain with Cretaceous sediroentary rock. The actual mine site. is located in volcanic rock with the ore zones situated in a Quartz-Feldspar Porphyry dyke. The volcanics largely consist of bedded and massive tuffs and formational bieccias. With the dyke intrusion, there could be a degree of jointing of the rock, and if the volcanics are basaltic, there could be a large . number of defects that could conduct water. BHP stares that rainfall accounts for the largest percentage of water pumped out.of the pit annually (4.5 M cubic mettes per year), there are no aquifers intersecting the pit wails, and the permeabiHty of the pit walls ranges from 1(y to 10 cm/s decreasing with depth. Since the mine is below sea level and right next to Rupen Inlet. the groundwater gradient was found to be into the pit, but marine water penetration has not prevented the mine from operating to full capacity. BHP, indicated that they beHeve the landfill would not be affected by groundwater penetration streams. The pit has a history of pit slope failure, which will continue for (he remainder of the mine life and after closure. The mine operators have developed tecfiniques for coping with such failure'during active mining, and similar techniques can be applied for ongoing operations as a municipal solid waste. facility. Slope failures are a natural occunence in mining and do not normaUy hinder operations or pose a threat to operatmg personnel It is expected that some flauening of the mine walls wil! occur over time and the main effect wiH only be some loss of volume for IandftIL A 'great deal-'of seismic study data is available for the pit and wouid be used during a feasibiTity study if and when it is perforined. atllbllIII III The conceptual design of the landfill was developed to ensum conformance with the Drat't BC Landfill Criteria (not fmal at the time of design), and on pmposed US Subtitle D standards The design of the landfill includes a leachate and stonnwater management system. %Paste deposition would be'within bedrock where permeabiTity is low, and the water table is more than 300 metms above the initial placement of waste. 'Ilus'would provide a natural barrier to leachate migration and runoff. Hydrauhc systems pump the water up and out.of the pit. Initial estimates of leachate volumes ate 190 to 1.900 cub isa bsb Sb eeibr bbbtab~ i I@ 11i II . '1$~ . Me b bwe in SEP 2 i) We I= - N ebb I II w I re I I fbig i III': — .- - 11'-: lIIII as I '- '. 1 u i i I I I I u r e I ' iiu'..i'=- % I . ~ ~ I il 8 "I ill I t III ~ e e tabgiSIII',1 I,14 I I j —. — ' Ii a lii li jii ', ~ ll =="--.. =-=-:~rgejll inbbuiibi abbe — g, Ngl IIV = "=: - --gjb s'4 I;: 1 ig ,. .:::;',',,'... '' &..i.— iebliI)f sit ls ultbab 'n tbsjlbvib ~ ujuj ' — li e I bill sti I, Hi. I Ig gjbi uli Supporting Documentation- Dud/- Region Dispose/ 24 meoes per day. The quantity would be stored in lined ponds, recirculated to Inc~se the rate of decomposition, and then pumped to the surface to ueatment ponds'. A zone of relatively high penneabihty around the pit wall and waste interface will be created using permeab! mine spoils. Between this layer and the waste. a low permeable soil barrier will be installed. as waste builds up, in order to create a barrier between perimeter runoff and tlie garbage. 'tormwater and leachate wiH be handled and ueated separately. Gss gen'crated would be collected using extraction fans and 'theh used as fuel Excess fuel would be burned off. Initial placement of waste will be in, as litde a'n area as possible and will continue in horizontal layers of 15 meties to 30 metres in depth. At the 'end of each day, waste woulci be covered with soils derived from mine waste rock. Intermediate covering will take place throughout the filling process, and when a final elevation of 90 metres below sea level is reached the landfill will be capped and .coveted with a 60-metre layer of salt water and'hen fresh water to the pit surface The salt water zone would stabilize acid'roduction in the rock. Transfer and Transportation Pre-sorted municipal solid waste'ould be compacted and baled at transfer stations befom. being loaded imo containers for shipping. The containe'rs would be tnicked to a shipping tenuhal on the Fraser River and then transported by barge or roH-on/rog-off vessel to the mine pit. Container ships are presently available for sale or lease on tAe international market, or they would be built for the project.. There are two possible sldpping mutes from the GVRD to ihe facility: IIII R III Western route: Around the south tip of Vancodver Island, «hrou'gh the Strait of Juan de Fuca,'nd then on to Quatsino Sound'nd Rupert Inlet ~ m=;'= From the western route, containers would be transfer to speciaOy equipped dumping . chassis for transport to the tipping face. From Port McNeil the conmners would be transfenud to dumping chassis, transponed by tmck, and taken to Ae tipping face. would be shipped back to the GVRD transfer stations. If the rmteni route to the facility were used, pans of an industrial road &om Port McNeil to the BmdCdl may need to be upgraded. There are suitable shipping facilities at both ends of the pmposal route that would requim inini mal upgrading. It'll Empty'ontaineis IH II t I~ r s % INI W ll I'%~g 'I% ="IS II jets „, 5 fS 5 Although speqific proposals have not yet been submiaed, there have been expressions of interest fmm local forest industries and fisheries representatives for backhaul I I lI I!5IMW ==="ilI /, II Eastern route: Thmugh the Strait of Georgia o'n 'the ~t side of Vancouver Island to Port Mc Neil ill Ital~ ~ Sigil nKl IXI Sw 4 il! Ngg "' p ~+a essss&15!par ~ ia+~~ s ~lip) gl ll WS " ~n « '+ „— ~,yeats 'IS ' ~ gIg]$ I ~ ~ II - IN)ggg','=i!isIiii ig III j'tllkllllll@gJ»,,jjjisg~~g,j.'2: iI III~+- — — '-I.p " -- uaI is II Iti@gj)LI,', «su la t — ~m g~ tielII ~ navis' aasttteeiegg~~ aag~m —e i~emm~lll/ 8 2-5 GHP tAinerets Cenede, Ltd. RF'IIjj) ' ~ ta ' Ig Lpt e u e ili / yg.=-..IIIt Il'Ni fi5'g/! iillliim i lIRL sitting opportunities. The potential for backhauls and other spin-off developments are not expected to be known until landfill plans are more definite. Engineering studies of the project at this stage have been based on BHP ownership and operation of the marine transport system including the vessels, container terminals, terminal equipment, containers, and some road transpon equipmcnt. It is assumed that sotue road transport and some marine uanspon capacity would. be chartered or contracted. The exact configuration will depend on the source and quantity, of wastes. Maintenance of containers and equipment will be done wherever it is most economical and technically efficient. Island Copper Mine has extensive maintenance shop facilities at the minesite, aud these would be used to the gteamst possible extent. lilN, Envircnmental Suitability I'Iia Ii: ;ila ill utlltt O'I II 0 QtlIW'g '/ 't ' miiii ji 1 jj,, iiiii el Kxll a i r. The main air impacts associated with the project would result from gas generated during decoinposition of refuse in the landfill and from transportation of waste to the facility.. BHP plans to install a gas collection system that'ould conform to the requirements of the BC Landftl) Criteria. Gas would be either flared or recovered for industrial applications. Gas would be genemtcd at a more rapid rate than the sites included in the other proposals. because the relatively high annual minfall (I,978 mm) will speud-up decomposition because of a high moisture content of the refuse. The site is in a remote area. and. air emissions from landfill gas and operations (dust, noise) should have relatively minor local hnpacts. I II Iil aasi Air Impacts As a mode of transport, tliie barge is generally recognized as more fuel efficient than transport by rail or by tr'uck (U.S. Departinent of Transportation, )980). However, the faciTity is about 550 kilometres from the OVRD using the western toute to the facility. Water Impacts te u it i t The water impacts at the hndfill are likely to be somewhat greater than the other proposals, again because of the relatively high rainfall at the site. However, systems are already in place to manage the high volume of water that collects in the.pit, and any stormwater or leachate would be collected and pumped out of the pit for ttcaunent. Since the pit is below sea level there will be no runoff out of th'c pit, only into the pit. Except with for Rupett Inlet, there are no surface water bodies nearby that could be contaminaoA faciTities. leachate if it were to escape the confines of the pit or the treaunent SEP Z Ij m Supt,arring g to Ministry of Energy and Mines (ME)vl) off the present operating mine would include blasu rt Inlet water into the pit, filling the pit with rai the pit with solid waste, capping and flooding water lake would become acidic according to M treatment if it were to be used for any purpose. as been underway for five years now, with the ust the past year. The MEM holds an extensiv back upon final closure and reclamation oF the m R I I un I ial I l / l SI 8 'g lg i gt5 I 'Idyll fill I I I, I tg gfliii i I Ia g till il I I I Nlllll ill I %IIII III I 'lgai Ii II I i 1~I I i~ g galiii ~ I I I I I )if II I! I, ii opuon ts considered as part of the reclamation is still un the MOELP have dealt with similar proposed mine closu to date. Conformance with the BC Landfill Criteria will take an of the unusual nature of the site. When questioned abou plans and the need for stradfication of salt and'fresh wate sentatives agreed with the need for preve'ntion of acid producdon.in the pit if it were flooded. Also, at this very preliminarystage, they could see no problem with capping a landfill with the available waste rock before flooding. I) IIII Loca4 Acceptability ilRHlll To determine whether there was support for the project locally, the conceptual proposal was first aired and discussed in the MWRD. Subsequent, to these dls'cussions. the pro-. posal was disclosed to a wider public audience and communicated to government agencies. To further ensure that all parts of the community are given an. opportunity to be heard, BHP, in conjunction with the MWRD has established'a Local Advisory Round . Table to discuss the issues raised by the proposaL If the project proceeds to,a feasibility study the committee wi)I continue to act as a coiumunication corridor to the various inter-. est groups. NI" 1! I ill It!II, I 'UIITl l~ ll I! a'ssiiil Igt'lltl ll III II I I l I lilt !I BlI ! I I ',lb I /lib I I fi'o'll 'I I I l Ii During a telephone conversation on October 22. 1993, the Village of Port Hardy Cle*Tteasuier indicated that there has been little'esponse to the proposal thus far because the feasibility study has not yet sinned..He said that some opposition may'ccur. frotn residents in Coal Harbour'ho have aheady voiced some concerns (they are the,closest community to the mine). He sees there being general support from the communities in the area. (Employment after mine closure is a main issue in the aine)'uring ,(~/ a telephone conversation on October 25. 1993, an Econoinic Development Officer . widt the MWRD staled that cominunity opinions about the proposal a'ppear to be split depending on whether the resident's focus is economic'or environtnentaL 'he stated that there has been some opposition to the pmject on envuunmental grounds fmm residents in I! i i 'l!l ~el gM4 R8 m,'~RMiiem~N 2.7 ut that there has been generai support disuict. responsible for regulatory activities at munities on,and near Rupert Inlet that are some concern mgarding th'e impact of the tives of the Ministries offered opinions ect than resist its implementation. A would not require a Waste Management but rather will require an operating certite management planning process. . g ghlt tl llti li mill! II II I Llllii i ggll,l1 I I I II iiI 41'' II Il 'uany 'here ll lt I In a wriuen correspondence dated November 8, 1993, BHP stated that ".it is unlikely that the landfill operation will signiTtcantly impact the status of wildlife presently existing around the mining operation." Terrestrial resources will'not be impacted any more tha'n they already have with the open pit mining operation. The proposed landfill site is already a sizable pit in which all activity would be hidden fmm outside view, and since are no villages, next to the pit the proximity of the proposed landfiB should not be a problein. Our limited inquiries did not reveal any cultural or, historic resources of significance that would be affected by the cunent mining operation or the proposed landfill; This is not to say there is no Native Indian cultural significance issociated with the sire.. The socioeconoinic benefits of the project could be significant by preserving the jobs of local residents, who otherwise would probably be forced to leave the ama once the raine was closed. aII4 ' Ii INilf . 44444)i 1&~44 I)i(IA The BHP Proposai to the GVRD included leuers of support for proceeding with a feasibility study. for the la.idfill from seven jurisdictions and organizations and a letter from the Quatsino Residents'rganization indicating their opposition to development of the facility. BHP has been monitoring the environment surrounding the mine since l969. Currently, a staff of five full-time scientists and technologists are engaged in both oceanographic and terrestrial monitoring. Biological oceanographic sampling results are available in BHP's Annual Environmental Assessment repon, which is submitted to BC Environment. A salmon rearing facility exists 6 kiloineues from the site in Holberg Iniet„and the raine area supports most of the wildlife species common to northern Vancouver Island.. sl I lillHI Other Environmental Impacts 441 ~ i I III Il tl p i I il! II'I 'IR Tli iII Pl 44 ~ll II l4~ ~ I glil ~ I ~ l'l4 hhh I ~ Supporting Documentation-Out-ot-Regiori Disposal Conformance with BC Landfill Criteria BHP plans for the facility to conform to the BC Landfill Criteria We did not uncover any evidence that the facility would not be able to conform, though the unique nature of the facility will require MOELP to use judgement in determining whether the facility will satisfy dte intent of the Criteria. g I( a NI I III: . SII II I ~ I I I I II jrlli: '::=IIi 'IIl I II II I tl I I I THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM MEMO TO: Environmental Protection Committee FROM: F. K. K. Cheung, P. Eng. Project Engineer SUBJECT: 1993 - 94 ANNUAL REPORT - COMMISS rl m=l ~™II% RECOMMENDATIONI 1. That Comnjittee receive this memorandum for info RACKCSROUND & COMMENTSl The 1993 - 1994 Annual Report from the Commission on R Legislative Assembly in accordance with section 12 of the The report generally covers thc period from April 1, 1993 ila/ P. ijt The table of contents include: %Niff iifg NPPNP P ta s ssi I 8 ~ I A Sustainable Future. 'Pl 7 I I 11 2: I~liIPPPPP( II S I Ill, IJ11PN I' Commission Mandate and Work Summary. Key Elements of a Land Use Strategy. Provincial Direction. 3.1 3.2 Participatory Planning Processes. Coordination. 3.3 3.4 Independent Oversight. Dispute Resolution. 3.5 Summary of Next Steps. Committee members can review the Report on a rotational r ll!Il, i,, mj r ! g, U'Sl II st J I FKKCI auachmcm l .l I ll I 'l I III I I I : I I ll ~ ill r I ril Ill il I i IIR eiii I g 8! 1 lf I I ! 4% 8 Ll i 'll If fK~ 5g H UUP ' JSI I IIM s 141 II ff ~ U ]/l!PP ji i LII ff9 IS .II I .9499! I! I ,'ll] III!ri 9!IA & ~,',',: &I 4il ~ I I!4 ~ J J I I ~ $ l I» &'c ~ ii i. ~ ''''" " IIII Ill 5 mijjm rfUig I '' iiiiimi a miil llref p '" I": -"= l)I lg III IIII II%!mi i I !Ill SIN M I!JLN~ e 'IUSI Umi J IIIII'. " = llglI ~ ~ f ~ ,, =: '==" ---4':!fkL !R&i I i LSI I i iilff ',, i; 4 I 9 il 9 I i 9 I II l. I I I I st I I II I $ I I I ~ ~ 4 f1 59 JU4 ~ ~ ~ M M I I Knviearument 4 4 19'9 Sl .1 SUf i S ',I 91 l If i I N cf~ I II 5 , I4 I 41 111 '9 ~ IJI 4 9 9 ~ S S 0 IJ 0 N ee ee 00 oe ee RCSOUXCCS RDJ. g 9 ,I+I ~ II ~ ' l ~ va e 911 I ' ~ i JSI 4 ' ~ I 3 I II I f« ii«'III «44JI ,mah~"-i 4 IS II! 11 S=: !',I IGNI I ll & I I 9 999 ' I! I Ii! @if ''g ' I ~1 1ILC 'I Ji ~ ' 'J f ll ll I Il'I '1 4 ',c nual report for fiscal available Copies of the report may be obtained from Hydro's Information Centre, 2nd floor, 333 Dunsmuir Street, Vancouver, B.C. V68 5R3. Telephone (604) 623-4152 or fax (604) 623-3515. r conditions affect net income ingg average water inflows io B.C.Hydro's or the year ending March 31, 1994 redecrease of 13 per cent in hydraulic rom the previous year. tion meant in order to meet the electrients of its customers, Hydro had to re costly electricity from other sources thermal generation whilecurtailing its ducing exports. Electricity trade income n for the year was $ 41 million less than t, net income of $ 190 million for the I million lower than it was in fiscal sii iiNI IIII i : IIIS I ii IIIIIII : ' III ul g I /oui ii III~I h'i ~ III ~t" (I I I a Ilk» ttiig, 'll.': . 4gll =.gI '. Ik .. 5I II I =-" ':Ill lj I I j I p ;,.. llgl ... III 1 per cent decrease. test annual report also notes continurecord growth in thc number of customers served by the utility, totalling 1.4 million at year-end. This represents an increase of 10.9 per cent in just four years. As a result of unusually mild winter weather, however, the volume of electricity sold during the year covered by the rcport decreased slightly. In his corporate letter, Hydro chair John Laxton says that customer participation in the utility's fiveyear-old Power Smart program has "freed up 1400 GW.h (gigawatt-hours) of electricity" — enough to supply new customers added since the program's inception "at roughly half the cost of adding new generation facilities." Study completed on cooling water discharges from Burrard Thermal plant Government to review report; Hydro to study dechlorination options A draft report on the impacts of cooling water effluent from B.C.Hydro's natural gas-fired Burrard Thermal Generating Station has been sent to government agencies for technical review. The report contains the results of a recently completed study by the firm of Seaconsult Inc., which looked at a range of impacts under current and possible future operating regimes for the plant. The study was initiated as part of Hydro's $ 270 million Burrard Upgrade Project. The major impact identified under all scenar'os was from residual chlorine concentrations. While the plant's chlorine discharge concentration at the end of the "pipe" remains well within the terms of the current permit issued by the provincial Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks, background concentrations of residual chlorine in the Port continued In addition to'providing detailed financial and ~ New fish weir installed at Duncan Dam operating information, Hydm's 1993-94 annual re- ~ Two recent Hydro reports available for review ~ Hydro's popular safety video wjttgtiapther honor ~ Electric System Operations Review IIna I concludes with report WqoQFhme ~ More Power smart savings port outlines the utility's various corpora:e strategic initiatives, including its work with industrial and government bodies and aboriginal groups to create new business opportunities and employment in B ritish Columbia. I SFP et. Iai III04 9i et exceed the provincial Thesehigherbackground because Burrard's efflut disperse as effectively, not decay as quickly, as moving todechlorination onse, Hydro has initiated I and rhemical alternause. so provided an assesoling water volume and nti fied to be less serious orine since the species mon being raised in local resent in the pens during , which typically occur port were reconmiendaand study work at the together with the dechlonnation options study, will be taking place during the summer and fall. Should an eventual decision be made to make changes to the plant's cooling water discharges, application would have to be made to the provincial Ministty of Environment, Lands and Parks for an amendment to the existing effluent permit. arsu ll Vr I New fish weir installed at Duncan Datn Upstream migration of bull trout enhanced At a recent ceremony involving members of the surrounding community, a new fish weir at Hydro's Duncan Dam in the Kootenays was oflicial ly opened. Completed in 1967 as the first of three Columbia River Treaty dams, Duncan Dam straddles the Duncan River, about 42 kilometres north of Kaslo. Behind the dam, Duncan reservoir provides the capability of storing 1.7 trillion cubic metres oF water for flood control and power production in both Canada and the United States. ilia a I I I ~ I Ili'I II I 'l I I i I I 6 As part of Hydro's corporate commitment to the environment, the new weir was designed to improve the movement of local bull trout populations to the reservoir from the tailwaters of the Lardeau and Lower Duncan Rivers below the dam. The structure furthers the work of local resident Huibertus "Dutchy" Wageningen — former dam caretaker — who pioneered a method of transferring the fish, using the dam's low level operating gate, the maintenance gate and the discharge tunnel. The new fish weir provides a more effective way and allows even the smallest of bull trout to migrate upstream. Part of the process still involves some elements of the basic technique developed by Wageningen. Before the weir was installed, it was estimated that hundreds of bull trout of various sizes migrated to the dam each season. The new structure is expected io lead to an increase in rhe population and contribute to a thriving fishery in the area. Two recent Hydro reports available for review Distribution Service Performance report and Cost of lVew Electricity Supply in B.C. published in June Hydro's latest Distribution Service Performance report, analyzing a number of key performance indicators which measure frequency and severity of outages at the customer level, has just been released. The eighth annual report covers the fiscal year beginning April 1, 1993 and provides an overall view of the utility's electrical distribution system performance. While the indices used do not offer absolute and de'fin itive answers to system performance, the information obtained allows management to assess system performance and set priorities for changes or programs needed for service improvements. The Lstest report shows reliability decreased slightly from the previous year but continues to be better than the Canadian Electrical Association average. The decrease in performance is mainly due to an increase in storm activity and source outages; the latter is due in part to improved reporting. The reportgoes intoconsiderabledeiail byregion but, generally — during the period covered— indicates that storms were responsible for 36 per cent of total customer-hours lost, and source outages for another 23 per cent. Fallen trees and vegetation growth also contributed measurably to increases in both frequency and severity of outages. .. 111 ;=iii II ~ I~ r~ j I mt Il It! is I II el ~ & I 'F. a , BW ~ I '.„'Iii is B.C.Hydro's Resource Planning group has issued its latest CONES (Cost of New Electricity Supply) estimates in a report that forecasts the expected cost of obtaining new firm energy and capacity in each of the utility's nine major transmission regions. The document also provides infomiation on the value of non-firm (secondary) energy, and the methodology for computing capacity quantities and values. Information in the report is based on the December 1993, 20-year electric load forecast, and the expected availability and cost of resource acquisitions. The CONES report is meant to be a screening tool and the estimates are provided to the private power industry and other users for guidance only. Estimates include adjustments for the monetized social costs now incorporated in Hydro's evaluation of resource acquisitions, as detailed in a separate publication: B.C.Hydro Resource Acquisition Policy. Since the last CONES report, a number of developments hav led to adjustments in Hydro's costs, including: ~ increased U.S. fish flow requirements on the Columbia River, ~ regulatory approval to pursue long-term export contracts, ~ a switch back to capacity products from the energy orientation used previously, ~ higher near-term natural gas prices. and ~ higher estimates of air emission damage costs. The report notes, "Since costs are reported at the 500 kv level, area transmission, and distribution costs are Bttt incfuded in the estimates presented, This limits the use of CONES estimates with respect to analysis of rates and other lower voltage supply issues." In addition, says the document, costs "are BIII applicable to B.C.Hydro's non-integrated areas." Both reports are available for review in I ivdre's Information Centres at 333 Dunsmur Sticei in downtown Vancouver or at the utility's Edmonds complex in Bumaby. Copies may be obtained by calling 623-4152 or 528-3167 respectively, Hydro's popular safety video wins another honor National and international awards now total twelve Hydro's safety video Elecrrojuice — directed towards teenagers (see Update August 1992iwas thrice-honored recently at the 35th annual Cindy Awards competition in Anaheim, California. The event is sponsored by the Association of Visual Communicators. 'fhe production won a gold Cindy in the educational category as well as a special achievement award for art direction/writing/directing/talent and original music. In addition, the video was tirst runner-up for the John Cieese Comedy Award which recognizes the effective use of humor to convey a message. It is believed Elecrmjuice has now won more awards than any other safety production in the world, having been recognized by at least a dozen national and international video festivals. Electric System Operations Review concludes with report to government Social benefits of alternative operations measured against costs of lost generation The results of B.C.Hydro's Electric System Operations Review (ESOR) have now been presented to the provincial government in a thick, three-volume report. The ESOR was initiated by a government directive in June 1993 (see Update June/July 1993, February 1994 and June 1994). During the review, Hydro's integrated electric system operations ice re examined and alternative operations were idemi- fied and evaluated in tenne of their potential for increased social benefits for the province. The process emphasized public consultation and relied heavily on the involvement of a number of community groups. In actual practice, says the report, "... approximately one-half of team efforts were applied to the identification and analysis of issues and altematives, and one-half to public consultation." This was believed to have been "sufficiently thorough to provide adequate informatioi and a good understanding of the operation of the integrated electric system and its implications." Recognized also, however, was the need to continue discussions with various stakeholders "for further development of understanding, snd for decisionmaking that considers the social implications of operations." ~sstiil ThctointMultipleAccountEvaluations forlarge installations vias considered to be "a strength of the review, and improved the findings." Chapter Eight of the report presents the results and'indings of the ESOR, among which are the following: ~ Iiigl''--lill I'j~lc ill Ill II l icci Ll(Jlj] u a i cn I I l S c I;c „-. -"wIIllii I ~ cled "..; implementing the potential alternative operations identified for the major installations on the Peace. and Columbia rivers, for Burrard Thermal G.S., and, to a lesser extent, for theBridgeRivergenerating facilities, would incur very high costs in lost generation." "In general, the costs of the alternatives for the large installations, estimated in monetary terms, varies fmm one order of magnitude to three orders of magnitude greater than the nonpower benefits estimated in monetary terms." ~ "For the smaller installations, the benefits to be gained from the potential alternative operations would have relatively lower cost." ~ "Much work remains to be done before there can be general application of the subjective application of the intangible elements of full social costing to decision-making." Those who participated in the consultation process will now review the report and study its findings ivhtle a technical analysis takes place at the govemment level. Copies have been placed in Hydro's district offices and in public libraries for review by interested parties. More Power Smart savings Chilliwack Hospital, Pacific Rim park move towards energy efficiency With the help of B.C.Hydro's Power Smart program, Chilliwack General Hospital has incorporated advanced energy-efficiency features into its recently-completed Heritage Village multi-care facility. The reduction in electricity use is projected tobe equivalent to the yearly needs of 36 homes; the hospital expects to save $ 18,000 on its annual electncity bdh On the mgged west coast of Vancouver Island, official of Pacific Rim National Park Reserve, located between the communities of Tofino and Ucluelet, have signed an energy-efficient agreement with Power .Smart. Under the terms of the partnership agreement — believed to be the first involving a national park — Hydro is commiued to providing technical assistance and other help while the park is obligated to appoint an energy manager, to upgrade facilities and equipment to higher energy-efficiency standards, to prepare a three-year energy-use plan, and to train employees in ways to save electricity. As a result of the cooperative effort, park officials expect to acldeve an eight per cent reduction in the 580,000 kilowatt-hours of electricity used each year. Update is a monthly ueivsletter from B.C. Hydro for elected officials, community and business leaders and others with a special interest in the utility's activities. For questions or comments call (604) 623-4529, fax (604) 623-3730 or write Update, Corporate Communications, B.C. Hydro, 16th Floor, 333 9 un smu ir Street, Vancouver, B.C. V68 5R3 our Sets ice PCS proud of Rccrclcd q ~ rcp r ommittee DATE: September 26, 1994 NATfON rtising from the BC Youth Soccer Publications requesting green advertisement in their souviner program for the be heid at BC Place Stadium from Dec. 29, 1994 to Jan. Committee approved a donation of $ 120 towards last ttached) ter Vancouver Beautiful" since it was done last year. publicadon of the souvenir program does not relate to ave corrurdtted to make a donation. la='-:Illlt trial IIII1fl, y "~s ZII11 [Ig 1NI IIII IHI%1 I III -:---" iii llg 1 ('=:.-=:;= I!I,I1, I IIIlliia I, s '5 Ml 5 l r au 1 . --'IIII .'''-'"- -urnalta u )) I a rrill III/I $ g II It sl ral Isa ~ Irlll) ) Irtaiii aif'Itl f g e.--.— "slits . b g Project Technician TBB'd BeeZT BETE ZBIe IeB9 b66T-ZZ-d95 B.C.YOUTH SOCCER PUBLICAl'IONS Ieeblleheel by S.C. YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION OATE ~eP~+~" Y TELECOPIER COVER LETTER FROM: I '4 We Are Translnitting I irbcl Utero& rO rt 6 C-rT /el kg 7 50CGG4 ell.c. YoleP'4 O 5 eep 5'Orlrr~ &Y'~ por 7 GO~ Cue. CoOM r~nrUa i /47&t.m7 r r\ COOdd r ~r gnrtrai-Ir& ~OU+ 5'upponi a HOIiarUC~ re& O rtr moor. S itrT lbI,Tet IiCP. y rBT= CiuoUZ.O af r&O iS +m'3 4V r9-S CO9.7. & %0446dvrrL r-'IW Co~cv& . Ae ~ov4 rfvlrAlnr2.6Q sarln60NG. irdlIrr 4.7Eg te l T i ezorUCE e ii.r-y-~~ c 5'/+ c8464. f ~~~~ ~28' Nil . eee ee I e e I ie e C. Pagets) Including This Cover Letter. crry ow Rc~ort r3 w~g & y If You Do Not Receive AII Copies, Please Call 482-3412 II I vertery O' "' /+'U~&'8U~~ WAyE I LEASE OELIVER TO: eel I ( I leech e el 'lli II i 6"'ili I e a IR 'd II BI I IHS I TBTd TBeZT b6, ZZ de9 ZBB Bztz ZSI'BS d SB: 21 VSS1 -22-dSS B.C. YOUTH SOCCER PUBLfCATIO/MS SS14)T/3rd CCXI/MNA Bc List (Advertslng ca-ardinator) BC Youth Sarxer Publications 82ra Manitoba Street De d)/V/b~ //' y'.& ~~+~4 VancoIver BC V5X3A2 TClaPhOne (604) 482.3102 Fast (604) 482-3129 Further to your recent telephone conversation with one of aur staff n.etnbers, I trust the following vrill provide you with the information you requ)re concerning the staging af lhe 9th Annual Canada Safeway Mini-Soccer Festival to be held at B.C. Place Sttsdium, Vancouver, from December 29, 1994 to January 2, 1995. The Festival is one of the most popular events in the BCYSA's calereSar and is geared toward girl" and boys in the 7-9 year-old age group. Some 150 teams will be participating in the event this year which translates into some 1800 players and close to 500 team coaches and nunagers. for the The B.C. Youth Soccer Association wig again produce a high quality souvenir program minimutn, we costs to a production event. The program is printed on 70!b Luna Gloss. To keep our corporate well as as professional and business community, try to enlist the support of the sponsors. The B.C. Youth Soccer Association is a non-profit amateur sports organization registered under the Societies Act of British Columbia and affiliated with Sport B,C. The Association Is recognixed by the Provincial Gavemment as the official governing body of organized yaust soccer in the province„and is a member of the Canadian Soccer Assodation. The Astociagton currently registers well over 57)$ 0 boys and girls between the ages of 6 and 18. In purchasing adverti(ing space in one or more of our publicatior.-. you are helping to keep registration fees to a minimum and allowing our organization to cant)nue to produce quality newslcttem, event programs and information booklets for our membmx. take this opportututy to thank On behalf 0'I our volunteer provincial board of directors, may I soccer in British Columbia. We youth organized you for taking the time to consider supporting we receive hom the business and proiessional patronage continuing the are most gmteful for communities. and particularly individuals like yourself! IIIIIimll 1% I I I hope that you will suppoet the Association with this publication I I'IR I IS I ~ Sincerely, I ! fj'lmlm Atchmffgsc/ PAGE SIZE (6 1/2 X 11) imll gi~ t imuI Ila 'gI III FVIIPaga(7 X9) Half page (7 X 41/2) Quarter Page (31/2 X 4 1/4) Sixth Page (3 3/4 X 3 ) l~ %/88 itti iits Eighth page (3 I/2 X 2 1/8) ai am 6899.00 S499.00 S299 00 S269.00 s229.00 Twettth Page (3 1/2 X I 3/8) Sixteenth Page (3 1/2 X 1) Bus. Listing (3 1/2) X 5/8) Good Luck Ad (1 7/8 X 5/8) pat/on Line If yoa require further info/Inst tan. please give me a call at S 169.00 S129.00 3 99 00 S 69,00 S 49.00 , lf f !IF)II 'LSD- 4 riD El"Ill lii imih11 2 'd ZB:21 SNIHSI ttAd l%)lm zz 6+s IillfHlg,'»Immi['= e ~M f'awwesnuotet )itf 18tltasam IKtz-ZBV-VBS WCrdd w aadl%sttut est(5 IIISiiisggttsmi saagt 'li((~cger~~ Ir.::. i,— — z--=masSI( 8 m T.;-tl' (I Il i g gUSY tK' / gP I T e 'm%M '' 'l 04) g jt I f f ~ T— I NW ' Rl'll t' [glmlg/ II%A~(( 11 ' ''-''I I ' g4tlt m ~ '..', — l I' I I 13 Qggg gmQg f5 Rjtml&as&msgr -= — — ': „g] %I %1 !%1 „, Tk'~ "Illtl=.l IGIIJ II:.-I I +15 ~ jP ) 9 180l ."-:.-.I I .. g!~=~ I'm ~/ I! aallAI~ fl I ~ a f+ ~ ~ m&i RS II at 't asm g m —— a I I II ICB g ! Ittm I O'III AerZt O66r-ZZ-dss KEEPING GREATER VANCOUVER BEAUTIFUL THE 3 R*s of RECYCLING REDUCE RECYCLE REUSE M matsqwi o This time of year is ons where the 3 R's of Reduce, Re-use, and Recycle can take on a new significance. CIIyorturrrroood City of Reduce Is the most important of the R's, and residents are encouraged to be smart shoppers and look for good packaging instead of overpackagirig. Rs-use is the second of the R's, and residents ars encouraged to look for packaging and containers that can be rc used.. Recycle is the last of the R's. Recycling is easier than ever with your local mun!cipal Rscycling prcgrafn. Please contact your municipality for details Ctlr of Wklrarook cire oF coaunms ,]It)II sra ANNUAL IBNI-SOCCER FESBFAUFAGE IO d ecrCMBo-F89 Wcud BNIHS I 8Ad OsrZr O6, ZZ doS EEE.=~ Eii arooiS B TE SBB'd 'i 'ls BB& ZBP PB9 I T EST- -d39 suvrr. s! &&auens&sbgllkctool ~ : i&Id Canadfan naffcnaf team star pauf peach&sat/do Is a big h)t In Bfrrl 'I!)iiiIAIh!ill 'd .','remier c ~flj;~f Vale)"..'." '" EHOL'ANO'.AL I sooTLAHD '; Dada&an ~;.Oic)g Forresn Canal(&am. First Oly(stan. ,e.Cotta.)fit&crt VCACOAYC& (Hsmiaorr~n)'. tcs slt ~ I " —- 'Piacenri) THE NETHERLANDS ; Second Olvhlon RCAdy scmuch Rldvnond, una St&tare, tss&«nd diviscn) PO&'&TOOAL L&oh Hoops&:Ottawa, rE(N)!hmwtoham G&y &cservc Icallll Trevor Kunut Mapte Rct(te.&tous &Am.r rveryaulh leam) rrjLrt r. .. o cc rlos caus«: vanccu cr. &O I . III ISI&uesa '' ~ i ~".".'ll c 'J ~l«CE ~ ~S '/A S !Prrjru& S/V '/ )P "- —.- — ggg/ 8 6! II tai iE SwPPO/t r / /)E)~ C..n Oru /)I/+& t r /fr &P I& CO»p/ftu L ( rr-I/lotrr/f/(' r/f/ C& ~ Fc nvndo Aoulvn Toronto ~Asm Ccy) O T —, J Ct -I IA I Ill« I tl&TH9( lelld IB& T IB, — ~;;~~ m!I&O;cs««iassnw& .S!I)I'jl«ÃI)E amjjjjj,",s 'hRllllMI)~' -,. —, I,iwl '" 'g!!R "m .....Il .—,=:=,««se ~ gpg]li! I!5 Ill&A ' )g~~ N < OH TRIAL &etnnlnt)ham CHy) I / /lO &Spon no C4bo Gydha ~ Mark watson, wc&i Vancou"c' &&ps~ &&Am) 1)IEII let&If I h a ~ I SccA&l&t elvis&CA ~ Htc&t Thorns«mtsurrey. (crystal Palace. &cserve les&At .epautpeechlsaedatpckcnna 0 t, 0 p V/IO pr- nit&sam e Afet(.Bunt&vs Mon&jess&, I!RMII I ~ 1st MH esaalt I SACT &/) LIITALY (Wast~)&am United, reserve C/(-/ /(Or/I/V ( Pt/( //At(u e, Erao oonclns: Toronto, !Ilail! 8~I /(. O/= 'hird H !0 li Ii«&tat&sf wg! e t «III f gya': -: .. ~si i pg Nf - s ~~l~'i!1)I )a l~ =-==' dgg&g =='-" —.-,", "-'-'„'-,'„'„-'III! ~N~ i sb 1ia c:.=-." liIN)!L I) m — -''~-'.-'-'-'=='==,—„.-"~!g)ILi R.'iRiisj jj j g=- =-: . = -::= —:=,:;,—; // — s — lk'Ijtaeiii I - — g~ I—