COMPARISON OF OF TIONS

OF'TION ADVANTAGES

A

*¥Saves possible litigation

#Saves possible litigation
XLow construction cost
XNO future maintenance problems

*Overall constructian cost not
too high if claim against bond
succeeds

*NoO future maintenance problems

*kKeeps construction costs
wWithim budget

xUse of same system for future
extensions saves huge future
construction costs
kConstruction methed is very:
simple and not dependant on
expertise of contractor
*kSaves possible litigation

- *Cheapest construction costs
. kUse. of same. ‘system. far future

extensions Saves. huge: future

' construction casts

xConstruction methed is very
simple and not dependant on
xpertise of contractor
*Maintenance of pumps is
responsibility of individual
property owners
*Cost to City is not dependant
on ultimate parcel size
XPower for each pump is taken
from private property service
kSaves possible litigation

DISADVANTAGES

kCost is not fixed in advance
XCost is way above budget
kOther extensions of s@wer will
be equally high above budget
*&This contractor has not shown
qgreat ability to get job done

&kHigher future maintenance costs

*Compromises our standards.
kThis contractor has not shown

great ability.to get job done.

kPossible litigation procedure

kLitigation could fail resulting

in City paying entire cost
KNO guaranty that installation
Procedure will work for new
contractor :

kCity faces significant future
maintenance costs

¥Both future installation and

‘maintenance costs increase if

_ Praperties subdivide into

parcels
KCity must supply power | ‘ta, @ach '
pump location .

kCity may get complaints about
unsatisfactory: service if.

. private pumos fail