LEG? IE ARLTARENT aime TN! Rou fap rm TERRACE — It doesn’t matter ‘what’ political party’ Nisga’a “People support because the ‘Overriding issue is land claims, says a Nass Valley chief -¢oun- cillor and Social Credit party - 4 member, eae . “We: have. Nisga’s Social Credit “and: is asking.: people: 't Social Credit on election day, id Harry | en i i ra the North Coast ridiiig, said he ae to: support Matshall-Lutz : and’: will vote -__ {tPeople ‘have'a free'choice, We'ré ot tellag” them aa council or NTC (Nisga'd Tribal: . @boriginal title to land..B Council) how to. vote,” hésaid, Court split’ on the ‘questi ani The Nisga’a home of the Nass . 3 | ings will get beiter, bit © Valley Was part of the old Atlin ~.-. meanwnite, Boot "au maybe things will get better, bit - ridi seni Johnston saya et totee ;, to" the “far: as: land claims” ar. : ed Up .in ed.Fran for the int __ the ‘North ‘Coast ‘tiding: which People;"* he said": :. includes Prince Rupért,”.-/ oo. Nyce. who. tain: dnd lost eles ..-Bgainst Linda Marshall-Lutz for to the legislature, Frank. Calder "the Social Credit nomination in Tepresented the area, first for’ » Of .17, years to ‘be tAlthpuph. “streets: after 10 ptm. unless ‘ap:~-—“Adthough. , Supreme Court of Canada déci: . At the same time, Johnston fan, pearing his name -which said’ her “government, if re-. ound: that ae fa ae (clainns)-seteled,** * ” i Unable to hike the fines for ‘breaking curfew, the city is Jooking at other ways of getting teens off the streets late at night. a And that, says. Permits direc- tor Bob Cafleur, sine bce restricting the opening hours o local pool halls..." Lafleur said a regent’rash of break “and enters, acts-of van- _ dalism and incidents: ‘of ‘arson had prompted the city'to take action,” hess Although one ‘option was to enforce the city’s Curfew by- law, he-.said the fines were too low to. be any: real: ‘deterrent: That’ by-law, . passed in 1978, prohibits anyone under the age Out:.on the companied by. an adult or “custodian’®, ° .. wet Although those breaking: the curfew are subject: to’ 4 fine, Lafleur said they only amount to $1 for the first offence, $2 for the second and $5- for every subsequent otie, - OS The city had investigated ‘the possibility of: in ing:" the fines but discovered that’ could Municipal Act itself’ was chang. ed, mo " Cee ahh. a _ Therefore, Lafleur said, the - option now being considered was restricting the hours