STRIKE PROTESTS OHIP RIP-OFF SCARBOROUGH — About 650 workers, mostly women struck the Honeywell Ltd., plant here March 20, rejecting the company’s 6% wage offer and its refusal to pick up the full cost of the 37.5% increase in Ontario Health Insurance Plan premiums flowing from the last Ontario budget. The last time the company forced its employees, members of the United Auto Workers into strike action was the bitter 16 week battle in 1970. PICKETS UP AT IRON ORE CO. SEPT ISLES — United Steel- workers at the Iron Ore Co. of Canada ([OCC), installation here went on strike March 10 to press the company to move a little fas- ter in current contract talks. About 3,000 people at the facil- ity are employed -by IOCC and the Steelworkers haven’t had a con- : tract since Feb. 28. UMW STRIKERS SEE OFFER WASHINGTON — United Mine Workers members in the 106th day of their strike March 20, against the Bituminous Coal Operators Association represent- ing the U.S. coal monopolies, re- ceived copies of the latest proposed contract settlement to be voted on the week of March 27-31. The 160,000 miners have al- ready turned down one inadequate tentative settlement, and militantly ignored strike-busting Taft- Hartley back-to-work legislation to back demands for an agreement giving miners the right to strike to enforce company contract viola- tions, particularly in the crucial health and safety field. L.C.U.C. TO FIGHT SUSPENSIONS TORONTO — The Letter Car- riers Union of Canada (LCUC), said March 20 they will fight the suspensions of two union mem- bers by Canada Post management because they delivered family al- lowance cheques four days early last month. When management earlier had made noises that it was consider- ing firing the workers, LCUC warned it would halt postal de- liveries in protest. PAPER WORKERS TABLE DEMANDS TORONTO — In negotiations with Canadian International Paper Co., and Abitibi Paper Co., the Canadian Paperworkers Union (CPU) has tabled wage in- crease demands calling for up to 17% over two years, it was an- nounced last week. PUBLIC SECTOR WORKERS MEET OTTAWA — Leaders of public -sector unions across Canada, at the invitation of the Canadian Labor Congress, met here March 21 to discuss a strategy to counter what executive vice-president Shirley Carr called ‘‘a declaration of war on (public service) workers and the unions which represent them.’’ The meeting involved organiza- tions both inside and outside the CLC and discussed certain obnox- ious changes in the Public Service Staff Relations Act, which among other things would enshrine fed- eral and provincial government - plans to leave public sector work- ers under wage controls under the guise of tying wage and benefits increases to those in the private sector. JOURNAL BOYCOTT STILL ON OTTAWA — The boycott against the reactionary, union- — busting Ottawa Journal is still on printing unions here say as 84 printers, members of the Interna- tional Typographical Union re- main locked out in a dispute over their right to benefit from the newspaper’s introduction of technological changes. UFAWU SEVEN TRIAL DATE SET VANCOUVER — May 1 is the scheduled trial date for the seven United Fishermen and Allied Workers Union members charged with obstructing an investigation under the Combines Investigation Act. The seven include union pres- ident Jack Nichol and secretary George Hewison along with other UFAWU members and officers. The defense campaign, is ex- pected to draw considerable atten- tion at the forthcoming Quebec CLC convention next month, as the UFAWU 7 face maximum penalties if convicted of $5,000 fines and/or two years in prison. TORONTO — Angry Steelworkers’ local union presidents, took time out from their lulnch break March 20, while attending their monthly Toronto Area Council Meeting to march up to Queen’s Park protesting the 37.5% boost in Ontario Hospital Insurance Plan premiums in the recent Tory provincial budget. Demonstrators said the measure would hit hardest at the poor and the unemployed, and noted that organized workers would have to fight hard to resist paying for the increase at the bargaining table. PACIFIC TRIBUNE—MARCH 31, 1978—Page 4 EDITORIAL COMMENT Students fight cutbacks Many thousands of post-secondary students, along with faculty members, have demonstrated their refusal to ac- cept education cutbacks — the result of provincial governments withholding funds. If allowed, this would mean either fewer facilities and lower standards, or higher tuition fees — or both. Higher prices for education, like higher prices for almost anything, hit the working-class hardest, and makes cut- backs and inflation the concern of work- ing people first of all. Millionaires and other parasites will send their offspring to university, or live in choice housing regardless of cost. ’ The fightback of the students, the workers and the farmers are, all of them, a battle against the dictates and policies of governments run by big business. It’s a battle to counter the economic and pollit-» ical instability running wild in the capitalist system. With reactionary governments sys- tematically driving politics to the right, jobs, education, parity for farmers, med- ical services and other social necessities are getting short shrift. The more these rightward-moving ~ How far Israeli ‘rights’? A propaganda flood following the Is- raeli military invasion and atrocities in Lebanon would have us pity the gangster government of Begin and abuse its vic- tims. Amid the big business media crying out its approval of Israel’s final solution for the Palestinians, the Toronto Star declares, “the Israelis were justified,” they merely wanted “to clear the Palesti- nians out of the border regions.” Clearing a people out of existence is more the Israeli goal. Other monied media “backed” into support of genocide. But the Star said flatly, “Israel had a right to strike back,” as if trouble in the Middle East began when 11 men committed a terrorist act, however re- gretable on the soil of the Israeli oppres- sor. Did the Zionist terrorists, one of them now Israel’s prime minister, have the “right” as far back as 1948 to attack Pales- tinian settlements like Deir Yassin, and butcher the occupants? Did Israel have the “right” to drive hundreds of thousands from their land even by the end of the 1948 war? Did Israel have the “right” through | the 1950s and 1960s to bomb Arab vil- lages, killing and maiming, to massacre children in attacks on Syria and Lebanon in 1972, to gun down a Libyan airliner, killing more than 100 people? . Did Israel have the “right” through all these years to drive the Palestinians out of their lands, dynamite and bulldoze their homes, arrest the people, deport many, subject them to torture and carry out orgies of killing as they are doing in Lebanon today? governments are able to desert areas of public responsibility and hand them over to the mercies of the private sector, the closer we come to scrapping anything; and anyone, which is not profitable. At the same time more and more con cessions and outright gifts are handed to the monopoly corporations. While workers’ living standards are being cul students are denied the right to acquire the abilities Canada needs. . The rekindling of militancy has been seen in recent demonstrations by trade unionists, farmers, and by the thousands _ of students who marched on the Ontario ~ and Alberta legislatures. Once it is widely grasped by all thesé sections of society that they are battli the same corporation bosses, their gov? ernments and their media, there will exist the basis for a powerful ant _ monopoly coalition to roll back the pre sent crisis policies. The unity — first of all parts of th working class — and these other sectors of society, opens the way toa force capa” ble of changing government policy — and where necessary, changing govern ments. Did Israel have a “right” to settle Is- raelis on stolen land, to bomb Egyptia® school children, to spread blood and _ pain in four neighboring countries, 0 jail opponents, chain them, torture them, break their health and refuse — them medical aid? - Only space limits the long list of such “rights” the Israelis have exercised. Aré these the “rights” the big business media in Canada want to defend and extend for” their client? Condemnation of Israeli trampling of human rights must be equalled by the condemnation of the USA which armed it for the very aggression it consistently carries out. This paper and the Communist Party are opposed to terrorism as a politica’ method. We are not terrorists, nor are many others, but if, like people throughout Europe in World War I, they are crushed by a ruthless military machine. directed by a ruthless racist ideology, they surely strike back against their tormentors. ws a The solution in the Middle East is tO” put a stop to the Israeli government pol icy of terrorism and genocide, and t0_ return to the Geneva peace talks with the Palestine Liberation Organization as thé legitimate representative of the PalesU- nian Arabs. - If Israel cannot be brou sanity, it is not.by sending a — ht back to_ N force t0_ protect it from retaliation while it carries out its annihilation of Lebanese an@ Palestinians, but by stringent sanctions: that the rights of other countries, and th world’s right to peace, will be protected. PA Ee) Rr a Sy A ae ow SE ae Ps DW os LO Oe ol Ca BOE ten ee OOS ee Ge ee PP OP a) Poe oe Seen Yo ee 7 ie 1 Ee? on WH oy S Srd tea ee So, ee | PU ee