4 Terrace Review — Wednesday, Nirie 24; 1987 a OPIN IONS _ QUITE F RAN KLY COMMENTARY - by Frank Howard The Attorney-General of B.C., Brian Smith, is not a dumb person. He is considered by many law- yers to be a very effective Barrister; to know his way through any of the laby- rinthine procedures of our ‘courts. In my.-view he is. very competent and politically _ shrewd. To identify. the manner in which he deals with subjects in the Legis- lature is not difficult. He is cautious, careful, quick, and knows all the angles. Why then did he seem to act in such a ques- tionable fashion by pro- ceeding with the applica- tion in the Supreme Court of B.C. to prevent a repet- ition of the June 1 so- called general strike? — I am one of those who. think that Mr. Smith did not blunder. He was ac- ting on behalf of the Gov- ernment and with the ap- proval of the Premier. He knew exactly what his ob- jective was and how to reach the objective. It is my opinion that. the Government’s action, with respect. to that. writ for an injunction, was Letters to the editor will be considered for publication only when signed. Please Include your phone. number. -The editor reserves the right to condense and adit latters. . Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the Terrace Review. Terrace Review Established May 1, 1985. The Terrace Review Is published each Wednesday by Close-Up Business Services Lid. Publisher: Mark Twyford . Editor: - Maureen Barbour _ Staff Reporter: Michael Kelly Advertising Sales: . _ 635-7860 © -. Production: ~~ Jim Hall Office: Garrle Olson -. Accounting: _ Mar] Twyford _ Second-class mall registration No. 6896. . Reproduction of this paper or any portlon thereof ia prohibited without permission of the publisher. Errore and omissions. Advertiaing is sccepted on the condition that in the event of typographical error, that por- tion of the advertising apace oc- cupted by the erroneous Item wiil not be charged for, but the balance of the advertisement will be pald for at the applicable rate. Advertiaera must assume respon- sibility for errota.in any classified ad which Is supplied to the Terrace Review In handwritten form. in compliance with the 8.C. Human Rights Act, no advertisement wiil be published which discriminates. against @ person due to age, race, rellgion, color, sex, nationality; ancestry of place of origin, 4535 Greig Avenue, Terrace, B.C. VBG 1M7 Phone: 635-7840 carefully planned, The writ was issued as a stategic move for a politi- cal purpose. The Govern- ment’s strategy was pro- bably to tar-brush_ the labor movement and make - some officers thereof ap-. pear as villians. The Government’s tac... tics have included denoun- cing opponents of Bills 19 _and 20. The writ issued by. - the Attorney-General was _ apparently part of that .ac- tivity: The writ had the ef- ’ fect of.categorizing certain union officers. It tended = to label them as conspir- ators, intimidators, and’ advocators of force to ac- complish a governmental change in B.C. The writ, : by implication, accused the. people named therein of supposedly having committed criminal acts. Everyone knows _ that there were no criminal acts committed and that none was contemplated. Every- one knows that even the idea .about criminal acts — was ludicrous. There was no criminality involved. . By issuing that writ the Government was appar- ently able to insinuate that criminal acts had- taken place but it didn’t have to back up the insinuation. © ' Isubmit, therefore, that it didn’t matter to the Government what hap- pened to the writ. The Government didn’t partic- _ ulary want‘an injunction. It wanted an effect. - Premier Vander Zalm is: not going to ask for Attor- ney-General Smith’s resig- nation for the simple rea- . son that Smith succeeded. He produced the effect. , WRONG SUBJECT What amazes me. is that the NDP caucus in Vic- toria seems to be clamour- ing for Smith’s resignation because of a. supposedly serious misjudgement. I maintain there was no misjudgement. There was _apparently a manoeuver ‘calculated to manipulate public opinion, to in- fluence the response of the media, and to get the NDP to debate: the wrong sub- ject By demanding Smith’s resignation for an alleged - blunder the NDP itself would seem to have blun- dered. It cannot suggest that the manoeuver was a serious misjudgement by Smith and at the same time suggest that Smith was deliberately abusing our judicial system to .at- tain a political objective. Quite frankly the gov- ernment has succeeded, once again, in getting the NDP to debate the wrong subject. It is wisdom when one learns from mistakes. What we have here is lack . of wisdom, yes, but most- ly pulliblity.. a | NiNe_BGTE BGT E SUBTECT os ong Or ome ~conprainnne TERDERSHP cae | oGlF Mees _ “Wag CASS. ‘new province, . ate, ~ Labor bill causes: rift Hubert | Beyer _ Terrace Review m Victoria Correspondent y -There’s a rift in the ranks of the Social Credit caucus. It’s nothing that can’t be repaired but it’s making Premier Vander Zalm’s smile appear a bit frozen these days. ‘The obvious reason for the dissension is the nasty mood that has’ gripped British: Columbia in the ‘wake of Premier Vander Zalm’s marching orders for the creation of a brave free of wealthy and powerful trade union leaders. When the 48 Socred MLAs were swept into the legislature on the shirt tails of a man who promis- ed peace, love and sereni- ty, many of them were: looking forward to a fresh start. What they got, in- stead, was confrontation on a scale, rare even for British Columbia. And. that makes the moderates © feel uneasy. The disenchantment | goes depper than that, however. Many of the Socred MLAs are moder- middle-of-the-road free enterprisers who prefer confrontation. They didn’t run on a radical, right-wing platform, but . that’s where they find - themselves now. The Socred — election campaign was based on reason. It appealed to the centre of the political spectrum. But no sooner was the election over, the right wing took power. And it’s showing no signs compromise to. of letting go. It’s the backbenchers i in particular who are quietly expressing doubts about Vander Zalm’s union- bashing and sabre-rat- tling. They have difficulty reconciling Bill 19, the Labour Relations Reform Act, and the government injunction with which all further opposition to the legislation was .to be crushed with their leader’s ‘election promise of gov- ernment by consultation. Life ‘as a backbencher isn’t easy atthe best of time. It’s harder when the ‘government takes a course of action for which it real- ly didn’t get a mandate. And it gets really tough when the calibre. of some” cabinet ministers leaves a _ ; lot to be desired. There: are at. least a ‘|. dozen. .Socred backben- chers who could. do as ‘good a job or better than © some of the cabinet miinis- ‘|: ters, but while the former are in the limelight and command higher salaries, the latter ‘are condemned to a. life of rubber- stamping cabinet deci- sions, Of the 47 Social Credit MLAs only 18 are cabinet ministers. They shape policy. They make the de- cisions. They determine the political direction of the province until the next -election comes around. The rest are foot soldiers whose only job is to vote - for government initiatives. Publicly, they would ‘disagree with that assess- ment. They would point out that they represent their constituents in Vic- toria, . straightening out problems on the home front. They would draw - your attention to the more or less firy speeches they hold in the legislature. _ Letter - Comments, suggestions. were appreciated I would like to take this opportunity to thank you and your staff for your re- cent- participation in the disaster drill and exercise held June 10 at the Ter- race Airport. ° [hope this exercise has’ Airpo been useful to yourselves and that it may assist you © in formulating any future disaster planning. We sin- cerely wish that this plan- ning will never be put to use; - I appreciate the com- ments and suggestions made during our debrief- ing session, The time spent -by Terrace Review staff member Daniele Berquist is well appreciated. On June 27 at 4:45 p.m, the will. be putting on a demonstration of. their equipment. a G. Wright Fire Chief Crash-Fire Rescue Service Terrace, B.C. tt Fire Department. The premier’. ae eo stress that all’. Socred. _ MLAs have’ a hand in shaping government poli- cy through discussions in. caucus meetings. He might point out that back- benchers have added res- ponsibilities as parliamen- tary secretaries to the various cabinet ministers. All of which is nonsense. . . BACKBENCHERS Backbenchers have no influence on government policies. More often than not, caucus is the last to be informed. of important — - cabinet decisions. As for being allowed to play par- liamentary secretary to as. cabinet minister, it amounts to little. more. than . taking opposition - questions on notice for the minister during question period. Backbenchers, in my opinion, always have been and always will be drones. DISAPPOINTMENT — “Loyalty will not let ‘them go public, but some . of them are privately ad- mitting to their disap- ' pointment, - particularly when they see a cabinet minister who is clearly not up to his task. Every premier with a large majority has had to - wrestle with the problem | of an under-utilized back bench, but Vander Zalmis — making it worse by con- sulting them even less than his predecessors did. Perhaps the rift will close once Bill 19 is law. Then again, if labor boy- — cots the legislation, as it has promised, labor re- lations in British Colum- bia could plunge into an even deeper abyss, tearing’ the Socreds apart-as never — before. -