* Darrel Currie (above) of the Hobbema Indian Reserve at Edmonton is the youngest member of a troupe of Canadian Indians now on an eight month tour of France demonstrating the traditional dances of the Cree Indians. BOOKS New work restores heritage of neglected Irish patriot OW can we explain the labor | pbbsiiied: amazing neglect of James Connolly, Irish patriot and leader of the Dublin Easter Rebellion, who was executed by the British government on May t2, 1916? “During his day Connolly was not only the leading Marxist of ‘the English-speaking world, he was widely recognized to be so. Read Labor in Irish History (New Books Publications), a little book of 132 pages, and try to think of something written before 1903 which is its equal for creative Marxist insight, wide scholarship, and masterly historical sweep. Eleanor Marx, one of Connol- _ly’s associates in the Socialist League, would be the only com- ~petitor. But Connolly had spent the preceding decade in two main occupations — carter and builder’s laborer. He created his own opportun- ities. He broke free from the limitations capitalist conditions imposed on his youth and soar- ed above them, in 1892 asking his wife to correct his spelling and grammar, in 1907 translat- ing from and speaking five lan- guages ! PROVINCIAL LEADER | LABOR PROGRESSIVE PARTY C.B.C. BROADCAST May 21 at 10:15 p.m. The product of this extra- ordinary mind is worthy of at- tention by every worker. One of the first central com- mittee meetings of the British Communist party recorded with interest that over half of those present had been brought into the movement personally by James Connolly. Labor in Irish History was the first attempt to create a theoretical basis for the tactics of the struggle for Irish inde- pendence. In preparing it Con- nolly drew on the work of Marx, Morris, Sketchly and above all ' Leslie. lis style is militant and smells of the powder of great controv- ersies in the early nineties, when the middleclass turned on Charles Stewart Parnell and the workers stood by him. Its essence, extracted from the ex- periences of 700 years, is that in order to be successful, the Trish struggle for independence must be led by the working class. As Charles Lever’s character Darby (in Tom Burke) put it, “the gentlemen ever and always betrayed us.” The publishers of this new, well-produced and readable edi- tion, with its striking cover, deserve the warmest congratu- lations. ’ ‘ C. DESMOND GREAVES SCIENCE ee) | Freud’s weakness he used self as subject OT MANY scientists become household words in their lifetime, but Sigmund Freud, who was born 100 years ago on May 6, has not only become a household word, he has become an adjective as well, “Freudian” is now an accepted label for almost any rather rum human relationship and for any piece of conduct which seems to have motives that do not meet the eye. Most people, if asked what the name Freud brings to their minds, would undoubtedly reply “Sex.” And rightly, for the basis of Freud’s ideas is that sex is the main motive force behind man’s actions. Plenty of abuse has been hurled at these ideas—those whose own ideas about sex are the nastiest usually being the » first to shout “Disgusting!” But none of the mud ever stuck to Freud himself. For the inventor of the “Oedi- pus complex,” who believed that all boys were in love with their mothers and wanted to kill their fathers, was a most modest, virtuous and upright professor of these startling views, a man of profound culture and human- ity, a model husband and a de- voted father of his six children. $03 bes % Sigmund Freud was born in imperial Austria on May 6, 1856, in an orthodox Jewish family. When he was six the family moved to Vienna, and very soon the little boy became conscious of the vile atmosphere of anti- Semitism. He died in London in 1939, when anti-Semitism seemed triumphant in Western Europe. - He has described ‘how, when he was nine, his father “fell off his pedestal,” through telling him how some anti-Semite had hustled him off the pavement and knocked his hat off. “What did you do?” asked Sigmund. “I stepped into the gutter and picked up my hat,” answered his father simply and, ‘it seemed to the child, unhero- ically. After this, Freud says, he burned with revolt against this treatment of his people, and identified himself with Hanni- bal, the Carthaginian who swore to defeat the conquering Romans who killed his father. The child grew up and became a medical student, and the study of the nervous system was his first interest. But soon he abandoned neuro- ology for what is commonly ealled “nerves” — the emotional disturbances which became the main concern of his life, xt ot xt In Paris, where he went to study psychopathology, he be- came interested in the use of hypnotism for curing hysteria, at that time regarded as a purely feminine ailment. From there he went on to de- velop his method of phycho- analysis, in which, by what Freud called “free association,” fhe patient is induced to fetch up from his sub-conscious the troubles of his childhood, and is thus cured of present dis- turbances of which these for- gotten (repressed) hurts are supposed to be the cause. It was in the course of apply- ing this treatment, and in the course of self-analysis, that Freud became convinced that the origin of all these troubles was sexual. However, despite the enthusi- asm of psycho-analysts and some May 18, 1956 — of their patients, there is still no proof whatever that this method cures anything that time would not have cured. It is a treatment, however, for people with plenty of spare time and money, although Freud’s ideas are the basis of much that it being done in child- guidance clinics and medical treatment of neurosis today. ¢ xt xt it Yet Freud’s theories have spread throughout the capitalist world, and one cannot help e Wondering whether they rang the bell there so loudly because they produced what seemed to be scientific justifications for what we may perhaps call “the individualist conception of his- tory,” in which what happens within the individual becomes the motive force. His theory of the conflict be- tween the basic sexual and ag- gressive impulses and the con- science is certainly not new, but is all in the Old Testament, which was part of his early up- bringing. His analysis of dreams and _their symbolism, for instance, is a very old idea, given new life by the sexual interpretation - Freud put upon them. And his picture of the child’s emotions and entanglement of sexual love for the mother and jealous hatred of the father may well reflect the situation in a Victorian patriarchal family, Where mother were both subjects of Papa, who ruled with a rod of iron, but it is not a law of human nature. All these ideas are used to- day in the United States in a highly reactionary way — one unusually self-critical psycho- analyst has described his job as “turning out well-balanced bastards’”—where revolt against existing society is often dis- missed as a “failure of adjust- ment” requiring psychological treatment. xt xt it In fact, the fatal weakness of Freud as a scientist is that, from the beginning he himself was his most deeply studied subject, and from what he found within him- self he generalised widely into a universal law, His autobiographical writings show how much he based on the analysis of his own dreams, sufferings and fantasies as a brilliantly clever, highly sensi- tive and unhappy Jewish boy in anti-Semitic Vienna. , Nevertheless we owe a good deal to Freud — and to others much less well known — for their delvings into the human soul, which have increased our self-knowledge and therefore our powers of objectivity and self-criticism. Above all, Freud played an important part in creating a more humane and understanding attitude toward children — par- ticularly when they are at their least angelic and most un- manageable. But of his precise theories of sexual symbolism, and his method of treating mental ill- ness, the best that one can say is that they are still unproven. Freud himself. said of the movement he started: “I can say that I have made many sugges- tions. Something may come 0 them in the future, though I cannot myself tell whether it will be much or little.” A hun-_ dred years after his birth, w®& still do not know. / : NOEL BRIAN PACIFIC TRIBUNE — PAGE 8 _ t and children