FRIDAY, JULY 25, 1969 CALLS SCARE ELECTION VOL. 30, NO. 30 es 10¢ BENNETT MUST GO! Thousands lose vote in summer election ‘‘Premier Bennett’s call for a Provincial election on August 27th, right in the heat of summer when large number of B.C. voters will be away from their homes on “That's on Will be us —U.S. Daily World © ste small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.’”’ With those words Neil Armstrong, the first man P on the moon, expressed the wish of mankind — that the great scientific advances in space exploration ed to advance the cause of humanity. (See editorial on page 2.) vacation, is thousands of our citizens,’ a deliberate attempt to disenfranchise * Nigel Morgan, Provincial leader of the Communist Party charged this week. ‘He is calling a snap, summer election, and allowing the bare minimum of notice permitted by law, in order to restrict debate of his unpopular school, hospital, labor, taxation and resources policies,’ Morgan told a gathering at the Party’s Annual Okanagan Regional Picnic at Sunnybrae Beach Sunday afternoon. “It shows Premier Bennett and his cabinet are running scared. After all, they have lost five consecutive byelections in the last twelve months. On top of this, there has been a marked fall-off in their up-country, rural vote where this, as well as previous governments, have traditionally gained power.” “The Socreds know that time is running out for them. And they have resorted to the worst kind of political gerrymandering in an attempt to avoid the wrath of public opinion. They are Pentagon wants bomber r By MAURICE RUSH a Pentagon has asked for a to provide bases Strat Ombers of the U.S. a €gic Air Command on ecuan soil. Defence eee Leo Cadieux has di Cated that the Cana- sho S0vernment will rtly make an announce- €nt approving the plan. Offieiaruncement by Pentagon invo} Said the US. request ved only refuelling tankers for contg bombers. But there is a ction between the the 4g0n announcement and defen atement by Canada’s : Ce minister who said the SAC pens “dispersal bases”’ for in Speers in Canada so that Would nt of an emergency they Beas disperse to Canadian » and operate from them. expla, Teason for the different Nations has not been made tence Officials in Ottawa. What is clear is that a deal is in the making under which Canada will provide facilities for U.S. SAC bombers to operate as part of the Pentagon’s military disposition of its striking nuclear air force. Such an agreement would extend the Pentagon’s military establishment to Canada and turn Canada into an immediate target for nuclear attack in the event of war since it will contain bases from which U.S. bombers will be expected to take off on bombing and other military objectives. Such an agreement would make a farce of any independent policy claim by the Canadian government, and open Canada to the threat of nuclear destruc tion. In an attempt to make the Pentagon’s ’ demand more acceptable to Canadians, defence minister Cadieux said there would be no storing of atomic weapons at these bases. It’s a known fact that SAC maintains bombers armed with nuclear warheads in the air on a 24 hour alert basis on the periphery of the Soviet Union. Are Canadians to believe that these - bombers which — according to the Pentagon will land for refueling at Canadian bases— are not to be armed with nuclear warheads? Once the Pentagon is given bases for SAC bombers in Canada the public will have little say in what goes on at these bases. This fact was revealed last week when the Pentagon admitted that it has large quantities of bombs containing the latest poison gases, including VX nerve gases, in bases around the world ready for instant use. This latest disclosure was forced from the Pentagon following a ‘‘mishap’’ in Okinawa in which a container of nerve gas broke open seriously injuring 24 persons. The Pentagon refused to admit previously that it had stored poison gases in countries around _thé world. The Okinawa incident bases has aroused a storm of protest among the Japanese people who were unaware until this latest incident that their territory was being used for storing of these horror weapons. If the Pentagon can secretly store poison gases at its bases around the world, what is to stop them from using bases in Canada — by secret agreement with a compliant government in Ottawa — to store nuclear and other weapons for use by the Strategic Air Command? Even if the Pentagon’s argument is to be accepted that they only intend to refuel their bombers in Canada — will these bombers not be armed with nuclear warheads in their flights across Canada? Or does the Pentagon expect us to believe they intend to refuel unarmed bombers in Canada and then fly them back to the U.S. to be armed with nuclear warheads? The announcement by the See PENTAGON, pg. 8 deliberately contriving to catch the people unaware and get the election over with in order to have another five clear years to _ carry forward a whole series of hew and even bigger giveaways to big foreign and domestic monopolies,”’ he declared. “They want another five safe years to tighten the squeeze on our schools and hospitals, to strait-jacket labor, and tax the poor to make ‘the rich richer. And the labor and progressive forces in British Columbia should above all else make sure they don’t get away with such outright political trickery.”’ “In spite of widespread dissatisfaction with Socred education, labor, resources and fiscal policies, and in spite of resentment over the successive Sommers, Gaglardi and Commonwealth Trust scandals, it would be a serious mistake to count the Bennett administration down for the count,’’ Morgan warned the Salmon Arm picnic crowd. “Outcome of the coming election is going to depend very largely on how the battle against the Socreds Bill 33; Sales Tax: resource giveaways; schools; hospitals and housing squeeze, and for real alternative policies are developed,”’ Morgan said. “The Liberals, no more than the Socreds, provide any answer to thse problems. Neither do the right-wing spokesmen of the NDP like their Provincial President, John Laxton, who recently told Premier Bennett he should ‘prove his belief in free enterprise by reversing some of the socialistic steps he has taken . . . he should denationalize B.C. Hydro and cancel medicare. After he gets through with those, he can continue to rid society of all the other socialistic curses, including unemployment insurance, pensions, free education, social welfare, workmen’s compensation and minimum wage laws’. “Such utter rot simply plays into the hands of the Bennett See ELECTION, pg. 8