Ten children’s books on IYC ’79 principles UNICEFP’s catalogue of items useful for Intemational Year of the Child lists a series of 10 books, written for children. The books were first published in Spain in 1978 and now are published in Britain, Australia and Canada. Each book deals with one of the principles in the UN Declaration of the Rights of the Child. The stories are touching and humorous, each written by a dif- ferent author. They are all beauti- fully illustrated by different ar- tists. My favorite story deals with the universal right of all children to a free education. Two silly kings rule their countnes and are con- stantly trying to outdo one an- other. The people of both countries get tired of the endless wars and want the kings to think about their needs for a change. The children > a PACIFIC TRIBUNE—MARCH 9, 1979—Page 6 of each country go to their king and ask: ‘*‘Why don’t you build a school and make yourself more famous than the other king?’’ _ Motivated by their desire to be the greatest, the kings build beaut- iful schools and education be- comes available to all children. After the children are.educated, they go back to the kings and tell them that the people don’t need them anymore. ‘*We think we can run the country so well there will no longer be poverty and wars’’, they say. As for the kings — the-get sent to school. Children respond enthusiasti- cally to these books which invite discussion about very serious matters. Five-year-olds, in a To- ronto day care centre, who hear some of the stories, were indig- nant over the unfair treatment some children in the stories re- ceived. | Friendly giants, robots, green and blue children, people from outer space, all play a part in the stories to illustrate a principle in the Declaration of Children’s Rights, in ways which a child can sympathize with. The books are published in Canada by John Wiley and Son Ltd., and can be ordered through most bookstores at $5.95 for a hardcover book, or $55 for the en- tire set. _ — Virginia Thomson Women in Canada Women — the main victims of government funding cuts By KERRY McCUAIG Restrictions and elimination of government funding for social services have serious affected women’s ability to take their full part in the workforce. It is a situa- tion which has not been ignored by working people and a growing movement is demanding that funding for these services not only be restored but increased. Women in Canada make up 51% of the population and 40% of its labor market: More than one government agency has labelled them ‘‘secondary earners’’, the reserved labor force, accepted when their manpower is needed and forced back into the home when jobs become scarce. But despite labels given by govern- ment ministries and employers, women work for the same reasons as men, to support themselves and their families. Over 40% of women workers are self supporting. Almost 53% of the husbands of married women workers have incomes under $8,000 a year. When women enter the job market they often face unfair employment practices. Personnel department attitudes characterize women as unreliable and unsta- ble; they may marry, or “‘worse,”” become pregnant; mothers have too many distractions, i.e., their children. Openings are limited to a preponderance of dead-end cler- ical and service jobs and at con- siderably lower wage scales than such employment offers men. Women on average earn 55% of wages earned by men, this diffe- rential applies to all fields of employment: industrial, techni- cal, clerical, professional. Attempts by women to achieve equal pay for their work will be seriously undermined by the fed- eral government’s Bill C-22 which will amend the Public Service Staff Relations Act. Its provisions will tie the wages of clerical and secretarial workers to their primarily unorganized, under- paid counterparts in the private sector. Although equal pay for work of equal value legislation has been passed, recent guidelines have al- lowed so many exceptions as to almost render the law useless. But any discussion of women in the work force must examine the Canadian economy which does not provide employment for all who want to work. Women in par- ticular would benefit from an industrial strategy which would allow Canada to develop a secon- dary manufacturing industry, nationalize and utilize its own natural resources, earmark funds ~ to develop science and technol- ogy for Canadian industry-and to prevent plant closures and job exports. The lack of this kind of indust- rial strategy has resulted in over 1,000,000 Canadians being with- out work; including 10% of the female work force. Government cutbacks in health care, education, the public and social services have added.-a tre- mendous number of women workers to the unemployed. Cuts in unemployment insur- ance payments, longer quali- fication periods, restrictions on those who re-apply and on those who have been out of the work force for over a year, and the disqualification of many part time workers will make it difficult for women, particularly mothers to collect UI benefits. Provincial labor relation acts make no provisions for guarantee- ing women job security after ab- sences for child birth. With legal blessing a woman’s employment may be terminated at any time during her pregnancy because of company regulations. There is no protection against denying employment, promotion, train- ing, etc. to a pregnant woman. Any demands for women’s equality in the labor force must include the demand or good qual- ity, affordable daycare. There are 2,099,000 children under five in Canada. In 1974 there were 11,351 spaces for chil- dren under three and 38,952 spaces for children three to five. This number has declined sub- stantially in the last five years. Country-wide figures at present are not available, but take, for example, Metropolitan Toronto which eliminated all its city-run infant care centres this year. Education cutbacks have seri- ously affected the number of supervised lunch period and after four programs for primary grade pupils. In-1974 there were fewer than 5,000 spaces for 2,338,000 children between six and 11. Summer brings additional prob- lems that can amount to a crisis for women who need child care. ~ With schools, nursery schools and even some daycare centres closed, many thousands of women face the sometimes insol- vable problem of finding some type of alternative reliable care for their children. Few employers are sympathe- tic to a woman who must take time off to. care for a sick child, not infrequently it can cost her her job. Both parents and children are victims of vicious government policy ‘which has cut back on funding for child care. Most work- ing parents are forced to make do with inadeuate arrangements and are left with the frustration and knowledge that if anything should happen to their children they as _ parents would be held responsi- ble. : Government funding cuts have also denied women access to — necessary educational, clinical and counselling facilities. The slashing of the $2-million family planning program by 50% has further prevented the utilization of this badly needed service. Cutbacks have also resulted in the closing or reduction of’ ser- vices in women’s shelters, half way houses, rape crisis centres and abortion facilities. The fight for women’s equality can only begin from equal access to economic life. Despite the Royal Commission on the Status of Women, women haven’t come a long way in these first four years of the International Decade for Women. The Canadian Govern- ment has im fact ensured that Many gains have been eroded. easier. leave to care for sick children. seniority. marriage breakup. in the country. less of income. cost of living. To enable women to participate fully in the work force the following must be demanded and implemented as a minimum: e a $4.50 per hour minimum wage, and effective government action to ensure equal pay for work of equal value. e changes in the Labor Act to make unionization of all workers e affirmative action programs to train more women for skilled labor, and legislation to force employers to install the necessary facilities for both male and female workers. e publicly-owned, low cost, 24-hour child care centres. e the Human Rights Commission to investigate and prosecute employers and training programs for discriminatory practices. e minimum sick leave provisions in the Labor Act, including __ @ three months government-paid maternity leave, and the right to return to the job after up to a year’s absence, with no loss of e equal sharing of all property acquired during marriage upon @ women’s shelter and other such facilities in every large centre e equal access to abortion and family planning services regard- e elimination of all laws which deny women equal rights o special constructive consideration because of their role as mothers. e doubling of the family allowance programs and tying it to the e a new made-in-Canada constitution which would provide equal rights to both men and women.