es acy PALLET ALLE AB EAE EAE LL LR OO a Re Lae oe eae Trudeau's USSR trip _could profit Canada By MEL DOIG Prime Minister Trudeau is scheduled to visit the Soviet Union later this month. Aa by the Canadian Tribune “to comment on_ the _ projected prime ministerial visit, William Kashtan, general secretary of the Communist Party of Cana- da, remarking that this will be the first time a Canadian prime minister in office has visited the Soviet Union, said the visit “could be an important event.” It follows the visit some months ago of Minister of In- dustry, Trade and Commerce Jean Luc Pepin, when an agree- ment concerning trade, scienti- fic and cultural exchanges was signed with the Soviet govern- ment. It is to be presumed, Mr. Kashtan thought, that the prime minister will also discuss ques- tions related to such exchang- es. “There is a wide field here on these three fronts,” he said, “and democratic Canadians will hope Mr. Trudeau will work out mutually satisfactory agree- ments that could lead to an en- largement of trade between Canada and the Soviet Union.” Replying to the comment that trade between the two coun- tries has been largely one way, with the Soviet Union making considerable purchases while Canada has bought very little _in return, Mr. Kashtan’s opinion was this disproportionate ex- change “cannot be pursued for too long.” “To sell, Canada must buy,” he said. “Only on this basis can long-term trade agreements be developed.” Act For Peace Turning his attention to an- other matter of intense interest to the Canadian people, the Communist Party general sec- retary said, “Democratic Cana- dians will also hope the visit “softhe iprime minister will lead to an agreeemnt on a common position with respect to the preservation of peace and elimi- nation of the hotbeds of war.” In this context he cited three critically important issues: a European security pact which could lead to a detente in Eu- rope and prevent West Germa- ny from becoming again a source of war; a politica] set- tlement in the Middle East which recognizes the right of all peoples to exist and to their security, based on the with- drawal of Israeli troops from territories it occupied in 1967; and the complete withdrawal of U.S. troops from Indochina. Canada has two very large neighbors, the Soviet Union to the north and the USA to the south. How, the question was asked of Mr. Kashtan, does the prime minister’s visit relate to this fact? “The strengthening of friendship and of economic ties,” he replied, “between our country and the Soviet Union can be an important element in withstanding the pressures of U.S. imperialism on Canada’s independence and sovereignty.” Need Stronger Ties Mr. Kashtan sees these pres- sures from the USA mounting on all sides — for example, in the Arctic around gas and oil resources, in the areas of for- eign investments and _ trade policies. “To surmount these pressures,” he affirmed, * Cana- da needs to strengthen its ties with the Soviet Union and other socialist countries.” Canadians are getting used to seeing Mr. Trudeau take off on flying junkets to distant places. What, we asked, if any- thing, is different about this trip? “From one side, there is no difference,’ Mr. Kashtan_ re- plied, “The Canadian govern- ment is - seeking through | all these visits to strengthen its position in the world and to create outlets for Canadian goods as well as for the export of capital. With the visit to the Soviet Union, however, there is a qualitative difference involved —here Canada is dealing with a mighty socialist power that plays an outstanding role in in- fluencing the course of world events.” “No question of major impor- tance,” he continued, ‘can to- day be resolved without or against the socialist countries. We hope the prime minister knows this, understands this, and that his trip therefore is not just another junket, but a serious effort to strengthen the bonds of friendship between our countries.” Nuclear-Free Zone Many Canadians wish Cana- da could become a nuclear-free zone. We asked Mr. Kashtan whether Mr. Trudeau’s visit to the Soviet Union might advance such a possibility. “I don’t know,” he replied, ‘whether this will be the case. I hope the prime minister wil] take an in- itiative in declaring that Cana- da desires to be a nuclear-free zone and that he asks for the support of the Soviet Union in upholding this stand.” “[ve no doubt,” he asserted, “that Prime Minister Trudeau would find no difficulty from that quarter. The difficulties will come from the State De- partment and the Pentagon in the United States.” The national question con- fronts our country in today’s grave constitutional crisis, aris- ing out of the failure to recog- nize the existence of two na- tions in Canada and their un- qualified right to self-determi- nation. What, we asked, are the chances that the prime minister on his visit to the Soviet Union may learn of the Marxist- Leninist solution to the national question there? “That’s a good question, and I would hope,” Mr. Kashtan re- plied, “that Mr. Trudeau may undertake a study of the na- tional question and of its solu- tion in the Soviet Union. Per- haps, in the course of his visit to a number of the republics of the USSR this will be possible.” “Canada can learn much from the Soviet Union on how to solve the national question,” he continued, “just as it can also learn from it how to under- take the vast development of resources and of the economy for the good of the people.” False Premises Speaking in Niagara Falls early last month, Mr. Trudeau had spoken of what he consi- dered the inevitability of un- IFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY, MAY 7, 1971—PAGE 8 Se Seba YA QP A -BAUEAPT DAUNDAM Union brief to Ottawa ‘Problems must be solve? A delegation from the 25.000- member United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers’ union (UE), met with federal Industry, Trade and Commerce Minister Jean-Luc Pepin on May 3, and submitted a comprehensive brief on the crisis facing Canada’s electrical manufacturing _ in- dustry. The union delegation said it viewed ‘‘with growing alarm, de- velopments taking place that constitute a real threat to the job security of our members and Canada’s future as a first-class, technologically advanced indus- trial country.” The submission was being presented at a critical time when Canadians are once again suffering from one of the worst cyclical periods of econo- mic dislocation since the Great Depression of the 1930’s. “We assert that such condi- tions are avoidable under proper government fiscal and economic policy,” the statement said. “We are also convinced, that the poli- cies followed by this government have massively contributed to the present economic decline in Canada today.” “No Reason Why...” Pointing to the growing domes- tic and world demand for elec- trical energy in the future, which is rising at a rate doubling every 10 years, the statement said there is absolutely no reason why Canadian electrical manu- facturing should not be expand- ing rapidly in all sectors of the industry. By LIZ HILL With banners blocking the stairway to the Ontario legisla- ture on April 30, members of the Young Communist League and the New Democratic Youth link- ed forces in condemning the On- tario budget handed down last “week. One huge banner, ‘Do not make youth the victim of the constitutional crisis’ attacked the Tory party’s policy of using the unresolved constitutional crisis to evade its share of the blame for unemployment and pass the buck to the federal government. While unemploy- ed youth walk the streets, many without any financial assistance, the budget sweetly pretends to aim for full employment while proposing steps to the opposite. The 5% tax credit given to the corporations to install modern- ized machines and equipment will hasten rationalization and thus increase layoffs. The young “There is also no reason why secondary manufacturing of all types should not be burgeoning in this country ... We have the advantage of vast domestic re- sources of energy and raw mate- rials and we have a work force capable of the task.” The delegation said that the major reason that such develop- ment is not taking place is the attitude shared by government and fostered by foreign-owned corporations that Canada must be a satellite of the United States. “This concept of Canada’s po- sition as a minion in a continen- tal relationship will guarantee “that we have no industrial fu- ture and will have an ever weaker voice in domestic and world affairs,” the brief declared. Monopoly Giants After citing figures to show that productivity in the electri- cal industry has risen signific- antly over the past two decades, the brief went on to analyze the integration and rationalization of the electrical industry which illustrates how a handful of cor- porate giants, who enjoy mono- poly powers, can manipulate manufacturing policy on a global scale to the detriment of the national interests of the country they are operating in. “Of these corporations . . . the leviathans, General Electric and Westinghouse, control the basis of industry in this country and the decisions made by them have resulted in unemployment picketers demanded ‘expand job opportunities, not profits’, and “Jobs now, Mr. Davis’’. While students are already worried about getting summer jobs to finance their way back to school, the budget makes no move to abolish tuition fees for post-secondary education or es- tablish stipends for students to make education accessible to all. The posters called for the establishment of emergency bur- Saries to students unable to continue their education due to financial hardships. “Give the 18-year olds the vote,” one placard proclaimed. With an Ontario election in the offiing, the budget is a slick deception aimed at the voters, and it completely ignores the needs of the youth. The picket- ers called the budget nothing short of a disaster for the work- ing people of Ontario and par- ticularly the youth. employment in technologically advanced economies, like Cana- da’s. This he contrasted to countries like the Soviet Union which, in his opinion, are using picks and shovels and where /unemployment is consequently unknown. We invited Mr. Kash- tan’s comments on this. “I think,” he said, “that very ~ few people can deny the tre- mendous _ technological and scientific development of the Soviet Union. These great tech- nological changes take place there without any adverse ef- fects on the working people. The Soviet Union underiakes to retrain and to raise the tech- nical level of the working peo- ple, to raise their living stand- ards. Here in Canada, as’ we’ know, and in other capitalist countries, technological change leads to growing ~ unemploy- ment.” Continuing, he pointed out that by its planned economy, based on public ownership, the Soviet Union has- demonstrated Socialism’s ability to maintain full employment, stable prices and rising standards. In conclusion, Mr. Kashtan said the visit of Prime Minister Trudeau can be an important factor in strengthening peaceful coexistence between Canada and the Soviet Union—*“but to give it meaning requires more than. pious declarations.” and job insecurity for tho of Canadian workers ant ed this nation of manula capability that is vital future.” The brief said that Ut try’s poor foreign trade Pr ance and the loss of Pel paratus and industrial equ orders were a direct 1 parent company attilu : 0 > of foreign consequence eel $ In the area of dome” ances, the union statem the problem was —. consumer demand, flowiNg the government policies sumer restraint, and 1) reliance on the imp uc “4 parts and finished prou List P Among the many dations urged by the union called for the | ment of a regulatory | the electrical manufat dustry comprised of ise agement and union ae tives in the industry thet | government officials decile have the right © “i product manufacture tet employment needs, iG ate buying and sell and import policies | location of resear lopment funds. | All corporatio try would have tion and receiv: the board _ before major changes in 4 areas. ried f The brief Ge Bs 0 setting up of tn aed” ree i pri ny _ tions, armed wi search and develope guarantee the red” ectt logy, to produce © whe! electronic equipmem. shown that this }§ i i st. The Central comm ad Communist Party of r sent warm fraternal fy the Communist Fan ania on its nt eveThis. is an imPre a? for your party, OF fo people of Romany C ism in your, coun ia eral secretary ine U tan’s message '0 ~~ clares. . ona “The formation marked a turnin’ Romanian wor ment, gave 4 direciion to its and its allies. 2n° conditions in un struggle conjoint). ut Soviet Union di achieved in the yout socialist society ub part “As an inteBre an socialist community uf international © , workers move’ under the leadel ance of yony he ortant. FOle ss SERIne imperialist democracy, nati m dence and socialle™ ip ide scale. tl aa, you vee cesses in the built ism, in the stren socialist camP r He the internationa? ©