/10. August 16th, 1976

advised that it was felt with the number of school grounds available
there is enough park space for other activities; also, the developer of
the townhouse project is proposing two play areas, a swimming pool, a
recreation building, etc. Alderman Mabbett questioned the foregoing of
the normal park levy in exchange for the tennis court, and Alderman
Ranger pointed out that the two developments combined would have contributed
$43,200.00 to this fund. Mr. Joel Kerbel, Barrister & Solicitor, was in
attendance on behalf of Grampion Ventures, one of the developers, and on
invitation of His Worship the Mayor, spoke to the proposal and pointed
out that it is a 30 ~ not a 32-lot subdivision - and that approval was
given to developing the tennis court subject to determining costs -
which has not yet been done. Mr. Kerbel suggested that the City not
exchange the levy for-the one acre parcel and development of a tennis
court thereon; however, Alderman Traboulay stated he felt 1£° the facility
was not provided the existing courts in the area would be filled to
capacity by the people generated from these two housing projects.
Alderman Ranger stated he was prepared to accept the one acre for a
tennis court paid for by the developers; however, he would like to see

hat is,
subdivision in abeyance - in view of the school situation and re-construction
of the Lougheed Highway over the next two years. Alderman Ranger stated
he was satisfied with the arrangements for access and egress; however,
he would like to know the elevation of the land on which the townhouse
development will be situated in relation to the Lougheed Highway, and in

response to his request, the City Engineer advised he would obtain this

sea FECES JO an ee SE

informetion. Alderman Ranger noted that it is still intended to include

a day-care centre in the development and to his query, Alderman Laking

advised that the units would be subdivided by strata title; however, the

INSTI ty Sera

HACE tee ET Tie Gi

tennis court facility will not be included in the strata plan. Alderman
Ranger then inquired as to direction in which the drainage from the develop-
ments would be directed, and the City Engineer advised that it would go

co the Cedar ditch system. Alderman Ranger then stated he would be

prepared to approve application R#12/76 but not R#7/76. Alderman Keryluk

referred to his previous opposition to application R#12/76 in view of

possible commercial development along the Lougheed Highway; however, the

Planning Officer advised that no further accesses will be granted by the

Department of Highways off the Lougheed Highway to that section.