November 17th, 1975 Moved by Alderman Laking: Seconded by Alderman Keryluk: That recommendation No. 2 of the Public Works Committee, set forth on Page 2 of a report from the City Engineer dated June 18th, 1974, that the garbage pick-up be limited to no more than three standard garbage cans weighing no more than 75 pounds each from every pick-up point, be approved. Carried. Prior to passage of the foregoing resolution, Alderman Ranger pointed out there is no mention of containers, and Alderman Thompson stated he felt that containerization removal is a separate issue and that he was prepared to support the motion on the understanding that a full report thereon would be forthcoming. Moved by Alderman Laking: Seconded by Alderman Mabbett: That recommendation No. 3 of the Public Works Committee, set forth on Page 2 of a report from the City Engineer dated June 18th, 1974, that Commercial and Industrial establishments, apartment, and public or institutional buildings requiring collection service in excess of three cans once per week will be required to make their own arrangements. Carried Moved by Alderman Laking: Seconded by Alderman Thompson: That recommendation No. 4 of the Public Works Committee, as set forth on Page 2 of a report from the City Engineer dated June 18th, 1974, that a garbage charge of $24.00 per year to those benefiting from the service be instituted with an appropriate mill rate reduction accompanying the institution of the separate charge, Carried. Prior to passage of the foregoing resolution, Alderman Laking commented that if a straight rate of $24.00 per year deduction is instituted, this should apply to everybody, and Alderman Thompson advised it would be made very clear and explicit that the charge is deducted from taxation for general purposes. Alderman Keryluk proposed appruval of recommendation No. 5 set forth on Page 2 of the report from the City Engineer dated June L8th, 1974, which states: "The garbage charge could be handled along with present water and sewer billings. First charge to commence in 1975"; however, members of Council generally agreed that the charge should be shown as a deduction from taxation for general purposes on the tax billing netice, and the following motion was then made: