| te An open i The following open letter has been sent by the Ontario Provincial Execu- tive of the Communist Party of Canada 10 the Houdaille (Oshawa) plant work- ers, members of UAW Local 222: * * * The Ontario Committee of the Com- munist Party of Canada greets the workers of Houdaille Industries in Oshawa. We congratulate you on the Militant and firm action you took by Occupying that plant. This has resulted in the achievement of the declared aims of your sit-in — greatly improved pen- sions and severance pay rates that you - forced this U.S.-owned company to concede. Your sit-in action serves as an exam- Ple to all workers, particularly in On- tario where in the recent period there have been 50 plant closures, 18 of them i the auto industry, shutdowns that have already resulted in the loss of tens of thousands of jobs in auto alone. But having acknowledged this, the fact remains — as Houdaille workers have told us they themselves realize — that what was lacking in the sit-in action was the aim of saving the jobs of the © workers, to prevent the shutdown of the Houdaille plant next October by forcing the Ontario Tory government to take over the plant to guarantee the workers’ jobs through continuous pro- duction. For the main need, the most im- portant fight for the workers is the fight for jobs — the fight for policies for full employment. The auto and other multi-nationals must no longer be allowed — and this without any legislative controls over them —to arbitrarily destroy the jobs of workers and the security and future of their families and communities. In On- tario and in all Canada legislation must now be fought for and won to guarantee there be no plant shutdowns without full and open consultation with the workers themselves, and this following one year’s prior notice of any intent by companies to end production. The UAW’s decision to present its t FIGHT PLANT CLOSURE & etter to Houdaille workers brief on Auto In Crisis to the federal government in Ottawa is commend- able. But more is needed. What is important now is that the organized labor movement as a whole, the CLC first of all, undertake a mass campaign for jobs, a mass campaign to ‘*Put Canada Back To Work’’. And as the first step a mass lobby in Ottawa organized and led by the CLC, a mass lobby for a jobs program. The basis for this mass campaign for jobs must clearly be a policy for the industrialization of our economy, a pol- icy to put an end to the deindustnializa- tion that has been dictated by U.S. and other foreign-owned multinationals in their own interests and against the in- terests of Canada and the working people. At the very centre of such a mass campaign for jobs and against plant clo- . sures will be organized labor’s united solidarity with all workers who under- take militant actions to save their jobs. Yours in solidarity in the fight for jobs . and against plant closures: TRIBUNE PHOTO — MIKE PHILLIPS After a 14-day occupation of Houdaille Industries in Oshawa by 200 workers company officials made concessions on pensions and severance pay. defend the right to organize t] Sit-in example of REPEAL THE MICHELIN BILL [ YRS 12°30 NC Calgary labor boycotts strike breaking inn ; By DAVID WALLIS CALGARY — The labor council voted unanimously Aug. 18 to put the strike-bound Calgary Inn on its ‘‘unfair’’ list for re- fusing to settle a strike with its employees which began July 5. At that time some 46 waitres- seS, waiters and bartenders walked out to back demands for a © an hour wage for wait- resses. Now there are about 20 members of Local 47 Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bar- tenders Union walking the picket line outside the hotel. Union business agent Graham Sproule told the labor council Aug. 18 that “‘the management of the Calgary Inn has refused to _ Negotiate with the union in good faith.”” Only 46 of the Calgary Inn’s 550 workers are organized and the company has told the striking workers they will only get their jobs back after the workers hired to scab on them have quit. Labor council secretary Bill Patterson informed the delegates that ‘‘these workers (at the Cal- gary Inn) are only earning $3.95 an hour, only 45 cents over the minimum wage.”’ The Calgary Inn has filled the jobs of the striking workers and seems determined to break the union. The Calgary Inn is owned by Western International who also own the Bayshore Inn in Vancouver. There the union con- tract provides a minimum of $6 an hour. Sproule, in asking for union solidarity by respecting the picket lines said ‘‘our fight is your fight ... this province is moving to- wards ‘Right to Work’ legislation and they’re trying to chip away at the weakest unions first’’. Undemocratic Changes The Labor Council also ex- pressed disgust with proposals by the Alberta Government to make prohibitive and undemocratic changes in the legislation cover- ing plebicites in Alberta. Under present legislation residents in Edmonton and Calgary can de- mand a city plebicite on city spending and bylaws through submitting a petition of around 14,000 signatures. Ron Brown, President of Local 37, Canadian Union of Public Employees told the Council dele- gates that a 20,000 signature peti- tion submitted last fall will likely be legislated invalid by the next sitting of the provincial legisla- ture. This petition, which called for a public vote on city council’s self-awarded 48% pay increase, has been stalled in the courts. Calgary Council is appealing a court decision declaring the peti- tion to be valid. Brown also went on to say that ‘‘the right to peti- tion is the only opportunity that people have to force council to take a different course.” Working people in Canada on this Labor Day should be unani- mous in saluting the workers of Houdaille, Oshawa for providing an example of militant struggle against what would have other- wise been another in a growing list of plant shut-downs. The agony of mass layoffs, plant closures and runaway industries is a new and com- pletely unexpected phenomenon ~ for the majority of the work force. Even highly union-conscious union members (who are un- fortunately a small minority of the total union membership) find themselves frustrated and with- out.answers when the protection afforted by their union contract provides no solutions to the clo- sure of their plant. Working people who bought houses, began to rear families all with perfect assurance that pros- perity and their jobs were -imperishable, suddenly find themselves on the street with little if any possibility of finding proper employment. Older workers with long senior- ity, which they were confident would protect them against the ups and downs of the production cycles, are dumped unto the job market with little likelihood of ever again securing meaningful jobs. All of this misery and heart- break has been piling up in Canada for the past couple of years with no promise but more of the same, when suddenly the workers of Houdaille ‘‘sit-in’’ in their bumper plant scheduled for final shut down on October 31. The sympathy and support of all Canadian working people went out to the workers of Houdaille who occupied ‘‘their plant’ for two weeks while the company was forced back to the bargaining table, where considerable gains in pensions and severance pay were won for the work force. The significance of the event however goes far beyond the gains achieved. It is the first suc- cessful action of the labor move- ment in Canada in this period of crisis, which went beyond the confines of traditional collective bargaining into the area of mass collective action. , Buz Hargrove, United Auto Workers representative was quoted as saying, “workers throughout Ontario can iook at what's happened here and say to themselves that as workers facing the closure of their plant, there is something they can do about it, rather than just throw up their hands and give up.” Hargrove is absolutely nght and the leadership of the UAW, as well as the workers involved in the sit-in, deserve the thanks of all labor for their encouragement and support of the actions. I think it is safe to predict that this is just the first of a whole range of actions which will be undertaken by Canadian workers as they fight for their right to a job and a secure future. As a matter of fact the workers at Tung-Sol Wagner, Bramalea, threatened with closure on Oc- tober 6, have struck the plant and mounted a picket line demanding improvement in pension and severance benefits as well as ac- tion by the provincial government to prevent the plant’s closure. The plant is part of United Elec- trical Workers Local 514 which has already been scaled down from 150 to 60 workers. Once workers are seized by the © concept of fighting back against plant closures, and mass layoffs, they can be expected to develop . the most diverse and colorful forms of struggle to achieve their ends, just as they did in the thir- ties: What is so far lacking in the fightback is a sufficiently fleshed out policy by the trade union movement to answer the basic problems of plant closures. While everyone can agree that the Houdaille actions were im- portant and provided somewhat of a victory, the bitter fact is that the plant is still closing and the workers will still be out on the street. The basic question of job security remains. It is to this central problem that organized labor must address it- self. The people of Canada, work- ing people, first and foremost, cannot and must not accept for one minute, the law of the capital- ist jungle to determine their nght to a job and an adequate income. A recent meeting of the To- ronto Labor Council adopted a resolution on plant closures de- manding that the Ontario government enact legislation which would make corporations justify a plant closing before a public tribunal; that workers and communities would receive full compensation from such corpora- tions in the event of any closure so that the corporations would bear the social costs: and that at least six months notice of such closure be given to unions and communities. What needs to be added to the good proposals in this resolution is that the government would step in and take the plants over and run them as public enterprises if they were serving a good and useful purpose. The slogan. of organized labor needs to be, no plant closures, no mass layoffs, jobs and job protec- tion for all Canadians. In the spirit of ‘‘collective ac- tion’ proposed by Canadian Labor Congress president Dennis McDermott, at the CLC conven- tion in May, it would be indeed timely for the CLC to organize a mass lobby on Ottawa this fall. Everything proves that work- ers are ready to fight for their night for a job and decent income. It is certainly time to hear ffom the CLC and all provincial labor federations. ~ PACIFIC TRIBUNE—SEPT. 5, 1980—Page 5