| atswer call for }| big Suez lobby nt Bin, § FEXPERT DISCUSSES SUEZ OPERATION 2 Pople to - Thep Yt the ¢ ay Peace workers t : LONDON an em Teturned to London Dicey 27 Sebate this week, atielg Vee booked» as far mingham to bring lobby in support of Re British P Ww e - ’ “No Wap a Committee’s Backed by. Labor Big (°° Of local Labor par- “Anion ite councils and trade “the Tanches affiliated to Fredo ent of Colonial Bmnitr the Suez Emergency “Ny fe has decided on a Ps Be With Suez Week.” llameng ed a lobby of par- Week — Wednesday this Station it 2ally and demon“ ithis M~Trafalgar Square a pate Sunday. et parliament meets Who loves peace ) (tr yy Westminster to tell en that the British f ovey Sue , Not support. war 4; declared the Suez Ener ptt el Committee, itish people can pr e- folly of war.’ P British TUC convention warns ‘No war over Suez’ BRIGHTON With a mighty “Aye,” the thousand voices of the representatives of Britain’s trade union movement last week gave a ment to discuss the issue. De emergency resolution on the Suez dispute, w used until the question has been referred to the United amendments demanding im- mediate recall ‘of parliament. (Fhe Eden government, bow- ing to popular pressure, later announced that parliament would be recalled on Wednes- day this week to discuss the Suez crisis.) Not since the end of the war have government ‘wage policies come under such bit- ter attack from all sides in a TUC convention. In the discussion which pre- ceded unanimous rejection of Chancellor of the Exchequer Harold Macmillan’s appeal for a wage freeze, Frank Cousins, general secretary of the powerful Transport and Gen- eral Workers Union, noted that Macmillan had suggested he would like to address dele- gates. hel “What does he think this is? .A film festival ?” Cousins: demanded. The Transport and General Union, he said, would not rest content with adoption of the resolution rejecting Mac- millan’s appeal. It would fight rising prices and help smaller unions to fight them as well. The convention overwhel- mingly endorsed a far-reach- legates to the Trades Union Con ing plan to control introduc- tion of automation and to en- sure that new -. techniques would improve living stan- dards for all. The resolution said that the TUC was not opposed to auto- mation but it was determined to protect the interests of unionists “against any ruth- less application of automation by employers.” It called for joint manage- ment-labor consultation, avoidance of redundancy, maintenance of earnings, re- ductions in the price of com- modities and adequate main- (Th ; liy © writer of this article Years in Port Said, from 19 ties 35 to 1949, working on q the PS that passed through | ] © Sue at y. canal. Previous to