FROM PAGE ELEVEN “FOREST POLICY” time in Canada’s history. If the nations needs are to be met then research must be given a higher priority. The I.W.A. proposes that: (a) 1.5 percent of the forest industries gross product be allocated to research and development. (b) The I.W.A. assist forest research institutions in securing long term adequate financing. (c) The I.W.A. assist forestry schools to secure adequate financing for needed pro- grams to ensure that trained researchers and specialists will be available in the future. (d) Encourage provincial, federal and private research agencies to coordinate research efforts. (e) Research and development be relevant to the needs of industry. (f) A balance between short and long term needs be established. (g) Annual reports be published indicat- ing the status and direction research is developing. (h) Research results are effectively com- municated to forest industry managers. FACTS DISPROVE U.S. SYSTEM By CLAY PERRY Regional Legislative Director The following facts were published by UAW of Canada in its newspaper Solidarity and the figures shown disprove those who have argued that Canadians and Ameri- cans should accept the North American system of widespread unemployment, pov- erty, and the unjust distribution of wealth that exists in Canada and the U‘S. as the price for the “‘efficiencies”’ of ‘“market”’ economics. 1. The GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT (GNP) is the value of all the goods and services produced in the economy (e.g. — cars, machines, hospital care). For 1979, Canada’s GNP was $260.5 billion dollars; with a population of about 23.7 million people, this averages out to about $11,000 for every man, woman and child in the country. The comparable GNP per person for Canada and some other countries is set out below (data is expressed in U.S. dollars). Switzerland $15,451 U.S. $10,737 Denmark 12,598 France 10,652 W. Germany 12,386 Canada _ 9,256 Sweden 12,335 Japan 8,891 Belgium 11,892 U.K. 7,054 Netherlands 10,843 Italy 5,606 Spain 5,301 About 60% of GNP goes to goods and services bought by the individual consumer; about 20% goes to investments made by private business (construction, machinery, equipment); and about 20% goes to goods and services bought by government institu- tions. 2. Canada’s population is about 23.7 million people and of these, about half —11.2 million are in the labour force (over 12/Lumber Worker/September, 1980 15 and working or looking for work). In 1979, about 10.4 million were working and 838,000 (7.5%) were unemployed. About 85% of taxpayers are wage earners, about 13-14% are essentially self-employed (doctors, lawyers, small businessmen) and 1-2% are the corporate elite (owners of dominant corporations, banks, media). As of the first quarter of 1980, the unem- ployment rates amongst some of the de- veloped economies were as follows: Canada 7.4% Italy 6.0% France . 6.8% W.Germany 3.1% USS. 6.1% Japan 1.8% U.K. 6.1% Sweden 1.8% Almost two out of five workers are women. About one out of every four workers is under 25. Out of every hundred workers, —about 5-6 work in agriculture, forestry, and fishing. —about 1-2 work in mines, quarries, oil wells. —about 5 work on construction. —about 20 work in manufacturing. —about 20 work in the government sector (teachers, hospital workers, municipal workers, civil servants, defense, crown corporations). —about 47 work in the private service sector (banks, hotels, restaurants, account- ants, lawyers, department stores). Of the non-agricultural paid workforce, about 3.3 million (39%) are organized. The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) includes 2.2 million workers. Average industrial weekly wages in Can- ada were $302.70 at the beginning of 1980. They were: $328.67 for manufacturing employees $361.22 for motor vehicle industry employees $371.97 for aerospace employees $386.17 for agricultural equipment employees The following table provides an interna- tional perspective on pay; it expresses average hourly compensation (wages and benefits) in U.S. dollars as of mid-1979. Sweden $11.89 France $8.17 W. Germany 11.33 Canada 7.97 Netherlands 11.31 Italy 7.38 Belgium 11.30 Japan 5.58 US. 9.09 U.K. 5.46 3. The main institution for organizing production in our economy is the corpora- tion. Although there are about 32,000 manufacturing companies in Canada, one hundred of these corporations employ about half the manufacturing workforce. Two- thirds of these hundred corporations are foreign owned. Together with a handful of banks and a few corporations in other sectors (utilities, transportation, retail) these corporations dominate the economy. The corporations are owned by stockhold- ers. Although many ordinary people own some stocks, the overwhelming majority of stocks are concentrated in a few hands: 1% of the population owns almost half the stocks and the other 99% of the population shares the other half. The branch-plant nature of our industry has meant that: a) We use high technology machinery and equipment. b) This technology is imported, so we are dependent on U.S. based corporations. c) Corporations have come to Canada to serve our domestic market rather than serve the world market so our plants are neither export-oriented nor of competitive size. The above weaknesses in our manufactur- ing base are reflected in the structure of our trade. Over 60% of our imports are manu- factured goods, while less than one-third of our exports (mostly auto-related) are manufactured goods. Our share of world exports of manufactured goods has been falling, and at a time of intensified inter- national competition and technological change, this trend will continue. Overall, about 25-30% of our GNP is exported and half our manufactured goods are imported. About 70% of our trade is with the U.S. The Government Sector accounts for about 20% of the goods and services pro- duced in Canada (e.g. — health, education, tax collection). The government is also involved in transferring an additional 20% of GNP from some Canadian taxpayers to others (e.g. — pensions, family allowances, unemployment insurance). The Government Sector in Canada does not account for an unusually high propor- tion of GNP according to international comparisons: Government Government Expenditures Revenue as%ofGNP as % of GNP (1978) (1978) Sweden 57% 60% Italy 42% 37% France 42% 42% West Germany 41% 43% U.K. 41% 39% Canada 38% 36% U.S. 382% 383% Japan 23% 24% The corporate share of direct (income) taxes was 22% in 1979 while individuals contributed 78%. Thirty years ago, the corporate share was 43%. SOURCE OF INFORMATION: Various Government Agencies