ne Guild strikes Oshawa Times OSHAWA — Forty-nine members of the Southern Ontario Newspaper Guild-were forced to take strike action against the Thomson-owned Times March 26 to back demands for a decent contract. The strikers are after a similar agreement won by Sudbury Star workers, also owned by. Thomson, which provided among other benefits a 100% company paid drug and dental plan. GOV'T GRANTS WILL KILL g00 JOBS TORONTO — The $140-million in grants the federal and Ontario: governments will take from. the taxpayers’ pockets and hand over to the pulp and paper industry is slated to wipe out 800 jobs over the next five years. A consultant to the Ontario government recently ad- mitted in print that poor manage- ment was behind the need for mas- sive government infusions of money to refurbish the industry and replace its obsolete machinery. Ontario is to provide two-thirds of the’ grant money. The consultant admitted that company managers in the industry chose ‘‘to keep the shareholders happy” (by paying dividends in good years) instead of planning for the low profit periods by re-investing high profits into new machinery and. equipment. 8,000 FACE LAYOFFS BRANTFORD — White Farm» Equipment Ltd., bared its plans April 22 to lay off 2,000 produc- tion workers when the company shuts down in September and Oc- tober after taking stock inventory in August. Meanwhile Massey- Ferguson Industries Ltd., has also threatened to lay off its 6,000 workers here, if, as one company spokesman said, economic condi- tions continue to decline. ENGINEERS WIN UNION CONTRACT TORONTO — After a three- _year fight, 150 professional en-. gineers and technicians at Spar Aerospace Ltd., have won the ‘right to form a union and this month signed their first collective agreement, The two-year contract won by the Spar Professional and Allied Technical Employees As- sociation provides for mandatory dues checkoff with wage increases of 11.5% and 9.5% in the first and second contract years. It also in- ” BRIEF cludes a cost of living adjustment’ (COLA) which will kick in after the Consumer Price Index rises 1% or more. HARVESTER “FURLOUGH’S” 280 HAMILTON — Layj workers arbitrarily for eee soy even months is: now being quaintly described by big busi- ness as a furlough, so 280 Inter- national Harvester Co., workers are getting the sack for at least seven or eight days, and they’re getting furloughs. It’s cute, be- cause when the term is used in the military it means that soldiers are being given a holiday away from their daily duties. Getting laid off from monopoly’s viewpoint is considered a holiday. From the worker’s viewpoint, it’s called a rip-off by the bosses. FIRST CONTRACT PROMPTS STRIKE _ GUELPH — Following the re- cent release of a conciliation board report, all 22 members of the Re- tail, Commercial and Industrial Union at Guelph division of Maclean-Hunter Cable TV Ltd., struck for their first contract April 16. Money leads a whole host of other key issues enumerated in the conciliation report which forced the cable TV workers to strike. - CARETAKERS FAVOR STRIKE TORONTO — Some 1,450 public school caretakers, non- ‘teaching staff, bus drivers and maintenance workers have set April 23 and April 28 in Toronto and Scarborough respectively as strike dates unless Education Boards in both areas make satis- factory offers that will settle con- tract talks. Toronto’s 700 care- takers voted 85%, April 13, to strike while their counterparts in Scarborough voted 95% for the same action, April 12. Members of CUPE, the caretakers want a 13% or 90 cent an hour wage hike, whichever is higher. < wu = < 4 w oO (2) ] | e z aay z 5 ao iv = SCENE There has been a concerted ef- fort by the Building Trades De- partment of the American Feder- ation of Labor, based in Washington, to scuttle the dem- ocratic rank and file base of the Canadian Labor Congress, dating back to the Vancouver Con- vention of the CLC in 1974. This attack is carried through by the international representa- tives of the building trades unions in Canada known as “‘roadmen’’. The signal for the latest attack was the resignation from the executive of the CLC by Ken Rose, who heads up the Inter- national Brotherhood of Electri- cal Workers in Canada. Behind the machinations of Washington, and its ‘‘Canadian”’ roadmen is their refusal to accept the growing demand in their own ranks for full Canadian auto- nomy, as well as their resentment of the changes in the CLC brought about by the growing weight of solely Canadian based unions such as the Canadian Union of Public Employees, the Public Service Alliance of Canada, etc. Quebec Rights Implacable hostility to the legitimate demands of the people _of Quebec for self-determination is another plank of the roadmen. This is inspired by their reaction- ary chauvinism but it is further aggravated by the fear that such a right for Quebec would spell the end of the craft unions there. Moreover, representing as they do, the collaborationist U.S. state department line of _ the Washington Building Trades Department, they are hostile to the more advanced positions . taken on a wide range of political issues by the CLC; compared to the AFL-CIO. The 1976 CLC Convention - dealt with the question of auto- nomy and agreed to the establishment of a Canadian Building Trades Department which would break the Washington Control over Cana- dian Building Trades workers. However due to great pressure and threats by the roadmen and Washington the CLC backed away from its mandate and the whole thing was scuttled. Re- cently the building trades workers in Quebec have filled the breach by setting up their own building trades department which has in- furiated the roadmen and Washington who demand the CLC break up this formation. In fact the Quebec workers are justified on two counts in their ac- tions. Actions Justified First they are justified because of the national status of Quebec and its right to take steps neces- sary to protect and advance the interests of the workers there, the main criteria being the strengthen- ing of the unity of the workers in Quebec and together with that their unity with their fellow work- ers across the country. There is no evidence that their actions do not serve both these ends. The second justification is the failure of the CLC to act on its mandate and set up a Canadian Building Trades department. The actions of the Quebec workers By WRLIAM STEWART LABOR | AFL fights Canadian trades autonomy | can only be seen as a further blow for Canadian autonomy of all building trades workers in the face of inaction by the CLC and open hostility and opposition by Washington and their Canadian roadmen. Being discussed by the building trades roadmen are a series of op- tions, all of which are designed either to secure the undemocratic changes they want in the CLC, or alternatively to try to lay the basis for a split in the Canadian trade union movement, and the establishment of a second Cana- dian trade-union centre. Washington Pulls in Horns One option is to boycott the CLC convention altogether. However this will not be an easy task as they tried a variant of this several years ago when they tried to withhold per capita-tax to deny their affiliates representation at the CLC. The reaction of the Canadian locals. of the building trades was to pay their per-capita directly to the CLC and the boys in Washington had to pull in their horns. - Another option they are exa- mining is to have the locals give their credentials to the roadmen who would then try to blackmail the convention with them or walk out. Still another is to try to stage a protest walk-out at the conven- tion by all building trades dele- gates. The arguments being used by the roadmen are many and varied. Among them is their usual rabid red-baiting and union baiting. The fishermen are being singled out for particular venom, as is CUPE, along with the Postal Workers and the United Electrical Work- ers Unions. In the list of complaints being used by the roadmen to win sup- port of their membership for their blackmailing, splitting actions are some questions which appear legitimate and require some study and action by the CLC. Two in particular need to be singled out. First is the complaint of raiding by industrial unions on traditional craft jurisdictions in big industrial complexes. Here the building trades unions claim, with some justification, that work of a de- finite construction nature is being done by in-plant workers, and at rates of pay far lower than en- joyed by construction workers. The CLC owes to the building trades a careful study of these charges and if they are found tobe - true, action to redress the grie- vance and remove this cancerous jurisdictional dispute from the movement. The other is the problem of rep- resentation, which finds the build- ing trades, and some other unions as well, faced with much smaller representation at conventions be- cause of the form of organization of locals which is demanded by their relationship with employers. It is precisely this problem which invites such proposals for bloc voting as will be coming be- fore this CLC convention. This problem needs to be ad- dressed also by the CLC, but not by the regressive bloc voting pro- cedures being advocated, which will lead to the emasculation of the democratic nature of CLC conventions. The CLC should be instructed rather to make a study of this matter and come before the next convention with proposals for representation to the conven- tion which would meet the com- plaints of the building trades, and other large industrial unions, to overcome this problem, without resort to the right-wing inspired bloc voting practice, or any varia- tion of it. Canadian Autonomy It has been made clear time and time again that the roadmen do not represent the real feeling of Canadian building trades work- ers. When the machinations of the roadmen are taken out of the backrooms and the membership becomes aware of the issues, they come down in their majority for policies of unity and Canadian autonomy, not splitting and U.S. control. There is every reason to be- lieve that this will be the response of building trades workers to this latest made-in-USA crisis being concocted for the CLC. The Canadian trade union movement faces perhaps the toughest challenge of its entire history. Whether the present all- sided crisis is going to be charged against the working people of Canada, or whether, through united action, the working people are going to make the big mono- polies shoulder the costs, is at is- sue. Splitters, whatever disguise they wear, can only serve to weaken that unity and help the boss class and its governments. Unity around class struggle policies needs to be the watch- word of the CLC Conventien. No convictions in mine tragedy GRANDE CACHE — Widespread disregard for roof support stan- dards led to the deaths of: four miners at Grande Cache on Feb. 29, according to a government investigation report. Nevertheless, Alberta’s Health and Safety minister, Bill Diachuk, says negligence charges will not be laid. “The tragedy was preventable, but it looks as if there was no negli- gence’’, Diachuk told the Legislature April 15. After the tragedy, Diachuk originally tried to claim the accident was ‘‘spontaneous’”’ but he was quickly contradicted by his own department’s investigation. The final report says the four men were killed when their machine cut into a pillar of coal supporting the mine roof, allowing it to collapse, but contrary to safety regulations, no ‘“‘breaker’’ support posts were in place. Mangement and the miners were both criticised in the report. But Phil Oakes, president of Local 7621 of the United Steelworkers, said the report confirmed poor safety standards which the union had been pres- sing management to resolve for months. PACIFIC TRIBUNE—MAY 2, 1980—Page 5