By C. A. Saunders HE resolution adopted at the CCL convention in Mont- real recommending trade union locals to affiliate to the CCE seems to have presented the CCF provincial executive here with a problem. The CCF's attitude, as expressed in the statements is- sued by Frank Mackenzie, its provincial secretary, appears to be one of inviting the iocals to help build and man the pros- pective CCF ship of state only if they will promise not to attempt to steer it. Where this attitude is likely to lead the CCF is already indi- cated by the speeches made by Grant McNeil, MLA. and the statements released to the press by Frank Mackenzie. McNeil seems to have aligned himself with those who find the policies they seek to defend so otherwise indefensible that they must use the old hoary canards and appeal to ignorance and pre- judice rather than reason. He cannot therefore, be altogether surprised to find his rem arks coinciding with the editorial com- ments of the Vancouver Sun in its recent attack on the Labor- Progressive Party. cS ackenzie, unable to advance any coherent reason for the CCF’s refusal to cooperate with the Trade Union Representation Committee in the forthcoming civic elections,- indulges in at- jacks on the committee. The CCF, he says, will not “oblige the Communists by sup- porting the Trade Union Repre- sentation Committee.” Neither apparently, will the CCF “oblige” the working people of Vancou- ver, including the thousands of trade unionists represented through the 30 trade unions on the committee, by cooperating with organized labor to elect a progressive civic administration. e Ppae apprehensions of the dele- gates who opposed the form of the CCL resolution on the ground that it should : contain provisions ensuring affiliation to the CCF on a democratic basis, removing the present restrictions and giving organized labor voice and vote in determining policy, were well founded. Surely the CCF does not imagine that organ- ized labor will Jend unqualified support fo a party which, repre- senting itself as the “political arm of labor,” denies the trade unions a voice commensurate with their