MOSCOW (APN) — it was in May 1972 that the Soviet-Amer- ican. summit talks took place in Moscow; and in the relatively short period of a year, certain Significant effects are notice- able. That meeting was a result of a mutual desire to reduce the risk of a nuclear war between the USSR and the USA. It indi- cated a desire to replace the dangerous confrontation of ma- ny years’ duration with condi- tions of peaceful coexistence and renunciation of the use of force. The Moscow meeting served to fix the existing realities be- tween the two countries in in- ternational law. At the same time it laid the foundation for the further normalization of these relations. During the past year all the points of the agree- ments reached for mutual rela- tions between the USSR and the USA were implemented and suc- cessfully fulfilled. The signing of the documents ending the war in Vietnam, was the kind of action which could eliminate obstacles to fuller co- operation. Variety of Agreements Never before in Soviet-USA relations have as many and as varied new agreements been made as in this past year. They cover commercial, industrial oe Unions meet to (The following is from an editorial, slightly abridged, car- ried in the March 1973 issue of World Trade Union Movement, review of the World Federation of Trade Unions.) On February 26 official delega- tions from the World Federation of Trade Unions, the Interna- tional Confederation of Free Trade Unions, the World Con- federation of Labor, the Inter- national Confederation of Arab Trade Unions, the All-African Trade Union Confederation and the worker members of the In- ternational Labor Organization Governing Body met in Geneva to prepare a World Trade Union Conference against Apartheid. A delegation from the United Na- tions Special Committee on Apartheid, a committee which played a big role in the success of this initiative, led by its chair- man, took part in the meeting. The important decision taken — to organize a conference. this June 15 and 16 in Geneva and to open it to all union organiza- and economic spheres, scientific and technological cooperation, health protection, a joint space program, and cooperation in en- vironmental protection. The méetings and contacts in culture and sport have broadened even more. The expansion of cooperation and the ensuing beneficial re- sults include literally all spheres 6f the two countries’ relations. But the more significant speci- fic result of the meeting is the taking of practical measures to reduce the danger of nuclear war and to curb the arms drive. Measures envisaged by the trea- ty on the limitation of anti- ballistic missile systems and the interim agreement with respect to limiting strategic offensive arms, as well as the agreement on prevention of incidents on - and over the sea (all signed dur- ing the talks) are complement- ed by agreements signed in Sep- tember 1971 on reducing the risk of accidental nuclear war between the USSR and the USA and improving the direct com- munications link between the two countries for use in emer- gency cases. Solution Possible The Soviet-USA agreements concerning missile and offen- sive strategic weapons, for the first time in history, put a limit on these modern and more Brezhnev, CPSU general secretary and president Nixon following the signing of the treaty between their two countries on the limitation of Anti-Ballistic Missile systems and on Certain Meas- ures with Respect to the Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms in May 1972. world fighting regime in tions of the against the odious South Africa. This conference will undoubt- edly help workers and people of South Africa in their difficult struggle. The extent of this help will obviously vary in accord- ance with the final decisions of the conference. But the interna- tional trade union movement has now in its hands immense oppor- tunities for resolute action and for an offensive which goes be- yond the stage of statements, of insufficiently coordinated ac- tions, or actions whch lack strength because of trade union division. United action means ef- fectiveness. And this effective- ness can be every great in the case which concerns us. The working class of the world, unit- ed, has from now on within its grasp the means to force South Africa to abandon its policy of apartheid. Consequently, we ex- pect of this conference that it will take a decision on the meth- ods of action capable of making the Government of South Africa PACIFIC TRIBUNE,