ion | a | _ CANADA Continued from page 1 The tentative pact struck last weekend under mediator Bill _ Kelly contains none of the con- cessions sought by the Crown corporation in its drive to cut jobs and services. Eliminated in the agreement “are any cutbacks in lunch and break times for letter carriers, Meaning the letter carriers fought off the attempt to impose a “straight through” work shift — a key element in the post office’s plan to cut jobs. Gone too is a Canada Post demand that workers use their Own vehicles on the job. Earlier in negotiations Can- ada Post dropped a demand that starting workers be per- manently paid less than current corporation employees. Instead, the starting rate will be frozen at $13.25 an hour. The gradual rise in salary to the top rate will take place over five years, instead of the current two years for new employees. Wages in the 31-month agreement will rise by three per cent on Aug. | and three per cent one year later. There will be no retroac- tive increase to cover the seven- month old expiry period. Andrus said the Letter Carri- ers Union retained its job pro- tection clauses, meaning no — acrucial victory, considering Canada Post’s drive to cut 8,700 jobs by the end of the decade. Letter carriers fired for “picket contracting-out and no layoffs : Jobs secure in post pact line activities” — the number is somewhere around 100 — will be reinstated and handed sus- pensions, which the union can grieve. Canada Post for its part won increased use of casual labour, allowing casuals to be called in for absences of more than five days, replacing the former 20- day limit. But statements by Canada Post officials made it clear the corporation will continue its drive to wring more concessions from its employees. Canada Post negotiator Har- old Dustan said that while the new contract may only margi- nally increase the number of “points of call” per route, the corporation. will press its objec- tive of an increase of 30 points of call in future negotiations. Canada Post spokesmen say the corporation remains com- mitted to eliminating its operat- ing deficit by March of next year. Andrus expressed the hope that by the time the current agreement expires, the Conser- vative government of Prime Minister Brian Mulroney — which suffered badly in an opin- ion poll where more than 50 per cent of the respondents held Ottawa accountable for the dispute — will be voted out of office-and a new plan for Can- ada Post will be introduced. Andrus called the tentative pact “a clear victory for the let- ter carriers.” ‘Time to break chains’, Erasmus says Continued from page 1 from here.’ The. opinion of the vast majority was the time for compromise was over it was time to assert Aboriginal rights even if it meant direct confronta- tion with Canadian authorities. “Those who are in control must change, or those who are chained will say this is enough and break the chains themselves,’’ Erasmus charged in his emotional address. Other Indian leaders such as Miles Richardson of the Haida na- tion and Konrad Sioui, regional Quebec chief echoed the need for action. The fallout from the First Ministers’ Conference and the denial of Aboriginal participation in the Meech Lake accord gave the Assembly an air of bitterness but not of helplessness. Delegate after delegate took to the floor to denounce the role of the Mul- roney government in Aboriginal negotiations and its dangerous trend of passing on Aboriginal jurisdictions to the provincial governments. The Assembly noted how the federal government was attempt- ing to shove Native self-govern- ment off the table in Canada by cutting off all constitutional fund- ing. The end of funding has al- ready meant the demise of the Inuit Committee on National Is- sues offices in Ottawa while the promise, is over. Native Council (representing ‘non-status’ Indians) and the Métis Council have had to slash their staffs. The AFN was unani- mous..in.its _determination...to stand up to the Canadian gov- ernment’s intention of ‘starving’ Native organizations out of exis- tence. Joe Mathias, representing the ~ AIDS comment catches Devine GEORGE ERASMUS (in Vancouver, 1981) ... the time for com- Squamish of B.C., captured the mood of the Assembly in an im- passioned speech that brought the delegates to their feet. ‘*We must find out what we can ~ do to block a bridge, to stop a train, to block a road. Freedom fighters is the word we must brainwash our children with.” A comment about AIDS and the Na- tive community in Saskatchewan has Premier Grant Devine in hot water. Dur- _ ing a recent meeting of cabinet ministers with women’s group representatives, the premier blurted out at one point that ‘‘if AIDS ever gets into the Native com- munity, it will be hell on wheels.” Aboriginal leaders have called the statement an indication of racist thinking in the leadership of Saskatchewan's Tory party. Cumberland’s NDP MLA Keith Goulet, a long-time activist in the Native struggles, has led demands for an apol- ogy from the premier, with no success yet. : During a heated exchange with NDP leader Alan Blakeney in the Legislature June 25, Devine refused to deny the comment, or to apologize, but con- tinuously claimed he was referring to “all age groups and categories and demo- graphic people,’ (sic). ae Goulet helped kick off last winter s brief legislature session with a devas- tating attack on racism in Saskatchewan, which he says has intensified under the Tories since 1982. Speaking first in Cree, then in English, Goulet hammered home fact after fact: while Native northerners had over 50 per Cent of the jobs at the Key Lake uranium mine, the figure has since dropped to 20 Per cent today; northern fishermen and trappers face government harassment From Regina simi tamal Kimball Cariou and restrictions; valuable lands are clear-cut without compensation; the To- ries subsidize the cost of transporting li- quor to the North, but have removed transportation subsidies for food, mak- ing it far more expensive than in the south: the people of Sandy Bay, who did most of the back-breaking labour build- ing the Island Falls dam many years ago, had to wait 30 years before their com- munity got electricity — even though the hydro project was only two miles away. During question period June 25, Gou- let returned to another theme raised in the last session, the question of constitu- tional rights for aboriginal peoples. “*Will the premier explain,” he asked, ‘‘why he accepted the principle of distinct society in the case of Quebec, and did not accept the principle of self-government as put forth by the Indian, Métis, and the Inuit?” : Devine replied by placing the blame for the situation on aboriginal peoples themselves. If their organizations had had a united position in 1985, their constitutional rights would have been enshrined then, he said. What he avoided answering was why he refused to support the principle in 1987, when unity of the aboriginal or- ganizations was much stronger. The Premier also indicated that he was ‘“‘in- clined not to have public hearings’’ on constitutional rights for Aboriginal peo- ples “‘because we can debate it here”’ in the Legislature. Goulet pressed Devine further on the results of the Meech Lake accord, point- ing out that it involves a clear shift in power from the federal to the provincial governments. “‘Many people, especially treaty Indian people,”’ said Goulet, ‘‘are concerned that with increased provincial powers the bilateral treaty-making pro- cess will be jeopardized. Will the premier ' honour the existing rights of treaty Indians?” Devine replied that ‘‘I would in all re- spects say, of course I will honour the rights.”’ But the rest of his answer was vague: ‘*... under the constitution, if we have exclusive rights, then by definition they’re our rights, and if somebody is going to spend in our area, they have to come out and talk to us about that.”’ The Premier appears unwilling to make a commitment to live up to the full letter and spirit of obligations to treaty Indians if the province’s jursidiction and powers are expanded. : The direction the Tories would like to go came out clearly during the same question period and in the media in re- cent days. Major cutbacks to Native- oriented social programs and to or- ganizations such as the Métis Associa- tion have been a prominent feature of the new Tory budget. Devine stuck to an earlier statement that his government is spending ‘‘a mil- lion dollars a day on Native people,”’ but was unable to provide figures to prove his claim. The province’s grant to the Métis Association (AMNSIS) was elim- inated entirely, with a smaller amount of money instead being allocated for funds for Native small businesses, in an effort to weaken the united voice of the Métis people while simultaneously encourag- ing ‘Native capitalism.” Clearly, the Devine government’s consistent racism will be near the top of the political agenda both inside and out- side the Legislature as mass opposition to the Tories continues to grow. PACIFIC TRIBUNE, JULY 8, 1987 e 3