UP TO VICTORIA NOW EDITORIAL That final ‘cash-in’ E bes problem of disposal of the corpus dilecti after life : has run its course may have little to do with socialist perspectives, and then again it may. Anyway it is back in the headlines. The B.C. -Memorial Society was established some years ago, primarily for the purpose of making a moderately low-cost and dignified funeral service available; to provide an alternative to a powerful funeral undertakers monopoly, organized to take a final big bite out of John Q. Public in his “ashes to ashes’’ finale. On the other hand the B.C. Funeral Services Association has been in a very lucrative business for a long time, set up to promote and safeguard that last “touching” big bite, so dramatically illustrated in Jessica Smith’s book, “The American Way of Death”’ This week the FSA announced its plans for another try to safeguard that big monopoly bite by drafting a brief to be presented to the ‘Bennett government proposing the establishment of a government undertaker-loaded Board, which would ensure “competent and qualified”’ burial services, etc. Obviously, despite FSA denials, directed against the B.C. Memorial Society’s modest funeral service rates; to get rid of a low-cost competitor with the aid of a monopoly- dominated government. The moral is clear. The elimination of our corpus dilecti, in other words our ‘“‘cadaver’’, can only be realized by the elimination of monopoly exploitation in all its evil and ghoulish forms — while we are ‘still alive. The FSA move to consolidate the burial racket shows it is time we struck another blow for those left behind to foot the bill. Adolph rides again = hile they both lived to ‘‘strut and fret their hour upon the stage’ of Canada’s Parliament, the late Socreds John Blackmore and Solon Low from Sunny Alberta, won considerable notoriety as the'twin Joe McCarthys in Canadian coldwar politics. No anti-Soviet, anti-Communist, anti-labor or anti-progressive fabrication or slander was too putrid or stale for either of these Socred political forgers to pick up, refurbish, and wave like a soiled rag in the Halls of Parliament, themselves shielded by parliamentary immunity. Now it would seem that the Blackmore-Low-McCarthy mantle has fallen on ex-Socred national leader, Robert Thompson. : Some few weeks ago Herr Thompson “‘discovered’’ that Socialist Cuba was beaming ‘“‘inflammatory’’ radio broadcasts to Quebec, urging French-Canada to rise in revolt against their “oppressors” in Ottawa, and establish its own ‘independent’ state on the banks of the St. Lawrence pronto! All of which was speedily exposed as a purely Thompson fabrication. Now he raises another thriller in parliament, to wit; that “‘Separatist”’ Gilles Gregoire, MP (Lapointe, Que.) is now visiting France, “raising money . . . for the destruction of Canada.” There should be some way of shutting off these mischieveous and provocative Socred Hitlerites in Canada’s Parliament, particularly since there are so many other really important issues upon which its time and money would be better spent. SSSSS8eeeere2 AS many fine speeches and high resolves of last week’s convention of the British Columbia Federation of Labor, there were very few moments in that week- long confab which could be described as dramatic. But there was one such minute of drama, which lifted for one brief moment the curtain of routine commonplace, to reveal that quality of unflinching and stubborn devotion to an ideal, which might well be described .as_ the “imperishable soul of labor” in a body all too often suffering from economic hallucinations or political rigor mortis, or both. Mrs. Josephine Hallock of the Union Label Trades Council, probably best known in B.C. labor circles as “Mrs. Union Label” was reporting for the BCFL Union Label Committee. Her report was brief, but in its brevity this \ physically frail little Sister in the great family of B.C. labor hammered home her persistent and consistent message with all the force of an ancient Vulcan. How to ‘“‘sell’’ the idea and consciousness of trade unionism by putting union products and services in the preferred class of every day commodities — food, clothing and shelter. How to mourish and develop “this most neglected child of the labor movement” so that it could become a giant in the service of the labor movement — a builder for public principle and morale. “Mrs. Union Label’ was getting through. The first evidence of this was when a large number of the delegate body of the BCFL convention seemed to be developing the first symptoms of “St. Vitus Dance’’ disease. But they were not. What they were actually trying to do was to take a peek inside their coats (or other. garments), as inconspicuuously as possible, to see if they could find a union label. oCFL Union Label Chairman Harry Minuk, ‘(International Ladies Garment Workers Union) quietened the figeting delegates by emphasizing that ‘‘the time and place to look is Rankin wins first round in welfare boost fight By ALD. H. RANKIN Last week I proposed in City Council that we ask the provincial government to boost present wretchedly low welfare allowances. Specifically my four point motion urged: . Rental allowances should be the amount of rent actually paid; . A 20 percent increase in food an? clothing allowances; . An increase from $50 to $100 in the allowable amount that welfare recipients may earn before deductions; . Assignment of four social workers to help people on welfare get job training and further education. Welfare allowances are today pitifully inadequate. A family of four, for instance, receives $172 a month. Of this amount $75 is allotted for rent and the balance of $120 for food, bus fares, etc. In practice rents JOSEPH ZUKEN, aldermanic candidate for the Winnipeg Labor Election Committee, was re-elected Wednesday, October 25 from Ward 3. Also elected along with Zuken was Trustee Mary Kardash in the same ward. Both candidates fought a strong campaign around the needs of the people of Winnipeg. ; when you are buying your clothing — not here.”’ And then the drama, spontaneous and deserving — in tribute to their frail little “‘Mrs. Union Label.’’ A whole convention rose to its feet —a delegate body probably more “honored in the breach than in the observance” of union labels, to give a resounding ovation to doughty Josephine Hallock. There is no doubt that if the underlying principle of the Union Label was pushed to its full potential, with a few thousand Mrs. Union Labels on the job, this ‘‘most neglected child’’ of labor might become considerably more robust. The causes of this neglect are many and varied in the boom-and- bust capitalist society in which we live. But one must begin by looking within the ranks of the labor movement itself. Millions of people in this society, union and non-union alike, are compelled to purchase the bare essentials of life, motivated by economic necessity, rather than by principle. Millions of others, many among them union men and women enjoying a great measure of ‘‘affluent”’ living, do much of their purchasing under the spur of bargain basement opportunities and ‘$1.49’ days, in are much higher than $75 — often $100 - $125 a month — leaving around $50 — 75 a month for food and other necessities. As a result many of the more than 22,000 people on welfare are ill-housed, ill-clothed and ill- nourished. : y The provincial government, which sets welfare scales, pays 90 percent of welfare costs; the city 10 percent. Surprisingly, my motion passed unanimously, although Ald. Earle Adams spoke against it. This is quite a change from last May. When I advocated a welfare increase at that time Ald. Reg Atherton saw only ‘professional life- long bums” on welfare, while Ald. Ernie Broome accused me of following the ‘‘Commie line.”’ It ‘would seem that either Ald. Broome has become the most recent convert to Communism or he has had a change of heart. I rather suspect the change of heart on the part. of several aldermen was aided by the convincing brief presented to Council by the United Community Service, by the women on welfare who spoke out courageously before Counc! their own behalf, and by the delegation backing them UP: However, we must remember the motion passed by City Co will not by itself raise we! allowances. It is still only 2? directed to the prov! government. : nl The next necessary St€P ” persuade the provincial goV® i to act on our recommendatio isn’t likely to be easy. Organs and individuals backing the inc should lose no time in sending © ‘and letters to Premier Benn” The whole effort should cl in a large representative deleg?” to Victoria at the appropriate! present the case for 4 increase. How society treats its fortunate citizens is a 8! of its humanity. Degradingly welfare standards are 4 blot ° rich province; we can well 4 do better. We all must bear responsibility for Wha government does or fails to do. Charter changes would Charles Caron, Vancouver secretary of the Communist Party, sent the following letter to City Council this week on proposed amendments to the City Charter; “Our understanding is that the City Council has instructed its legal department to prepare an amendment to the City Charter. This amendment is to be submitted to Parliament at the next session of the Legislature. “The amendment calls for; No vote for the ratepayers on capital expenditures for streets, curbs, roads, sewers: These capital expenditures are called essential and should therefore not go up for by-law votes. which Union Label principles play little or no part. Then we have another evil, perhaps the greatest despoiler of the union label concept; a high-salaried trade union beaurocracy who ‘“‘sell”’ the union label to unscrupulous employers and exploiters, so that the latter may operate an under-paid sweat-shop or a highball industrial hell — then put their product on the market as ‘Union Made’? — while their speeded-up workers drop with fatigue — and curse their phoney- dominated union and their boss with equal vehemence. Any of the 528 BCFL convention delegates who stood up to pay “Mrs. Union Label’? a well deserved tribute, can find many such enterprises in Vancouver itself — if they are interested. Enterprises which, with the assistance of a trade. prompt us to opp' the Council. “1. We submit that the abrogating its authority placing such an important © the City Charter to the el the form of a referendum: “2. We oppose the ch amendment since ratepay’ be denied the right 10 where future capital expen will take place. : “In our opinion the Counc! review its decision 0 and not seek such an ame the City Charter.” d union high-salarie operate a sweatshop facade of a Union abel degrading the union as label. J : “Selling” the Union Label without first establis ¥ principle it is preset. represent in the factory concerned, is scarece encourage or imbue thé outside with the urge made goods only. The products of such a may not be “‘hot”’s Ca depressingly and vaio clammy. It is time the was upgraded to mea? es intended to mean; not@™ the product of swea 7 protection for trade, unl? 2 women against che@ ,products. wea _ Editor—TOM McEWEN » Pacific Tribt .4g¢¢ ‘West Coast edition, Canadian Associate Editor—MAURICE ee gs Published weekly at Ford Bidg., MezzGnine No. 3, 193 E- Vancouver 4, B.C. Phone 685-5288. Subscription Rate: Canada, $5.00 one year; $2.75 fo oot ‘North and South America and Commonwealth countries, All other countries, $7.00 one year. Authorized as second $ class mol ‘Post Office Depaitment, Ottawa, and for payment of postag? ~ November 4, 1967 — PACIFIC TRIBUY