“The Canadian labor move- ment is on the brink of a major split...” (2) At least, this is how Wilfred List, Toronto Globe and Mail labor reporter, sees the situation following the decision by the Canadian Labor Congress to accept into direct affiliation three provincial civil service associations over the objection of the Canadian Union of Public Employees with jurisdiction in the public service field. “The next move is up to CUPE’s national executive board,” Mr. List continues. He concludes this from authoriza- tion given by CUPE’s 1971 con- vention to withhold per capita tax from the CLC if it granted affiliation to civil service asso- ciations in the way it has now done. Crippling Blow Needless to state, a CUPE withdrawal from the CLC would be a crippling blow to trade union unity. It would open the door to private employers and governments to get still tougher with their workers. Those who believe that splits and secession is the road to paradise would glory in the chaos that would ensue. Those who want to make second class citizens of public service workers by taking away nF their right to strike would be a quick to take advantage of such a situation. Labor Minister John Munro’s recent statements would indicate that the government may be more than pleased to actively assist such a develop- » Ment. The interests of the trade union movement and the work- ing class of Canada demands that such a calamity must be averted. ok * e There can be no room for equi- vocation on the point that estab- lished jurisdictions of affiliated unions within the CLC must be respected. Necessary changes in struc- ture and organizational policy must be based on voluntary and democratic principles. But there has to be a limit to the veto power that any single union can impose to keep unions and work- ers outside the congress from BY BRUCE MAGNUSON LABOR SCENE These are times when labor must be united being brought into the house of labor. The constitutional provision for a two-thirds majority to override any single veto is to assure congress.the needed pow- er to carry out its duties to all affiliated unions, as well as to the working class. One of the main responsibili- ties of congress is to assist the struggle for autonomy for Cana- dian workers, and moving in the direction of a fully independent, sovereign and united trade union movement in this country. Respect for these guidelines will assure Canadian workers the organizational strength, unity and solidarity needed to protect and advance their interests and needs. The questions raised by CUPE have gained recognition in the policy now embarked upon by the CLC to: organize non-union workers, and to reaffiliate and bring back into the house of labor all workers who are will- ing and eligible to join. CUPE’s -claims are legitimate and ac- knowledged as such in the deci- sion to create a national organi- zation of provincial civil service associations within two years. CUPE’s president, Stanley Lit- tle is quoted as saying: “The international unions have decid- ed they run the CLC.” But the CLC decision on policy of orga- nization is more clearly a move toward more than less autonomy. Similarly with the aim to or- ganize a country-wide federation of provincial civil service asso- ciations. In what way can one truthfully claim that this will weaken the Canadian content and autonomy of the CLC? CUPE’s argument that civil service associations are not unions, that they support com- pulsory arbitration in place of strikes, and that once they are in the congress there will be no pressure on them to change, is not a convincing argument. It is difficult to believe that govern- ment emp/oyees will learn more about. trade union principles out- side the trade union movement. Right now the question is to bring them into the mainstream of organized labor. It would seem that a drive to organize these workers is long overdue. In B.C., government employees have their own union affiliated for some time directly to the CLC. In New Brunswick, CUPE has established itself. Now that others are knocking on the door of the CLC, why not com- plete the work of bringing pro- vincial civil servants into the house of labor and deal with form and structure once this is done? Most obvious is the fact that CUPE will not help to solve any real or imaginary problem in this regard by withdrawing from the CLC. Where would it go? Even more to the point, the only ones to benefit would be the vested big business interests and their Liberal and Tory poli- ticians who want organized workers divided and fighting each other. Surely these are questions that ought to be de- bated by the CUPE membership. It is of the greatest importance that it’s forthcoming convention in Montreal next November make the contribution that a great organization like CUPE is capable of, in the direction of an independent, sovereign and unit- ed Canadian trade union move- ment. Must Be United To the extent that any prob- lem exists between CUPE and the CLC it will not be solved from the top without the in- volvement of the membership. These are times when labor must be united, not divided. It is well that the officers of both the CLC and CUPE fully realize this fact. In the final stage it is the membership which will set- tle accounts and make the judg- ments on its leaders, based on how well they have fought for its interests and needs. It is essential that those elected to power to make decisions and to lead, be constantly reminded of this. The anti-labor policies of the corporate and state structure of monopoly capital cannot be de- feated by a fragmented trade union movement. Only 4ll-inclu- sive unity can cope with this enemy of the workers. Isolated feudalism’ at Asarco For 10 of the last 30 months hard-rock miners in Buchans, Newfoundland have been forced on strike against one of Can- ada’s most arrogant corpora- tions — Asarco. In the August issue of Steel Labor, Steelworkers National Director William Mahoney de- scribed the corporation’s activ- ities as “isolated feudalism” in Buchans. The striking workers live in run-down company housing that is barely habitable in the win- ter. The wages, when the work- ers were not into a_ forced strike situation were low, even by Newfoundland _ standards. Conditions are so bad in the town that even the Progressive Conservative government in the 4 province had to initiate an in- dustrial commission to look into the causes of the strike. Report Ignored The commission produced the Dyer Report of its findings and recommended the immediate implementation of its recom- PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY, SERTEMBER 21, 1973—PAGE 8 ea es mendations. But Asacro, true to its multi-national image, has ignored the report and its re- commendations and has remain- ed oblivious to any suggestions that could lead to an end of the strike. Asacro evidently feels that it is on solid ground in refusing even the most. elementary de- mands of the workers and even of the government. The Americ- an-owned company has mines in other parts of the world and it appears content to try to starve the workers back to work and claims that the strike is not affecting its overall production of minerals. Multi-national Octopus Like a giant octupus, Asarco tentacles are far reaching. Asar- co claims 100% control over 19 mining operations — eight in the U.S., three in Canada, two in Peru, one each in New Zea- land, Bolivia, England and Aus- tralia and, not at all surprising- The striking workers, despite the heavy-handedness of the company in Buchans, have re- ceived considerable support in their struggle,and their mili- tancy remains high. -Don Head, President of the striking local in Buchans has said “there is no reason why our people should be put through further hardship because of Asarco’s arrogant defiance of the Government of Newfound- land, the union and the em- ployees. “The Government should now act and I am sure that every Newfoundlander would support them, as well as the people of Canada generally. Asarco is try- ing to push us all around and it’s time they learned that Cana- dian workers will not stand for that.” During February, overseas clearances and shipments of ly, one in Chile. One of its Canadian grain to the United companies is listed without States, totalled 42.6 million naming the country. bushels. 22a9 oe dobphuwattien weditidgde vixen ei pata ~ RE CP call for unity Action against price hikes TORONTO — In a bold move aiming for decisive action against runaway prices of ne- cessities, the national leader of the Communist Party of Canada, William Kashtan, has called upon a number of organizations angered by price rises, to take united action. Proposing “an all- Canada crusade . . . to roll back prices and curb monopoly profits,” the Communist leader said that his Party “believes such united ac- tion is long overdue, both in the economic and political arena.” The unity letter went to the Canadian Congress of Labor, Confederation of National Trade Unions (CNTU), National Farm- ers Union, New Democratic Party, Congress of Canadian Women, Women Against Soar- ing Prices, and La Ligue des Femmes du Québec. The letter cited the ‘“deterior- ating situation confronting working people in town and country arising from galloping inflation,” and the fact that “the inflationary price spiral has dug deeply into working people’s living standards, and further ag- gravated the growing difficulties of th poor, the pensioners and others on fixed income.” Tory Freeze Charging that government eco- nomic and financial policy is not directed to cope with these prob- lems, but rather to make the rich richer and the poor poorer, the Communist letter warned that these outrages “would-be codified in law if the Conserva- tive Party’s wage freeze policy were instituted. “Inflation has become the means through which state mo- nopoly capitalism redistributes the national income in favor of the corporations and the weal- thy at the expense of the living standards of the working peo- ple,” the Communist’ leader pointed out. In this letter, he accused both Liberals and Tories of refusing “to come to grips with rising unemployment, economic insta- bility and uncertainty. Instruments of Monopoly “They cannot and will not act on behalf-of the public because they are the instruments of mo- nopoly policies in Canada. This PROFITS UP Asarco’s total assets for 1972 are close to the billion dollar mark . . . $989,991,000. As compared to 1965 this is an increase of 94.5%) when the total’ asset figure stood at $505,777,000. Profits for 1972 were $360,- 706,000 as compared to $240,- 672,163 in 1965. aypoyit! wtp thrgas « aged poerrigT Vartpel at is to be seen in the so-calle anti-inflation program of Government which is merely # exercise in shadow boxing. 74 ing over the Tory program, — Government has “frozen” price of bread and milk at the highes. price, tapped the oil corporation’ on the wrist, but refused t0 © what must be done if the WO! ing people are to be protecté roll back prices and curb m? poly profits. i “This soft approach to mor, poly contrasts sharply wit ‘ harsh position of Liberals ae Tories regarding the just ©), mands of the railway worke™ says the CPC letter. ty “It took the Senate eX). one hour to enact the st breaking legislation which C7, pelled railway workers rat! back to work at sub-stam "re wages,” it reminds. “Comes this to the time it takes Pa, pest i ment to enact legislation t0 8, | a.square deal to pensione®, an poor, the working farmers working people generally. rdue Long Ove ne net e face the government’s uphold”. capitalist profit and exploit the letter stated: of “The Communist Paty ac’ Canada believes such unite the tion is long overdue, bot ID ve economic and political ate0 (74. propose that an all-Canac@ a sade be undertaken to ve pro" prices and curb monOPO’ ng fits. We believe that the onsvl dian Labor Congress if Cr i tation with the National » ers Union, the New Dem Cott Party, women’s groups, the a munist Party and all O'} jing tions interested In. c prices down, should init! a campaign which coul the form of a mass mass lobbying of Pat terest. Workers to Benefit tio Pointing out that such #40 “will give a new Canada, away from control, to the control nty ada’s destiny and sovers™ Kast” the Canadian people, Mvort tan’s letter urged “op0s consideration” of this Po” for united action. - anit “While each of our Ore ip tions,” he concluded, “SY cris its own way to react tO poli of capitalist economi¢ there is no question united action could mu effort a hundred-, yes: mh sand-fold. The workiné ¢ i will be the beneficiaries an effort.” Onee a. oe f ca fi jo! 6 fel ati? ‘ direct” ye (i re