iy ; iSite dalled wg - have to do the cooking. By GALINA CHERGOVA Res KRASNOVA is a turner in a plant at Saratov, .a_ city on the Volga; but it is at home rather than at her lathe that I shall describe her. . The Krasnovs had invited me to lunch and they were telling me that on Sundays the whole family spent the day in the woods on thé opposite shore of the Volga, or on the beach, and that he and she both worked in the same factory. “And who takes care of your children while you are working?” I asked. “What do you mean, ‘who’?” Lydia asked in amazement. “But _our factory has a marvelous’ kin- dergarten. What don’t they do for the children! — “They are taught music, books are read to them, they go in for gymnastics. And the toys! But a strict schedule is kept — naps, meals, walks, games. “As far as I’m concerned, I’m perfectly at ease about my child- ren and the more so because I devote nearly all my leisure time to them.” “But when you come home you , Isn’t it difficult?” I asked, hoping that I was not offending her, and I add- ed, ‘“Doesn’t your husband’s sal- ary go far enough?” Lydia began to laugh. “As to the cooking, no. We get all our meals cooked at the factory canteen. The food there is excellent. I only prepare meals on Sunday — everyone gets his favorite dish. “My husband helps me too. He does the shopping and gives me a hand with the housework.” At this point the husband in- terrupted: “Of course, we could live on my salary. But Lydia is a quali- fied turner, she earns almost ‘as much as I do—why deprive one’s self of the chance to earn money? Besides she would be bored with staying at home.” Without giving him a chance to finish, Lydia leaned towards me and said earnestly: ‘Don’t think that I’m working for the money alone or just be- cause it would be boring to attend to the house! “Tf you just give a moment’s thought to the great construction going on in our country and the enthusiasm of the whole Soviet people for their work, can you stay at home? An even more wonderful and happy life is being built up for the people, for you S| Why Soviet women work This woman is a top worker in the Stalin auto plant. ~” and for me, for our children! “How could I, a mother of two children, remain on the _side- lines? I also want to contribute to the general achievement.” That is why Soviet women work. x Evdokia Fedorovna has been teaching for 50 years. She has Soviet women have more time and opportunity to develop artistic talents seen children grow up, genera- tions have passed before her eyes. Captains pilot their ships on long sea voyages. Engineers and architects construct new build- ings. Professors in their labora- tories discover secrets of science. Many of these are former pupils of Evdokia Fedorovna. And even in her school there are teachers ~ who used to be her pupils. She opened up to all of them magnificent horizons of know- ledge, she taught them to love labor and to understand the great works of literature. Evdokia Fedorovna could have retired long ago for, like thous- ands of other members of the teaching profession, after 25 years of teaching she is eligible . for a pension. But retirement is far from her thoughts. How can she give up the work that she loves? Retire? Live in the shadow of that great, inter- esting life that is bubbling all around her? How can she part with those children so avid for knowledge, interested in every- thing — how can she leave the school where she feels that she is still so useful? Evdokia Fedorovna, as long as she has the strength, will go on devoting her intelligence, her knowledge, and her experience to her chosen work. That is why Soviet women work. - Where women are the fashion critics By ROSE HENRY Nor many people think of-the Soviet Union as a land where every. woman ¢an go to fashion shows, and millions do. But so it is. Serious people come back from visits to the Soviet Union talking about more important things, so the frivolous ones, from ambassadors’:-wives to streamlined American. women correspondents, have spread abroad their upper-class view ofa world of drab and dreary clothes. — To such people it means no- thing that 30-odd years agg the ordinary Russian working or peasant woman was a shape- less bundle, with rags tied round her feet. tie That today she steps out, to. do all sorts of skilled and ex- citing work, comfortably dress- ed and well shod means no- thing to a woman who shops in expensive style shops and has her eyes trained on the ‘exclusive. : It is true, of course, that no Soviet woman wears the sort ‘of extreme dresses that make * fashion head&ines in Paris and New York. It is equally true that only a tiny circle of wo- men in Britain or France, the U.S: or Canada, wear them. But Soviet women are just as much interésted in clothes as women anywhere else, and they have far more say in the sort of clothes they will wear than we have. e Soviet dress designers, work- ing for the All-Union House of Fashions in Moscow and other capital cities, or on their own, long.ago established the habit of asking their future wearers what they want. Shows of new designs are taken to the factories, where -women working there are ask- ed to judge them, criticize them, choose their favorites and so on. In summer regular shows, ~ for criticism_.and comment, are held in the big public parks. As a result of such meetings, new dresses are chosen for mass production — such as a’ young girl’s chiffon dance dress called “Butterfly” which every student wanted for her “fresh- ers’ ball” last. winter. Evening dresses, of course, are worn a lot in the Soviet Union. They are usually long and flowing, in glowing col- ors and richly embroidered, for every Russian loves em- broidery, and most of them do it too, superbly. At home in the evenings Soviet women often wear their own version of the housecoat, or very comfortable and rich- ly embroidered pyjama suits. For everyday wear Soviet women give their vote every time to clothes that are simple, comfortable, inconspicuous in style and color, but not at all. standardised. And they are get- ting them in increasing quan- tity and variety. ee Many of the ideas, the col- ‘ors and the embroideries used in modern Soviet clothes have the traditional costume of the Soviet people for their inspira- tion. | ; Recently a whole series of conferences have been organ- ised between designers and or- dinary women, and dress de- signers and textile designers, - with the aim of making clothes not only cheaper and of better quality, but also better styled and more varied in the future. One of their jobs is to im- prove the design of children’s clothes — already revolution- ised in color and gaiety since the early days. And it is just typical of a' Socialist society that clothes for children are already among the very best, and that the foremost designers in the So- viet Union delight to work at their improvement. PACIFIC TRIBUNE — FEBRUARY 5, 1954 — PAGE 10 ; ~ tions. Mel Colby E’VE just finished reading at . old Hansard debate in which George Cruickshank, former Lib eral member for Fraser Valley, told the House of Commons that Prime Minister Louis St. Laurent should be paid more money. Cruickshank made these remarks in April, 1953, and helped to cut his own throat in the August elec Which is unfortunate — for other MPs. He would be 4 handy man for other MPs to have around now that the question of a pay increase is being discussed. When Cruickshank made his 1953 speech he rose in the House, _gulped down a huge sob; fought back Niagara-like tears and in 4 voice which quavered with pity, opined that the prime minister's $15,000 salary, plus $4,000 annual indemnity, plus $2,000 tax free living allowance, plus $2,000 motor car allowance, was a pitt ful sum for a man to be eking out an existence on. Perhaps we are being too cruel when we begrudge our prime mit- ister a miserly salary jump of $10,000 a year and our MPs 4 piddling $3,000 to $5,000 hike. Our prime minister does try. He could charge his entire grocery bill up to expenses but refuses — to do it. This year he insisted on paying back $5,000 of his household allowance to the fed- eral treasury, that amount being his estimate on how much it cost to shop at the corner grocery store. : Imagine that! Five thousand a year is all the prime minister and his wife spend on groceries. If this happens to our prime minister the country will have no one to blame but itself. We can see him now _ shuffling around that 30-room government ° hut, getting in the way of the cook and the five maids, while he wonders whether he can afford to have a bedtime snack or not. If the prime minister is on the verge of starvation, how about our MPs? Have you ever taken a good look at an MP? Most of them have that haggard, tightly- rawn look, that skin-and-bone appearance that reminds one of King Farouk. Most of our MPs lose money by permitting them- selves to be elected and going to Ottawa. By the time they get their indemnity and their tax free living allowance and their odds and ends from this lobbyist and that lobbyist, well, you know how it is. Our MPs lose money by go- ing to Ottawa.. We know one who. lost 36 cents playing gin rummy on the train. e hurt. an MP is the fact that no one begrudges paying an old-age pensioner $40 a month whether he deserves it or not but every- one jumps on the idea of increas- ing the pay of an MP by $3,000 or $5,000 a year. And how many old age pensioners have you heard complaining about the is- sue? Plenty. There are letters to the editor in every newspaper column. For the unity of the nation, for that great, warm feel- — ing of fellowship that comes from giving, wouldn’t it be a splendid _ Sesture if our old-age pensioners were to take up a collection and tender the proceeds to the MPs? And how about the widows and orphans, the crippled, the blind and the maimed? Couldn’t they spare a little for such a worthy cause? How about the mothers? Surely they could spare a little from their family allowance cheque? How. about the unem- ployed? or she dug down real deep could scrape up a few pennies towards the fund. If you aren’t getting unemployment insurance steal a few dollars from your widowed mother. ; Your MP needs your help! Are you going to let him down? One of the things that must | Everyone of them, if he —