/2. By-laws the use of special charges for residential pick-up. Varying methods of charging were used, some municipalities leaving the charge as a separate item on the Tax Bill and some billing the charge along with the Water and Sewer billing. Out of the remaining Municipal By-laws reviewed, only two By-laws indicated that the garbage collection function was financed entirely by the General Mill Rate levy and the remaining municipalities reviewed indicated that they finance the Basic Residential collection out of Mill Rate taxes and have special charges for’ extra residential pick-up and for commercial garbage collection. The use of special charges, therefore, is fairly widespread, Application of Special Charges in Our Case When the Finance Committee reviewed the problem, in our particular case, the use of special charges appeared to be a logical solution. We were faced with two problems, one, many taxpayers within the City were not receiving the benefit of garbage collection and were, in fact, looking after their own #arbage collection and disposal costs. This resulted in double taxation in effect as ‘they were indirectly paying for the garbage collection within the City through General Mill Rate and were having to pay their own Contractor to handle their own garbage probiem, The second problem was that in Many cases, commercial and industrial taxpayers were receiving a service that was costing the City far in excess of what these owners were paying in their annual taxes, The recommendation to levy special charges, therefore, solved the first problem in that if the service was designed to provide a minimum collection of three Cans per week and the cost of this service was collected by way of a special charge,then the taxpayers that were benefitting from this service would be paying for the service received. Those Properties that were not receiving the service, e.g. the condominiums, all of the vacant land within the City, the C.P.R., etc. would continue to look after their own garbage disposal needs at their own expense. The second problem noted above could only be resolved by either removing the services from the commercial users that were costing excessive amounts or by expanding the garbage service to include container collection facilities and to establish special charges to finance this expanded service. The solution to either problem appears to require the use of special charges. The impact of the whole tax appears to be as follows: Alderman Ranger quite accurately calculated the contribution from commercial and industrial properties at approximately $30,000.00 per year. Bear in mind that this $30,000.00 is being raised by some properties that are not receiving