EDITORIAL PAGE i _ “If it’s the monster you're looking for, you're in the wrong loch! ” Editorial comment... . Fe Coalbrook mine disaster of 1960 in the Transvaal, which snuffed out the lives of 437 min- ers reached its climax in a Johan- nesburg court a few weeks ago. The presiding judge, Mr. Jus- tice(?) H. J. Potsgieter, “fined” the coal operators sixty-four pounds, (approximately $170) for violations of the South Africa Mines Act, saying he” . . . took into consideration that the com- pany had lost a mine and several thousand pounds sterling.” Of the 437 dead miners and their destitute families the emin- ent judge had no words of sym- pathy for their “losses”. Measur- ed in terms of “apartheid justice’, about 33-cents for every murder- ed Negro miner. Where monopoly profits are concerned, human _ life comes cheap. Longshoremen in Melbourne Australia demonstrated their in- ternational solidarity with the workers of Laos by refusing to load a Dutch freighter with a cargo of barbed wire bound for Saigon. This action was taken when the Aussie “Warfies” learned the barbed wire was to be used for 'U.S.-Ngo Dinh Diem -~ concentra- imprison: tion camps, built to South Vietnam workers fighting for neutrality and peace. ‘to sea”, x A birthday, whether of an indi- vidual or a nation, should be a happy event, with the years ahead always pointing to a sy oe future. Canada Day of 1962, ninet¥- five years since that first historic birthday when the Fathers of Confederation proclaimed Cana- da’s “Dominion from Sea to Sea and to the uttermost ends of the Earth” is a proud and happy day — but also one marked by tremen- dously vital and complex ques- tions. We celebrate this natal day of our Canadian nation with a deep pride in the achievements of her native and immigrant peoples, whose “toil, sweat and tears” have transformed a vast virgin wilder- ness into a modern industrial en- tity. No less we celebrate the crea- tion of a great French and English nation, in which the growing bonds of unity and understanding lead ‘to one great objective;. the sovereign equality and identity of both, welded together for the sov- ereign independence, the peace and the democratic progress from “sea which is and must remain, Canada’s heritage and ultimate destiny. On this 95th birthday of Can- ada a sinister U.S.-created mush- room cloud casts its shadow upon the vast domain of our country. From this cloud comes the mult- iple threat of a vanishing Cana- dian independence, the expropria- tien of our rich natural resources, the domination and control of our vital industries, the loss of our markets and our jobs, the econo- A joy-and a duty Commen mic destruction our people, and the ee squan ing of our. wealth in a crim arms race. Regarded by the m poly royalists of U.S. imperia as “expendable” in their — fense”’, the very survival of | ada as a people and a natiO gravely threatened. Not nice thoughts for a Dut day celebration, but neverth thoughts which must commé@ the deep concern, the maximll unié,, and the determined ré of all Canadians; to choose before time runs out, whether birthdays ahead are to be mark with joy — or the desolation # nuclear - blasted wilderne® against which the verdant Natl of Canada’s matchless beat! cries out with horror? These pressing and vital 4! tions were not resolved i recent election of the 25th Parl ment since Confederation, a twelve days before Cana! birthday. On the contrary, the is already every indication © the threat to Canada’s indept dence, peace, and survival» wellbeing, will materially w® One decisive power remé the people who built Canada whom Canada is not “expendab nor a thing to be bartered @¥ for a fast profit buck. The pe united and determnied, is thé and only assurance for prigh! birthdays to come for a sovel™ independent Canada, at peace wi the world — and a true leader ” a world at peace. That must signal the peop! resolve on Canada Day, 1962-_ Pacific Tribune Editor — TOM McEWEN Associate Editor—MAURICE RUSH Business Mgr..OXANA BIGELOW Published weekly at: Room 6 — 426 Main Street Vancouver 4, B.C. . Phone MUtual 5-5288 Subscription Rates: One Year: $4:00—-Six Months: $2.25 Canadian and Commonwealth ‘coun- tries (except Australia): $4:00 one year. Australia, United States and all other countries: $5.00 one year Authorized as second class mail by the Post Office Department, Ottawa, and for payment of postage in cash. Tom McEwen "i. n getting set for the “next” elec- | tion, quite a load of ideologi- cal garbage remains to be cleaned up from the recent one. Much of this political . debris other purpose than to confuse and befuddle the voter before the elec- tion, and leave him (or her) stag- gering at the result after the event. When the election. din had sub- sided and one of the largest elec- toral votes on record had voted in. a minority government, the weisenheimers made the welkin ring with their plaintive wail — “what Canada needs is a strong government to get things done?” What these political weather- cocks mean by “‘‘a strong govern- ment” is anybody’s guess, but it may be taken to mean a govern- ment with a big majority in Par- liament. If our assumption is cor- rect then Canada has had more than enough of that sort of ‘“‘strong government”. Twenty-two years rule with a back- running of Liberal whacking big majority of bench ‘“‘yesmen’’, who vote as they are instructed by the party Whip, rather than on the desires and needs of their constituent electors. served no The four years or more of Tory rule with an all-time top-heavy “follow John’ majority and the end results, ditto. The peoples’ most vital interests relegated to the background, dnd monopoly in the saddle either way. So much for the ‘‘strong government”’ wise- acres who try. to measure “strength” by counting noses? A “strong government’ is one that serves the people, the common people, first, last and all the time. A government which places the peace and wellbeing of the people before narrow partisan interests and the monoply plunderbund these partisan interests rest upon. Hence a ‘minority’ government can also be ‘‘a strong government . to get things done’”’, providing what it does or tries to do is done solely in the interests of the com- mon people, and which regards the people as the prime source of its stTength; an outlook utterly im- possible by a monopoly-subsidized “majority”. Any doubts on this latter score can be checked against their wild and extravagant ‘‘prom- ises” during an election campaign —and promptly forgotten or swept under the old-line party rug be- tween elections? Another specimen of old-line political garbage tossed around during elections is the “don’t waste your vote’ bowel mover. This rhapsody on ‘waste’ carries. a double-barrelled illusion; one, that if the electors vote for anything other than a Tory or Liberal, his vote is ‘‘wasted’’; and two, if he _ “‘wasted?”’ votes for a “John” instead of # | “Mike” or vice versa, his vote This ‘theory of waste” (if such may be termed) has its roots in two- -party concept of ‘‘democl® cy”, now very much in crisis. Sine® Tweedledee and Tweedledum 4 two peas from the same monopol. cultured pod, the selector whe votes for either thinking hes (oF she) is voting for a “change” something “different”? is most ce tainly “wasting” his vote. Like wise the voter who feels fed UP the gills with either and votes Social Credit is merely compouB® 4 ing the “waste” with self-dece tion and worse to follow. The worst illusion of all is von ed by the voter who says 1 Communist candidate; ‘You gu! are alright, your party has a only program that makes se? you are the only outfit that spe?” for the working people — but ¥ haven’t got a chance. I’m going ~ vote for so-and-so.” The only reply to that, eve? something of a cliche, is the 9? thing that makes sense — and pro” gress; better to vote for somethi™ you want but don’t get it. they vote for something you don ‘¢ we and get more of it? If as and when the next elect comes around, it will turn SS much better for” the comme people if the garbage of “StU@: government”, ‘‘wasted” votes al ; P “you haven't ,got a chance disposed of well ahead of tine June 29; 1962—PACIF C TRIBUD