Canada foreign policy is ‘made in the USA’ By MARK FRANK OTTAWA—Professor A. R. M. Lower of Queens Uni- versity recently stepped down long enough out of his ivory tower to tell Canadians the stark naked truth: Canada has no foreign policy of its own. Canadian foreign policy is dictated by Washington, D.C. Here is what the professor says in an article in Maclean’s Maga- zine, December 15, entitled “Can- ada—Next Belgium?” “There is no suggestion in this country of a desire for an in- dependent foreign policy, which means independence of action in foreign affairs . . talk of a Canadian foreign policy just does not make sense. . . If, there- fore, it can be asked, whether Canada is a satellite of the Unit- ed States, there can be only one answer. Of course she is.” Cold turkey from a professor. It does not matter whether Am- erican foreign policy is embark- ed on a world expansionist drive, propping up reactionary regimes, lifting a dollar-curtain into place —creating two economic and po- litical worlds, sidesstepping the UN. All this does not matter. Canada is doomed to play a puppet-on-the-string role, accord- ing to the professor who speaks in shocking terms about the in- evitability of mass destruction and a World War III. . As though to emphasize the academic view, General H. D. G. Crerar told 40 delegates to the Conference of Defense Associa- tions on December 5 that Can- ada was in the political and mili- tary “front line” in a big war shaping up between the USA and the USSR. Included in the audi- ence were senior Canadian army commanders and Defense Minis- ter Brooke Claxton. General Crerar has just return- ed from a trip to his fellow brass- hat General MacArthur of Japan. Students of the Far East see in General Crerar’s latest talk to high military officials on “Can- ada and Japan’ an attempt to sell MacArthur’s position on Am- erican use of Japan as a base of attack against a revolutionary China. : That Crerar is speaking with the official approval of top cab- inet members who make Canadian foreign policy is to be seen in what is fast appearing as a} King Doctrine in international affairs—Canada’s own little Tru- man Doctrine. Most significant was Premier King’s elaborate statement on December 8 outlining what he ealled “inside information.” As an afterthought Mr. King said it was more accurately “authorita- tive information.” Whatever the language two things stuck out as plain as day: @ The “inside” information had been public propaganda for many a month. It was the old “red bogey.” Millions and mil- lions of words had already been i * MAY 1948 ‘BE A YEAR OF _ PRORESS FOR LABOR * 4 R. Lawryniuk 296 Keefer St. FRIDAY, JANUARY 2, 1948 softening up Canadians with the well-worn story about “com- munistic influences” being at the seat of Europe’s troubles. @ Mr. King’s speech was in- tended to place the Canadian seal of approval on the Mar- shall Plan as a “genuine” aid- Europe program. He linked his support of the Marshall Plan with forbidding implications that the USSR was directing those forces hostile to an “aid” plan involving loss of sovereign- ty as a political string. This fact plus his mysterious reference to “inside information” leaves nothing to the imagination. Canadian policy is committed to Marshall Plan economic and poli- tical penetration in Europe; the rebuilding of a war potential in the German Ruhr; a_ two-world strategic concept envisioning the inevitability of war between Can- ada and the USSR. Mr. King’s “own” Truman Doc- trine of course got an advance start by the sensational manner with which Igor Gouzenko’s stolen information was employed as an essential weapon of pro- paganda to. stir international opinion against the USSR. Since the Gouzenko affair the unparalleled remarks of Mr. Phillipe Brais, K.C., crown prose- cutor in Prof. Raymond Boyer’s trial further expose the wale mongering character of the King Doctrine. Mr. Brais, who _inci- dentally is reported as having received anti-Soviet coaching for his part in the “spy” scare by members of the RCMP, summed up in his final address to the jury with the words: “War between Soviet Russia and the United States is com- ing.” Member of Parliament J. F. Pouliot (Lib., Temiscouata) pro- tested the remarks in a question to Minister of Justice J. L. Isley asking whether the department had authorized the declaration. Mr. Ilsley replied that his de- partment “does. not* give counsel instructions” in such addresses to the jury. f Not a single note of censure of what is fundamentally a war - mongering. declaration cOntrary to the spirit of a recent UN resolution! By implication it cannot but be concluded that our government appears to favor _ such anti-Soviet propaganda voiced in our courts to stir opinion against the USSR and to strenghen what it feels is a weak legal case against Prof. Boyer. i Surrey LPP plan prices campaign CLOVERDALE, 3B.C.—Problems of Fraser Valley dairy, poultry and hog farmers arising from the King government's recent termin- ation of feed grain subsidies and the campaign for restoration of price controls and subsidies will occupy members of Labor-Pro- gressive Party Clubs in Surrey and Langley muicipalities when they meet in a South Fraser re- gional conference on Sunday, January 11. The conference will also dis- cuss the recent municipal elec- tions, in which progressives gen- erally received a setback in the two municipalities. ; Completing the agenda is a review of LPP organizational work, Just before the break | Chatting amiably. Secretary of State George C. Marshall and Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslay Molotov share a ‘love seat’ in the London residence of U.S. Ambassador Lewis Douglas. Shortly after this picture was taken the London meeting woun up in disagreement. unity seen dissatisfaction and bitterness at the betrayal of both the Social Credit government and the feder- al Liberal government; a deter- mination to resist the big busi- ness attack on living standards. At the Legislative Session early in the year some concessions were won. (Removal of Social Service Tax, free hospitalization for pen- sioners, etc.) as a result of pres- sure on the government. Large KATE FOUNTAIN numbers of workers were involv- ed in strikes during the year and union membership grew. The packinghouse workers’ strike brought about a high degree of farmer-labor unity that resulted in some gains for the workers. This unity was again demonstrat- ed at conventions of labor and farm bodies where, in each case, fraternal delegates were received and listened to enthusiastically. Probably in no other: prov- ince in Canada is there such consciousness of the natural al- liance between farmers and wor- kers. This close tie between city and country toilers is one of the greatest signs of the health and strength of the people of this province. The Alberta “dirt farmer” and the Alberta worker in every in- dustry and commercial enterprise Growing farmer-labor in Alberta By KATE FOUNTAIN Our Round-up for 1947 is at a close. Traditionally the year’s end is a time for review and reflection. It is a time for high resolve for a truly new year. Looking back over the year passed in Alberta, what do we see? A growing are victimized by the same forces of capitalist exploitation. The four big packing plant companies in the province exploit their work- ers and underpay the farmers with equal ruthlessness and _ callous- ness. The farmer robbed of just rights by the oil monopolies who invade his land, has common cause with the worker in the oil field. The worker compeled to seek wage increases because of inflated food prices knows that it is’ not the farmer who reaps the reward but the food monopolies. Worker and farmer members of consumer coopera- tives find that protection afford- ed by the coops is more and more threatened by monopolist control over supplies and prices set by the big manufacturers, wholesalers and distributors; Big Business which has used its fi- nancial power over government policy to bring new and unjusti- fied taxation upon cooperatives. The small business and profes- sional men whose economic se- curity depends upon that of wor- kers and farmers, are the logical allies of both. Cooperation of these three groups on economic and political problems spells peo- ple’s unity of such strength and proportions that it is no wonder the forces of reaction and fi- nance capital endeavor to break it at every turn. : Such people’s unity in action on a& common program can mean the difference between depressed living standards and government measures to raise the standard of life. In a very few months now we will be called upon to go to the polls and express our will as to who shall govern Alberta for the next four or five -years. Alberta people have such a con- scious pride in their progressive history it is unlikely they will be enticed back to the fold of old- line parties. Through all appeals to Right or Left, it must be borne in mind that united» action of all progressives and election of their candidates wil be the best possible safeguard that the next provincial government will keep Alberta progressive and carry out the will of the majority on every issue. Race bias prevalent TORONTO — Discrimination against negro girls seeking to be- come. student nurses exists in a iumber of hospitals across Cana- da, according to the results of a Dominion-wide survey of 58 schools of nursing. The survey was conducted by the National Council of the YWCA in the form of a questionaire sent to 178 hospitals. More than two- thirds of the hospitals receiving the query did not réply. : Returned questionaires recorded no rejections on the grounds. of race, but the Council noted “a real tendency to discriminate speci- fically against Negro girls.” ; Indian and Chinese girls: are more readily accepted in nursing schools, the survey showed, and the open discrimination practised against Japanese-Canadians during the war has eased off. Hospitals operated by Roman Catholic nuns seemed generally free of discrimination, but in two of these—one in Halifax, and one ix St. Vital, Man. The medical staff were reported as objecting to negro trainees, although the nuns were willing to receive them. No ‘high wages’ here OTTAWA—The government was urged last week to place a tem- porary price ceiling on butter, during the next few months when the product will be in short supply. Mrs. R. J. Marshall of Agin- court, Ont., president of the Cana- dian Association of Consumers wired Finance Minister Abbott and Agriculture Minister Gardiner urg- ing Ottawa to curb soaring butter prices while production was at a low ebb. In a statement, Mrs. Marshall was quoted as saying that much of the butter now selling at 75 cents a pound in Montreal, at 71 and 72 cents in Ottawa and at from 68 to 72 cents in Toronto was storage butter which was pur- chased from the producer at much lower prices and which at the time it was purchased was selling for a far lower price to the con- sumer. ‘It is ridiculous that butter, which was selling to the consumer at 66 to 67 cents a pound should suddenly be selling at anywhere from 70 to 75 cents,” declared Mrs. Marshall. ¢ Is mine director TORONTO—James_ F. , former secretary of State, has been reported elected a director of the Newmont Mining Corp. of Canada Ltd., a Canadian concern. Appar- ently @ holding company, it has been reported engaged in pros- pecting and exploration over the past few years. It was formed in 1944, To bake their own EDMONTON — At a general meeting of Edmonton housewives resolutions demanding a roll-back of prices and the imposition of a 100 percent Excess Profits Tax were forwarded to Finance Min- ister Abbott. The ‘petition cam- paign sponsored by the Edmonton Housewives’ League on the prices issue has met with tremendous support in many Alberta centres and communities. : The meeting also endorsed a ‘bake-your-own-bread’ campaign; it was pointed out by League presi- dent Mrs. A. Swankey that home- baked bread is ‘much more nour- ishing and economical.’ She fur- ther stated that it ‘cost bakeries only 5.7 cents to produce a loaf of bread, yet consumers are forced to pay the unreasonable price of 12 cents a loaf.’ PACIFIC TRIBUNE—PAGE 3