ee This week the Terrace Review asked: Fam tag tM a the cuertenth MM nh fe tue 2 Te MeN a OE LU TASTE th SI : _ If there was a better selection of organic produce at competitive prices, would you be more inclined to buy - organic? Edgar Cole Yes. If the prices were competitive |’d sooner eat organically grown pro- duce than anything else. Especially If it was locally grown. Ken & Lorna Morton Lorna — If there was a good selection | might buy organic, We use a lot of fruit and vegetables and grow some of our -own, Ken — | don’t know per- sonally if the evidence is conclusive that there is any difference in quality. However, | am concerned about the use of pesticides and growth hormones. We have mixed Jill Wiley Yes. | would be in- terested in buying foods grown with fewer pesti- cides and chemicals. | wouldn't even mind pay- ing a bit more! Jane Turner Yes. If organic produce was the same price anda better selection, | would buy It. Leona Long (from Prince Rupert) “] Letters to. the Fditor "| They won't be coming back To the Editor; We as visitors — or “aliens’’, as your fishing regulations de- scribe us — would like to make a ‘few comments on your newly- established fishing fees for those of us from outside the province of B.C. 1. We feel that $10 per fishing rod per day was established to tell us to stay home. This being the case, we are going to do just that! We understand that this fee was adopted to give the residents of B.C. a better chance to fish, and it most certainly is doing the job because tourists who normally would stay for a month or two are leaving for their home or going straight through to Alaska. 2. We wonder how the residents of B.C. would react if the U.S. imposed a tax upon every B.C. resident who crossed the border to buy groceries, gas, etc., because they are so much cheaper in the U.S. Now, this in- flux of people from across the border is causing a hardship on the U.S. residents in the cities along the border. This demand has increased the price of all commodities in these cities. 3. We have been guests of the City of Terrace for 11 years, and most certainly have given benefits to the economy of this region, We have enjoyed our- selves here immensely, spent lots. of money; sad to say ‘we won’t be back!” You can’t promote tourism by imposing such an unreasonable fee against the tourist. Mr. & Mrs. Bert L. Spangler, P.O. Box 32, Enumclaw, Wa. 98022. Bad habits among the beverage crowd To the Editor; I wonder why people who drink beer feel the need to leave their bottles (intact or broken) - and cans to litter paths and lake shores and river banks. I think anyone old enough to be at the recreational areas avail- able to us here is also able to bring home their tins and bottles -_and not create litter and danger for bare feet. Broken glass and tins hurt. — For those who are not able perhaps the adults or guardians with them would help them create a clean and healthy en- vironment, Lynn Buckle, Terrace, B.C. Forestry Insights — — Continued from page A7 same forest. exists. Po caatart ie ous 8 NRT SRT aT : i. yD aE = Poe 44 TS cts ss en at! feelings. } don’t think it really makes much difference. | buy some organic, but mostly the other. If you don’t know what’s going on, things go on without you. read the Terrace Review Sustut-Takla — — Continued from page A5 well below capacity due to timber shortages, the Rim mili closed down altogether and Westar's Kitwanga operation is also closed. Pacific Inland Resources, West Fraser’s sawmill in Smithers, would have gotten 150,000 cubic metres of the Sustut timber if the ministry staff recommendations had been followed. "It would have madc an enormous difference to us," said Ross Johnson, PIR’s mill manager. The decision placed additional pressure on the relative- ly small Bulkley Timber Supply Area, driving up local wood prices and forcing clear-cut logging into more visible.arcas, Johnson said. Both Claude Richmond, Minister of Forests, and his deputy minister Philip Halkett failed to return telephone messages left by the Terrace Review. "Integrated management", doing everything in the same spot at the same time, is a misunderstood and misused term. It can’t be a reality. Loggers. falling trees on tents would be shot by the hunters. But if you can think of “successive multiple use", you might have a concept that’s workable. For this, though, we may have to wait for society to mature a bit. We have to be willing to accept change. In "successive multiple use" society would determine what is most important in an area and then determine the use, or possibly the order of users. As an area began losing value for one use, it would gain value for another and both would have to move. In most cases, we would probably discover, moving an activity to a new loca- tion from time to time might offer something better than what already Before any of this happens, how- ever, society has to begin asking some important questions now. Should we preserve it? And if so, at what cost? Should we save the. plants. and give up the potential wealth of logging? Should we give up the recreational experience? Should we keep everyone out? Or can we have it all? And in con- sidering these questions there’s one important fact to remember. IF we save trees simply for the sake of saving them, eventually we'll end up with nothing. The trees will be too old for the loggers and too dangerous for the tourist. Nature will have reclaimed her own. Next week, we begin our dis- cussion on the British Columbia tenure system. Is it an effective - management tool, or is it the rea- son we have so many management problems? legates TG 2 et ee DAES ETT LY REET NE core ele DC TERRE geome Cia gel