Land Use Comm.
Te strata subd.
3020/26 Vincent

jLand Use Comm.
ive strata subd.
' 1366/68 Mary
‘Hill Road.

March Ist, 1976

From the Land Use Committee, February 26th, 1976 with regard to an
application to subdivide an existing duplex at 3020-3026 Vincent Street
(SS#2/76) and recommending approval of the application.

Moved by Alderman Laking:

Seconded by Alderman Thompson:

That the application to subdivide by strata-title an existing

duplex at 3020-3026 Vincent Street (SS#2/76), be approved,

Carried,
Aldermen Mabbett and Traboulay voted against the resolution.

Prior to passage of the foregoing resolution Alderman Traboulay
expressed concern that by approving this application two more rental
units were being removed from the market at a time when rental accommodation
is in short supply, and noted that he had been in favour of the previcus
applications tonight only because they were new structures and would not
be affecting the present level of rental units available. Alderman
Laking suggested that approval was not necessarily taking rental units
away from people but rather creating affordable home ownership and
allowing a person to own their own home which otherwise would be impossible.
Alderman Mabbett objected on the grounds that the application does not
meet City regulations as the property in question is located quite a bit
under the 600 feet from another duplex on the same side of the street
required by the By-law. Alderman Laking indicated that the units had
been constructed in 1969 prior to passage of the present Zoning By-law
and at the time of construction met all By-law requirements.

From the Land Use Committee, February 26th, 1976 being an application
to subdivide an existing duplex at 1366-1368 Mary Hill Road (SS#3/76)

and recommending approval of the applicatior.

Moved by Alderman Laking:

Seconded by Alderman Thompson:

That the application to subdivide by strata-title an existing

duplex at 1366-1368 Mary Hill Road (SS#3/76), be approved.

Carried.
Alderman Traboulay voted against the resolution.

Alderman Traboulay expressed objections similar to those expressed
during the discussion of the Previous application and felt that at the
present time there are more available units for sale than are available

for rent within the City. Alderman Laking indicated that in this particular