dations of an advisory committee convened by Brian Smith in Novem- ber, 1980. The six members included a representative of B.C. Parents for French. While most clauses in the final document are identical to the com- mittee’s draft, at least one of the changes is very significant. The draft stated that an Early or Late Immer- sion class ‘‘shall be established”’ when the minimumnumber of students (20 and 24 respectively ap- plied; the final document uses the word ‘‘may”’. In a letter to Mr. Smith, BCPF has expressed concern over this and other aspects of the policies. As this newletter is printed no reply has yet been received. BCPF is also awaiting information on several of the advisory committee’s related recommen- dations. Included is a request that the policies be extended to include the secondary grades (8 - 12) by J. Gibson ENGLISH CONTENT OF E.F.I. PROGRAM Richmond Parents for French held their Annual General Meeting on April 29, 1981 at the Richmond Inn. Following the business aspects of the meeting, a very informative panel discussion was held on_ the wide ranging topic ‘‘The Quality and Quantity of English Language Arts in Early French Immersion Programs.” Panel members included; Judy Gib- son, B.C. Director, C.P.F.; Dr. Geof- frey Mills, Consultant, Victoria School Board; Peter Welton, Vice- Principal, Ecole Cook, Richmond; and John Rance, Secondary School English Teacher, Richmond. Judy Gibson presented _ infor- mation on the English content of Early French Immersion as contained in the B.C. Ministry of Education guidelines plus data from a variety of Immersion programs across Canada. She also discussed the Immersion situation in Coquitlam and some of the concerns felt by parents there. Dr. Mill’s presentation covered the English-French content in both the Partial Immersion and Total Immer- sion programs in Victoria. In Grades 4-7, the French content comprises 70 percent of the time allotment and, as this figure is greater than the Ministry of Education guidelines, Dr. Mills discussed the factors involved in the Victoria policy. He stated that ‘‘the stronger the students are in French, the more the students are able to cope with the material offered in French, especially in Social Studies and Sciences.” Also, the fact that there is very little opportunity to rein- force French-speaking skills in the community, plus indications that English Language Arts skills do not suffer with an increased French con- tent, prompted him to promote the higher percentage. Dr. Mills also stressed other aspec- ts that should be considered in plan- ning the program — namely, the choice of subjects which are to be presented in English (Mathematics would be his choice); staffing witha view to having a different teacher for each language, rather than having one teacher teach both English and French content; possibly the need for Immersion “booster shots” (periods of 100 percent French) to be given in the later elementary years. This latter type of a program would aim to help overcome the French Immersion “dialect” that emerges with children in the program. Peter Welton reviewed the newly released Ministry of Education guide- lines for teachers of English in the E.F.l. program. His remarks gave us much insight into the difficulties en- countered in teaching English Language Arts in a limited time frame. John Rance, presented his methods of teaching English Language Arts to his students. He stressed the vital importance of reading in the home — Parents reading for their own pleasure, using libraries and having reading materials available for children.