Section 5 of Article 17 of the constitution of the Canadian La- bor Congress deals with the ques- tion of affiliates who are in arrears in respect to monthly per capita payments: “Any organization which does not pay its per capita tax on or be- fore the specified time shall be noti- fied by the secretary-treasurer of the Congress. Any organization three months in arrears in payment of per capita may become suspend- ed from membership in the Con- gress and can be reinstated only after arrears are paid in full.’ Technically speaking, that sec- tion will be the guideline for the CLC executive council when: it meets this week to deal with the case of the 14 building trades un- ions who have not paid their affilia- tion fees since April, 1980. These unions are said to have a combined membership of 400,000, but I doubt if they have ever paid per capita for that total. According to published reports, the affiliation fees, which are paid directly by the international officers, total $675,- 000 a year at the current rate. Section 4(a) of Article 3 of the constitution deals with the rights of suspended unions in respect to pro- vincial federations of labor and area labor councils: “Any affiliate of chartered or- ganization which has seceded, is under suspension or has been ex- pelled shall not be allowed repre- sentation or recognition in the Congress, or in any subordinate body thereof.” This means that if the executive council suspends the delinquent unions, provincial fed- erations and area labor councils could be instructed to suspend their affiliations to those bodies. While there are no precise figures avail- able for B.C., it could involve up to 40,000 workers, including such af- filiates as the Carpenters, Electric- ians, Plumbers and Laborers. (The Teamsters are not in the CLC.) Comment Jack Phillips What the international officers are demanding has been spelled out in-a number of articles in the Trib- une over the past year. In sum- mary, they object to the fact that the Quebec Federation of Labor took into affiliation a 7,000-mem- ber local of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers which seceded in 1973. According to the letter of the CLC constitu- tion, the Federation had no right to do so. Building trades leaders also claim that industrial unions have invaded their work jurisdiction and that the system of representation at CLC conventions works to the dis- advantage of the building trades. The Quebec Federation of La- bor justified its action by pointing out that it has to contend with rival federations in that province and also with a unique set of represent- ation and collective bargaining laws. Left on their own, the Fed- eration officers claimed, the Elec- trical Workers would have joined a rival federation. On the issues of jurisdiction, the CLC leadership has demonstrated flexibility. An agreement was negotiated, agreed to and signed by leading officers of the building trades and industrial unions in Canada, and then en- dorsed by the CLC. On the issue of changing the rep- resentation and the system of vot- ing at CLC conventions, the CLC leadership has tried to accommo- date the building trades leaders, but they were unable to obtain the necessary two-thirds majority in convention on more than one occa- sion. If a substantial portion of build- ing trades unions had not chosen to boycott the 1980 convention of the CLC, itis likely that a modified sys- tem of bloc voting would have been adopted. . Jim Kinnaird, president of the B.C. Federation of Labor and vice- president of the CLC, is obviously disturbed by the current situation.. Speaking to last week’s convention of the B.C. Ferry and Marine Workers’ Union in Duncan, he said he will vote against his own un- ion when he votes to suspend the 14 — building trades unions from the CLC. He is a member of Local 213 of the International Brotherhood . of Electrical Workers. : In reporting his speech, the Vic- toria Times-Colonist March 4 made this observation: ‘‘. . .Kin- naird indicated he feels the building trades unions orchestrated a split by following a very definite pat- tern.”’ The following quotations from the news report should provide some clues as to what lies ahead. “In his speech to the ferry work- ers, he said he believes the differ- ence would prove too difficult to overcome. He felt the structure of TWU campaign puts pressure on B.C. Telephone directors Continued from page 1 down the pulp mill, sawmill opera- tions, construction sites and many offices. The outcry, both from employers and the Southam and Thompson press, underscored the effectiveness of the action and the heat that it put on B.C. Tel, already notorious for its anti-labor stance. Meanwhile, the TWU continued to mount its own pressure on the company to settle the 15-month- old dispute and to drop attempts to discriminate against some 24 workers. In Victoria Monday, more than 400 TWU members demonstrated outside the provincial legislative buildings carrying a huge black coffin and placards declaring, — “‘Workers’ Rights Die under U.S. Ownership’’. B.C. Telephone _ is owned, through a Canadian sub- sidiary, by the huge U.S. multina- tional General Telephone and Elec- tronics of New York. Labor minister Jack Heinrich, who has repeatedly stated his inten- - tion to keep out of the dispute, spoke briefly to the demonstrators, telling them that he had called on federal labor minister Gerald Regan — under whose jurisdiction the B.C. Tel dispute falls — to in- tervene to effect a settlement. The appointment of Collins as federal mediator was prompted partly by Heinrich’s urging. Also this month, in response to the claims by B.C. Tel that its cor- © porate decisions are ‘‘made in Canada’’, the TWU has circulated Gordon F. MacFarlane Chairman and Chief Executive Officer British Columbia Telephone Company Burnaby, B.C. 432-4241 Harry M. Boyce .- Company Director Yorkshire Trust Company Vancouver, B.C. 685-3711 W. Thomas Brown 669-1600 Chairman Odium Brown & T. B. Read Ltd. Vancouver, B.C. Justin V. Harbord 388-5533 President Harbord Insurance Ltd. Victoria, B.C. Gerald H. D. Hobbs 682-0611 Chairman Cominco Ltd. Vancouver, B.C. Victor F. MacLean 684-8201 Company Director Vancouver, B.C. a list of B.C. Tel directors and the various companies for. which they are in turn executive officers. The list includes telephone numbers. TWU business agent Larry Armstrong last week urged unionists to call up the company directors and demand that they ‘PACIFIC TRIBUNE—MARCH 13, 1981—Page 12 TELL THEM YOU’RE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE! 736-4411 McGavin ToastMaster Limited Vancouver, B.C. Allan M. McGavin Chairman of the Board John W. Pitts Chairman and President Okanagan Helicopters Ltd. Vancouver, B.C. 278-5502 J. Ernest Richardson Chairman of the Board MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. Vancouver, B.C. 683-6711 Horace B. Simpson Vice-President Okanagan Holdings Ltd. Kelowna, B.C. 860-7600 Hugh R. Stephen Company Director Victoria, B.C. 598-5928 negotiate a settlement with the TWU. The company’s directors include executive representatives of some of the biggest companies operating in B.C. such as Cominco, MacMillan-Bloedel and: McGavin Toastmaster. — the building trades unions with their hiring halls and closed shops was more important to some key figures than affiliation with the Ca- nadian labor movement. “Tn. anticipation of what was coming, he said he had met with building trades locals.in B.C. and was convinced they wanted to re- main allied with the B.C. Federa- tion of Labor and the CLC. ‘‘Any vote taken at the national level would be submitted to the trade unions in B.C. for their con- sees B.C. JIM KINNAIRD ... trades staying in B.C. Fed, labor councils. 2 sideration, he said. It was aclear in- dication that they would be able to decide if they wanted to re-enter the CLC through Canadian unions.” The strong-endorsation given to the militant position of the B.C. Federation of Labor in support of the Telecommunication Workers’ Union and the Canadian Union of Public Employees embraces all sec- tors of the Federation membership, including industrial, building trades and public sector unions. It is obvious that Kinnaird and the Federation executive council would like to maintain and extend that unity. Now, they are faced with the threat of the suspension of the building trades unions and with a possible expulsion by the CLC con- ‘vention in 1982. Also, there is talk, « on the one hand, of setting up a CLC building trades department and taking into direct affiliation locals of building trades unions that leave, or are expelled from, their internationals. On the other hand, there is talk of the building trades leaders setting up a new trade union centrein Canada in op- position to the CLC. It should be obvious that if the CLC and the building trades un- ions become involved in a head-on collision across the country, there will be serious divisions, raids and -counter-raids in the fight for juris- diction, jobs and membership. If such a battle spread to B.C., the kind of unity we are now experienc- ing in one of the most important bargaining years in the history of organized labor could go up in RiBUNE smoke. The immediate winners — would be the worst enemies of or- ganized labor. My guess is that as soon as the meeting of the CLC executive council is concluded, Kinnaird will return to B.C. and meet with the — officers of the B.C. and Yukon Building Trades council in orderto discuss the new situation — assum- ing there will be a vote to suspend. According to .reliable reports, ~ thereis a strong feeling in the build- ing trades here — I would say ama- jority feeling well reflected in the provincial leadership — to stayin _— | the B.C. Federation of Labor and the area labor councils in the event that the 14 internationals are suS- — pended. However, if the interna- tionals set up a new trade union ~ centre in Canada and put the press- ure on their locals to sever com- pletely their connections with the CLC and all of its subordinate — bodies — under threat of trustee- ship or expulsion — this could cause serious complications. It is generally conceded that the loyalty to the B.C. Federation of Labor shown by building trades unions here is stronger than build- ing trades loyalty to federations in other provinces. However, there could be a much greater opposition to the separation from the CLC and its subordinate bodies in other provinces than what appears on the surface at this moment. Many progressive minded mem- bers of the building trades in B.C. have taken aconsistent position for more Canadian autonomy and for the full implementation of Cana- dian standards of self government as adopted by CLC in convention. Needless to say, these positions are not popular with most of the top international officers and their highly paid roadmen in Canada. ~ | These progressive minded mem- bers are also opposed to any break- aways from the internationals that would result only in splits, disrup- tion and isolation. If at all possible in the period following immediate- ly after the CLC executive council meeting, they would favor a policy of their unions retaining member- ship in their respective interna- tionals, while continuing to be part of the B.C. Federation of Labor and area labor councils. This is not a retreat from the fight for more Canadian auton- omy with the eventual goal of a fully-independent trade union movement. What these progressive minded workers are seeking is a course to minimize the dangers in this situation and to prevent the iso- lation of the most progressive forces in the building trades from the majority of their fellow workers in the industry and from the main- stream of the trade union move- ment. That is no easy task they have set themselves. I will come back to this problem next week. : SRA E ASE Published weekly at Suite 101 — 1416 Commercial Drive, Vancouver, B.C. V5L 3X9. Phone 251-1186 Read the paper that fights for labor City OF tOWN- 3s 55; M) Postal Code .............. | am enclosing: 1 year $121 2 years $220) 6 months $7.0 OidO New Foreign 1 year $15 0 Bill me later CF Donation$.......... NGG NUNC INTENSE NON ON ERENG NORG AG NGNGRLNGNS