"Moved 1 by Alderman a Mabbert: oS ee .. dune 4th, 1973.

~ Seconded ‘by Alderman Ranger:

“That By-law No. 1253 be read « a | third time. . a

NEW. BUSINESS:

From Aldernan BE .W. Habbett, June ith, 1973. coimenting that Alderman anger had re votd
seen ‘fit. to attack: several Couneil meubers after adjourament. of the, regular ‘nesting itene
last week at a time when: they could not rebut him; and stating that it ‘is: nds in- ce a

tention ‘to-use his. denocratic ‘Hight: andy vote as he: sees fit at: the tines whether
“at is for indemnities, rezoning, by-laws, land | sales, or whatever,
Alderman’ Ranger, in Speaking to ‘the above-mentioned matter, comented that
“Alderman Mabbett had’ the right to rebut | at ‘the’ ‘time | if he "chose: S80" tol do, and. .
| “remarked that’ ina “Conimittee meeting of ‘Couned alt, with, the exception of —
Thompson, had - agreed to a 20%° increase” in the" ‘Counc dl 8 indennities, and ‘that’
| neither” ‘the Mayor nor Aldérman Mabbett: had argued ‘the potnt at the co _—
Mabbett stated his assurance that he had no discussion with: Mayor Scott prior to.
initial présentation ‘Of the Tidemnity syle, and that ne: had fought against an”
increase: very strongly when the by-law was resented Yast year. Sneee a
From the Envitonnental Sub Committee, ‘June 4th, 1973 setting forth: ‘two: resol- Envirn.Sub
utions,. “one concerning maximum fines for by-law offences and the’ other conterning “pe max.t
flood control costs, and’ recommending. that they ‘be forwardad: ‘to: ‘the: Lower Mainland pie
Municipal ‘Association. for. endorsement and hence ‘te the. ULB.C. Me office, for submis=

sion to the 1973 Convention.” *

“Moved by: Alderman Meyer: ize

Seconded by Alderman Rangers

"That as. ‘xeconmended ‘in a report from the ‘Savironmental Sub committee, ‘June os
4th, 1973 the “following resolution as. set forth therein be forvardéd” ta" the lower
Mainland Municipal Association for endorsenent and hence to. the U. Ba C. Me ‘office
for submission to the’ 1973 Conventions as : ae |
1.- "WHEREAS" ‘the maim fine’ permitted ‘urider’ the provisions of the. ‘Sumaazy ‘Conview
tions ACE: ‘de $500. oo: De ee . ee SS. .
AND wuss aainy tte’ for example, pollution offences, are sonst ines of
| AND. WHEREAS. ‘the only penalty available at. the > present time ‘is under the: -Suimary,
onvictions Act:

THEREFORE BE IT. RESOLVED ‘that the: Province of British Colimbia’ be requested

_ to amend either the Suiinary Convictions’ ‘Ret ‘or ‘the e Nundetpal het inv order’ that -

municipalities may be able’ to stipulate a fine. of not nore. than: 41; O00: 00;°

“AND THAT. a clear declaration be made thar each day an 1 offence ‘coritinues cone

“stitutes: a new and separate offence or alternatively, ‘hag specific ‘legislation