An exhibition of wide interest to citizens opened at Vancouver Art Gallery this week and will continue until May 6. Under the heading “People of the Potlach,” Vancouver Art Gallery and - UBC have assembled the most representative collection of Pacific Northwest Indian art and cul- ture ever brought together. One display shows part of an Indian house. The exhibition will be, reviewed on this page next week. oe Extravagance of Helen of Troy fails to produce epic picture VEN though Homer is never i mentioned in the credits, a film about Helen of Troy de- mands greatness in its treat- ment, or at least the lusty ex- travagance of a Cecil B. de Mille. Warner Brothers’ epic, made in Italy with an international east of featured players and an army of 5,000 extras, has a fair amount of spectacle and excite- ment and colorful surge. But this competent and work- manlike tale of how a_ beefy young man named Paris met and jumped over a cliff with a humorless blonde named Helen, with elaborately violent conse- quences, lacks the epic touch. The assault on Troy, the epi- sode of the wooden horse, the fighting and the comings and goings of the chariots have vigor and merit as CinemaScope spec- tacle. The settings and cost- umes are undeniably lavish. But there’s little real gusto in the decorous orgies, bacchanalian Gances and scenes of rapine. And most of the actors can’t do very much with the dialogue —particularly when it’s dubbed in by another voice: When Paris first sees Helen sporting in the sea in a blue tunic he says admiringly: “Aphrodite!” Helen, apparently not having had a classical education, fails to catch the allusion, She simp: ly says, “What?” and goes on ‘to remark: “This creature’s crazy, but with a nice sort of craziness.” Delivered in the peculiar breathless sing-song adopted by dubbing voices, this sets the tone for much of the dialogue, which has the classic directness and simplicity of the comic strip. The safhe blankness has been favored in the looks of the principals. The Paris of Jacques Serenas is more college football- er than prince. Rossena Podesta is comely enough in a heavy way, but lacks go. Only Stanley Baker, as the sulky Achilles, achieved any- thing like Homeric | stature. “Most of the other heroes re- minded one strongly of a gath- ering of Rotarians. Janette Seott makes a sweet Cassandra, Se Scene from Helen of Troy showing the giant horse being welcomed by the Trojans. Movie stars Rossena Podesta and Jack Serenas, but.most convincing acting is turned in by Stanley Baker. though, and Brigette Bardot, as a slave, would lure me into the ship-launching trade-a lot quick- er than her mistress. ~ x * * In The Court Jester Danny Kaye clowns with his usual en- dearing warmth ‘as a sort of Walter Mitty of the age of chivalry. : _He is a member of a Robin Hood-like band of outlaws, and, by posing as a visiting jester, gains admittance to a’ wicked king’s court, where a witch puts a spell on him. ' One snap of the fingers and the shy, timid Danny becomes a masterful lover, fearless swordsman and paragon of chivalry. Another snap and he reverts at once to his old self. Danny is aided and abetted by talents far superior to those usually employed in film sagas of knighthood and outlawry. Glynis Johns, Angela Lansbury and Cecil Parker see no reason why farce should lack distinct- ive touches of character and wit, and Basil Rathbone ensures that the villainy department shall not lack style. Script and direction, by Nor- man Panama and Melvin Frank, are ingenious and slick and a great deal better carpentered than is usual in this sort of picture. The trouble is that too much talent has to be brought to bear. Polish it how you like, it is’ still basically second-rate material. - ; Danny and company - dis- appoint in the end because, al- though they do this very well, it is not really worth doing for performers of their accomplish- ‘ments. They ought to be scaling the heights of comedy instead of showing off on the nursery slopes. THOMAS SPENCER surprise, fine novel OVELS about industrial N struggles by those who have taken part in them are still few and far between. For this reason particularly we should welcome He Must So Live, by David Lambert (obtain- able in Vancouver at the People’s © Co-op Bookstore, 337 West Pen- der Street, price $2.25.) It is the story of how the men of a Clydeside foundry overcame disunity and hesitations to fight against layoffs and victimisation during the hegtic thirties. The author himself started work as an apprentice in a foundry on his 15th birthday, and worked in’ Clydeside found- ries till his health broke down. He is now on the staff of the Amalgamated Union of Foundry Workers. : He has created a rich, warm- hearted story of the people and places he knows so well, the heated discussions in the foundry, the anger at poverty and injustice, the religious diy- isions, and the love, humor and hope of the packed, vigorous humanity of the Clyde. — x x x This book has many of the ingredients of a first-rate novel. There is plenty of action and excitement as the story unfolds. Ten foundry workers are fir- ed, and the workers, taken by at first do nothing about it. An old militant, Bill Omond, rouses them to protest and to seek guarantees against future sudden layoffs, and, as a result, himself is fired. The workers go on strike, and the climax is reached in a great demonstration against unem- ployment, during which Bill Omond, already a sick man, is beaten by the police. The central character, Bill Omond, is a splendid creation — a Socialist of the old school, a pupil of John McLean’s, who has recently joined the Communist party, but is reluctant to ac- cept advice and criticism from his comrades, particularly those younger than himself. The many other characters— especially Bill’s ‘wife,’ Ma, and her daughters Jean and Cathie, and’ Father McGrory, the Cath- olic priest — are well-drawn individual people. The young Communist organ- ized, Jack Speed, eager, self-sac- rificing, yet insensitive about other people’s feelings and bet- ter at laying down the law than Saks ences of others, weaknesses. But the conflict between Omond and Speed is never satis- factorily resolved. has familiar In fact, the stress which fs laid on this conflict obscures one of the main problems which the author is trying to work out in the novel — the role of con- scious leadership in working class struggles. : : eee Se Some of the leaders of the workers, it seems, happen to be Communists, but the Communist party does not appear as the leading, organizing force that it undoubtedly was in the strug- gles against unemployment, war and fascism in the thirties. When the workers are rallied to make their protest to the boss against the dismissals, this ap- pears to be not so much the re- sult of their own experiences and thoughts, combined with correct ‘leadership, but rather the result of an almost magical inspiration on the part of Bill Omond. And the failure to resolve the at learning’ from the experi- - Metal worker writes of Clyde conflict between Omond and the Communist organiser in a ra- tional manner (it is resolved only on the emotional plane) — deprives the book of a satisfac- tory ending. The dialogue is excellent throughout. But in descriptive writing David Lambert is not yet sure of himself. There is - some clumsiness and obscurity which mars the narrative, and which the publishers should have helped the author to over- come, Young working class writers like David Lambert possess the experience and vitality needed: to create first-rate novels; but they should constantly study the craft of writing in order to achieve the precise effects which they desire. : CHARLES CLAY * * * HE setting of Doris Lessing’s " Retreat to Innocence is Lon- don, 1955, and its central figure is Julia, a ravishingly pretty student who plunges into a des- parate love affair with a mid- dle-aged Central European re- fugee writer, whom she picks up in a coffe bar. In outline, it is a simple little story of the clash of innocence and experience; but as Doris Lessing develops it the simple human story reflects in the pas- sions of its characters the great and complex issues of our time- — For the ¢ontrast and tension between Julia and her unsuit- able Jan is not only the “nor- mal” contrast between genera- tions, or between British and Central European experience (though) it includes something of both of these). By a brilliant device of story. telling we see Jan, the old anti- fascist fighter, now isolated and disenchanted, only through the eyes of the pretty spoiled girl who says: “Politics make me sick.” In particular she reacts v10- lently against what she thinks | of as the “stupid” left wing movements of the thirties. And as Jan tries to explain to her the personal and political facts of life, with a charm an) wit that come over remarkably well (most intellectuals in n0o- vels being prosy bores) he eX- presses not only his courage, his keen eye for sham and hypo- crisy, but also his sense of 150- lation and restlessness. Resentful of what he sees 4° “little bureaucrats” and deeply angry at cases of injustice and harshness, he can understan the mistakes of the revolutio? but not accept them. The author does nothing * blur or soften Jan’s conflict oF solve it for him. His final de- cision, after a bookful of tal and the way it reacts upon Julia, I found both convincing a” deeply moving. This is a book that attempts something new and is certain 0 ‘rouse. controversy. It: is fres evidence that we will achieve a literature that really mattet® not by keeping off difficult a? controversial problems, but by deepening our imaginative sh sight into the lives of the hus) man being involved. b It was timé, anyway. a someone wrote a novel aii would show sympatheticall? and truly the anti-fascit inte a lectuals of the thirties so lomo slandered by the Spenders ne Koestlers who repented of the youthful courage. ; g MARGOT HEINEMA! a APRIL 13, 1956 — PACIFIC TRIBUNE — PAGE 8