jZoning Amend.
B/Law #1512-
‘final con-

j

sideration

SLA INAV Non ethene es

oning Amend.
/Law #1514-
inal passage
adoption,

QM rho N

hee Ot te a A Eo one

March lJ0th, 1977

Moved by Alderman Ranger:

Seconded by Alderman Laking:

That By~law No. 1512 be reconsidered, finally passed and adopted.

Defeated.

Mayor Campbell, Aldermen Laking, Ranger and Traboulay
voted in favour of the resolution.

Prior to passage of the resolution noted above, Alderman Keryluk
again stated that, in his opinion, the action now proposed to be taken
by the Council was totally incorrect from a Development and Planning
point of view and upon receiving permission from the Chair, with Alderman
Mabbett informally dissenting, Alderman Keryluk expanded his remarks to
include comments on adjacent property also proposed for rezoning.
Alderman Keryluk suggested that rather than rezone the properties in
question, the Council should attempt to get together with all property
owners and De elopers in the area and attempt to work out a solution to
the access problem which he felt was the main reason the Council members
were opposed to the properties maintaining their present Commercial
zoning. In reply, Alderman Laking advised that the City’s Land Use
Committee had attempted to get all Developers together to discuss development
of the property, but that the Committee received very little co-operation
until the possibility of rezoning was mentioned.

Alderman Keryluk then referred to representations made at the
Zoning Public Hearing held on March 7th, 1977 by persons resident on
Angelo Avenue and stated that these persons had been under a misapprehension
in thinking that Angelo Avenue was the only access to Commercial development
in the area and he demonstrated from a map of the area, that, in his
opinion, other access was feasible. Aldermen Laking and Traboulay,
however, disputed Alderman Keryluk's claim and stated that such alternative
access was not, in fact, available. The discussion continued and, at its
conclusion the question was called on the resolution noted above.

Moved by Aiderman Laking:

Seconded by Alderman Mabbett:

That By-law No. 1514 be ceconsidered, finally, passed and adopted.

Carried.

Alderman Keryluk voted against the resolution.

,
j
¥
i
i
i
y
b
i
‘
i
i
;
i
L
i
i
i
ft
:

STi otecem neg mrtg co