Page Ad — Terrace ‘Standard, Wednestay, April 22, 1992 © Publisher/Editor: Rose Fisher — — (TERRACE STANDARD) ESTABLISHED APRIL 27, 1868 . Rod Link ere No. 7820 4647 Lazelle Ave., Terrace, B.C., V8G 158 Phone (604) 638-7283 Serving the Terrace area, Published on Wednesday of aach weak by Cariboo Prass (1909) Lic. at 4647 Lazelle Ave., Terrace, British Columbia, Storias, photographs, illustrations, dasigns and typestyles in the Terrace Standard are tha property of the copyright hokders, including Cariboo Prass (1969) ktd., its ik lustration repra services and advertising agencies. Fax (604) 638-8432 Reproduction in whole or in cart, without written ps Authorized a5 second-class mail pending the Post Citice Department, for payment of postage In cash. Advertising fdanager Marlee Paterson - Production Manager: Edouard Credgeur Go Arlene Watts — Typesetter, Susan Credgeur — Janet Vivalros — Advertising Consultant, Sam Collier — Advertising Consultant, Charlene Matthews -~ Circulation Supervisor: Jatt: ‘Nagel - - News/Communly, | Malcolm Baxter — News/Sports Froat Olflce Manager, Carolyn Anderson — Typesotter Composing/Darkroom, ae cIACLILATION CONTROLLED f° WeRIFIED Special thanks to all our contributors and correspondents for their time and talents. ey re EDITORIAL _ 6; a TH Price of justice When the lawyers go on strike, you’ve Ontario, that prosecutor makes $70,000. got to be worried. But that’s exactly what could happen this spring. In a move that threatens to snarl the province’s justice system, B.C. pro- secutors have voted 96 per cent in favour of striking June.15, Not quite the man- date the NHL hockey players gave their ‘union leaders, but it’s close. Crown prosecutors, of course, are the lawyers for the province. Along with the police, they’re the grunts on the front lines of the justice system, putting evidence before judges that ultimately puts crooks behind bars. Drop into one of the court-rooms at — the Kalum St. courthouse-sometime and — watch the case loads. Stacks of files, masses of information and endless pro- cedures as defence and prosecution parry before the bench. Now lawyers generally get little sym- pathy when they complain about not making enough money. But have a look at the facts: A’B.C. prosecutor of five HOw reget to bye dae 4 ast ats Mane cong! “ae arth : themselves a “ane poorer. - _ It’s all because :the New Democrat provincial government ‘has decided to end the supplementary homeowners grant introduced’ by the Socreds. That grant. was intended to ease the burden of school taxes on householders. But, so Finance minister.Glen Clark’s ra- tionale went, it. favoured the well-off because the greater the value of your home, the bigger the «supplementary ‘grant and tax’ break you received. - ‘esult, ; : - they’ hi ‘ find: ae cre The average defence lawyer collects considerably more, as does the judge presiding over each case. According to the newly formed Crown Counsel Association of B.C., make an average 50-per cent less than legal aid lawyers. If the government hopes to keep‘quali- ty prosecutors, that kind of discrepancy must be eliminated. - Ironically, it may be possible for the government to find some replacement workers for striking prosecutors in the Lower Mainland. But that scenario is very unlikely here in the northwest. Private bar lawyers, who already have plenty of work, wouldn’t work for the wages prosecutors are paid. Victoria would have to pay the going rate to at- tract replacement workers — and if that happened local prosecutors would hap- — pily scab for themselves. We’re all rich - When this year’s tax notices arrive in. the mail next month, more than three- quarters of the city’s homeowners are coin to find they are officially classified In other words, the system favoured the rich and therefore had to go. According to figures released by city council, 78 per cent of all homeowners in _perrace will see their taxes rise,ds @ result of the abolition ‘Of the grant... “That’s because the change effects. anyone with a house with an assessed .5.-Canada Free Trade pact value ‘of $50,000 or more. It’s a figure that? s ludicrously low if the wealthy are indeed the target. After all, these days it costs in the area of $95,000 to build a standard, three- bedroom, far-from-palatial home. _ The NDP may pay lip service to mak- ing the rich pay. But ultimately, it’s or- _dinary people who are footing their bills. Ss = . Y SENSES, P their members VICTORIA — Ever get the feeling we got snookered by Yankees when we entered into ~ _the Free Trade Agreement with _ them? And have a sneaking "hunch things will get worse if Mexico get dealt into the card game? I do. ~ Don’t get me wrong, I’m what Garde Gardom, our: agent general in London, calls _ 2 free trader. 1 firmly pane “that ‘the future is in eliminatin “trade. ‘barriers, not shoring un them up or erecting new ones. It’s the rules of the that bother me, or rather the interpretation of the rules by the Americans, It seems that, according, to the Americans, everything that -works in their favour is con- sidered to be governed by the agreement; everything that works in Canada’s favour is. being challenged.. Canadian lumber exports to the U.S. are perceived to be a The tube trance Media handlers do ‘their best to help people look good during television interviews, but their efforts can be erased bya few casual movements from a fringe person who.doesn’t realize he’s in the camera’s view, . Last week, David’ Milgaard was interviewed‘on (The Jour- nal) following. -the Supreme — Court's decision to grant him a new trial. While he spoke direct- ly to the viewer and camera, behind him stood a man, visible only as a torso with left hand resting on the back of David’s chair. While David answered ques- tions concerning his’ future, the man’s hand spasmodically clen- ched, every few words, giving, an impression | of anger or ner- vousness, .. I wanted::to- know who the hand belonged to. © . Milgaard’s lawyer, itching. for a re-trial?’ An uncle thinking,, “Quit, David,” -while you're ahead,’? Or a Stoney Mountain penitentiary guard on- duty without visible means: of authority? Handlers. help. politicians. to look: ‘persuasive, oentertainment notables to look stunning. They::- dress them. in non-reflective - clothing, no glittering jewelry or. zebra’ stripes. to detract from.” their TV image. But-the star’s. media moment can be ruined by.’ one background: individual fidgeting... ‘Tapping - a. pencil, even ;; chit+)..p chatting to a neighbour, draws * shuffling papers, ~ the viewer's eyes, away from th star's message: * “ threat to their own forest in- dustry, and a countervailing duty is slapped on our soft- wood lumber entering the States. - When, on the other hand, British Columbia places a limit Through Bifocals by Claudette Sandecki | Once, at the conclusion of a . First Ministers’ conference, _while Prime Minister Mulroney was earnestly summing up the conference’s attainments and predicting the sorry state of Canada’s prospects, my atten- tion was glued on a woman: Seated behind him, ; Knees crossed, she bounced her highheeled foot up and down. Her. bobbing foot “mesmerized me until my head nodded up and down with her foot like a kitten getting set to pounce. What if her shoe clattered to . the floor? Was the -floor carpeted? Suppose she was sw- inging her foot.in Morse code? If so, what message was she sen- - ding? No matter if a politician im- - peccably dressed in.a banker blue: suit. ‘delivers, a. stirring” “speech calculated * ‘to. the last nuance, my mind will focus on “the functionary behind © him wearing earphones. . ‘Is the: functionary listening to a--Prench translation of the politician’ s talk ‘on conference room equipment? Or to CBC ‘M..Stereo. or a play-by-play of _ baseball. ‘game -on joweréd portable: radio a i. tucked in his coat pocket? ‘on the amount of raw logs leaving the province, the . Americans cry foul, pointing » to the free trade agreement as ’ an excuse for wanting unimpeded access to our raw logs. Not that I can blame them — for wanting to get their hands If the functionary’s eyes on as many raw logs as possi- brighten and a satisfied look ble. Asa result of a number of flits across his features, I con- court-imposed environmental clude his favoured team scored, constraints on logging, Oregon and I don’t mean the and Washington mills will be politician’s party. If Mulroney facing a severe log shortage, scored a telling point, chances and access to our raw logs are I missed it in my keen would ’be just the ticket for analysis of the fuctionary’s them. behaviour, In the latest development on My curiosity in perepheral that front, some U.S. politi- people probably comes frommy cians have hinted that they years as a mother. Every Mom, would drop the countervailing becomes skilled at focusing on duty on our softwood lumber the main action while monitor- jf we lift the ban on our export ing fringe folk for signs of of raw logs. Fortunately, | menace, misbehaviour or Forest Minister Dan Miller. mayhem, nipped that little scheme in the Fringe TV hones my skill and putt, No deal, he said. fascinates me. Meanwhile, the Americans NO SHELTER! No FVELI No GAME! “ust ROCK HARD SNotd AND A BitinGe winD!! i Pf al iD EY SETTLED... E ASHTRAY IN MY ORSCHE. WAS JUST ABOUT FULL... > Fi ws \ Pe 3 al — se S ‘free trade American- style — From the Capital by Hubert Beyer are also taking a run at our fishing industry. That con- troVersy started back in'1986, } when the Americans first’“?°" 7 demanded that we'drop our regulations which required salmon and herring cought by our fishing fleet to be landed and processed in Canadian _ plants. In 1989, the Mulroney government, like a good little free-trade partner, gave in to those demands, allowing the Americans virtually free access to our unprocessed salmon and herring. _ ‘The new regulations require only that fish be landed at.a designated landing station for counting prior to export, The U.S., however, wasn’t even satisfied with that, threatening retaliation under its trade laws, unless Canada guaranteed that our fish could be purchased and exported by U.S: buyers without ever touching Cana- dian soil. Somewhat unsettled by the prospect of fosing a potential . 4,000 to 5,000 jobs, if it acced- ed to that demand, Ottawa of- ~ fered ta send the issue to ar- bitration under the disputes .. mechanism of the Canada-US. . Free Trade Agreement. And that’s where it stands at _ the moment, If the arbitrators determine that our regulations aren't consistent with U.S. laws, we will have to do exact- ly as the U.S. trade authorities tell us. Not a happy prospect. ’ Last week,-a delegation of the United Fishermen and Allied Workers Union and the Prince Rupert Amalgamated Shoreworkers and Clarks Union came to Victoria to. plead their case. ~ While sympathetic to their cause, there isn't a lot provin- cial government officials can do to help them. Free trade.is HES URES APPRECIATE THAT:-- co Bae . a federal matter. | yeh ~ all levels of government. They: * : municipalities to undertake _ ing of Canadian fisheries ‘Still, the two ‘inion’ have ah op extensive list oF ‘Suggestions for. are asking coastal Poa economic development in- itiatives that encourage domestic processing industries . » and discourage the location _ within their boundaries of lan- ‘ ding stations or unloading . facilities for direct export. ’ The unions are also urging - municipalities to put pressure .- - on the federal and provincial |,” governments to implement... policies for domestic process- resources. They want provincial governments to develop legisla- . . tion similar to U.S. laws that -. would ensuire full utilization | . of domestic processing capaci-. ty | before raw fish leaves the : . province. * ” They also urge provinces to. delay any‘amendments to pro- vincial legislation required by. the Free Trade Agreement un- til Canadian authority over the processing of‘fish resources is. guaranteed.’ And finally, the unions are. demanding that Ottawa in- troduce further regulations re- quiring fish landed in Canada to be eviscerated, counted and graded prior to export, place... export taxes on unprocessed | .: herring, and serve notice of Canada’s intention to - withdraw from bilateral fisheries agreements until our’ right to fully enjoy the benefits of our own resources is assured, Given the double standard | the U.S. applies to the inter- pretation of the Free Trade Agreement, I'd say the unions’ demands are worthy of public” support. THS ISA 6K Ecosy STEM! N FRAG ILE