ni ih CTE TE Ti ti Tay OT tT N all the current discussions of Britain’s:crisis, two funda- mental factors are always left out. < : The first is that at bottom it _ js a erisis of the British Empire, _of that parasitic structure whose very existence is being challeng- ed by- the Colonial Liberation Movement. ae The second is that this crisis is being enormously ageravat- ed by the policies which Britain, as a member of the American- controlled Atlantic alliance, 1s being compelled to follow. There can be no realistic long- term or short-term policy for Britain if these facts continue to be ignored. It is one thing to stress its long-term character, however. and quite another to show that it is a crisis of imperialism, growing ever more murderous in the period of its degay. To describe British imperial- ist economy as parasitic is not to indulge in abuse but to state an irrefutable fact. The extent of the parasitism was almost unbelievable in the past and is a most significant factor today. + Before the First World War three-fifths of Britain’s im- ports were paid for by exports, and two-fifths by ihcome from overseas investments — partic- - mlarly ‘in the Dominions and Colonies—and by the earnings of the shipping trade. ; + Britain had a surplus of £125 million per year for invest- ment overseas with a view to further exploitation. + It was the undeviating aim of (British capitalism between the wars to develop its: exploita- tion of the Colonies and to earn thereby a large surplus for fur- ther investment, The return from British in- vestments overseas fell as a consequence of the . Second World War. ; In 1951 a little under ‘four- fifths (78 percent). of British imports were paid for by British exports, which was an advance on the three-fifths before the First World War. : One-fifth could not, however, be met out of exports. So British policy since the war has attempted, by means of in- tensified exploitation, not only to fill this gap but to create a further surplus for annual in vestment, The fact that the imperialists had somewhat to.relax their hold on India and Pakistan made them desire all the more to hang on to the remaining Colonies and client States. - V They aimed to. extract more tribute from Malaya, from Persia, Iraq and Egypt, and from all the far-flung Colonies still remaining in their possession. VY Not a gradual freeing of the Colonies and satellite States, but their intensified exploita- tion is the basis of British col- onial policy. & In Malaya, Persia, Iraq and Egypt, and in the African Col- onies, however, this policy comes up against the fierce resistance of the peoples. : The Liberation Movement is at different stages of develop- ment in the various areas, but everywhere it is active. + Never has British imperi- alism been challenged in~so many areas at the same time. + Never before has it been compelled to mobilize so many troops and expend so much money to defend the whole structure of imperialist robbery. In the economic debate in the House of Commons on July 29, Butler. said: “Our overseas military and political commitments which cost us only a few million (per year) in the thirties, came to nearly $200, million in 1951 and now’ cost even more, and that represents the efforts of our far- flung: forces in Korea, Egypt, Malaya, and elsewhere.”’ Yet the Tory party, the Labor party and the Trades Union Con- gress have the audacity to de- scribe Britain’s economic crisis without making it clear that V the attempt to maintain im- perialist exploitation puts $200 million a year on the debit side of Britain’s balance of payment accounts; and that V this huge drain was virtually non-existent before the war. The second feature of Brit- ain’s crisis is the policy of being pursued by the United States— the overlord of the capitalist if Continued from page 9 The great conspiracy to. rebuild a German army Dulles added that the U.S. should integrate Germany’s eco- momy with that of Western Eu- rope. That was one of the aims of the Marshall Plan. And the Americans quickly set about it. That year a constitution for a West German State was drawn up at Bonn. In 1949, an “Inter- national Authority” for the Ruhr was set up. Its purpose was said to be the control of the German cartels. It gave con- trol of the Ruhr to the U.S., with German capitalists acting as managers, While these moves were being made the Americans had been telling us how “dangerous” the Russians were. It was the Russians, they said, who were “aggressive” and had to be “contained.” \ The louder they shouted about the “dangerous” Russians the more dangerous the Americans in fact became, Having taken control of the Ruhr, Europe’s great arsenal, they engineered the Western Union “defense’’ pact. The North Atlantic Pact followed and the new German Army is to be part of thiS set-up. German -troops being brought into the alliance because: the U.S. cannot go to war with Russia without using Germany as a base and without a German army. e are These preparations for war sometimes become so clear in spite of the propaganda fog that people in all countries. and es- pecially in France and in Ger- many herself, become alanmed. . new diversions are arranged. The “air lift” is a classic of its kind, CRM Crisis of the E MTEL eee U LOOP MMM eM ee Mt Me Mn en nner nT British Empire world. Never has a single State been so economically powerful in re- lation to its contemporaries as the U.S. is in relation to the rest of the capitalist world. % The U.S. is the undisputed boss of the ,capitalist war alli- ance. + It would be wrong to re- gard this as purely a military alliance, where’ a number of in- dependent’ States concert their military strategy, with a poten- tial enemy and a possible war in view, while on other ques- tions ‘they go their own sweet way. + It is not an alliance of the type of Holland and Britain in the 17th and 18th centuries} or Britain, France and Russia in the First World War, The relations of the U.S. to its allies is a relation of a mas- ter to his satellites. ‘ The “allies”? of America are rather in the position of those German princelings of the 18th It lasted from June 26. 1948, to September 30, 1949. In June 1948 the Americans introduced a new currency in Western Germany and the West- ern sector of Berlin. This was the death blow to any idea of German, unity. } The, Russians suggested that since currency reform was need- ed it should be applied to the whole of Germany, which should have one currency, : To stop a traffic in black’ market currency, ‘the Russians imposed transport restrictions. This was made the excuse for the air-lift. : The British people were told that the Russians were trying to “starve’’ Western Berlin, In fact the Russians offered to supply Western [Berlin with all the food it needed while the restrictions were in force. es century who hired out their soldiers, at so much a ‘head, to fight Britain’s battles), The Atlantic alliance is also an economic and political group- ing. ‘The boss nation regularly interferes in the political and economic affairs of its subord- inates. | It prescribes with whom they shall trade and- what they shall trade in. It forces them into an econo- mie war with Eastern Europe and ‘China, a war which is against their best interests. It mobilizes them as its obed- ient satellites so that it can make the United Nations its ser- vile tool, Some of the capitalist and tight-wing Labor leaders have lost all taste for national inde- pendence. They want America to play its boss role more thoroughly. V The whole world, they tell the U.S. bosses, is dependent on U.S. capitalism financing a vast But the air-lift had a double use for the Americans. It masked their real purpose of splitting Germany and served as “‘terror’’ propaganda against the Rus- sians. The real issue—over currency —was scarcely mentioned by the American propaganda machine. Now we have reached what the Americans hope will be the final stage in Germany short of the actual war they plan. In Bonn the West German big businessmen and their political stooges have signed a ‘‘contract’’ with the Western Powers, In Paris a European Defense Treaty thas been signed. These treaties have been framed by the Americans. They will provide the West’ German government with an army and an arms, industry. Under the treaties the Ruhr “International Authority’ will ® A British Roya] Marine mando smiles as he poses the severed heads of Mal patriots. In his right hand ae with holds the head of a Malaya The British governmen” girl, has admitted .the authentic of this picture. ~ development plan in the pack ward and even the advance capitalist countries in the Wor V The idea is 5 spread—notably by the Lab? party and the TUC in their T cent statements—that if an 6°” nomic crisis breaks out in United States ordinary mortal elsewhere can do very litt about it. V The United States is San Claus. You mustn’t shoot 1” or even criticize him. : ‘BUBNEEEL Com ayan sedulously « the These are the two aspects oF Britain’s crisis — the decayi® Empire and American domin® tion. And no policy *is worth its salf, that does not deal with both. — , We go. With it will-go all preteae? of any limiting of the ste) German arms industry. De-Nazification long ago he abolished in fact if not in name — Now Nazis will be even mor? openly recruited by the Ameri cans, + Who wants all this? The. British and Canadian people don’t want it. iy + The German people are P testing against it, + The French fear it. The men of Wall Street Washington, with the assistane” of British Right Wing P ians' in the Tory and L@ parties, have thrust the 2°” danger upon the world. see But it is not too late to stoP the Yanks and their creatures” The people can prevent ratification of these treaties: They can prevent the Fr. tion of these suicide pacts. pot PACIFIC TRIBUNE — SEPTEMBER 5, 1952 — PAGE 1° \ is 10°. f t and olttie,