Parenthése | La voix des parents de Colombie-Britannique eoeeceecec eee ee eee ee eee eee oer eee ee eee e eee eee eee eee eeoeeoee eee eee eee eFFeee2F eC oe STO ooo HCOOH OOOO e Partners Committee Update e As anticipated, the Part- ee ners Committee model was launched in the CSF (franco- phone education authority) schools in November 2008, during the annual FPFCB convention. More than 125 people took part in the day-long work- shop on the subject. Of these, nearly half represented the CSF, teaching and non-teaching staff, and school administrators; the remainder consisted of parents associations representatives from the preschool and K-12 sectors. All of the key players were therefore well represented. The meeting began with a discus- sion of the Who and the What. Partici- pants had an opportunity to become familiar with the new CSF policy, which outlines establishment and operational procedures for a Partners Committee, as well as the accompanying sup- porting document. Resource persons were on hand to answer questions and get feedback from the audience. During the second part of the meet- ing, if was the participants who sef to work on the How. They separated into smaller groups and were asked to iden- tify: 1. deciding factors that would ensure the success of the partner commil- tees; 2. resources needed fo support the school communities; and 3. assets on which the school commun- ities could rely to ensure the success of their Partners Committee. The discussions that took place dur- ing the workshop were exiremely pro- ductive. Participants’ many ideas and comments have been compiled and will be used to identify the needs of the school communities and guide the de- velopment of resources to meet those needs. A summary of the day’s discus- sions has already yielded a fair under- standing of the key issues and factors that will contribute to the success of the Partners Committees. In brief: 4. Determining factors: ¢ Each and every individual must have a common understanding of the purpose and mandate of the Partners Committees * Commitment and active in- volvement of all partners *« Excellent communications be- tween the Partners Committee members and the people they represent 5. Required resources: e Training workshops ¢ Availability of models: agenda, budget, consultation mechan- isms, etc. * Online access to resources 6. Assets: « A common vision for the part- ners, who share a common in- terest, i.e. the well-being of the children By Marc Gignac, Interim Executive Director of The Federation of Parents Since the launch, many schools have begun fo establish Partners Com- mittees. The CSF task force set up to steer implementation of the model has reviewed the guide, basing its review on feedback from the workshop. The guide is at the printer’s now and will be available soon. It will also be available on the CSF website (www.csf.bc.ca). The draft of an educational pro- ject development template has also been prepared. During its next meet- ing, the task force will revise the draft and plan for the development of other resources fo properly support the ef- forts of the Pariners Committees to fulfil their mandate. The FPFCB is playing an active role on the task force, seeing to the parents’ interests and cooperating to ensure that the Partners Committees work as they should. The Federation also wants to ensure that the momen- tum generated during the convention is maintained. It is therefore important to ensure that the project continues to move forward and that the school communities are regularly informed of latest developments. More fo follow...