sii 1978, members a — September 15, After eight and a half mont By MIKE PHILLIPS ED McDONALD SUDBURY — When 11,700 ainers and smelter workers here went on strike against Inco Met- als Ltd. last Sept. 15, the Tribune said. the strike can be won. Three-hundred and sixty-one days later the members of Steel Workers Local 6500 scored a clear and decisive victory over the Canadian multi-national cor- poration which had fought to force them to accept a four cent an hour wage increase and the crippling of their grievance pro- ceedure. Sudbury miners and smelter workers ended their epic strike June 3 by voting 67.7% or 5,983 to 2,869 to ratify a pact with the company which would bring the total package increase valued at $4.07 an hour over the next three years and no weakening of the local’s trade union rights. The new agreement gives the workers an immediate 61-cents an hour wage hike the first year with 10-cents an hour in each of the second and third years. However, 24-cents of the 61-cents in the first year was money due to.the work- ers under the old’ agreement which Inco refused to pay. The cost-of-living adjustment will provide 12 COLA increases of 15 of Steelworkers Local 6500 filled the hall. it’s an offer we can’t accept, ___ their president told Christmas. cents each over the life of the agreement with a 20% COLA ad- justment in August. The union bargaining commit- tee was successful in winning a “30. years and out’ pension clause with a basic minimum monthly pension of $600. Local 6500 is the first Steel Workers’ local. in Canada to win ‘‘30 and out”’ Local 6500 president Dave Pat- terson, who had been elected to the post on a program of negotiat- ing an agreement the members could be proud of, called the settlement a ‘‘breakthrough”’ and credited the courage and deter- mination of Local 6500 members with the victory. **The determination to win cer- tainly paid dividends,’* Patterson said. “‘If it hadn’t been for them we would have signed for a lot less.”’ Patterson and other strike lead- ers paid tribute to the massive sol- idarity movement which sprang up across Canada to help the Inco strikers, resulting in hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations flooding into the strike head- quarters in Sudbury. Tribute was paid also to the wives supporting the strike committee for their in- valuable contribution in keeping up moral through the harsh winter PACIFIC TRIBUNE—JUNE 15, 1979—Page 4 TRIBUNE PHOTO — MIKE PHILLIPS them, but we’re looking at a six month stock pile of nickel the company has to draw on. They voted to strike, knowing it was going to be a long cold winter. At first they felt alone, in some cases betrayed. Christmas approached. A vow was made to strikers’ children that they would have a Christmas. Truck caravans of toys and clothing arrived from across Ontario, turkeys from food work- ers, fish from B.C. fishermen. Thousands of spe eta kids had their and in taking part in the fund- raising campaign. The strike cost international -union $12-million in strike béne- fits. Local 6500 Inquest Committee chairman John Higgison, who acted during the strike as the loc- al’s drug committee chairman, said when the strike began he didn’t believe the Inco workers would receive such support. | ‘It surprised me when the money started coming in’’, he Said. ‘“‘Everybody attacked the local businessman, but I want to tell you, they were really fantas- tic, the way they helped us out. Without their help it would have been a hard for us’’. Higgison praised the labor movement across the country for its support. ‘‘ The help of local un- ions all over Canada and money given us through donations helped us to buy most ofour drugs and provide other forms of family assistance’’, he said. He said the strike had cost the local more than $500,000 to pro- vide the life-sustaining drugs to union members needing them. No accurate estimate of the suf- fering the workers had to endure to force Inco to make them an offer they could consider in dig- nity can be made, but many came a cry across the country. Members of 6500 and the Wives Supporting the Strike Committee travelled across the country, speaking at labor rallies, to wo- men’s groups, to ethnic organiza- tions, everywhere working people backed them, knowing their strug- gle was a test casé for all Cana- dian labor. Public opinion ran high against Inco, even at stockholder meetings, people supported the strikers. And it worked, now their victory is ours. “Inco is everyone’s fight” be- workers spoke of loosing as much as $10,000 over the strike’s eight and one half months. duration: Huge debts were incurred, home mortgages pushed back and, in some cases, families fell apart. But it is clear in the hearts and minds of workers and citizens here that the culprit and reason for what only can be described as a massive and criminal assault on an entire community was the greed and arrogance of one of the globe’s biggest multi-national corporations — Inco. It is a knowledge that never will be forgetten in Sudbury, and the company with its usual arrogance seems determined not to let them forget. Right up to the signing of the agreement between the union and the company Inco had to test the union and insult the strikers. The day following the rati- fication of the agreement, Inco workers began buying the drugs under the drug plan provided for in the contract which the union couldn’t supply during the strike. The union then learned that Inco wouldn’t pay for drugs purchased by anyone who hadn’t been recalled. Also in the recall, which so far has seen about 65% of the work- force back on the job, anumber of -Majority realized the strike can! light duty workers were told thet wasn’t any work available {0! them. The signing ceremony betwee the union and the company the possibility of being cancelled because of union leadership and membership anger. Inco forced to smarten up, agree to p4) everyone’s drug cost and agree! writing that all employees 3 signed light duty prior to the strik because of injury would guaranteed jobs. This attitude by Inco and thé manner in which it consistently tried to degrade the workford’ and weaken the union throughou! the strike and during the massi¥’ layoffs leading up to the strike explained much of the dissab’ faction a significant proportion df the local felt with the final se ment. Many workers felt there wat more to be won from Inco, but last forever and, despite mud being left to be desired i in the coh tract, important gains were by the workers. They also knew that walking back into Inco wil dignity and pride over havi forced the company to retret from its union-busting stand at insulting non-offer last Se tember, will not be difficult to