OUNC

: APR 17 1972
B NOTICE OF MOTION FROM THE LAST COUNCIL MEETING by Alderman P.F. Ranger.

Re: Duplex Guidelines.

The area of conflict to my thinking are:
- * - aj Single Family Dwellings can be converted to a duplex without. any public hearing

or opportunity to be heard prior to the issuance of a permit.
- b} That the parking regulations should require that in the case of duplexes,
up and down or side by side, one space per dwelling be provided so as to permit

unobstructed access to and egress from each space at all times, behind the

required front. yard set back.
ec] That one only, duplex be permitted within a cul-de-sac.

I propose the folicwing changes to the Zoning By-law:
a] That section 502 (3) (b) be revised to read - 'in the RS-1 zone shall
not be permitted closer than 600 ft. from any other Two Family Residential
Use along both sides of any street.' , a =
b] ‘hat the following clause be added - ' shall not be permitted where any
other Two Family Residential Use is existing within the same cul-de-sac.’
ec] That under Accessory Off-Street Parking Use a section requiring in a Tio
Family Residential Use shall provide one space per dwelling unit in a manner _ _ .
go as to permit unobstructed access to and egress from each space at ail times, =

lLecated to the rear of the required front yard.

‘

- “After discussion with staff and the City's Solicitor it appears that
: to require a public hearing prior to the issuance of a permit it ie not ‘practical.
- , As I understand it, if an individual complies with the Zoning By-law regulations and
other City By-laws we must issue a Building Permit. Unless we spot zone duplexes
a public hearing would serve no purpose other than informing individuals that we

are about to issue a permit, but regardless of there opinions the permit would be

een, Sh

Llesued,