VA to _WORLD INTERNATIONAL FOCUS Tom Morris _ Giving peace achance... What a kick in the political teeth Reagan got last week When Costa Rican President Oscar Arias was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize! Just days after Rambo Ron addressed the OAS saying he ~ will demand millions more for his contra war; days after his UN ambassador stalked out of the United Nations during Nicaraguan President Ortega’s Speech, Arias wins the presti- gious award — then correctly tells the press it was the plan for peace, and not an individ- ual, which won the prize. Now Reagan will have to Spit in the face of world public Opinion to ram through the con- tra aid bill. The U.S. Congress will have to publicly discredit Itself to meet Reagan’s demand BillDay™ FREE PRESS MORE BLOOD PARTII No Congress, no law, no Sandinista can stop hitn. — something they are not like- ly to do. Everyone knows Reagan’s scenario to kill the Arias plan for peace in Central America. It’s simple, just like its author: First, Reagan ‘“‘welcomes’’ the plan because he has no other option; Then he publicly says Nica- ragua will never abide by its provisions; Then he says Nicaragua, by complying with the provisions is engaged in trickery; He then calls for stepped up contra attacks and funding; The continuing war will then ‘““prove’’ the Arias plan has failed. Then Reagan can step in, something he dearly wishes to do before leaving office next year. Oscar Arias winning the Nobel Peace Prize is a major REAGAN blow to Reagan’s scenario. Arias’ public plea to ‘‘Give peace a chance’’ in Central America can overcome Rea- gan’s option of continued kill- ing and destruction. The Nobel Prize committee in Oslo had better take care Reagan doesn’t begin funding some Norwegian contras. Two debacles in one week “Over my dead body,” Reagan told reporters who ~ questioned him about the dan- ger that his nominee for the Supreme Court would be de- feated= = Unfortunately none of them accepted the challenge, be- cause last week Judge Robert Bork, who represented Rea- gan’s hopes to swing the coun- try’s highest court sharply to the right for years to come, was defeated by the Senate. It was a dramatic defeat both for conservatism and for Rea- gan personally. In a welcome change, the organized opposi- tion to Bork and his draconian views outclassed the usually effective right-wing lobby. The public outcry which met the nomination was quite unprecedented. ‘‘Stop Bork”’ demonstrations erupted civil rights, approaching that of . Attila the. Hun, proved too “much even for the Great Communicator to sell to the country. everywhere: His, record on | This defeat for Reagan came just days before he awoke to discover his contra fortunes had been torpedoed in far-off Norway. It just wasn’t the Gipper’s week. Move over Admiral Nelson The United States navy is the world’s largest, most sophisticated navy. It has more ships in mothballs than most nations have in active service. Its attack carrier fleets patrol every sea. Its submarine fleet rings the USSR, each new Tri- dent carrying enough nuclear strike power to destroy every major Soviet target. The electronic _ gear, search-and-destroy equip- ment, state-of-the-art aircraft and helicopters, guided missile systems carried aboard U.S. naval vessels is awesome. How, then, to explain the glee being displayed over the sinking last week of one Ira- nian 7-meter long speedboat by the mighty U.S. navy? Why the endless reports, complete with maps? Are military analysts and the public supposed to be impress- ed? »Have.we. witnessed another» Battle of the Coral Sea, - another sinking of the Bis- mark? Can we now sleep safely in our beds? Tougher sanctions demanded Continued from page 1 SACTU (South African Congress of Trade Unions) Support Com- mittee. Net proceeds from a collec- tion were to sent to SACTU and the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU). Makatini charged that the Thatcher government had at the Commonwealth summit waged an “unprecedented orchestrated cam- paign of disinformation ... the objective being one of blunting the momentum in favour of sanc- tions.” “For the first time, the Com- monwealth has taken a position despite the demand for a so-called consensus ... the Commonwealth has opted for sanctions despite Margaret Thatcher’s intransigence and opposition,” Makatini declared to applause. Canadians against apartheid would like to see Ottawa do much more to end racial discrimination in South Africa, he acknowledged. But he praised Canada for play- ing “an extremely positive role in making common cause with the front line states, with SWAPO (South West Africa People’s Organization), with the ANC and with the Caribbean countries and the African countries against Mar- garet Thatcher. The congress spokesman. “sooner or later, the Margaret Thatcher government is going to face a situation like that of the Reagan adminstration, when the American people forced the Uni- ted States to adopt sanctions.” limited, but Soviets eat well and with the “arefree nature of people who know that Staple foods are cheap, plentiful, and €re will always be more tomorrow. Oviets are very well dressed, al- Ough they will all tell you horror stories about what they had to go through to get S suit or that pair ofjeans. They are, on € whole, one of the best educated Populations in the world, with a decent €vel of health care, enviable social sec- unity and a fairly fluid social structure. Of Sourse, there are ‘‘buts’’ in all of those areas, It is precisely because they have "eached this level that they have grown Utely conscious of what they don’t ave. Soviets — particularly young ones __8re not interested in comparing them- ‘elves with most of the world. The only tenficant comparison for them is how Cy rate against the advanced countries ee West, like Canada, and they are of Oking only of the prosperous sections these societies. th hey see that in their lives they lack s € Tange of refined consumer goods and Weve that Canadians — always pro- ded they can afford to — take for Sfanted. Soviets feel stifled by bureauc- Y, petty rules and mindless proce- €s, and wish they had more social Nobility. Just about every one I’ve met . S to travel, and deplores the non- °NVertible currency, the cold war bar- ey and the bureaucratic obstacles that ake It so difficult. full ittually all see such improvements as Y within the scope of socialism to provide, although many frankly take the attitude that they’Il ‘‘believe it when they -see it.”’ I've never met. anyone who contemplates a return to capitalism, but sometimes. I wonder whether they understand the full complexity of the: danger. : But what about perestroika? What movement is actually taking place in oples’ lives? P This question receives a very different answer depending on whom you ask. Intellectuals tend to speak, with some satisfaction, of exciting new books and articles, of movies released from censor- ship, and the growing climate of open discussion. Western journalists measure progress frugally in terms of street demonstrations and exit-visas granted. Workers, I’m sorry to say, are the most likely to assert that at this stage they see no movement, only confusion. _ So far, I have only once received a gratifyingly simple and straightforward answer to the question, ““how is peres- troika affecting your life?’’ It came from a élass of grade 10 history students at Moscow’s municipal school number 622. When I put the question to them, I at first received tedious recitations about the quality of heavy piping and new oil- fields in Siberia. Gradually, however, he ideas" > = Soa got up. “‘T don’t know if this is what you mean,” she said, “but we have a new computer class downstairs. We never had that before’’. She was right. After nearly missing the electronics rev- olution, the USSR is now racing to catch A still from It Isn’t Easy To Be Young, a documentary that has shattered forevert he silly stereotypes of uncomplicated problem-free youth. up. Last September school no. 622 re- ceived its first class with 12 Soviet-made “‘Elektronika’’ pe’s, and kids who never saw a computer before are now learning to program. Another student stood up. ‘‘We have the anti-alcohol drive,’ he pointed out, ‘“‘and you never see a drunk on the street anymore. My parents have stopped drinking.’’ There was general laughter at this, but it does seem to be the case that the double policy of restricting supply and trying to educate against alcohol- abuse is beginning to. have some.impact on hardened drinking patterns. Finally, another girl offered this: ‘‘I went to see the film, Js /t Easy To Be Young?, with my parents. Afterwards we had a good talk. We are talking more about things these days.”’ /s /t Easy To Be Young? is the controversial documentary about Soviet teenagers that has shattered forever all of the silly stereotypes of uncomplicated problem-free youth under socialism. These examples may be small, but they express real, tangible and hopefully permanent changes that are happening today in people’s lives. And that brings me to what I wanted to say in this column: Soviet people have everything they need. In fact, given their turbulent history, they have reached an impressive level-of development. But they are; on the whole, a strong, decent, thoughtful, hard-working and long- suffering people who deserve much more. *‘Perestroika’’ is the word they are using these days to sum up their hopes and aspirations. PACIFIC TRIBUNE, OCTOBER 21, 1987 9