By HERVE FUYET Quebec _ On November 15, the votes of work- Ing people for an end to the anti- Working class policy of the Liberal 80vernment, against unemployment, Inflation and for national self- determination were decisive in the Parti uébécois victory. _ The election of the Parti Québécois in tun has created a new situation in Québec for the labor movement. The Party in power does not directly repre- Sent monopoly capital but is rather Petty bourgeois nationalist. One of the Sic questions is for organized labor and other progressive forces suchas the Ommunist Party and to some extent € left-wing elements of the PQ to €xercise pressure on the government to force it to implement its electoral prom- and to adopt an anti-monopoly pol- It is the only way out of the general _ sis of capitalism that affects Québec. According to Statistics Canada, €bec official seasonally adjusted Unemployment rate in July was 10.3% L€. 295,000 unemployed. Inflation is high and lay-offs are numerous. Under €se conditions strikes are generally long and hard in all sectors of the €conomy, with management using Scabs and goons, supported by court Mjunctions against effective picketing, and by the local police or the riot squad. Strikers are being threatened, beaten Up, or even shot at and wounded as happened recently at the Robin Hood Flour Mill in Montreal. But in spite of the economic situation and the climate Of repression, strikes are often con- ducted successfully. Uniroyal (tire-recycling) has been Closed for more than two years. Jean “ournier, president of the union at Un- royal, tells me that the workers are United and solid and that a successful Settlement is near. Centre Educatif et Culturel (textbook publisher) €mployees are preparing a militant an- Niversary for the first year of their Strike. Muessens (heavy machinery), Olcano (heating equipment, 80vernment-owned), Radio Mutuel Tadio) and many others are on strike Cither for recognition of their union, a t collective agreement, and or better _ Wages and working conditions. In spite of the economic crisis and the Tepression, militancy pays off. Stan- Chem workers (chemicals) and Iron and 4itanium workers after a long struggle Primarily for their health and security Won most of their demands. ‘*telicopter-imported scabs and Management goons with dogs could not gach the determination of the work- Last February, the teachers of the University of Québec in Montreal, after almost six months strike, one of the longest of its kind in North America Succeeded in keeping their threatened . quired rights and won most of their €mands. One cannot list all the cult strikes, nor their successful or Partially successful settlement. One Should mention however the struggle of € flour mill workers which is particu- arly hard and important because it is Part of the over-all battle against gov- €mmental wage controls. _ Québec participation, with the work- from English Canada, in the March demonstration in Ottawa, and in the anada-wide day of protest on October 4 was high. The PQ government has put an end to Law 64, the Québec equivalent of fed- fral Law C 73, governing employees of © provincial government and as- SOciated institutions. The tough strike of the flour mill workers in Québec, supported by the labor movement in general, is a continuation of the struggle against Bill C 73. They won a partial victory when the federal government agreed to treat as forced savings the contested 40 cents an hour beyond the federal guidelines won at the negotiat- ing table. Robin Hood Company, one of the four struck flour mills, refused to give in, fired all their workers on’strike, and is responsible for.the shooting by goons of eight workers, two of which were seriously wounded. Ensuing popular . indignation forced the PQ to give seri- ous consideration to the fulfillment of an anti-scab law electoral promise. The labor movement almost completely supports Bill 45, the proposed anti-scab law, while the Conseil du Patronat (bosses association) and the various chambers of commerce in Québec pro- test loudly. The shooting at Robin Hood also in- itiated a boycott campaign of Robin Hood products, and a campaign to for- bid management private armies, a cam- paign in which the Communist Party of Québec, and the Canadian Tribune par- _ demand an end to wage controls. ticipated with the trade union move- ment. é The PQ proposes to further revise the labor code and transform it into the basis of a ‘‘contract of social peace’. Regrettably the 250,000 member Québec Federation of Labor, the largest trade-union centre and the one with the highest percentage of indus- trial workers, while opposed to tripar- tism at the federal level now shows signs of favoring it at the Québec level. For instance nobody in the QFL leadership denounced Jean Gérin- Lajoie, president of the Québec section of the United Steelworkers, when he in effect renounced the official class struggle position of the QFL as expres- sed in its manifesto “‘The State is a cog of our exploitation’, attacked the Con- federation of National Trade Unions (160,000 members) and the Centrale de : [Enseignement du Québec (60,000 teachers) and the Communists, treating them all as ultra leftists in his report to the Québec steelworkers convention last December. Gérin-Lajoie also de- - ‘scribed the PQ as a worker’s party, a title energetically rejected by René Lévesque himself, and recommended Quebec abor joined workers from across English Canada in Ottawa, M full support for the PQ. In addition he opposed the formation of a mass feder- ated party of the working people such as advocated by the Parti Communiste du Québec and seriously entertained by the CNTU, the CEQ and unions in the QFL itself. While there are dangerous signs of penetration of petty bourgeois nationalism and reformism in the QFL, the CNTU and the CEQ in the main share the analysis of the PCQ that sees the PQ as petty bourgeois nationalist which has to be forced to side with the working class. Ultra leftist elements which make no distinction between the political parties of monopoly capital and the PQ create problems in this respect. At the last convention of the CNTU in May, the executive in its report attacked the ar- rogant and anti-democratic attitudes of the Maoist groups and the Trotskyist groups in the labor movement. The executive of the CNTU deplored the fact that objective factors delayed the growth of a mass party of the working class such as in France and in Italy. The executive emphasized that the struggle for anti-monopoly intermediate objec- tives will isolate the ultra leftists groups ‘eer x an arch 22 to ~ “for whom even the short term objec- tive is always Socialism’’. Michael Bourdon, president of the construction unions of the CNTU stated that the position of the CNTU executive was anti-ultra-leftist but not anti-communist and that ‘‘the Communist-led CGT in France has as many problems as us with the ultra lef- tists’. The struggle of the trade union movement against petty bourgeois re- formist nationalism and against petty bourgeois ultra leftism will strengthen the trend toward unity of action and even organic unity of the labor move- ment in Québec. The economic summit of the PQ last May when the unions met with the bos- ses and the government clearly demon- strated that Lévesque was not able to deliver on his promise of social peace made to big U.S. capitalists in New York. Both the CNTU and the CEQ demanded the fulfillment of electoral promises and the democratic national- ization of key sectors of the economy. They refused to follow the dominant right wing of the PQ that would like to create at the expense of the working people a purely French-Canadian monopoly capitalism. After the sum- mit, reactions of the -Montreal Labor Council (QFL) and of CUPE (QFL) in Québec indicated strong resistance to- ward tripartism in Québec also in the QFL: There is a limit to what trade unions can do and there still exists a glaring gap in the political spectrum in Québec. There is still no member of the National Assembly speaking squarely for the working class, no mass political forma- tion of the working people that would deal a hard blow to monopoly capital. The next step for labor in Québec must be the formation of a new mass political party of the working people which could take the form of a federation of trade union and democratic organiza- tions, including naturally the Com- munist Party of Québec, which first formulated the idea, and possibly left- wingers of the PQ. Such a party would tap the tremendous anti-monopoly sen- timent in and out of organized labor and move the labor movement out of its present political dead end. Key to the formation of such a new party is a policy on the national ques- tion that unites rather than divides working people in Québec. None of the three Québec labor fed- erations has as yet taken a stand on the ’ national question. Documents are being prepared that would help to take the pulse of the membership and also to propose courses of action. Certainly, an unprecedented working class-led struggle for the equality of French and English Canada economically, socially, politically and constitutionally as advo- -cated by the Communist Party of Canada would contribute to such unity in Québec and in Canada in general and would contribute to a successful anti- - monopoly s Democratic organizations sharing — other views on the national question could certainly also participate in the — future mass federated party of the working people..One should re- member, though that if separatist views predominate, it would necessarily lead ‘to tailing behind the French-Canadian petty bourgeoisie and becoming an au- xiliary of the Parti Québécois among the workers. As stated very recently by Marcel Pepin, an influential labor leader, past president of the CNTU: “‘... the sep- aration of Québec would open even more the Québec economy to U.S. economic domination. The separation of Québec should not take place because the work- ers would suffer the economic consequ- ences”’. : This is also the message of a great Québec labor leader, a leading member of the Communist Party for years, our beloved and sorely missed late com- rade Jean Paré. On the occasion of Labor Day it is appropriate to recall that it was Jean Paré who drafted the resolution unanimously adopted by the last convention of the Canadian Labor Congress in Quebec calling on the fed- eral government to proclaim May Day, the international day of solidarity of the working class, a statutory holiday, thus uniting the workers of English Canada and those of Québec who for several haga now Officially celebrate May ay. Hervé Fuyet is a professor of political science at Dawson Col- lege, Montreal and an executive member of the Dawson’s teach- er's union. He has been a teacher for 15 years and active in the _ trade union movement for the last 10. A member of the Communist Party of Quebec, he is a delegate to the Montreal central council of the CNTU. PACIFIC TRIBUNE—SEPTEMBER Q, 1977—Page 5 labor marches forward