vanuary oth, | 294

“ity of Port Coquitlam
_-350 Snauannessyv 5
Port Coquitlam, =.¢.

Attention: Mayor Traboulay and Councillors:

This is in response to the Development Variance Permit
*67/93. | am strongly opposed to the request submitted py
Genstar ana your special consideration.

Considering the fact that the original survey plan called for
only 3 lots, it is now quite obvious that the attitude is to cram in
as many lots as possible, without the reaards of otners.

Prior £0 purchasing rnv property, | checked with the various
aity cepartments and Genstar. At that time | was assured tnat tne
extent of development wouid be oniy & lots, if at ail. Upon this
reassurance, | purcnased my property My iot nas one of the pest
views in Port Coquitlam wnicn 1s totally unopstructed on my
north and east property lines. My main purpose in purchasing was
for the view and investment. Now more than half of my view will
be eliminated.

| Know | cannot stand in the way of progress, but the RS1
restriction of 36 ft. is too high. Also asking a variance from 28
meters down to 22.927 meters would be excessive in anyone's
DOOKS.

If any sizea house was built on Jot 11, another major problem
would be confronting me. with the existing slope on that lot. |
would probably be forced to stare at an unsightly retaining wall
abutting my east property line.

Acceptance of lot 1t is far too reaching and overwhelming of a:
request for my personal approval or, for that matter, my
concerned neighbors.

Mr. & Mrs. Dennis R. Chmilar
2605 Klassen Court

Port Coquitlam, &.C.

Lot 2, Westview Heignt