A CONVERSATION PIECE Can our prison system ever eradicate crime? By R. G. O'NEILL EWS of the pending closure of the notorious St. Vin- cent de Paul penitentiary in Montreal reminds us that our ‘methods of rehabilitating crim- inals is little better than it was ‘at the beginning of this century. Now, after a great public outcry, something at last is to be done about it. But is it real- ly? They'll transfer the prison- ers and perhaps even tear the prison down, but will anything be done to halt the tide of crime? And what can be done in a system where the main purpose in life is the Almighty Dollar rather than the dignity of man? Jails seem to be as much a -part of our way of life as the banks and the insurance com- panies. It is assumed that if you’re smart you may make it to the top and live in a pent- house in idle luxury; if you’re not so smart, you'll probably end up in jail at some time or other. Most of us are some- where in between the two ex- tremes, hoping for the former and fearing the latter. Is it really: possible to do away with ‘crime altogether? Can we get rid of all jails or will we always have the wrong- doer with us? What is wrong? What is right? It depends a lot on what the law says, although one thing is sure: we have very little to do with either making the laws or administrating them. This will always be so with the system the way it is— until the ordinary people have a say as to what constitutes law and order. And what should our attitude be to the wrong-doers? Are we not all, in a certain sense, res- ponsible for them? Kahlil Gibran, a “Lebanese philosopher, in his work titled “Prophet,” wrote: ! Is it really possible to do away with crime altogether? asks writer R. G. O'Neill. Can we get rid of all jails or will we always have the wrong- | doer with us in a system where the main purpose in life is the Almighty dollar rather than the dignity of man? Often times that I heard you speak of one who commits a wrong as if he were not one of you, but a stranger unto you and an intruder upon your world.” And again the same work: And this also, though the word lie heavy upon your hearts: The murdered is not account- able for his own murder, And the robbed is not blame- less in being robbed. The righteous is not innocent of the deeds of the wicked, And the white-handed is not clean in the doings of the felon; Yea, the guilty is often times the victim of the injured, and Why all the fuss about not having a job? | haven't worked a day in all my life!” still more often the condemned is the burden bearer for the guilt- less and the unblamed.. .” Is not this true? The convict, the robber are doing time for us who know what is the basic cause of crime in our present’ society yet do nothing to change it, or who pay lip ser- vice to the need for a change and that is all. In this age of automation, cybernetics, rockets to the moon and all the advantages of modern living, is it not a shame that we still have-a criminal | class, that there is not a dis- tribution of these advantages so that we all may share in the modern-day wonders? Yet man still robs man to make more for himself, slums still exist, poverty and luxury stand side by side, greed and corruption seem to be the rule, and the honest man is consi- dered a fool. In the kind of society we live in there will always be those who think they can make it the easy way, get back the mdx- imum benefit by a minimum of effort. Crime is basically the fault of society, not that of the individual person, for each per- son is influenced largely by the values set up by the society, and of course his own environ- ment. Communists believe human nature can be changed, that by altering the type of society we can also alter the people in it; not to dehumanize them, as some of the promoters of the Cold War will tell you, but to bring out the best in them. The prisoners of today do not reform the criminal; they only hide him from society. When a prisoner re-enters the world outside, he is even more confused, and only sees re- venge upon the society that put him in jail. When we read of the condi- tions in the Vincent St. Paul prison, is it any wonder there are not more criminals among us? The fact that the majority of our citizens are law-abiding is due not to our laws, but to the people’s inherent pride and dignity. Our aim should be to cater to this quality, improve society, not dehumanize it. “AS A REWARD FoR 35 YEARS OF ATHFUL SERVICE, THE COMPANY: WILL ore es Fuluré eco. Fred Wright in U. E. News (U.S.A.) side and the speaker was being lington North. . .” “Wellington South,” mumbled the boozy one. _ “Jn answer to my friend from Wellington souse . - A the speaker went on. That didn’t get into the papers: the Senate is not the only Gentleman’s Club in Ottawa. 2 el ae Now that my memory has started clicking like a com- puter: trite to this generation: Two ditch diggers were always feuding over politics: one a Republican, the other a Democrat. | The day after the election Pat saluted his partnef triumphantly: “Ah, Ike, I see that the Republicans are still in power.” “Yes” answered Ike who had prepared himself for 4 and I are still in the ditch.” * 2 Sobering after-thoughts on the American elections: (1) In spite of the obvious danger to peace, and social security he represented, 25 million voted for Goldwater. (2) The that Johnson has been able to move away right of cen without as yet raising enough of an outcry. | H | ribbing. “And I see that you | Mee J. $. Wallace This Pearson is an up-and-comer And Diefenbaker quite a hummer Said Tweedledum and Tweedledumber. Wee South deserves laurels for electing at NDP candidate. Which takes me back to the time I was listening in on a House of Commons debate interrupted by the member for Wellington South who was clearly half seas over... t0 revive a metaphor from the day of sail. _ The speaker said: “In answer to my friend from Wel- — Once I ran as a labor candidate (once!). My brother Tom said to me on the eve of polling day when the resul was a foregone conclusion: “Joe, don’t be self-conscious about appearing on the street the day after the election if the voters don’t remember you on election day, they certainly won’t the day after.” e * * Then there is a Pat and Mike story that may not be latter was so far reactio * * *« civil libertie American High prices of medicine) no bitter pill for monopo! For the top companies, there’s no business like drug business. Aside from fantasies of promo- tion that rival show business, the profits are truly remarkable. What a copyright is to a play- wright, a patent is to the drug manufacturer. Hugging this to his bosom, the drug executive may set his price without re- gard to potential or actual com- petition. Some 47 percent of all ethical sales are covered by five broad drug classifications: hormones, tranquilizers, sulfas, vitamins, and antibiotics. There are nine classifications of hormones. In three of these, there is only one producer; in two, there are two producers; in each of the remaining four classifications there are three producers. With tranquilizers, the situation is worse. There are two producers of Resperine and only one producer in each of the remaining six areas — Hydroxyzine, Chloropromazine, Prochlorperazine, Perphenazine, December 11, 1964—PACIFIC TRIBUNE Promazine and Meproba Concentration is equally i” fas, and not much better 1? remaining two classificati? The 25 largest companies ” count for almost 55 perce™ all prescriptions written in” nation. These leading in! among the most profitable © industry by any standards: —Pills, Prescriptio™ Profits, AFL-CIO. pe nee "Baked dirt’ helps house plants If you're. going to pot 4 or two, it’s all right to us? of the soil in your back the nearby woods. Put the soil in a shallo and bake it in your ove? to 240 degrees for 49 minutes. This will paste? Now, mix the soil with third sand—also pasteut your oven—and pasteuri=” moss. You'll be able % almost any house plant mixture.